跳至主要内容

2025-04-02-top

  • 精選方式: TOP
  • 時間範圍: DAY

討論重點​

以下是19篇文章的討論重點條列總結，並附上對應的錨點連結與逐條細節：

1. Mercedes Weighs Pulling US Entry-Level Cars Over Tariffs​

重點：

  • 關稅影響：川普政府25%關稅可能使入門級車型（如GLA SUV）在美銷售無利可圖。
  • 策略調整：考慮停售低利潤車型以應對成本壓力。
  • 市場衝擊：反映貿易政策對德國車企的營運挑戰。

2. Liberation Day: Trump Prepares to Announce New Round of Customs Duties​

重點：

  • 新關稅預告：川普擬宣布新關稅，但可能較預期寬鬆。
  • 全球擔憂：國際市場對貿易戰升級的警戒。
  • 市場反應：若關稅溫和，可能觸發短期反彈。

3. Tesla Car Sales in France, Sweden Drop to Lowest First-Quarter in Four Years​

重點：

  • 銷量下滑：Tesla在法國Q1銷量年減36.8%，市占率被中國品牌超越。
  • 整體車市萎縮：法國新車註冊量年減7.83%。
  • 競爭壓力：中國電動車品牌（如比亞迪）市占達3.19%。

4. Atlanta Fed's GDP Estimate -3.7%​

重點：

  • GDPNow模型：預測從+3.9%驟降至-3.7%，引發衰退疑慮。
  • 模型權威性：即時數據調整與高透明度受市場信賴。
  • 經濟隱憂：諷刺語氣反映對數據真實性的焦慮。

5. Is This Market Manipulation? February US Job Openings Data​

重點：

  • 數據質疑：職缺數7.568M低於預期，媒體四捨五入至7.6M被指誤導。
  • 經濟矛盾：ISM製造業PMI（49）顯示收縮，與官方樂觀敘事衝突。
  • 操縱論點：推測「聰明錢」利用媒體掩蓋疲軟。

6. Europe Stocks Close Lower on Tariff Uncertainty​

重點：

  • 市場下跌：Stoxx 600指數單日跌1.51%，Q1累計跌3%。
  • 關稅衝擊：川普政策引發避險情緒，全行業受波及。

7. Newsmax Spikes 700% on NYSE Debut​

重點：

  • 政治紅利：保守派媒體因川普當選收視上升，上市首日股價暴漲。
  • 資本操作：籌資7,500萬美元，反映投資者對其前景樂觀。

8. Hims & Hers to Sell Lilly's Zepbound​

重點：

  • 業務擴張：遠程醫療平台新增減重藥銷售，股價漲8.5%。
  • 產業趨勢：整合處方藥與線上服務成新方向。

9. What % of Net Worth in Individual Stocks?​

重點：

  • 資產配置：27歲投資者個股占比高，尋求風險評估。
  • 長期目標：平衡被動投資（指數基金）與主動選股策略。

10. r/Stocks Daily Discussion & Technical Analysis​

重點：

  • 技術分析工具：RSI、MACD等指標應用於短線與長期投資。
  • 資源整合：提供入門教學與常見

文章核心重點​

以下是每篇文章的一句話摘要（條列式輸出）：

  1. Mercedes Weighs Pulling US Entry-Level Cars Over Tariffs
    梅賽德斯因美國25%汽車關稅考慮停售入門級車型，以應對潛在利潤壓力。

  2. Liberation Day: Trump prepares to announce new round of customs duties but promises to be nice
    川普擬宣布新關稅但暗示力度減輕，全球市場關注政策對經濟的潛在衝擊。

  3. Tesla car sales in France, Sweden drop to lowest first-quarter in four years
    Tesla在法國銷量跌至四年新低，反映中國品牌競爭加劇與市場需求放緩。

  4. Atlanta Feds GDP estimate -3.7%
    亞特蘭大聯儲GDPNow模型預測驟降至-3.7%，引發對經濟急劇惡化的擔憂。

  5. Is this market manipulation? February US job openings slip to 7.6M, consistent with a healthy but decelerating job market
    作者質疑媒體將職位空缺數據四捨五入至7.6M，掩蓋經濟疲軟與市場操縱可能。

  6. Europe stocks close lower, cementing March loss as tariff uncertainty persists
    歐洲股市因關稅不確定性單日跌1.5%，創今年首個月度跌幅。

  7. Conservative cable channel Newsmax spikes more than 700% in first trading day on NYSE
    保守派媒體Newsmax上市首日暴漲700%，反映政治氣候對其商業價值的影響。

  8. Hims & Hers to sell Lilly's Zepbound on telehealth platform
    Hims & Hers宣布銷售禮來減重藥Zepbound，股價應聲上漲8.5%。

  9. What % of your net worth are in individual stocks?
    27歲投資者尋求反饋，探討個股占淨資產35%的配置是否過於激進。

  10. r/Stocks Daily Discussion & Technicals Tuesday - Apr 01, 2025
    討論技術分析工具與市場行為解讀，提供相關資源連結。

  11. Interesting Stocks Today (04/1)
    分析JNJ、NMAX等個股短期交易機會，聚焦新聞驅動的價格波動。

  12. Thoughts on gene editing stocks? Getting smoked
    基因編輯股因政治風險暴跌，討論是否過度反應而具抄底價值。

  13. 2025 Q1 asset class returns & new valuations
    全球資產Q1表現分化，美元貶值推升非美股市回報但美股下跌4.8%。

  14. Broker Forcing Equities
    投資者因經紀商強制要求降低現金比例，考慮轉換至低成本交易平台。

  15. Rocket mortgage Redfin/mr cooper question
    探討Rocket Mortgage股票收購案中，股價上漲可能增加收購成本。

  16. Bought NVDA at the wrong time? Not sure what to do next
    新手因跟風買入NVIDIA虧損，陷入止損或長期持有的決策困境。

  17. Should I actually buy stocks as I buy options?
    討論價內看漲期權到期前平倉與行權的利弊，建議優先考慮流動性。

  18. MicroStrategy's Bitcoin strategy
    分析MicroStrategy以零利率債務收購比特幣的高風險財務策略。

  19. Life savings crumbling
    年輕投資者因科技股暴跌承受心理壓力，尋求市場是否會復甦的觀點。

目錄​

1. Mercedes Weighs Pulling US Entry-Level Cars Over Tariffs​

這篇彭博社文章的核心討論主題是：

梅賽德斯-賓士（Mercedes-Benz）因美國前總統川普政府對進口汽車加徵25%關稅的政策，考慮停止在美國市場銷售部分入門級車型（如GLA SUV等），以應對關稅可能導致的經濟效益問題。

關鍵點包括：

  1. 關稅影響：川普政府的高額關稅（25%）可能使入門級車型的銷售無利可圖。
  2. 策略調整：梅賽德斯正評估削減低利潤車型，作為應對關稅的應變計畫之一。
  3. 市場反應：此舉反映跨國車企在貿易政策不確定性下的營運挑戰，尤其對德國汽車製造商的衝擊。

簡言之，文章聚焦於「貿易政策如何迫使汽車製造商調整產品策略與市場布局」。

內容​

連結： [https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-01/mercedes-weighs-pulling-us-entry-level-cars-over-trump-tariffs

> Mercedes-Benz Group AG is considering withdrawing i``` least expensive cars from the US because President Donald Trumps auto tariffs would likely make their sales economically unfeasible, according to people familiar with the matter. > > The German automaker is mulling cutting sales of more entry-level models like the small GLA sport utility vehicle as part of broader tariff contingency plans, the people said, declining to be identified because the deliberations are private. Trumps 25% duties are scheduled to take effect this week.](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-01/mercedes-weighs-pulling-us-entry-level-cars-over-trump-tariffs

> Mercedes-Benz Group AG is considering withdrawing i``` least expensive cars from the US because President Donald Trumps auto tariffs would likely make their sales economically unfeasible, according to people familiar with the matter. > > The German automaker is mulling cutting sales of more entry-level models like the small GLA sport utility vehicle as part of broader tariff contingency plans, the people said, declining to be identified because the deliberations are private. Trumps 25% duties are scheduled to take effect this week.)

討論​

評論 1:

Hi, you're on r/Stocks, please make sure your post is related to stocks or the stockmarket or it will most likely get removed as being off-topic/political; feel free to edit it now and be more specific.

To everyone commenting: Please focus on how this affec``` the stock market or specific stocks or it will be removed as being off-topic/political.

If you're interested in just politics, see our wiki on "relevant subreddi```" and post to those Reddit communities instead without linking back here, thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

It looks like the cheapest one is $43k before tariffs

評論 3:

So much winning

評論 4:

I was downvoted when I wrote that this would affect cheap cars and push manufacturers toward more expensive cars. Expensive cars are more profitable, and sell despite the price hike.

評論 5:

I figured this would happen. Foreign automakers are not going to move every single car to USA to get built. They will do a few popular models and the rest...well if you can afford a mercedes, you can afford the 25% tariff.

2. Liberation Day: Trump prepares to announce new round of customs duties but promises to be nice​

The core discussion topic of the linked articles revolves around former U.S. President Donald Trump's planned announcement of new tariffs, with implications for international trade and market reactions.

Key points:

  1. Tariff Announcement: Trump is expected to impose a new wave of tariffs, but signals they may be "lighter than expected" (per Le Parisien).
  2. Global Economic Concerns: The RFI article highlights how world economies are bracing for potential disruptions ahead of the tariff deadline.
  3. Market Speculation: The question raised suggests that markets might rally ("sharply rise") if the tariffs are less severe than anticipated, coinciding with France's "Jour de la Libération" (Liberation Day).

Theme: The focus is on the interplay between U.S. trade policy, global economic uncertainty, and potential market volatility in response to tariff decisions.

內容​

連結： [https://www.leparisien.fr/international/eta-unis/jour-de-la-liberation-trump-sapprete-a-annoncer-une-nouvelle-salve-de-droi-de-douane-mais-promet-detre-gentil-01-04-2025-STHG4ATJHRCPXEXBZD3TJ2IPWQ.php

https://www.rfi.fr/en/international-news/20250331-world-economies-brace-for-trump-tariffs-ahead-of-deadline

What do you think? The marke will sharply rise on their Liberation Day because it will be lighter than expected?](https://www.leparisien.fr/international/eta-unis/jour-de-la-liberation-trump-sapprete-a-annoncer-une-nouvelle-salve-de-droi```-de-douane-mais-promet-detre-gentil-01-04-2025-STHG4ATJHRCPXEXBZD3TJ2IPWQ.php

https://www.rfi.fr/en/international-news/20250331-world-economies-brace-for-trump-tariffs-ahead-of-deadline

What do you think? The marke``` will sharply rise on their Liberation Day because it will be lighter than expected?)

討論​

評論 1:

Hi, you're on r/Stocks, please make sure your post is related to stocks or the stockmarket or it will most likely get removed as being off-topic/political; feel free to edit it now and be more specific.

To everyone commenting: Please focus on how this affec``` the stock market or specific stocks or it will be removed as being off-topic/political.

If you're interested in just politics, see our wiki on "relevant subreddi```" and post to those Reddit communities instead without linking back here, thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

Liberated from my future retirement, now free to work a back breaking factory job until the day I die with no union. Hell yeah, brother.

評論 3:

Liberated from adequate chips, car par```, and international good will.

評論 4:

Hes gonna leave himself a way out

He has no backbone

評論 5:

Sounds like typical abusive behaviour where you do horrid things but claim youre being nice to the abused.

3. Tesla car sales in France, Sweden drop to lowest first-quarter in four years​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是 法國汽車市場在2024年3月及第一季的銷售表現，尤其聚焦於以下重點：

  1. Tesla在法國銷量大幅下滑：

    • 3月銷量年減36.83%（僅3,157輛），第一季總銷量6,693輛。
    • 市占率降至1.63%，落後於未納入PFA統計的中國品牌（如比亞迪等），後者合計市占達3.19%。

  2. 法國整體車市萎縮：

    • 3月新車註冊量年減14.54%，第一季累計下滑7.83%。

  3. 全球關注Tesla的季度交付數據：

    • 報導提及Tesla即將公布第一季全球產銷量，暗示其表現可能影響市場評估。

總結：文章透過法國市場案例，反映Tesla面臨的競爭壓力（尤其來自中國電動車品牌）及整體車市需求放緩的趨勢。

內容​

連結： [https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/france-car-registrations-down-1454-march-tesla-sales-fall-3683-2025-04-01/

Tesla registered in March 3,157 car sales in France, a 36.83% drop from last year, for a total of 6,693 car registrations in the first quarter, data from French car body PFA showed.

I``` market share in the country dropped to 1.63% in the quarter ending March, and lost ground to brands not accounted for by the PFA, including BYD (002594.SZ) and other Chinese EV makers, whose total share of the market rose to 3.19%.

Overall new car registrations in France fell 14.54% in March and were down 7.83% in the first quarter.

Tesla is set to report i``` global first-quarter deliveries and production numbers on Wednesday.](https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/france-car-registrations-down-1454-march-tesla-sales-fall-3683-2025-04-01/

Tesla registered in March 3,157 car sales in France, a 36.83% drop from last year, for a total of 6,693 car registrations in the first quarter, data from French car body PFA showed.

I``` market share in the country dropped to 1.63% in the quarter ending March, and lost ground to brands not accounted for by the PFA, including BYD (002594.SZ) and other Chinese EV makers, whose total share of the market rose to 3.19%.

Overall new car registrations in France fell 14.54% in March and were down 7.83% in the first quarter.

Tesla is set to report i``` global first-quarter deliveries and production numbers on Wednesday.)

討論​

評論 1:

Registrations in Sweden for Mars:

Model Y: down 61.9% compared to last year, to 767 cars.

Model 3: down 70.6% to 131 cars.

Model X: only 2 registered.

Model S: only 1 registered.

Total number of registered cars in Sweden for Mars: 24 024 cars, an increase of 1% compared to Mars 2024.

https://www.svd.se/a/yEr2zr/tvarnit-for-tesla-pa-svenska-marknaden?utm_source=androidapp&utm_medium=share

評論 2:

TSLA stock is green. Sad

評論 3:

Those numbers are comically low. How is Tesla a one trillion dollar company? lol

評論 4:

Do you all hate Musk or Tesla cars?

評論 5:

How many pos``` about tesla sales numbers does this sub require per week? Seems the quota must be pretty high.

4. Atlanta Feds GDP estimate -3.7%​

根據提供的內容，文章的核心討論主題可總結為以下幾點：

  1. 亞特蘭大聯儲GDPNow模型的近期波動：
    討論聚焦於GDPNow對美國GDP增長率的實時預測在短時間內劇烈下滑（從8週前的+3.9%降至當前的-3.7%），引發對經濟突然惡化的質疑與擔憂。

  2. GDPNow模型的權威性與獨特性：
    解釋該模型被廣泛認可的原因，包括其透明度（公開方法論與數據）、高頻更新（隨新數據即時調整），以及歷史上的預測準確性，強調其作為實時經濟指標的可靠性。

  3. 對經濟前景的悲觀情緒：
    文中諷刺語氣（如「解放日將讓我們從金錢中解脫」）反映部分人對經濟失控的焦慮，暗示當前數據可能預示嚴重的經濟衰退風險。

  4. 即時數據與傳統預測的差異：
    對比其他機構的滯後性預測（月/季度更新），凸顯GDPNow的動態調整能力，但也引發對短期波動是否過度反應的討論。

關鍵問題：為何受信任的模型顯示經濟急遽放緩？是數據異常、模型局限，還是真實經濟困境的早期信號？這成為討論的核心矛盾。

內容​

https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow

Atlanta Feds GDP estimate

8 weeks ago it was +3.9%

4 weeks ago it was +2.3%

Last week it was -2.8%

Today it stands at -3.7%

How can we fuck up this bad? Liberation day is tomorrow too. We're going to be liberated from our money.

Edit. The Atlanta Fed GDPNow estimate is widely used and respected as a standard for real-time economic forecasting because of a few key reasons. The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta publicly shares the models methodology, updates, and the componen behind each estimate. Unlike most other forecas (which are updated monthly or quarterly), GDPNow is updated every time new relevant data is released, sometimes multiple times a week. Which is what just happened. It has a solid reputation for accuracy in estimating the direction and magnitude of GDP growth.

討論​

評論 1:

If you fail at 4 casinos, failing this bad should come as no surprise at all.

評論 2:

The US is gonna be liberated from the entire world tmrw.

評論 3:

Because half of the country can't stop watching and listening to right-wing infotainment.

They're drowning in lies and misinformation all day, every day, and they vote accordingly.

It's legitimately going to surprise a broad swath of this country when the economy ends up in a ditch, and they're also going to believe it when they're told it's Biden's fault.

All you can do is take the necessary precautions, because it's coming.

評論 4:

Can a conservative explain to me like Im 5 how this is a good thing?

All I can find is them saying shit like bout time and hard reset and Canada deserves it. Can we get into some fundamentals on any positive aspect of this?

評論 5:

Its crazy how all trump had to do was lie and take credit for the good part of bidens economy and it would have worked with the majority of the country. I dont understand this massive self inflicted gunshot wound

I know its a popular theory that hes doing this so his rich friends can swoop in and buy everything but lately i feel like thats giving him too much credit. I think its more likely that hes just stupid and theres no adult in the room to tell him not to, because this administration very obviously is making this up as they go along

5. Is this market manipulation? February US job openings slip to 7.6M, consistent with a healthy but decelerating job market​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是對美國勞動市場數據的質疑，以及對媒體和市場操縱的懷疑。作者指出，儘管實際職位空缺數（7.568 million）低於預期（7.63 million），但媒體選擇四捨五入至7.6 million，可能試圖掩蓋經濟疲軟的跡象（如ISM製造業PMI低於50的收縮信號）。作者進一步推測，這可能是「聰明錢」（smart money）利用媒體製造出場機會，符合Wyckoff方法的市場操縱邏輯，暗示經濟數據被刻意淡化以維持市場信心。

關鍵點總結：

  1. 數據質疑：職位空缺實際值低於預期，但媒體報導方式（四捨五入）被認為有誤導之嫌。
  2. 經濟隱憂：ISM製造業PMI（49）顯示經濟收縮，與官方樂觀敘事矛盾。
  3. 市場操縱論：推測媒體配合「聰明錢」透過選擇性報導創造離場時機，反映對體制的不信任。

內容​

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/february-us-job-openings-slip-140647040.html

Interesting market manipulation. Last month was 7.762 mil. It was expected to be 7.63 mil. The actual number was 7.568 mil. It was lower than expected, but they specifically picked the rounding to hit 7.6 mil.

This is just my opinion regarding the Wyckoff method, but I think the media is trying to create an exit for smart money. These numbers are not good. ISM Manufacturing PMI is 49 which means our economy is contracting.

討論​

評論 1:

Anything that surprises you isnt market manipulation, no.

評論 2:

>Is this market manipulation?

No.

評論 3:

That is how rounding works, but this is the worst job market in over a decade, since the GFC. I don't think all the cut jobs from Fed and Fed fallout have hit... and Tariff insanity hasn't flowed yet. I have already seen the jobs market collapsed.

評論 4:

They didnt pick the rounding lol

評論 5:

These things can be modeled. If you doubt the numbers, then calculate it yourself. Lo``` of private entities do this. Prove it I say.

6. Europe stocks close lower, cementing March loss as tariff uncertainty persis```​

根據提供的文章內容，核心討論主題可總結為：

「歐洲股市因美國關稅政策衝擊而大幅下跌，市場情緒受貿易緊張局勢主導」

具體要點包括：

  1. 市場表現：歐洲股市（以Stoxx 600指數為代表）單日顯著下跌（-1.51%），並錄得今年首個月度跌幅（-3%）。
  2. 直接原因：投資者對美國總統川普即將實施的貿易關稅措施感到擔憂，導致避險情緒升溫。
  3. 影響範圍：幾乎所有行業和主要交易所均受波及，反映關稅政策對全球市場的廣泛衝擊。

（註：由於提供的連結無效且內容為模擬文本，此分析僅基於給定的段落資訊。）

內容​

[https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/31/european-marke-live-updates-stock-moves-tariff-news-and-data-.html](`https`://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/31/european-marke-live-updates-stock-moves-tariff-news-and-data-.html)

European marke``` traded sharply lower on Monday as global investors braced for U.S. President Donald Trumps trade tariffs to come into force.

The regional Stoxx 600 index closed 1.51% lower, with nearly all sectors and major bourses firmly in negative territory. The final trading day of March marks the Stoxx 600s first losing month of the year, with a loss of nearly 3%, according to LSEG data.

討論​

評論 1:

Hi, you're on r/Stocks, please make sure your post is related to stocks or the stockmarket or it will most likely get removed as being off-topic/political; feel free to edit it now and be more specific.

To everyone commenting: Please focus on how this affec``` the stock market or specific stocks or it will be removed as being off-topic/political.

If you're interested in just politics, see our wiki on "relevant subreddi```" and post to those Reddit communities instead without linking back here, thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

And today eurostoxx up +1.10% . What a beautiful crash will be 2th with market closed as schedules tariff press 12AM. Loaded all in pu``` of different companies that went slightly green today. 3th will be purple day in Europe. And to finish the week EU tariffs on US tech...

評論 3:

The market doesnt actually care much about tariffs or all the other macro FUD that Reddit has been parroting over the past 2 years of raging bull market

7. Conservative cable channel Newsmax spikes more than 700% in first trading day on NYSE​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
保守派新聞媒體Newsmax在政治環境變化下的商業發展與市場表現，具體包括以下重點：

  1. 收視率與政治關聯：Newsmax因川普等共和黨人士當選而收視上升，但仍落後於Fox News。
  2. 資本市場動態：透過發行股票籌集7,500萬美元資金，並在紐約證交所上市首日股價大漲至83.51美元，顯示投資者對其前景的樂觀態度。

背景暗示保守派媒體的影響力與商業成功可能與特定政治氣候（如共和黨執政）相關聯。

內容​

The conservative TV news outlet has seen i``` ratings rise with the election of President Donald Trump and other prominent Republicans although it still falls behind the dominant Fox News. Newsmax raised $75 million through the sale of 7.5 million class B common shares at a price of $10 a share. The stock closed at $83.51 for the day.

[https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/31/newsmax-stock-star-trading-on-nyse.html?utm\_source=convertkit&utm\_medium=email&utm\_campaign=Market%20Bulle:%20Marke%20close%20out%20Q1%20in%20the%20red,%20Trump%20to%20unveil%20more%20tariffs,%20OpenAI%20closes%20$40B%20funding%20round%20-%2017124768](`https`://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/31/newsmax-stock-star-trading-on-nyse.html?utm_source=convertkit&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Market%20Bulle:%20Marke%20close%20out%20Q1%20in%20the%20red,%20Trump%20to%20unveil%20more%20tariffs,%20OpenAI%20closes%20$40B%20funding%20round%20-%2017124768)

討論​

評論 1:

$20B market cap, they did $155m revenue and lost $64m last year this might as well be a meme coin thats about to get the rug pulled.

評論 2:

This IPO is just mental. MAGA don't seem to be in on this, over on Truth Social they were caught off-guard and didn't even know it was happening. All the $DJT holders are salty af right now.

$20bn is a completely absurd valuation for $NMAX.

The company makes $171m in revenue, is unprofitable with an increasing $72m loss (losses were $41m the previous year) and has negative shareholder equity.

To put it in perspective:

$NMAX is more than double the valuation of The New York Times ($8bn), a company that makes $2.5bn in revenue and is profitable.

It's worth nearly as much as the Fox Corporation which generates $15.1bn in revenue and $2.4bn in profit.

The one thing I would say though, is that out of the other "MAGA stocks" $NMAX is the strongest, even though it still has shitty fundamentals that don't justify it's valuation.

$RUM for example makes $95m revenue, but doesn't even make gross profit. It literally just burns money, with it's cost of revenue being $138m and an overall loss of $338m.

$DJT unsurprisingly is the worst of the bunch, making a measly $3.6m (less than a busy McDonalds branch), and the company actually spent $6.3m more on marketing in 2024 than they did in 2023...only to make ~$500k less in revenue. Additionally the operational losses appear to be growing, latest was about $186m, up from $58m the previous year.

Wouldn't suprise me to see $NMAX absolutely tank in the coming days/weeks. It's already down 15% to $196/share in after hours trading. It's unclear who's actually buying this, some insiders probably got rich af and are about to unload their bags onto retail.

評論 3:

I tried to short but there were no shares available.

評論 4:

PT Barnum was right.

評論 5:

And then almost 200% the next day. That's a run from $14 to $233 in 2 days of trading. That's whiplash-inducing!

What level of current or future profit margins can support that?

8. Hims & Hers to sell Lilly's Zepbound on i telehealth platform \{#8-hims-hers-to-sell-lilly-s-zepbound-on-i-teleh}​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
遠程醫療公司Hims & Hers Health宣布將在其平臺上銷售禮來公司（Eli Lilly）的減重藥物Zepbound，此消息帶動該公司股價上漲8.5%。

關鍵點包括：

  1. 商業合作：Hims & Hers擴展業務至減重藥物線上銷售領域，與藥廠禮來合作。
  2. 市場反應：投資者對此舉持樂觀態度，股價顯著上揚。
  3. 產業趨勢：反映遠程醫療平臺整合處方藥銷售（尤其是熱門減重藥物）的趨勢。

簡潔總結：文章聚焦於Hims & Hers進軍減重藥物市場的決策及其對股價的即時影響。

內容​

(Reuters) -Telehealth firm Hims & Hers Health said on Monday it plans to sell Eli Lilly's weight-loss drug Zepbound on i``` platform.

Shares of the company were up 8.5% in afternoon trading.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hims-hers-sell-lillys-zepbound-173933245.html

討論​

評論 1:

Worth mentioning as well that Zepbound has had price decreases that compete more closely with the compounded GLP-1s and generally make it easier for people to buy without insurance.

They offer an alternative to the self injecting pens, allowing patien``` to inject from a vial (like the compounded versions). Doses up to 10mg, which is pretty high, are $500 a month.

If Lilly embraces cheaper Zepbound in the states, I think they will have massive earnings in the coming years. Historically medication is expensive and it's easy to secure profi``` that way but the demand for these drugs are so high, it might actually make more sense to sell them cheaper and get more customers.

I'm VERY bullish on GLP-1s and the space in general and very curious about what the future holds as mass adoption picks up.

Orforglipron, a GLP-1 developed by Lilly in pill form, is another potential game-changer on the horizon. Telehealth companies would eat that up. Also, compounding is coming to an end so Lilly will not have to compete directly with those pharmacies much longer (unfortunately for those on the meds, that was a VERY cheap way of securing them).

評論 2:

Up 10% on the news.

評論 3:

Ah yes, more pills instead of diet and exercise. Classic America.

9. What % of your net worth are in individual stocks?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
「個人投資組合的配置與合理性評估」

作者（27歲，無房無子女）分享了自己的資產分配細節，並尋求反饋，重點包括：

  1. 當前投資組合：

    • 退休帳戶（401K、Roth IRA）以指數基金為主。
    • 短期資金存放於貨幣市場基金（VUSXX）以應對近期大額支出。
    • 個股投資涵蓋藍籌股、成長股和少量高風險標的。

  2. 主要疑問：

    • 當前配置是否合理（如個股比例是否過高）。
    • 是否符合長期「跑贏市場」的目標，尤其是擔心個股投資的潛在風險。

  3. 未來計畫：

    • 持續加碼個股（若市場下跌）並最大化退休帳戶投入。

整體而言，作者希望透過社群反饋，評估自己的策略是否過於激進或偏離典型投資建議（如被動投資為主）。

內容​

Hey all,

Looking to get some feedback on where Im keeping all my money. Feel free to remove if not allowed. Background - 27M, dont own a home yet, no kids

150K - 401K through work in index funds

50K - Roth IRA brokerage account in index funds

40K - VUSXX money market fund. way more than usual as I have some big life even``` coming up and didnt want too much in stocks 25K - individual stocks which is split up into roughly 40% blue-chip stocks like MSFT/GOOGL, 40% solid growth stocks like AXON, SE, MELI and 20% more speculative picks like RKLB

This is the bulk of it. If the market continues to go down I plan on continuing to buy more individual stocks and will keep maxing out my Roth and contributing to 401K. Is this pretty typical for a portfolio? Mostly dont want to be too much in individual stocks as I know its hard to beat the market over the long term. Thanks all!

討論​

評論 1:

About 85%, but Im probably an outlier.

評論 2:

I got like 20% in a start-up

評論 3:

Less than 2%

評論 4:

I had to calculate it but its only about 10%.

Its funny how much time I end up worried about what only amoun to about 10% of my asse.

評論 5:

5%

10. r/Stocks Daily Discussion & Technicals Tuesday - Apr 01, 2025​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是 技術分析（Technical Analysis, TA），並圍繞以下重點展開：

  1. 技術分析的定義與用途：

    • 透過歷史價格走勢、即時數據、數學/統計指標（如RSI、MACD等）及圖表分析，評估證券的趨勢軌跡。
    • 解讀其他市場參與者的行為並預測其動向。

  2. 技術分析的核心理念：

    • 強調「價格已反映一切」（priced in），即所有新聞、市場情緒和基本面變化最終體現在價格中。

  3. 適用範圍：

    • 適用於任何時間框架（短線或長期投資）。

  4. 資源與工具：

    • 提供入門教學連結（如Stockcharts的技術指標與K線介紹）及實用網站（如Finviz、Bloomberg等）。
    • 列出常見TA術語（如支撐/阻力、移動平均線、超買超賣等）與相關策略（趨勢跟踪、通道交易等）。

  5. 討論彈性：

    • 雖以TA為當日主題，但也允許其他股票相關討論，並提供每週固定議題的連結（如週二技術分析、週四選擇權交易等）。

總結：文章旨在引導讀者探討技術分析的原理、工具與實際應用，同時提供相關資源供深入學習。

內容​

This is the daily discussion, so anything stocks related is fine, but the theme for today is on technical analysis (TA), but if TA is not your thing then just ignore the theme.

Some helpful day to day links, including news:

Technical analysis (TA) uses historical price movemen, real time data, indicators based on math and/or statistics, and char; all of which help measure the trajectory of a security. TA can also be used to interpret the actions of other market participan``` and predict their actions.

The main benefit to TA is that everything shows up in the price (commonly known as "priced in"): All news, investor sentiment, and changes to fundamentals are reflected in a security's price.

TA can be useful on any timeframe, both short and long term.

Intro to technical analysis by Stockchar charchool and their article on candlesticks

If you have questions, please see the following word cloud and click through for the wiki:

Indicator - Trade Signals - Lagging Indicator - Leading Indicator - Oversold - Overbought - Divergence - Whipsaw - Resistance - Support - Breakout/Breakdown - Aler - Trend line - Market Participan - Moving average - RSI - VWAP - MACD - ATR - Bollinger Bands - Ichimoku clouds - Methods - Trend Following - Fading - Channels - Patterns - Pivo```

See our past daily discussions here. Also links for: Technicals Tuesday, Options Trading Thursday, and Fundamentals Friday.

討論​

評論 1:

I just want liberation day to be over

評論 2:

From WSJ.

"President Trumps economic team is preparing a new tariff option for him in the waning hours before his April 2 trade policy announcement, according to people with knowledge of the discussion"

People's livelihoods all over the world are on the line, they're just winging it the night before like a college assignment.

評論 3:

This admin man.

>Commerce Secretary indicates he could withhold Chips Act gran```, Bloomberg says

> Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has indicated he could withhold promised gran part of the Chips Act as he pushes companies set for federal semiconductor subsidies to expand their US projec, Mackenzie Hawkins and Ian King of Bloomberg repor```, citing people familiar with the matter.

> Lutnick's goal is to generate tens of billions of dollars in additional semiconductor investment commitmen without increasing the size of the federal gran, Bloomberg's sources added. Publicly traded companies in the space include AMD (AMD), Marvell (MRVL), Microchip (MCHP), Micron (MU), Nvidia (NVDA), Qualcomm (QCOM), TSMC (TSM), and Texas Instrumen``` (TXN).

評論 4:

This is from Joe Weisenthal, one of the hos of Odd Lo:

>One of the ugliest, most stagflationary ISM-manufacturing repor``` we've seen in a long time.

>Wrote about it for the Odd Lo newsletter. Virtually all the commen are complaining about tariffs, and the only categories that are going up are prices and inventories.

評論 5:

The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2025 is -3.7 percent on April 1, down from -2.8 percent on March 28.

> The alternative model forecast, which adjus for impor and expor of gold as described here, is -1.4 percent. After this mornings construction spending report from the US Census Bureau and incorporation of the available March data into the models dynamic factor model, including manufacturing data from Institute for Supply Management and measures of consumer attitudes from two surveys, both the standard models and the alternative models forecas of first-quarter real final sales to private domestic purchasers growth declined from 1.5 percent to 0.4 percent.

https://www.atlantafed.org/cqer/research/gdpnow

11. Interesting Stocks Today (04/1)​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是 短線交易（short-term trading）的潛在標的與市場動向分析，主要聚焦於以下重點：

  1. 短線交易策略：

    • 作者明確指出這是「日內觀察清單」（daily watchlist），專注於當日或短期可能出現價格波動的股票，而非長期投資。
    • 強調「股價當日變動潛力」是選股關鍵，其他基本面或長期因素均為次要。

  2. 個股分析與催化劑：

    • JNJ（強生）：因破產法院駁回其滑石粉訴訟和解方案，可能引發股價波動（過去類似事件導致大幅波動）。
    • NMAX（新上市股票）：IPO後暴漲700%，關注短線過度炒作後的做空機會（例如130美元附近）。
    • MRNA（Moderna）：FDA高層辭職與大規模裁員可能延緩藥品審批，導致生技股延續跌勢。
    • LYV（Live Nation）：因反票務黃牛行政命令引發小幅下跌，但預期短期波動有限。

  3. 新聞驅動的交易邏輯：

    • 所有標的均與即時新聞事件掛鉤（如政策變動、訴訟進展、IPO熱潮、監管機構動盪），顯示作者透過「事件驅動」（event-driven）策略捕捉市場情緒與流動性。

  4. 風險與操作彈性：

    • 明確聲明可能交易清單外的股票，且不保證執行任何交易，反映短線交易的高度靈活性與即時判斷需求。

總結：文章核心在於「如何利用突發新聞與市場情緒，篩選具短期價格波動潛力的股票」，並提供具體技術面與事件面的交易邏輯。

內容​

This is a daily watchlist for short-term trading: I might trade all/none of the stocks listed, and even stocks not listed! I am targeting potentially good candidates for short-term trading; I have no opinion on them as investmen```. The potential of the stock moving today is what makes it interesting, everything else is secondary.

News: US Health Agency Mass Firings Begin As Kennedy Orders 10,000 Cut

JNJ (Johnson & Johnson)- A U.S. bankruptcy judge rejected JNJ's $10B proposal to settle thousands of lawsui alleging that i talc-based produc``` cause ovarian cancer. This is the THIRD time the company's bankruptcy strategy has been blocked in court. JNJ has always moved significantly off these updates (first and second rejections were in 2021/2022 because it means they have to pay out billions), overall not too interested in a short, but maybe a long if we sell off significantly- we always recover from these types of moves.

NMAX (NMAX)- NMAX experienced a surge of over 700% in the IPO yesterday, shares are currently above $100 (from an initial IPO opening of ~$15). This is similar to DJT all those years back (which was renamed), more interested in a short around $130. Worth noting $100 was the level yesterday afterhours and we sold off from there, broke it today. There's usually a pop in these conservative news outle``` when they IPO, mainly interested in the short today.

MRNA (Moderna)- Dr. Peter Marks, head of the FDA's vaccine program, has resigned, citing conflic``` with RFK Jr. Also, 10K FDA employees were fired today. Read through from this is all actions done through FDA will be far, far slower because of all the employees fired, so these pharma/biotech companies will potentially move far slower as well.

We saw pretty big moves in MRNA and NVAX yesterday (7% move in MRNA!!) , we may see continuation of the selloff today due to the new news of the FDA employees. Watching the $6 in NVAX, and $26 in MRNA.

LYV (Live Nation Entertainment)- Trump signed an executive order aimed to fight ticket scalping. LYV saw a small selloff in afterhours yesterday, other than that, don't expect any massive move until further action is taken (the wheels on this will turn slowly). We've seen a decently sized move following the report in February ($157->$112) where an investment firm released a report saying that they'd likely have to divest Ticketmaster to continue operations (or face regulatory actions).

討論​

評論 1:

Someone suggested to me that the Newmax rise might be the oligarchs taking shares. Anyone else think this is likely? (I have no opinion)

Other than that Tesla is up 4.5ish %. And no good economic numbers this morning.

Oh, wanted to add that French Power Cos``` hit Zero as their system was flooded by solar. Nice to know that some countries have their shit together.

評論 2:

$ENGS- Energys Group Announces Pricing of $10.125 Million Initial Public Offering and Nasdaq Listing

評論 3:

Assumming that people against science and common sense like RFK Jr won't be in the governnent forever, would MRNA and other US health labs be interesting long term stocks, right?

Genuinely asking and interested in everyones views.

12. Though on gene editing stocks? Getting smoked \{#12-though-on-gene-editing-stocks-getting-smoked}​

这篇文章的核心讨论主題是：
基因编辑生物科技股（如 $CRSP、$BEAM、$NTLA）近期因政治因素（如 RFK Jr. 的言论和政府官员变动）股价暴跌，是否已过度反应风险而具备长期投资价值？

具体分析要点包括：

  1. 股价暴跌原因：政治不确定性（如 RFK Jr. 的反生物技术立场、联邦政府相关官员离职）导致市场恐慌性抛售。
  2. 行业基本面：基因编辑技术仍被视为该领域最具创新性和长期潜力的科技之一。
  3. 投资争议：
    • 悲观观点：政治环境（如特朗普或 RFK Jr. 的政策）可能持续打压行业，股价反映破产风险。
    • 乐观观点：当前估值可能已过度悲观，存在“抄底”机会。
  4. 关键问题：在政治风险下，这些股票是否已跌至值得长期布局的价位？

总结：文章聚焦于政治因素对生物科技股的冲击，探讨其暴跌后的投资价值与风险平衡。

內容​

Stocks such as $CRSP, $BEAM, $NTLA, just to name a few, have been getting absolutely destroyed, partially due to RFK jr. and I think another important member within the federal government related to bio recently stepped down.

These are starting to look like they are getting priced for bankruptcy, and is arguably one of the most innovative tech in the sector to this day with great longer term promise.

Are these a lost cause under RFK and Trump? Or could they be worth bottom fishing

討論​

評論 1:

Welcome to r/stocks!

For stock recommendations please see our portfolio sticky, sort by hot, it's the first sticky, or see past portfolio stickies here.

For beginner advice, brokerage info, book recommendations, even advanced topics and more, please read our Wiki here.

If you're wondering why a stock moved a certain way, check out Finviz which aggregates the most news for almost every stock, but also see Reuters, and even Yahoo Finance.

Also include some due diligence to this post or it may be removed if it's low effort.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

Im planning on buying more, particularly CRSP.

Gene editing will undoubtedly be a big player in the future of medicine. Also, CRSP has been a favorite of mine to trade. It tanks, then spikes on big news.

Andpriced for bankruptcy? Check your sources. CRSP is sitting on almost $2 billion in cash. More than enough to ride out a few tough years.

評論 3:

They have been crap way before Trump. The only reason the price went up so high was due to QE during Covid.

評論 4:

They could be decades away from clinical use

評論 5:

IOVA is also doing terrible. And they have a product in the market, approvals lined up. I wonder why no Big Pharma or Biotech company is just buying them.

13. 2025 Q1 asset class returns & new valuations​

核心討論主題總結：​

該文章的核心內容是分析2025年第一季主要資產類別的名義美元報酬率（含股息再投資），並探討影響表現的關鍵因素，包括：

  1. 資產報酬率比較：

    • **美國股市（VTI）下跌4.8%，而非美國股市（VXUS）**上漲5.7%，美國債券市場（BND）上漲2.8%。
    • 平衡型基金如全球股票（VT）下跌1.0%，但股債混合組合（60/40的VSMGX）微幅上漲0.2%。

  2. 美元貶值的影響：

    • 美元指數（DXY）當季下跌約4%，推升以其他貨幣計價的非美國資產的美元回報。

  3. 通脹與估值變化：

    • 累積通脹（CPI-U）三個月達1.1%，影響實質回報。
    • 估值指標顯示：
      • 美國股票（VTI）本益比上升（26.1x），盈利收益率下降至3.8%。
      • 非美國股票（VXUS）本益比小幅上升（15.6x），盈利收益率維持6.4%高位。
      • 債券（BND）到期收益率保持4.6%不變。

總結：​

文章主要聚焦於2025年Q1全球資產表現差異的原因（如美元走弱、估值變化），並透過數據比較各類資產的風險與收益特性，提供市場動態的綜合觀察。

內容​

The total returns (including reinvested dividends) in nominal (before-inflation) USD terms of core asset classes during the first quarter of 2025 were:

|Asset Class|Nominal USD Return|

|:-|:-|

|US stocks [via VTI]|-4.8%|

|Ex-US stocks [via VXUS]|+5.7%|

|US total bond market [via BND]|+2.8%|

For some blended / balanced funds:

|Fund|Nominal USD Return|

|:-|:-|

|Global stocks [via VT]|-1.0%|

|60/40 global stocks / bonds [via VSMGX]|+0.2%|

A weaker USD was a contributor to the return of ex-US stocks in USD terms. The USD ended the quarter down about 4% relative to a basket of other currencies (source), increasing the USD value of ex-US stocks denominated in other currencies that strengthened against the USD.

Cumulative CPI-U inflation across the 3 months through February was 1.1% (source).

Valuation metrics as of 3/31/2025:

  1. VTI trailing P/E ratio: 26.1x (source) => trailing earnings yield: 3.8% [from 27.5x / 3.6% at the start of the quarter/year]

  2. VXUS trailing P/E ratio: 15.6x (source) => trailing earnings yield: 6.4% [from 15.4x / 6.5% at the start of the quarter/year]

  3. BND yield to maturity: 4.6% (source) [unchanged from the start of the quarter/year]

討論​

無討論內容

14. Broker Forcing Equities​

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. 經紀商對現金持有比例的警告
    作者收到經紀商的提醒，指出其投資組合中現金比例過高（約40%），並要求增加股票投資以符合規定。

  2. 當前投資配置與收益
    作者的現金目前存放在貨幣市場基金中，年化收益率約2.5%，並支付約1%的年度交易費用（約2700加元）。

  3. 考慮轉向線上交易平台
    由於作者近年來成功跑贏市場（即使在市場下跌時），他考慮是否應轉向費用更低、更靈活的線上交易平台，以進一步優化投資策略。

  4. 尋求適合加拿大地區的交易平台建議
    作者希望獲得適合加拿大投資者的線上交易平台推薦，以實現更高效且成本更低的投資管理。

核心問題：
是否應繼續接受當前經紀商的高費用服務（受現金比例限制），還是轉向線上平台以降低成本並保持投資策略的靈活性？

內容​

Hi Everyone,

I received a phone call today from my broker stating that Im carrying too much money in cash and that I need to invest more money in equities by the end of next month.

I currently have the cash sitting in money market fund making around 2.5% and Im about 40% in cash.

This is apparently against the rules. I like the current offering as I can make as many trades as I want for around $2700 per year which is 1% of the portfolio value.

Im wondering if it is time to switch to online trading as the strategies that I have been using have lead me to best the market and by an increasing margin over the last couple of years including this year when the market is down.

Any advice would be appreciated. I live in Canada so I would need a trading platform that is available here.

討論​

評論 1:

Which broker is this?

Regardless, switch to IBKR.

評論 2:

Yea, Id ditch this broker. You should be able to keep as large of a percentage of your portfolio in cash as you deem appropriate. I use IBKR and I know they pay around 4% on any cash in your account.

評論 3:

Yeah. Move elsewhere. Sounds like you are trying to be pushed to commission based transactions. They are in it for them, not you

評論 4:

The sec actually checks WMs cash balances as too much cash signals to them a possible breach of duty. Your broker could use written correspondence from you requesting an unusually high cash reserve. Not sure if its the same regulatory situation in Canada.

I expect theyre likely right that youre wrong to have so much cash. Ask about more uncorrelated investmen``` if youre worried about equities.

Edit: is it possible youre in breach of your deal with them as they dont count cash as managed and they have a minimum AUM?

評論 5:

How many transactions are you even making that 1% fees on your portfolio is even close to a fair deal? Are you daytrading?

15. Rocket mortgage Redfin/mr cooper question​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：Rocket Mortgage 以股票交易方式收購 Red Fin 和 Mr. Cooper 時，股價變動對收購成本的影響。

具體要點包括：

  1. 股價上漲可能增加收購成本：若 Rocket Mortgage 的股價在交易完成前上漲，需支付更多股票價值給被收購方（例如：100 股從 $1,200 升至 $1,800），可能稀釋原有股東權益或提高收購開支。
  2. 市場行為的潛在影響：投資者可能延後買入 Rocket Mortgage 股票，直到交易完成後，以避免承擔股價波動風險或稀釋效應。
  3. 交易結構的關鍵性：提問者關注的是「全股票交易」（stock deal）的定價機制，以及股價變動如何動態影響交易雙方利益。

簡言之，問題圍繞「股票收購中股價變動對交易條件的影響」及其可能的市場反應。

內容​

Hey guys..sorry I cant find an answer..so rocket mortgage is acquiring red fin and Mr cooper for stock deals.

Does this surpress the price of rocket mortgage..like the more rocket mortgage goes up the more they pay for these deals at the time of closing said deal?

Like 100 shares of rocket at $12 to Mr cooper is $1200..but if rocket goes to $18 its $1800 to Mr cooper. Am I thinking about this right? Wouldnt people wait to buy rocket if they wanted to after the deal is closed.

I really hope this makes sense. Thanks

討論​

評論 1:

No

評論 2:

Yes

評論 3:

Huh?

評論 4:

I don't know

16. Bought NVDA at the wrong time? Not sure what to do next​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：一位投資新手在不了解市場的情況下跟風買入NVIDIA股票後面臨虧損，尋求是否應該止損或長期持有的建議。

具體要點包括：

  1. 投資背景：作者缺乏投資知識，因朋友推薦而跟風買入NVIDIA股票，但買入後股價下跌導致虧損。
  2. 當前困境：不確定應立即止損（避免進一步虧損）還是長期持有（期待未來反彈）。
  3. 投資心態：
    • 無明確投資目標，僅希望長期資產增值。
    • 投入金額在可承受損失範圍內，但對後續決策感到迷茫。
  4. 外部建議的影響：根據其他評論，傾向於長期持有甚至加倉，但作者仍對市場波動感到不安。

總結：文章聚焦於「非理性投資行為後的決策困境」，並探討新手在情緒與有限知識下如何應對市場波動。

內容​

Hi everyone,

I know absolutely nothing about investing. My understanding is just: I buy stocks, they can go up or down, and I either make or lose money.

On January 6th, I bought 73 shares of NVIDIA. I had heard from friends that they made good money with it, so I thought Id try it too.

Im from Brazil, and I paid BRL 1,381.61. Now my investment is worth BRL 951.92 thats a loss of BRL 429.24.

Looking at the chart on Google, it seems like I got unlucky and bought right before it dropped.

My question is: should I just accept the loss and take my money out before it drops more? Or should I leave it there and hope for the best?

I honestly have no clue what might happen next, and to be honest, Im not really interested in learning more about investing I just want to make a reasonable decision here.

Thanks in advance!

EDIT: Based on the commen, I think it's important to clarify that I didn't have any specific goal with this investment I just wanted to grow my money over the long term. I was aware of the risk of losing money, so I only invested an amount I was comfortable with potentially losing. From what I've read in the commen, it seems like holding onto these shares for the long term might actually be a good idea (Apparently even buying more haha).

討論​

評論 1:

Hold

評論 2:

You are lucky that you bought NVDA and not any other popular stock. It's a valuable company which had a stock price appreciate a little too quickly. If you hold, the price will come around as the company keeps making money

It could have been way worse. Do not buy stocks you know nothing about in the future. Also don't take a loss in NVDA unless you know what you're doing

評論 3:

what time frame are you expecting to make money in? luckily, nvda is a good company. You did buy at a high, but if it were me, i'd just wait and hold on to it and it will likely rise in price again. The marke``` are all down right now because of the economic uncertainty. hopefully this is just a price correction. we'll know over the next few days. In the end, just try to have patience and wait it out. You should think more long term on this. This is not investing advice. lol.

評論 4:

Definitely hold. It will go up eventually and you'll thank yourself.

評論 5:

Ive lost double than yours and I am holding and keep on buying for long term

17. Should I actually buy stocks as I buy options?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：在到期日临近时，持有价内（in-the-money）的看涨期权（long call option）是否应行权，以及是否有替代方案获取收益（例如平仓期权而非行权）。具体聚焦以下几点：

  1. 行权的必要性：

    • 當標的資產價格（如AAPL）高於行權價（$260 > $240），理論上行權可獲利（每股$20，共$2000）。
    • 但行權需支付全額行權成本（$24,000），可能面臨流動性壓力（如現金不足）。

  2. 替代方案：

    • 平倉（Sell the Option）：在到期前賣出期權，直接獲取內在價值（intrinsic value）和時間價值（若剩餘），無需動用大筆現金。
    • 價差策略：若持有其他相關期權，可透過組合操作鎖定利潤。

  3. 關鍵考量因素：

    • 現金流限制與行權成本。
    • 平倉的市場流動性（bid-ask spread）與執行效率。

總結：文章主要探討价内看涨期权持有者在到期前的決策（行權 vs. 平倉），並強調平倉是更靈活且常見的獲利方式，避免現金壓力。

內容​

For example, if I buy long call option (strike price $240) on AAPL (now $230). When the date is close to the expiration day, the AAPL price is $260. Should I actually spend $24000 ($240 100) to exercise the call right? Is there any way to walk around to get my earnings? Because I'm not sure I could take $24000 cash from my bank.

Thanks in advance!

討論​

評論 1:

Welcome to r/stocks!

For stock recommendations please see our portfolio sticky, sort by hot, it's the first sticky, or see past portfolio stickies here.

For beginner advice, brokerage info, book recommendations, even advanced topics and more, please read our Wiki here.

If you're wondering why a stock moved a certain way, check out Finviz which aggregates the most news for almost every stock, but also see Reuters, and even Yahoo Finance.

Also include some due diligence to this post or it may be removed if it's low effort.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

If you don't have a deep understanding of intrinsic and extrinsic value, which you don't, you shouldn't be anywhere near options

評論 3:

You should flip it around. Find a stock you like. Buy some shares. If it dips, consider a call option since it requires less capital. If it runs up quickly, sell a covered call.

Only do options if you are willing to lose it all.

評論 4:

You shouldnt be trading options and no you should sell before the exercise date - thats the whole point of trading options is to use leverage which you dont have if you exercise.

Read (actually study) Hulls textbook (its like 1,000+ pgs of dense text) called Options Futures and other Derivatives if you want to learn.

評論 5:

If you sell it in the market one day before most times is the right choice. You will earn pretty much same usually. Nevertheless buying calls of tariffed companies announcement incoming in late week by EU on tech is not probably the smartest...

18. MicroStrategy's Bitcoin strategy​

以下是該文章的核心討論主題總結：

  1. MicroStrategy的債務驅動收購策略
    文章聚焦於MicroStrategy如何透過「可轉換優先票據」（convertible senior notes）進行激進的債務融資，以支持其大規模收購比特幣的戰略。這種債務工具的特點是低至零利率的借款成本，且允許債權人在股價達到特定條件時轉換為公司股票。

  2. 零利率債務的運作邏輯與風險
    核心討論點在於：為何市場允許MicroStrategy以極低利率發行債務？關鍵在於投資者將這些票據視為「隱含比特幣期權」——若比特幣價格上漲帶動MSTR股價，債權人可透過轉股獲利。但此策略也隱含高風險，若加密市場崩盤，公司可能面臨巨額債務違約。

  3. 對投資者的潛在影響
    作者質疑這種策略的永續性，並探討其對不同利益相關者的影響：

    • 債權人：承擔公司違約風險，但獲得潛在股價上漲收益。
    • 股東：股權可能因轉股被稀釋，但受益於比特幣持倉增值。
    • 市場觀察者：此模式反映加密產業與傳統金融工具的創新結合，但也凸顯監管灰色地帶。

  4. 根本問題：企業財務策略的透明度
    文中反覆提及對MicroStrategy財務架構的理解困難，暗示其複雜性可能掩蓋真實風險，呼應了加密資產會計處理的爭議性。

附註：由於無法直接訪問連結內容，此總結基於您提供的文本片段及公開資料推論。若需更精確分析，建議補充文章其他關鍵段落。

內容​

https://deep-dives.ai/share/0f4127b3-3743-4904-8d10-7b87f5699674

I just couldn't understand this company and tried to generate a report on this.

>A cornerstone of MicroStrategy's acquisition strategy has been the aggressive use of debt, primarily through convertible senior notes. These notes allow the company to borrow funds, often at very low or even zero percent interest rates, with the provision that bondholders can convert their debt into MSTR stock under certain conditions (usually if the stock price exceeds a predetermined level).

Zero percent interest rates?? I still don't know whether I use invest, but I get the rationale..

討論​

評論 1:

Micro strategys entire business model is to sell a dollar for 2 dollars.

評論 2:

I wonder if any company has tried using all their profi``` to buy gold as gold keeps going up. Further, issue more convertibles and debt to buy even more gold. I wonder how such company will be viewed.

評論 3:

The collapse of microstrategys equity is going to be glorious

評論 4:

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/dutch_tulip_bulb_market_bubble.asp

評論 5:

There's nothing to understand. The entire crypto industry is built on fraud and lies and now the fucking POTUS is using his office to perpetuate the scam for his family's benefit. The whole thing is a house of cards, and the only smart move is to steer clear and stick with fundamentals

19. Life savings crumbling​

这篇文章的核心讨论主題是：

一位年輕投資者（24歲）對近期市場下跌的焦慮與擔憂，以及他對未來投資回報的不確定性。主要重點包括：

  1. 投資虧損的痛苦：

    • 他將畢生積蓄投入AMD、NVIDIA、SoundHound、MU等科技股，但目前面臨嚴重的未實現虧損（unrealized loss）。
    • 每天看到投資組合虧損數千美元，感到非常痛苦。

  2. 對未來的迷茫：

    • 詢問市場是否會好轉（"light at the end of the tunnel"），還是自己已經犯下無法挽回的錯誤（"did I completely f myself"）。
    • 尋求對這些科技股未來走勢的看法或建議。

整體而言，文章反映了短期市場波動對個人投資者的心理壓力，以及對長期投資策略的困惑。

內容​

I know everyone is feeling the hurt from the market the past couple months. However, Im 24M and invested my life savings into AMD/NVIDA/ Sound hound / and MU last year. I own shares so i unrealized loss, however i so painful opening up my robinhood and seeing being down thousands of dollars everyday.

Anyways what does the future look like? Is there light at the end of the tunnel or did I completely f myself.

討論​

評論 1:

Should prob have diversified your life savings over more than 4 stocks.. no ETFs?

That said you're only 24, so your "life savings" is from a pretty short timeframe, you will earn much more money over your lifetime..

What does future look like? lol nobody knows that, but not looking good unless you're blindly optimistic.

評論 2:

How are you down so bad if you invested last year or did you invest in like December?

評論 3:

Im in the same boat. Started investing last Feb and since Trump took Office Ive lost everything I gained and than some Im just riding out this wave buying the dips and try to remind myself this is a long term investment and patience will do me good. (I pray)

評論 4:

You're 24. Sit tight and wait it out. It's only a loss if you sell and, if they are good companies, they'll come back.

評論 5:

Well first off don't be an idiot who pu``` their "life savings" in single stocks. Second, don't be an idiot that checks the brokerage account every day. Invest for the long term. Set it and forget it. You're 24 yet stressing like you're 65 about to retire on this money

總體討論重點

以下是19篇文章的討論重點條列總結，並附上對應的錨點連結與逐條細節：

1. Mercedes Weighs Pulling US Entry-Level Cars Over Tariffs​

重點：

  • 關稅影響：川普政府25%關稅可能使入門級車型（如GLA SUV）在美銷售無利可圖。
  • 策略調整：考慮停售低利潤車型以應對成本壓力。
  • 市場衝擊：反映貿易政策對德國車企的營運挑戰。

2. Liberation Day: Trump Prepares to Announce New Round of Customs Duties​

重點：

  • 新關稅預告：川普擬宣布新關稅，但可能較預期寬鬆。
  • 全球擔憂：國際市場對貿易戰升級的警戒。
  • 市場反應：若關稅溫和，可能觸發短期反彈。

3. Tesla Car Sales in France, Sweden Drop to Lowest First-Quarter in Four Years​

重點：

  • 銷量下滑：Tesla在法國Q1銷量年減36.8%，市占率被中國品牌超越。
  • 整體車市萎縮：法國新車註冊量年減7.83%。
  • 競爭壓力：中國電動車品牌（如比亞迪）市占達3.19%。

4. Atlanta Fed's GDP Estimate -3.7%​

重點：

  • GDPNow模型：預測從+3.9%驟降至-3.7%，引發衰退疑慮。
  • 模型權威性：即時數據調整與高透明度受市場信賴。
  • 經濟隱憂：諷刺語氣反映對數據真實性的焦慮。

5. Is This Market Manipulation? February US Job Openings Data​

重點：

  • 數據質疑：職缺數7.568M低於預期，媒體四捨五入至7.6M被指誤導。
  • 經濟矛盾：ISM製造業PMI（49）顯示收縮，與官方樂觀敘事衝突。
  • 操縱論點：推測「聰明錢」利用媒體掩蓋疲軟。

6. Europe Stocks Close Lower on Tariff Uncertainty​

重點：

  • 市場下跌：Stoxx 600指數單日跌1.51%，Q1累計跌3%。
  • 關稅衝擊：川普政策引發避險情緒，全行業受波及。

7. Newsmax Spikes 700% on NYSE Debut​

重點：

  • 政治紅利：保守派媒體因川普當選收視上升，上市首日股價暴漲。
  • 資本操作：籌資7,500萬美元，反映投資者對其前景樂觀。

8. Hims & Hers to Sell Lilly's Zepbound​

重點：

  • 業務擴張：遠程醫療平台新增減重藥銷售，股價漲8.5%。
  • 產業趨勢：整合處方藥與線上服務成新方向。

9. What % of Net Worth in Individual Stocks?​

重點：

  • 資產配置：27歲投資者個股占比高，尋求風險評估。
  • 長期目標：平衡被動投資（指數基金）與主動選股策略。

10. r/Stocks Daily Discussion & Technical Analysis​

重點：

  • 技術分析工具：RSI、MACD等指標應用於短線與長期投資。
  • 資源整合：提供入門教學與常見