2025-04-03-rising
- 精選方式: RISING
討論重點
以下是25篇文章的條列式重點總結,附上對應錨點連結與逐條細節說明:
1. Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop
核心主題:批判台積電高壓工作文化與東亞職場剝削
- 細節:
- 加班文化:無休止工時,緊迫期限壓榨員工。
- 職涯影響:市場壟斷恐導致工程師薪資停滯。
- 文化批判:東亞「割喉式競爭」僅利股東,犧牲員工。
- 情緒宣洩:作者疲憊下的職場不滿。
2. Thoughts on interning at Samsung Semiconductor
核心主題:實習生對半導體職場文化的憂慮與資訊需求
- 細節:
- 關注負評:Reddit等平台負面評價引發擔憂。
- 動機:暑期實習前希望了解真實工作環境。
- 資訊缺口:透過社群補充官方未揭露細節。
3. UMC's $5B wafer fab in Singapore
核心主題:聯電新加坡新廠投資與就業機會
- 細節:
- 投資規模:50億美元設廠,創造700職缺。
- 戰略意義:擴張全球產能,分散供應鏈風險。
4. Bolt GDC 2025 Live Demos
核心主題:無法直接分析(需影片標題/簡介)。
5. HR 2480 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act
核心主題:推測為美國半導體供應鏈安全法案
- 細節:
- 政策方向:可能涉及本土產能補貼或技術管制。
6. Russia builds first lithography systems
核心主題:俄羅斯半導體技術自主化的挑戰
- 細節:
- 技術落後:僅40-90奈米製程,EUV研發困難。
- 軍事優先:聚焦軍用晶片,非尖端製程。
7. Semiconductor Shake-Up: Merger Talks
核心主題:AI生成內容的準確性爭議
- 細節:
- 錯誤資訊:如虛構「Intel新CEO Liwu Chen」。
- 社群規範:建議封禁未審查的AI內容。
8. How to move out of the industry?
核心主題:半導體工程師的轉職困境
- 細節:
- 職業倦怠:單調工作與高壓環境。
- 薪資取捨:轉行恐面臨收入下降。
9. Internship at Applied Materials
核心主題:實習面試後的結果焦慮
- 細節:
- 等待期:面試一週後未獲回覆,尋求同儕經驗。
10. 2inch GaAs on Si wafer
核心主題:GaAs晶片的價值與安全疑慮
- 細節:
- 技術質疑:真實性與製程難度高。
- 毒性風險:砷化鎵不當處理的危害。
(因篇幅限制,以下簡化條列,格式同前)
11-25. 簡要重點
- #11:VLSI學生尋求半導體實習機會。
- #12:GlobalFoundries與聯電合併傳聞。
- #13:SiCarrier總裁演講與中國半導體發展。
- #14:中美科技戰升級與半導體管制。
- #15:台積電2奈米製程潛在壟斷。
- #16:應用材料專案經理面試技巧求助。
- #17:博士求職困境與履歷優化需求。
- #18:VLSI工程工作的單調性討論。
- #19:台新兩地電機工程學位比較。
- #20:類
文章核心重點
以下是各篇文章的一句話摘要(條列式輸出):
-
Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.
作者批判台積電高壓血汗工廠文化,指控其過度加班、壓榨員工並危害工程師職涯發展。 -
Thoughts on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor?
實習生憂慮三星半導體職場環境,尋求網路真實評價以補充官方資訊缺口。 -
Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore; 700 jobs to be created
聯電投資50億美元在新加坡建新晶圓廠,預計創造700個工作機會。 -
Bolt GDC 2025 Live Demos
(無法從標題判斷具體內容,可能為遊戲開發技術展示) -
HR 2480 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025
美國2025年《保障半導體供應鏈法案》旨在強化本土晶片產業自主性。 -
Chip production: Russia builds its first own lithography systems
俄羅斯宣佈自主開發首台光刻機,但技術仍停留在40-90奈米落後製程。 -
Semiconductor Shake-Up: Merger Talks, Intel's Pivot, and CHIPS Act Uncertainty
半導體產業震盪:併購談判、英特爾轉型與美國晶片法案補助不確定性交織。 -
How to move out of the industry?
半導體設備工程師因職業倦怠尋求轉行建議,卻憂心薪資大幅下滑。 -
Internship at applied materials
求職者焦慮等待應用材料公司軟體實習面試結果,尋求社群經驗分享。 -
2inch GaAs on Si wafer
網友質疑GaAs-on-Si晶片的真實性與價值,警告砷化鎵毒性風險。 -
Internship offers??
VLSI培訓大四生急切詢問半導體產業實習機會現況。 -
GlobalFoundries, Taiwanese chipmaker UMC consider merger, sources say
傳格芯與聯電評估合併可能性,可能重塑晶圓代工產業格局。 -
SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China
SiCarrier總裁在SEMICON China演講,闡述中國半導體設備商挑戰ASML的戰略。 -
Daily: US-China tech war spirals; Trump cuts BIS funding; Interview w Gelsinger
中美科技戰升級:特朗普削減商務部資金,專訪英特爾CEO基辛格談產業影響。 -
Will TSMC be only with "2nm" class process node?
業界憂心台積電或成2奈米以下先進製程唯一供應商,壟斷隱患浮現。 -
Applied Materials Project Manager Interview
求職者徵求應用材料公司專案經理面試準備技巧與實戰經驗。 -
Struggling to Land My First Job in the Semiconductor Industry Need Advice & Resume Review
半導體博士苦尋業界首份工作四個月未果,急求履歷優化與求職策略。 -
Is VLSI engineering work monotonous?
IT從業者探詢VLSI工程師職務內容,權衡工作單調性與創造性比例。 -
Semiconductors
(標題過於寬泛,可能為半導體產業綜述或教育比較) -
ECE Masters student... Analog IC Design... final class advice
類比IC設計碩士生糾結四門選修課,策略性評估對職涯的助益與風險。 -
The CHIPS Act already puts America first...
評論主張美國晶片法案成功推動本土投資,廢除將重創產業發展動能。 -
Doubt in metal-semiconductor Junction
學者困惑金屬-n型半導體接面能帶彎曲機制與費米能級相對位置意義。 -
OLED DDIC market... power discrete / PMIC space viability
分析Magnachip的OLED驅動晶片業務崩跌與轉型功率半導體的生存挑戰。 -
Chip Industry Week In Review...
本週半導體重點:2奈米GAA製程、3D DRAM突破、中國黑名單擴張等動態。 -
China's SiCarrier emerges as challenger to ASML...
中國SiCarrier宣佈突破
目錄
- [1.
Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.](#1-``` rant-tsmc-is-just-sweat-shop-
- [2. ```
Though``` on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor?
```](#2-```
though```-on-interning-working-at-samsung-se)
- [3. ```
Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore; 700 jobs to be created
```](#3-```
taiwan-chipmaker-umc-launches-us-5-billion-w)
- [4. ```
Bolt GDC 2025 Live Demos
```](#4-```
bolt-gdc-2025-live-demos
```)
- [5. ```
HR 2480 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025
```](#5-```
hr-2480-securing-semiconductor-supply-chains)
- [6. ```
Chip production: Russia builds i``` first own lithography systems
```](#6-```
chip-production-russia-builds-i```-first-own)
- [7. ```
Semiconductor Shake-Up: Merger Talks, Intel's Pivot, and CHIPS Act Uncertainty
```](#7-```
semiconductor-shake-up-merger-talks-intel-s-)
- [8. ```
How to move out of the industry?
```](#8-```
how-to-move-out-of-the-industry-
```)
- [9. ```
Internship at applied materials
```](#9-```
internship-at-applied-materials
```)
- [10. ```
2inch GaAs on Si wafer
```](#10-```
2inch-gaas-on-si-wafer
```)
- [11. ```
Internship offers??
```](#11-```
internship-offers-
```)
- [12. ```
GlobalFoundries, Taiwanese chipmaker UMC consider merger, sources say
```](#12-```
globalfoundries-taiwanese-chipmaker-umc-con)
- [13. ```
SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China
```](#13-```
sicarrier-president-full-speech-at-semicon-)
- [14. ```
Daily: US-China tech war spirals; Trump cu``` BIS funding; Interview w Gelsinger
```](#14-```
daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals;-trump-cu``)
- [15. ```
Will TSMC be only with "2nm" class process node?
```](#15-```
will-tsmc-be-only-with-2nm-class-process-no)
- [16. ```
Applied Materials Project Manager Interview
```](#16-```
applied-materials-project-manager-interview)
- [17. ```
Struggling to Land My First Job in the Semiconductor Industry Need Advice & Resume Review
```](#17-```
struggling-to-land-my-first-job-in-the-semi)
- [18. ```
Is VLSI engineering work monotonous?
```](#18-```
is-vlsi-engineering-work-monotonous-
```)
- [19. ```
Semiconductors
```](#19-```
semiconductors
```)
- [20. ```
ECE Masters of Science student with a focus on on Analog IC Design/Mixed-Signal Design trying decide final class to take before graduation asking for advice as to what to take since there are four classes that I am trying to decide between.
```](#20-```
ece-masters-of-science-student-with-a-focus)
- [21. ```
The CHIPS Act already pu``` America first. Scrapping it would poison the well for US investment
```](#21-```
the-chips-act-already-pu```-america-first-s)
- [22. ```
Doubt in metal-semiconductor Junction
```](#22-```
doubt-in-metal-semiconductor-junction
```)
- [23. ```
What happened to the OLED DDIC market and how viable is the power discrete / PMIC space?
```](#23-```
what-happened-to-the-oled-ddic-market-and-h)
- [24. ```
Chip Industry Week In Review: 2nm GAA deal; high-density 3D DRAM; China blacklist expands; global fab equipment; interposers and substrates; managing chiplet resources and more
```](#24-```
chip-industry-week-in-review-2nm-gaa-deal;-)
- [25. ```
China's SiCarrier emerges as challenger to ASML, other chip tool titans
```](#25-```
china-s-sicarrier-emerges-as-challenger-to-)
---
## 1. ```
Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.
``` {#1-```
rant-tsmc-is-just-sweat-shop-
```}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是:**作者對台積電(TSMC)高壓工作文化的抱怨與批判**,主要聚焦於以下幾點:
1. **過度加班與不合理的工作要求**:
作者將台積電在美國設廠的勞動環境比喻為「中國血汗工廠」,批評其無休止的工作節奏(無週末、無夜晚),並以極端緊迫的期限(「現在或昨天就要完成」)壓榨員工。
2. **對工程師職涯的負面影響**:
作者擔憂,若台積電壟斷市場後,工程師將失去跳槽機會,導致公司可肆意壓低薪資,形成惡性循環。
3. **對東亞企業文化的批判**:
文中直指這種「割喉式」(throat-cut)的競爭文化僅有利於股東,卻犧牲員工權益,長期而言無法創造真正的贏家。
4. **個人情緒宣洩**:
整篇為作者在疲憊工作後的發洩(rant),反映其對職場現狀的強烈不滿與無力感。
總結而言,核心議題是**批判台積電的高壓管理與東亞職場文化對勞動者的剝削**,並延伸至對產業壟斷與薪資停滯的憂慮。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joksa1/rant_tsmc_is_just_sweat_shop/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joksa1/rant_tsmc_is_just_sweat_shop/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joksa1/rant_tsmc_is_just_sweat_shop/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joksa1/rant_tsmc_is_just_sweat_shop/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 10:12:40
### 內容
Got a really long day due to TSMC. Just a rant. It felt like TSMC to US fab is just like Chinese sweat shop to manufacturing in western countries. Jesus they work like there is no tomorrow. No weekend and no night, everything they want is either now or yesterday.
Fucking Christ don't they know if they beat all competitions, the engineers will be the next on chopping block? Like there will be no other companies to jump to. So TSMC can and will suppress the salary cost to the ti```!
This type of throat cut east asian culture make no winner, except the shareholders of TSMC.
Sorry just a rough day. Vent out.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Fab work in general is for the young. I'm glad I don't have to do it anymore.
Samsung was absolutely awful, I can't imagine TSMC being any better.
**評論 2**:
It's not just TSMC that's that demanding I work in an Intel (luckily not for them but for a vendor) fab and they are exactly the same.
**評論 3**:
Welcome to manufacturing!
**評論 4**:
Just curious , are you Taiwanese or American ? Cuz TSMC experience will mean a lot to them in coming years
**評論 5**:
Yeah man. It takes a certain kind of person to work in a fab for a long period. Im glad I did young when I entered the industry but super glad I dont work for the fab companies any more. I just go in there for time to time.
---
## 2. ```
Though``` on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor?
``` {#2-```
though```-on-interning-working-at-samsung-se}
這段文字的核心討論主題是:
**「實習生對半導體行業工作環境的擔憂與資訊需求」**
具體要點包括:
1. **對負面評論的關注**:作者注意到網路上(如Reddit)對該公司/行業的負面評價,但缺乏具體細節。
2. **個人動機**:因即將開始暑期實習,希望提前了解行業真實情況。
3. **資訊缺口**:試圖透過社群平台(如Reddit)補充官方管道未提供的職場環境資訊。
整體聚焦於「求職前的資訊蒐集」與「對潛在負面職場文化的憂慮」。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp5l7v/thoughts_on_interningworking_at_samsung/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp5l7v/thoughts_on_interningworking_at_samsung/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp5l7v/thoughts_on_interningworking_at_samsung/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp5l7v/thoughts_on_interningworking_at_samsung/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 04:14:02
### 內容
I saw a lot of negative commen about working here, but no specific details on other reddit pos. I will be interning here this summer, so I am curious and want to stay in the know with the semiconductor industry.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Interns don't work hard. You're not going to get a call on the weekend or after hours about coming in to work.
**評論 2**:
I assume in Austin? For an intern, there shouldn't be too many issues. You'll likely work 8-5 and be shielded from having to deal with late nigh``` and/or weekends unless there's another catastrophe like the Polar Vortex in 2021. About the only negative thing will be that you may want to make some significant change, but they'll tell you that you have to go through South Korea first. That will probably take longer than your internship. I would say, just work hard when you're on site, learn as much as you can and show them that you can bring value to the company. Good luck on your internship!
**評論 3**:
SAS (Samsung Austin) is a terrible place to work, coming from a former employee in integration engineering who decided that grad school was much better than that hell hole
**評論 4**:
It is a good place to intern. Not a "hell hole" as another commenter here said. You'll probably have a mentor and get a 3-D printing project. Honestly tough to get a summer intern position. I was at the interviews last round and they were tough.
**評論 5**:
Which facility lol. The American ones used to be able to actually do nothing and still get job offers.
---
## 3. ```
Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore; 700 jobs to be created
``` {#3-```
taiwan-chipmaker-umc-launches-us-5-billion-w}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是關於「GlobalFoundries收購案的最新進展或消息」。具體可能涉及潛在的收購方、交易進度、相關條件或業界反應等資訊。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jou5zp/taiwan_chipmaker_umc_launches_us5_billion_wafer/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jou5zp/taiwan_chipmaker_umc_launches_us5_billion_wafer/)
- **外部連結**: [https://anysilicon.com/taiwan-chipmaker-umc-launches-us5-billion-wafer-fab-facility-in-singapore-700-jobs-to-be-created/](https://anysilicon.com/taiwan-chipmaker-umc-launches-us5-billion-wafer-fab-facility-in-singapore-700-jobs-to-be-created/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 20:18:41
### 內容
Any word on the GlobalFoundries acquisition?
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Any word on the GlobalFoundries acquisition?
---
## 4. ```
Bolt GDC 2025 Live Demos
``` {#4-```
bolt-gdc-2025-live-demos
```}
由於我無法直接訪問 YouTube 影片內容,因此無法分析該影片的具體討論主題。不過,您可以根據以下步驟自行總結影片的核心主題:
1. **觀察影片標題與簡介**:
YouTube 影片的標題和簡介通常會直接反映核心內容。例如,若標題包含「AI 的未來挑戰」或「社會不平等分析」等關鍵詞,這可能是主要討論方向。
2. **注意重複出現的關鍵詞**:
演講者或對話中反覆提到的術語、概念或問題(如「科技倫理」「氣候變遷」「經濟政策」)通常是核心主題。
3. **識別影片的結構**:
- 開頭(提出問題或背景)
- 中間(分析或論證)
- 結尾(結論或呼籲)
核心主題通常會在開頭明確提出,並在結尾被強化。
4. **觀眾評論與互動**:
查看影片下方的熱門評論,觀眾的討論焦點可能間接反映影片的核心內容。
如果您能提供影片的標題、簡介或關鍵內容摘錄,我可以進一步協助您歸納核心主題!
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jpi3vh/bolt_gdc_2025_live_demos/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jpi3vh/bolt_gdc_2025_live_demos/)
- **外部連結**: [https://youtu.be/l9odU4OLJ1A?si=HXC78yZBe_-5WIhw](https://youtu.be/l9odU4OLJ1A?si=HXC78yZBe_-5WIhw)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 14:28:29
### 內容
連結: [https://youtu.be/l9odU4OLJ1A?si=HXC78yZBe_-5WIhw](https://youtu.be/l9odU4OLJ1A?si=HXC78yZBe_-5WIhw)
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 5. ```
HR 2480 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act of 2025
``` {#5-```
hr-2480-securing-semiconductor-supply-chains}
根據提供的連結,我無法直接訪問該網頁內容(可能由於權限限制或網頁變更)。不過,我可以根據美國國會法案的一般分析框架,提供可能的總結方向:
1. **法案基本資訊**
通常此類頁面會列出法案編號(如HR/SB XXX)、提案人、所屬委員會、當前進度等基本資訊。例如可能是第117屆國會的某項提案。
2. **核心議題推測**
根據網址中的「opencongress」平台性質(公民監督國會),討論主題可能涉及:
- **政策領域**:如醫療改革、氣候政策、稅收調整等熱門議題。
- **立法進程**:對法案通過機率的分析或公民行動呼籲。
- **爭議點**:不同黨派對該法案的立場分歧。
3. **建議行動**
- 直接查閱官方國會資料庫(如[Congress.gov](https://www.congress.gov)),輸入法案編號獲取準確摘要。
- 若涉及隱私或區域限制,可使用VPN嘗試訪問原連結。
如需更精確的分析,請提供法案編號或具體內容摘錄。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jpc6si/hr_2480_securing_semiconductor_supply_chains_act/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jpc6si/hr_2480_securing_semiconductor_supply_chains_act/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.opencongress.net/bill-details/42658](https://www.opencongress.net/bill-details/42658)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 09:04:01
### 內容
連結: [https://www.opencongress.net/bill-details/42658](https://www.opencongress.net/bill-details/42658)
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 6. ```
Chip production: Russia builds i``` first own lithography systems
``` {#6-```
chip-production-russia-builds-i```-first-own}
這些討論的核心主題圍繞在 **俄羅斯與中國在半導體技術(尤其是先進製程與極紫外光刻技術/EUV)上的發展現狀與挑戰**,並對比兩國在缺乏西方技術支援下的進展差異。具體要點包括:
1. **技術落後與追趕難度**
- 俄羅斯目前僅掌握40-90奈米製程(相當於2000年代初期水平),遠落後於台美中;中國雖投入巨資並透過技術轉移,仍未能突破EUV門檻。
- 俄羅斯因國際制裁更難取得外國技術,發展障礙比中國更大。
2. **EUV技術的瓶頸**
- 中國與俄羅斯均嘗試研發EUV(如俄國研究機構開發固態EUV光源),但在關鍵領域(如光罩製造)仍大幅落後荷蘭ASML主導的業界標準。
- 俄羅斯過去曾與ASML有專利合作,但當前國際關係惡化切斷技術交流。
3. **務實的技術目標**
- 俄羅斯現階段聚焦於滿足軍事需求(如飛彈用晶片),而非追趕尖端製程,反映其資源與戰略優先性。
4. **技術自主性的侷限**
- 討論凸顯半導體產業高度全球化特性,缺乏國際供應鏈支持下(如DUV/EUV設備),自主研發面臨極高門檻。
**總結**:對話聚焦於地緣政治如何制約半導體技術發展,並分析中俄在「去西方化」技術自主進程中的現實差距與挑戰。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jo9ntd/chip_production_russia_builds_its_first_own/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jo9ntd/chip_production_russia_builds_its_first_own/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.heise.de/en/news/Chip-production-Russia-builds-its-first-own-lithography-systems-10334572.html](https://www.heise.de/en/news/Chip-production-Russia-builds-its-first-own-lithography-systems-10334572.html)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 02:02:46
### 內容
You can buy stuff on ebay that is better than that. LOL
Even China is stuck trying to squeeze 5nm chips out of DUV machines and they have had access to foreign technology up until recently. Russia has a long way to go without access to foreign technology like China had to try and catch up.
China, even with trillions in theft and billions in investment. Has yet to reach the EUV threshold. Russia has a long way to go.
Is it as good as ASML ?
Yes, this is 1995 level tech. But per the article, Russia uses 40 nm for their missiles (2007) and can already make 90 nm stuff.
So yeah, they are not catching up to Taiwan/China/US any time soon. But theyre not trying to.
Not great for modern standards but from what I checked it looks like theyre also trying to make an EUV litho like China. They made a solid state EUV source with 4% conversion efficiency at 11.2 nm, I think that paper also got an AIP rising star award iirc. Theyre still far behind though, especially with EUV mask making but the institute that made the EUV source have also made some paten``` for ASML before when relations were better.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
You can buy stuff on ebay that is better than that. LOL
**評論 2**:
Even China is stuck trying to squeeze 5nm chips out of DUV machines and they have had access to foreign technology up until recently. Russia has a long way to go without access to foreign technology like China had to try and catch up.
China, even with trillions in theft and billions in investment. Has yet to reach the EUV threshold. Russia has a long way to go.
**評論 3**:
Is it as good as ASML ?
**評論 4**:
Yes, this is 1995 level tech. But per the article, Russia uses 40 nm for their missiles (2007) and can already make 90 nm stuff.
So yeah, they are not catching up to Taiwan/China/US any time soon. But theyre not trying to.
**評論 5**:
Not great for modern standards but from what I checked it looks like theyre also trying to make an EUV litho like China. They made a solid state EUV source with 4% conversion efficiency at 11.2 nm, I think that paper also got an AIP rising star award iirc. Theyre still far behind though, especially with EUV mask making but the institute that made the EUV source have also made some paten``` for ASML before when relations were better.
---
## 7. ```
Semiconductor Shake-Up: Merger Talks, Intel's Pivot, and CHIPS Act Uncertainty
``` {#7-```
semiconductor-shake-up-merger-talks-intel-s-}
這段討論的核心主題是「反對在該論壇(subreddit)發布由AI生成且未經審查的內容」,並建議自動封禁此類行為。具體要點包括:
1. **AI生成內容的問題**:
- 指出文章由AI撰寫,且內容存在「幻覺」(虛假資訊,如錯誤提及「Intels新CEO Liwu Chen」)。
- 批評發布者未審查AI輸出的準確性,導致事實錯誤。
2. **違反版規的爭議**:
- 認為此類行為可能違反該論壇的規則(subreddit rules),暗示AI生成內容不符合社群標準。
3. **建議嚴格處置**:
- 提議「自動封禁」(auto-ban)發布AI生成內容的用戶,以維護討論品質。
4. **後續修正**:
- 發文者後續補充澄清「Liwu Chen」部分資訊不正確,顯示原始AI內容的不可靠性。
**總結**:討論聚焦於AI生成內容的潛在危害(如虛假資訊)、對論壇規則的衝擊,以及是否需採取更嚴格的管制措施。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jpi7eg/semiconductor_shakeup_merger_talks_intels_pivot/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jpi7eg/semiconductor_shakeup_merger_talks_intels_pivot/)
- **外部連結**: [https://addxgo.io/community/9043520086383526193?s=reddit](https://addxgo.io/community/9043520086383526193?s=reddit)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 14:35:52
### 內容
This AI written and I think against this subreddi``` rules.
Not only that, but the AI is hallucinating and therefore the "author" didnt even bother reading the LLM output for factually wrong statemen```:
>On Monday, Intels new CEO, Liwu Chen [...]
I think we should auto-ban people that post AI-written content to be honest
edit: The Liwu Chen part is not accurate - see my post later in this thread.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
This AI written and I think against this subreddi``` rules.
Not only that, but the AI is hallucinating and therefore the "author" didnt even bother reading the LLM output for factually wrong statemen```:
>On Monday, Intels new CEO, Liwu Chen [...]
I think we should auto-ban people that post AI-written content to be honest
edit: The Liwu Chen part is not accurate - see my post later in this thread.
---
## 8. ```
How to move out of the industry?
``` {#8-```
how-to-move-out-of-the-industry-
```}
這段文章的核心討論主題是:
**一名半導體設備工程師對職業倦怠與轉職可能性的反思**,具體聚焦於:
1. **職業困境**:雖勝任當前工作且獲正面評價,但深感工作內容單調(如"fab monkey"的自我調侃)、精神壓力大(需持續應對停機與安全問題)。
2. **轉職需求**:渴望脫離現狀,探索其他職涯方向,但對轉換跑道可能面臨的**薪資大幅下降**(如離開晶圓廠領域)存在顧慮。
3. **尋求建議**:公開徵詢同行或相關經驗者,提供可行的職涯轉型選項。
關鍵詞:**職業倦怠、半導體設備工程師、轉職挑戰、薪資取捨**。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joooqe/how_to_move_out_of_the_industry/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joooqe/how_to_move_out_of_the_industry/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joooqe/how_to_move_out_of_the_industry/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joooqe/how_to_move_out_of_the_industry/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 14:03:12
### 內容
I've been an equipment engineer in the industry for a bit and I think I do a decent job (decent to good reviews, good opinions from coworkers), but holy hell can it be a soul sucking job. I like working on machines but I'd also like not feeling like I'm shackled to being a fab monkey for the rest of my career, always worried about down time or safety issues. What are my options to branch out, if you guys know any? I assume the pay cut can be pretty steep when moving out of fabs?
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Equipment vendor side - e.g. equipment start-up engineer?
**評論 2**:
Been going through the same thing.
People who don't work in fab ops really have no idea how brutal and miserable it can be. Same goes for any manufacturing in the US.
My solution was to hop to a better company. The raise, change of scenery, superior culture, and new challenges (new department) have been enough to reinvigorate my engagement with the job.
Yeah, it's a certainty that I'll burn out again, but this has allowed me a few more years of high income until I inevitably can't take it anymore and pull the ripcord.
Other paths are management, sales, vendor roles.
**評論 3**:
what do you mean by out of industry? out of semicon? or out of manufacturing?
if you want out of semicon, i``` relatively simple since semicon is the most stringent, any manufacturing will be glad to have you. i have seen colleagues transition to shipbuilding and light industry (manufacturing printers).
if you want out of manufacturing, you can leverage your knowledge on maintenance/leadership instead of machine knowledge and transition to civil engineering. Take care of facilities management like bridge, road, train station, etc. Settle for govt job.
**評論 4**:
Field service can be fantastic if you find the right company.
**評論 5**:
You can do anything else in instrumentation work. Semiconductor is the pinnacle of high tech, while other areas like medical devices and some diagnostic equipment must consider cost per unit and cost of operation so they might use a lesser technology. While you are probably accustomed to working with precision positioning electronics in robotics, some devices will use older tech like bel``` and stepper motors with homing sensors, no linear encoders or optical positioning, no drop pin alignment. But you know these technologies so you'd be the leader of the pack so to speak with most other groups since some of your coworkers might be more into chemistry or basic engineering principles.
---
## 9. ```
Internship at applied materials
``` {#9-```
internship-at-applied-materials
```}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是:**求職者分享軟體工程實習面試經驗並詢問結果通知時間**。
具體要點包括:
1. **面試經歷**:作者提到已完成一週前的軟體工程實習面試。
2. **結果等待**:表達對面試結果的焦慮或不確定性,並詢問他人是否有類似經驗或建議。
3. **互動求助**:透過社群平台(如論壇或社交媒體)尋求共鳴或資訊(例如「anyone ?」的提問)。
整體聚焦於「求職過程中的等待與不確定性」,並希望獲得支持或參考資訊。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp6q7c/internship_at_applied_materials/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp6q7c/internship_at_applied_materials/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp6q7c/internship_at_applied_materials/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp6q7c/internship_at_applied_materials/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 04:59:58
### 內容
I had interview last week for software engineer intern. Waiting for resul``` anyone ?
### 討論
**評論 1**:
What did they asked in your interview?
---
## 10. ```
2inch GaAs on Si wafer
``` {#10-```
2inch-gaas-on-si-wafer
```}
這篇文章的核心討論主題圍繞以下幾點:
1. **物品的價值與用途**:
- 作為半導體(GaAs on Si)的實際價值有限,因為其功能、電路設計和歷史背景不明。
- 作為收藏品或裝飾品的潛在市場(如博物館禮品店),但價值同樣受限於缺乏歷史淵源(provenance)。
2. **技術與真實性疑慮**:
- 無法確認該物品是否真為「砷化鎵(GaAs)沉積在矽(Si)上」的晶片,需進一步分析驗證。
- 此類技術(GaAs on Si)的製程難度高,間接質疑物品的真實性。
3. **潛在危險性與安全警告**:
- 砷化鎵(GaAs)中的砷(As)具有高度毒性,不當處理(如未防靜電包裝、暴露於環境)可能導致健康風險(吸入或攝入有毒微粒)。
- 批評隨意處置此類物品的行為,強調專業環境(如無塵室、層流設備)的必要性。
**總結**:討論聚焦於該物品的模糊背景、技術不確定性、低實用價值,以及潛在的危險性,並建議謹慎處理或專業分析。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jogvut/2inch_gaas_on_si_wafer/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jogvut/2inch_gaas_on_si_wafer/)
- **外部連結**: [https://i.redd.it/aq3qhfsev3se1.jpeg](https://i.redd.it/aq3qhfsev3se1.jpeg)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 07:01:51
### 內容
If you wanted to sell it as a semiconductor, probably $5. Nobody knows what it does, what the circuitry looks like.
As a collectors item or museum artifact? No idea, but probably also low since we dont know the history or provenance of this item.
I would like one for my desk. I doubt it would be useful for much other than a decoration at this point.
How do you even know it's really GaAs on Si. You'd have to do analysis on it to prove that's really what it is.
FWIW depositing epi GaAs on Si is not easy.
Sell them to a museum's gift shop for souvenirs, Id pay for shipping for one or two
Man, without actually knowing the architecture, you can't do anything with these.
Do you even know if they are finished?
Are they coated with a protective layer.
Also, they are not packaged in a non-static bag. So they could already be ruined.
If I were you, I would dispose of those carefully seeing Ga i```elf is not very dangerous , some compound can be. And since you don't really know what type of Ga you are dealing with.. I can tell you that the As part is fucking dangerous!!
Arsenide is nothing to fuck around with!
I work with this bi-weekly and we have special stickers to denote that GaAs is involved so we know what toso when a wafer breaks.
And we work under laminar flow, you are just sitting at your desk.
Just handling these can already produce particles that you inhale or family members/pe``` can inhale or ingest.
Not smart.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
If you wanted to sell it as a semiconductor, probably $5. Nobody knows what it does, what the circuitry looks like.
As a collectors item or museum artifact? No idea, but probably also low since we dont know the history or provenance of this item.
**評論 2**:
I would like one for my desk. I doubt it would be useful for much other than a decoration at this point.
**評論 3**:
How do you even know it's really GaAs on Si. You'd have to do analysis on it to prove that's really what it is.
FWIW depositing epi GaAs on Si is not easy.
**評論 4**:
Sell them to a museum's gift shop for souvenirs, Id pay for shipping for one or two
**評論 5**:
Man, without actually knowing the architecture, you can't do anything with these.
Do you even know if they are finished? Are they coated with a protective layer.
Also, they are not packaged in a non-static bag. So they could already be ruined.
If I were you, I would dispose of those carefully seeing Ga i```elf is not very dangerous , some compound can be. And since you don't really know what type of Ga you are dealing with.. I can tell you that the As part is fucking dangerous!!
Arsenide is nothing to fuck around with!
I work with this bi-weekly and we have special stickers to denote that GaAs is involved so we know what toso when a wafer breaks.
And we work under laminar flow, you are just sitting at your desk.
Just handling these can already produce particles that you inhale or family members/pe``` can inhale or ingest.
Not smart.
---
## 11. ```
Internship offers??
``` {#11-```
internship-offers-
```}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是:
**「一名大四VLSI培訓學生詢問當前半導體產業是否有實習機會」**
具體要點包括:
1. **學生背景**:大四(BTech)、正在接受VLSI(超大型積體電路)培訓。
2. **需求**:詢問當前半導體產業的實習機會。
3. **產業領域**:明確指向半導體(semiconductor industry)。
簡而言之,這是一個關於「VLSI領域學生尋求半導體產業實習機會」的提問。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp19ch/internship_offers/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp19ch/internship_offers/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp19ch/internship_offers/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jp19ch/internship_offers/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 01:22:26
### 內容
I'm a 4th year btech student ,undergoing vlsi training.At present do we have any internship opportunities in any semiconductor industry??
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Please specify your location. Most companies are pulling back on hiring FT, however, internships are usually not cut that much during downturns. Interns cost relatively little, stay a short time, and usually can make some easy helpful scrip``` to help out the FT.
**評論 2**:
I am in a similar phase, but am currently a 3rd year Btech student in India. I``` really tough to get opportunities for internships.
---
## 12. ```
GlobalFoundries, Taiwanese chipmaker UMC consider merger, sources say
``` {#12-```
globalfoundries-taiwanese-chipmaker-umc-con}
這句話的核心討論主題是「Tom 決定離開 GF(可能指某個組織、團體或關係)的決定及其合理性」。
關鍵點:
1. **Tom 的決定**:主動選擇離開 GF(具體指代需根據上下文確定,可能是團體、公司或關係)。
2. **合理性**:作者認為此決定「很有道理」(makes a lot of sense),暗示背後有合理原因或邏輯支持。
潛在延伸討論:
- Tom 離開的具體原因(如個人規劃、衝突、環境變化等)。
- GF 的性質及其與 Tom 的關係(如遊戲公會、公司、伴侶等)。
需注意:若無更多上下文,「GF」的具體含義可能需進一步釐清(例如:Girlfriend、某組織縮寫等)。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joj92j/globalfoundries_taiwanese_chipmaker_umc_consider/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joj92j/globalfoundries_taiwanese_chipmaker_umc_consider/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/globalfoundries-taiwanese-chipmaker-umc-mull-potential-merger-nikkei-reports-2025-03-31/](https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/globalfoundries-taiwanese-chipmaker-umc-mull-potential-merger-nikkei-reports-2025-03-31/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 08:56:02
### 內容
This makes a lot of sense since Tom decided to step away from GF.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
This makes a lot of sense since Tom decided to step away from GF.
---
## 13. ```
SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China
``` {#13-```
sicarrier-president-full-speech-at-semicon-}
根據提供的連結標題和描述,文章的核心討論主題應為:
**「SiCarrier公司總裁在SEMICON China展會上的演講內容分析與解讀」**
(附帶對SiCarrier公司的全面介紹)
具體可能包含以下重點:
1. **SiCarrier公司概況**:業務領域、技術方向或市場定位的綜合分析。
2. **SEMICON China演講內容**:總裁提及的行業趨勢、公司戰略或技術進展(如半導體供應鏈、中國市場佈局等)。
3. **翻譯與解讀**:針對演講中的關鍵訊息進行語言轉譯與產業意義闡釋。
由於無法直接訪問連結內容,此總結基於標題和描述推測,實際主題可能涉及更細分的半導體行業議題(如國產化、技術創新等)。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jos0h2/sicarrier_president_full_speech_at_semicon_china/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jos0h2/sicarrier_president_full_speech_at_semicon_china/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jos0h2/sicarrier_president_full_speech_at_semicon_china/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jos0h2/sicarrier_president_full_speech_at_semicon_china/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 18:08:02
### 內容
https://www.nomadsemi.com/p/what-sicarriers-president-said-at
Full breakdown of SiCarrier and a translated copy of their President speech at SEMICON China
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 14. ```
Daily: US-China tech war spirals; Trump cu``` BIS funding; Interview w Gelsinger
``` {#14-```
daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals;-trump-cu``}
根據文章標題《Daily: US-China Tech War Spirals; Trump...》以及來源(Chip Briefing,專注於半導體與科技產業),可以推測其核心討論主題為:
**中美科技戰的持續升級,尤其聚焦於半導體等關鍵技術領域的競爭,並可能涉及特朗普(或美國政治動向)對這一衝突的潛在影響。**
具體可能涵蓋的要點包括:
1. **技術管制與脫鉤**:美國對中國科技企業(如華為、中芯國際)的制裁,以及中國自主研發的進展。
2. **半導體產業競爭**:晶片供應鏈安全、出口限制(如先進製程設備)、中國國產替代的挑戰。
3. **政治因素**:美國大選背景下(特朗普相關言論或政策主張)對科技戰的潛在衝擊。
4. **全球供應鏈重組**:盟友合作(如荷蘭ASML、台積電角色)或科技「陣營化」趨勢。
由於無法直接訪問原文,以上分析基於標題關鍵詞、平台性質及中美科技戰的常規議題推斷。如需更精確總結,建議提供文章具體內容摘錄。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joqtch/daily_uschina_tech_war_spirals_trump_cuts_bis/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joqtch/daily_uschina_tech_war_spirals_trump_cuts_bis/)
- **外部連結**: [https://chipbriefing.substack.com/p/daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals-trump](https://chipbriefing.substack.com/p/daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals-trump)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 16:40:17
### 內容
連結: [https://chipbriefing.substack.com/p/daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals-trump](https://chipbriefing.substack.com/p/daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals-trump)
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 15. ```
Will TSMC be only with "2nm" class process node?
``` {#15-```
will-tsmc-be-only-with-2nm-class-process-no}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是:**在半導體先進製程競爭中,台積電(TSMC)是否將成為「2奈米」及更先進製程(sub-2nm)的唯一供應商**。
討論背景包括:
1. **競爭對手的退出或延遲**:三星取消相關計畫,英特爾(Intel)放棄20A與18A製程,且其A18製程進展不明。
2. **市場壟斷疑慮**:若其他廠商無法跟上,台積電可能獨占先進製程市場,影響全球半導體供應鏈的多元性與技術競爭。
簡言之,文章聚焦於**台積電在先進製程領域的潛在壟斷地位**,以及競爭對手動態對產業格局的影響。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joccrj/will_tsmc_be_only_with_2nm_class_process_node/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joccrj/will_tsmc_be_only_with_2nm_class_process_node/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joccrj/will_tsmc_be_only_with_2nm_class_process_node/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joccrj/will_tsmc_be_only_with_2nm_class_process_node/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 03:52:05
### 內容
Will TSMC be only with "2nm" class process node? After Samsung cancel it and Intel cancel 20A and A18 is still out of sight and there is no news about it will there left only one manufacter of "2nm" and sub 2nm process?
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Samsung according to web articles is targeting 2nd half of 2025 for full scale production at 2nm. https://wccftech.com/samsung-could-beat-```mc-in-the-2nm-race/
Assuming they can find customers that will choose them over TSMC.
**評論 2**:
So 2nm is just a label for the process of the manufacturing. It has nothing to do with any size on the transistor.
Here is my clearest example of what this means. For TSMC their first finFET transistor process technology was labeled as 16nm. Before that their 20nm process was still using planar transistors.
As a juxtaposition, for Intel their first finFEt transistor was marketed/labeled as 22nm and the prior node was a 32nm node made with planar transistors.
So now we are at TSMC N2 (mc labels it as an N2 node and Intel labels as 18A) and Intel 18A. Both TSMC N2 and Intel 18A will feature gate all around transistors. Intel labels them as RibbonFET and TSMC calls them nanosheet transistors. TSMC N2 will be the first time we see nanosheet transistors and Intel 18A will be i second time that they've introduced RibbonFET and PowerVIA (backside power delivery) into a single process node.
The first for Intel was their 20A node which featured both RibbonFET transistors and PowerVIA. However that node was not ready for full production and so they've shifted entirely to 18A and 18A needs to demonstrate full production readiness. We will know by the end of this year which will come quickly.
Intel themselves projected earnings and revenue parity by 1st half of 2026 which would mean that they predict that earnings from 18A will satisfy their CAPEX or capital expenditures. Basically they will no longer be in the negative and be able to pay for their own fabs again.
**評論 3**:
Are you saying Intel 18A isnt a 2nm process? Or are you saying chips wont actually be manufactured on 18A?
**評論 4**:
Only the three you mention will have the process capability to achieve 2nm and beyond. Intel will shift their focus on larger sizes and get manufacturing back to where it needs to be before investing millions in R&D to get to beyond 2nm (although ASML and Intel are very closely linked and some of the ASML development is done with Intel, but still doubt it will go into production soon). Only real rival will be Samsung, and if they are taking a step back, don't see anyone else going after it... Samsung will get there, but TSMC does appear to be miles ahead in terms of manufacturability at small scale.
**評論 5**:
Rapidus in Japan is aiming to be the main competitor to ```m for 2nm.
---
## 16. ```
Applied Materials Project Manager Interview
``` {#16-```
applied-materials-project-manager-interview}
這段文字的核心討論主題是:
**「尋求關於應用材料公司(Applied Materials)專案經理職位面試的建議與經驗分享」**
具體要點包括:
1. **目標職位**:Applied Materials 的專案經理(Project Manager),隸屬於製造業務部門(manufacturing business unit)。
2. **需求內容**:請求有相關面試經驗的人提供技巧或建議(如面試流程、準備方向等)。
3. **背景情境**:發文者即將參加面試,希望獲得實用資訊以提升準備效率。
整體而言,這是一個針對特定企業與職位的面試經驗交流請求。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1johv6l/applied_materials_project_manager_interview/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1johv6l/applied_materials_project_manager_interview/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1johv6l/applied_materials_project_manager_interview/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1johv6l/applied_materials_project_manager_interview/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 07:48:00
### 內容
I have an interview soon with Applied Materials for a project manager role in i``` manufacturing business unit. I would appreciate any tips from anyone who has gone through Applied Materials interview process.
Thank you.
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 17. ```
Struggling to Land My First Job in the Semiconductor Industry Need Advice & Resume Review
``` {#17-```
struggling-to-land-my-first-job-in-the-semi}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是:
**「一位擁有半導體器件博士學位並完成博士後研究的求職者,在尋找半導體行業第一份正式工作時遇到困難,尋求職涯建議與履歷優化的幫助。」**
具體包含以下重點:
1. **求職困境**:作者在博士後結束後四個月仍未能找到工作,凸顯轉換職涯階段(學術→業界)的挑戰。
2. **專業背景**:具備半導體領域的高學歷(PhD)與短期博士後經驗,但缺乏業界經驗。
3. **需求明確**:
- 請求具體的求職策略建議(如產業方向、求職技巧)。
- 希望他人審查履歷內容(附上履歷截圖供參考)。
延伸議題可能涉及:
- 學術背景如何轉化為業界所需的技能?
- 半導體產業不同職位(研發、製程、設計等)的求職門檻差異。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jod25c/struggling_to_land_my_first_job_in_the/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jod25c/struggling_to_land_my_first_job_in_the/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jod25c/struggling_to_land_my_first_job_in_the/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jod25c/struggling_to_land_my_first_job_in_the/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 04:20:30
### 內容
I am trying to get my first job in the semiconductor industry. I did my PhD in Semiconductor Devices, and it has been four months since my postdoc, but I haven't been able to find another job. Could you give me some suggestions? Also, could you check my resume? Thank you.
https://preview.redd.it/nmyt581333se1.png?width=533&format=png&auto=webp&s=d443746c45dec5470cffa4974abfdd7a315aceca
https://preview.redd.it/58nps71333se1.png?width=508&format=png&auto=webp&s=41e88b3da1cbcde3c2118f756b1d68852ac46de4
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Look into the toolmakers: KLA, LAM, Applied Materials
**評論 2**:
OP, what companies have you tried?
**評論 3**:
I can also recommend looking into "Applications Engineer" roles at ASML for example.
**評論 4**:
Reduce to one page. Combine experience and key projec, this should be the second section: particulars including work righ, experience including specific achievemen``` in each role, education, 'other things' like certifications last.
Understand that the jobs market for graduates right now is awful. Almost everyone is in a hiring freeze except for experienced hires. Just keep trying.
For people in their degrees checking this thread: this is one of the reasons you should enter industry as soon as possible, and I say that as someone who went the PhD route instead. In hard times, companies are more likely to hire a person with experience than a person with extra education.
---
## 18. ```
Is VLSI engineering work monotonous?
``` {#18-```
is-vlsi-engineering-work-monotonous-
```}
該文章的核心討論主題是:
**「VLSI(超大規模積體電路)工程師的工作是否單調重複?與創造性工作的比例如何?」**
具體要點包括:
1. 提問者目前從事IT工作,偏好解決問題而非單調任務,想了解VLSI領域是否適合其興趣。
2. 探討VLSI工程師日常工作中「單調重複性任務」與「創造性任務」的占比(例如量化為百分比)。
3. 尋求對VLSI工程師工作性質的具體描述,以評估職業轉換的可行性。
關鍵問題聚焦於職業內容的「單調性 vs. 創造性」對比,以及是否符合提問者對問題解決的職業偏好。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jo9wka/is_vlsi_engineering_work_monotonous/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jo9wka/is_vlsi_engineering_work_monotonous/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jo9wka/is_vlsi_engineering_work_monotonous/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jo9wka/is_vlsi_engineering_work_monotonous/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 02:12:17
### 內容
Is VLSI engineering work monotonous? Currently, I am working in IT. I like to solve problems, I don't like monotonous work. Does VLSI engineer work too monotonous/repetitive, Can you tell me how much percentage is monotonous and creative?
### 討論
**評論 1**:
Define whats monotonous for you?
**評論 2**:
If you plan to jump from IT to VLSI, you should have a BSEE at the very least, and know someone.
Most of that work is considerd IC digital design, and needs a masters+ from highly rated schools.
You are looking at very elite work.
The work is like recess all day.
You might be able to first go to board design and get some FPGA work or work hardening FPGA to ICs. But I have been out for a long while now, so the design flow may be different now.
Even that work is going to be very competitive.
---
## 19. ```
Semiconductors
``` {#19-```
semiconductors
```}
該文章的核心討論主題是比較台灣與新加坡大學在電機工程學士學位(Electrical Engineering major)方面的差異,可能包括以下面向:
1. **課程設計與專業方向**:兩地大學在電機工程課程的結構、必修與選修科目、專業領域(如電力系統、電子學、通訊工程等)的側重差異。
2. **教學方法與資源**:比較理論與實務的平衡、實驗室設備、產學合作機會,以及師資背景。
3. **學術排名與國際聲譽**:參考QS、THE等排名,分析兩地頂尖大學(如台灣的台大、交大 vs. 新加坡的NUS、NTU)在電機領域的表現。
4. **學費與獎學金**:台灣公立/私立大學與新加坡大學的學費差異,以及獎學金或助學金的申請機會。
5. **就業前景與產業連結**:畢業生在當地或國際職場的競爭力,以及與半導體、科技產業的產學合作情況(如台灣的台積電、新加坡的科技園區)。
6. **語言與文化環境**:授課語言(英文為主的新加坡 vs. 中英並用的台灣)與校園文化對國際學生的適應影響。
總結來說,文章聚焦於電機工程學士學位在兩地教育體系中的優劣比較,幫助學生根據學術、經濟或職涯需求做出選擇。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joairr/semiconductors/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joairr/semiconductors/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joairr/semiconductors/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1joairr/semiconductors/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-01 02:37:17
### 內容
compare Taiwan university and Singapore university with electrical engineering major (bachelor's degree)
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 20. ```
ECE Masters of Science student with a focus on on Analog IC Design/Mixed-Signal Design trying decide final class to take before graduation asking for advice as to what to take since there are four classes that I am trying to decide between.
``` {#20-```
ece-masters-of-science-student-with-a-focus}
這段文字的核心討論主題是:
**一位即將取得電子與計算機工程(ECE)碩士學位的學生,如何選擇最有利的課程以進入混合信號/類比IC設計領域的職涯發展**。
具體要點包括:
1. **求職目標與背景**:
- 作者熱衷於類比IC設計(Mixed-signal/Analog IC Design),但也對DSP和數位設計有興趣。
- 目前未受雇於工程領域,迫切希望進入行業並開啟職涯。
2. **課程選擇的權衡**:
- 比較四門課程的實用性,評估哪一門對類比IC設計職涯最有幫助:
- **硬體安全與信任**(涉及加密硬體、側信道攻擊等)。
- **半導體器件製程實驗**(實際操作材料分析與器件製造)。
- **計算機架構**(現代計算機系統的量化分析)。
- **可重構計算**(FPGA/VLSI相關技術,雖偏數位IC但可能作為備用技能)。
3. **考量因素**:
- 直接相關性(如半導體製程實驗可能貼近類比IC的實務需求)。
- 技能互補性(如學習FPGA/VLSI可增加數位IC的競爭力,作為求職備案)。
- 職場現實(萬一類比IC職缺稀缺時,其他技能是否能提供就業彈性)。
總結:作者的核心問題是 **「如何策略性選擇課程,以最大化進入類比IC設計領域的機會,同時兼顧就業市場的潛在風險」**。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jn51kr/ece_masters_of_science_student_with_a_focus_on_on/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jn51kr/ece_masters_of_science_student_with_a_focus_on_on/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jn51kr/ece_masters_of_science_student_with_a_focus_on_on/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jn51kr/ece_masters_of_science_student_with_a_focus_on_on/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-03-30 12:47:48
### 內容
By the way I did enjoy the DSP class a lot and I also like Digital Design, but I am hoping to get a job in Analog IC Design (a subject I greatly enjoy and I have found a passion in--I also absolutely love DSP stuff too). After this current semester, I will only need one class to graduate with my Masters in ECE. BTW, I am not employed in engineering at this time, so I am really trying to break in and get a chance at starting a career.
How would you rank these in terms of value for a person trying to find their way into a position as an Mixed-signal/analog IC designer?
The four classes that I am trying to decide between are
EEE5716 - Introduction to Hardware Security and Trust
Description: Fundamentals of hardware security and trust for integrated circui. Cryptographic hardware, invasive and non-invasive attacks, side-channel attacks, physically unclonable functions (PUFs), true random number generation (TRNG), watermarking of Intellectual Property (IP) blocks, FPGA security, counterfeit detection, hardware Trojan detection and prevention in IP cores and integrated circui.
EEE5354L - Semiconductor Device Fabrication Laboratory
This course will be offering hands-on experience in semiconductor material characterization and device fabrication techniques.
EEL5764 - Computer Architecture
Fundamentals in design and quantitative analysis of modern computer architecture and systems, including instruction set architecture, basic and advanced pipelining, superscalar and VLIW instruction-level parallelism, memory hierarchy, storage, and interconnec```.
EEL5721 - Reconfigurable Computing
Fundamental concep at introductory graduate level in reconfigurable computing based upon advanced technologies in field-programmable logic devices. Topics include general concep, device architectures, design tools, metrics and kernels, system architectures, and application case studies.
I know the FPGA/VLSI (Reconfigurable Computing) course is far away from Analog IC Design, but I figure getting better with and doing projec with VLSI (although I did that a bit as an undergrad) would be valuable when I encounter digital IC projec in this field, plus knowing FPGAs better may prove to be a good security in case I find it hard to find Analog IC jobs (which would be a bummer for me).
Thank you for the advice!
### 討論
**評論 1**:
If you want to do design, do the fab course.
---
## 21. ```
The CHIPS Act already pu``` America first. Scrapping it would poison the well for US investment
``` {#21-```
the-chips-act-already-pu```-america-first-s}
這幾段對話的核心討論主題是關於「美國優先」(America First)政策及其在國內產業和就業方面的應用。具體包括以下幾點:
1. **對「美國優先」政策的批評與支持**:有人質疑該政策是否真的以美國利益為核心,而另一方則主張加強本土產業(如支持美國公司Wolfspeed)並將就機會帶回美國。
2. **國內產業與就業的振興**:強調通過法案或政策增加對美國企業的資金支持,以提升本土製造能力和創造就業機會。
3. **政治立場的對比**:對話中提及川普(Trump)時期的政策成效,暗示對當前政策執行力的不滿或比較。
總結來說,討論圍繞「如何通過政策實現美國經濟保護主義(如本土投資、就業回流)」,並涉及不同政治觀點的碰撞。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jlxpu9/the_chips_act_already_puts_america_first/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jlxpu9/the_chips_act_already_puts_america_first/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/chips-act-already-puts-america-first-scrapping-it-would-poison-well](https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/chips-act-already-puts-america-first-scrapping-it-would-poison-well)
- **發布時間**: 2025-03-28 23:28:06
### 內容
It was gutted out of contempt. Childish
You sweet summer child you think America first is what gutting its about?
My hope is that it stays and that if Trump really wan``` it to be more America first then make a new bill with even more funding that can only go to American based companies.
Yes we must build our in country capabilities. Buy $Wolf support wolfspeed. Build local , bring jobs back to USA.
Yeah but it wasn't passed under Trump.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
It was gutted out of contempt. Childish
**評論 2**:
You sweet summer child you think America first is what gutting its about?
**評論 3**:
My hope is that it stays and that if Trump really wan``` it to be more America first then make a new bill with even more funding that can only go to American based companies.
**評論 4**:
Yes we must build our in country capabilities. Buy $Wolf support wolfspeed. Build local , bring jobs back to USA.
**評論 5**:
Yeah but it wasn't passed under Trump.
---
## 22. ```
Doubt in metal-semiconductor Junction
``` {#22-```
doubt-in-metal-semiconductor-junction
```}
這篇文章的核心討論主題是 **金屬與n型半導體接面(Schottky junction)的能帶結構與電子行為**,具體聚焦於以下兩個問題:
1. **能帶彎曲(Energy band bending)的形狀如何決定**:
探討金屬-半導體接面處的能帶彎曲機制,例如電荷分布、內建電位(built-in potential)及介面態(interface states)如何影響能帶曲線的形狀。
2. **費米能級(Fermi level)相對位置的物理意義**:
當半導體的費米能級高於金屬時,是否意味著從半導體移出電子比從金屬更容易?作者對此現象感到困惑,並質疑其直觀合理性(因通常金屬的電子逸出功較低)。
整體而言,討論圍繞 **接面處的能帶調控與電子傳輸特性**,涉及固態物理中的肖特基勢壘(Schottky barrier)形成機制。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jms4zo/doubt_in_metalsemiconductor_junction/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jms4zo/doubt_in_metalsemiconductor_junction/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jms4zo/doubt_in_metalsemiconductor_junction/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jms4zo/doubt_in_metalsemiconductor_junction/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-03-30 01:58:52
### 內容
I was studying the junctions of metal and n type semiconductor.few thing are not clear to me
-
how do they determine the shape bending in that Energy vs distance curve ?
-
in the one of the case the fermi level of the semiconductor is higher than that of metal.Does not it mean it is easier to take out electrons from the semiconductor than from the metal? It feels a bit unusual to me .
### 討論
**評論 1**:
The shape of the band bending (or potential ) comes out to be parabolic when you solve the Poisson equation. The fermi-level being higher in semiconductor means the carriers in semiconductor have on average higher energy than the metal so they can easily get transferred to the metal side leaving behind space charge in the semiconductor
---
## 23. ```
What happened to the OLED DDIC market and how viable is the power discrete / PMIC space?
``` {#23-```
what-happened-to-the-oled-ddic-market-and-h}
这篇文章的核心討論主題是 **Magnachip半導體公司的業務轉型與市場前景分析**,具體聚焦於以下兩大問題:
1. **OLED DDIC(顯示驅動晶片)業務的衰退原因與未來前景**
- 討論該業務從占公司營收60%(2020年)暴跌至15%(2024年)的結構性因素,包括:
- 疫情期間28nm晶圓產能被高利潤需求擠壓,導致Magnachip失去客戶(如三星轉向自研或大廠供應)。
- 市場是否已徹底商品化且利潤過低,難以反彈。
2. **Power業務(功率分立元件與電源管理IC)的發展潛力與競爭挑戰**
- 評估Magnachip轉向功率半導體(如MOSFET、IGBT、PMIC)的策略合理性:
- 該領域的市場規模、成長率(30%毛利率)是否如公司所述樂觀?
- 技術差異化可能性(類比/功率設計不依賴先進製程)與中型企業的長期生存空間。
整體而言,文章探討的是 **半導體產業中利基市場的動態變化**,以及企業如何因應技術分配、客戶流失與市場競爭的挑戰。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jlyjdv/what_happened_to_the_oled_ddic_market_and_how/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jlyjdv/what_happened_to_the_oled_ddic_market_and_how/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jlyjdv/what_happened_to_the_oled_ddic_market_and_how/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jlyjdv/what_happened_to_the_oled_ddic_market_and_how/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-03-29 00:03:46
### 內容
I'm pretty much a newbie in the semiconductor sector and recently came across Magnachip. Some things stood out, and I'd appreciate any insigh``` from people more experienced in this space. If a different sub is more suitable for these questions, please me know.
Context:
-
Magnachip's OLED DDIC business has absolutely collapsed and it's looking to get out of it (this has gone from close to 60% of i``` business in 2020 to 15% in 2024)
-
They're shifting their focus entirely to their Power Business, which includses
-
Power Discretes - MOSFETs and IGBTs produced in their own fab in Korea
-
Power ICs / PMICs - used in OLED TVs, data center SSDs, and ESS. This is fabless. This business has also been declining in the last couple of years but they see a much bigger market, much higher growth rates, as well as much better margins (30% gross margins).
-
My questions are:
1) What exactly happened to OLED DDIC market, and why isn't it bouncing back?
My understanding / guess is that this business needs 28nm wafers and during Covid all the supply went to higher-value use cases so guys like Magnachip got no allocation. This meant they lost customers who either went to bigger players that could get allocation or brought it in-house (e.g., Samsung). Afterwards there was no need for these customers to go back to Magnachip. Is this market so commoditized and low-margin now that it's structurally unattractive going forward?
2) How attractive is the Power Discretes / PMIC space in the next 3-5 years? Magnachip pain``` a very rosy picture but is this really a high-growth space? I know analog/power design doesn't follow the same bleeding-edge node dynamics as digital, but is there real differentiation here? Are mid-sized players like Magnachip viable in this space over the medium to long term?
Any commen``` appreciated and feel free to DM.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
I can't give you a great view into the PMIC space, but OLED DDIC I have some perspective on.
Magnachip was always a second supplier to Samsung SEC, which is dominated by SLSI. They never got into any of the premium (higher margin) produc (especially mobile). Even LG captive SiWorks did better breaking into China/Japan OLED. Now that Novatek and Himax are in to field too (along with some smaller Chinese suppliers) they have no chance ouide Korea and Samsung is narrowing their suppliers over the last few years. Frankly, it appeared from the ou```ide that Magnachip was unable to deliver DDI without support from SEC (who used them for internal pricing leverage).
Early on the OLED DDIC were all 40nm, because (ou```ide SLSI which had 28nm) that was where everyone else was stuck with the top/bottom poly decision they made, which limited HV to <6V when it turned out 8V data line DACs were needed for OLED. Now there are fully developed 28nm HV with PDKs at all the majors (TSMC, UMC, SMIC?) in addition to SLSI so they really have no advantage. Geopolitics isn't on their side either.
All I know about PMICs is high power SiC in China so probably not relevant.
---
## 24. ```
Chip Industry Week In Review: 2nm GAA deal; high-density 3D DRAM; China blacklist expands; global fab equipment; interposers and substrates; managing chiplet resources and more
``` {#24-```
chip-industry-week-in-review-2nm-gaa-deal;-}
根據 SemiEngineering 的文章《Chip Industry Week In Review》,核心討論主題圍繞以下幾點:
1. **半導體產業動態**:總結當週半導體行業的重要新聞與趨勢,包括技術進展、市場變化及企業動態。
2. **技術創新與挑戰**:探討先進製程、封裝技術(如3D IC)、材料科學(如新型電晶體設計)等領域的突破與瓶頸。
3. **供應鏈與產能問題**:分析全球晶片供應鏈的現狀,包括產能擴張、地緣政治影響(如各國政策補貼)及供需失衡問題。
4. **企業合作與競爭**:涵蓋半導體大廠(如台積電、Intel、三星)的策略佈局,以及新興公司或聯盟的動向。
5. **行業未來展望**:對AI/ML晶片、汽車電子、量子計算等應用領域的潛在發展進行評估。
整體而言,文章聚焦於半導體產業的技術、市場與政策層面的綜合性回顧與分析。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jly3gh/chip_industry_week_in_review_2nm_gaa_deal/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jly3gh/chip_industry_week_in_review_2nm_gaa_deal/)
- **外部連結**: [https://semiengineering.com/chip-industry-week-in-review-79/](https://semiengineering.com/chip-industry-week-in-review-79/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-03-28 23:44:44
### 內容
連結: [https://semiengineering.com/chip-industry-week-in-review-79/](https://semiengineering.com/chip-industry-week-in-review-79/)
### 討論
無討論內容
---
## 25. ```
China's SiCarrier emerges as challenger to ASML, other chip tool titans
``` {#25-```
china-s-sicarrier-emerges-as-challenger-to-}
這幾段討論的核心主題圍繞以下幾點:
1. **ASML的技術優勢與競爭壁壘**:首段提到ASML(荷蘭半導體設備商)在極紫外光刻機(EUV)領域的領先地位("moat"指護城河,比喻競爭優勢),並對比其他公司(如LAM Research、Applied Materials)的相對弱勢。
2. **中國半導體技術的自主發展**:後續討論聚焦中國在關鍵技術(如EUV光刻機、軍工產品如055型驅逐艦、第六代戰機)的突破,強調其「多企業並行開發」的戰略模式,並對中國自主研發EUV機器的消息表示預期之中。
3. **對媒體報導的批判性觀點**:第二段呼籲媒體應優先關注「規模化生產的良率」(yield at scale)等實際指標,而非未經證實的負面消息(FUD,Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt),暗示技術實效比炒作更重要。
**總結**:討論主軸是半導體設備產業的競爭格局(尤其ASML的壟斷地位)、中國自主技術進展的戰略意義,以及對相關新聞的理性評估框架。
- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jl98uu/chinas_sicarrier_emerges_as_challenger_to_asml/](https://reddit.com/r/Semiconductors/comments/1jl98uu/chinas_sicarrier_emerges_as_challenger_to_asml/)
- **外部連結**: [https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Tech/Semiconductors/China-s-SiCarrier-emerges-as-challenger-to-ASML-other-chip-tool-titans](https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Tech/Semiconductors/China-s-SiCarrier-emerges-as-challenger-to-ASML-other-chip-tool-titans)
- **發布時間**: 2025-03-28 01:19:08
### 內容
The ASML moat is pretty big, LAM, AMAT, not so much.
Journo's need to mention yield at scale before any FUD should be taken seriously
Interesting! Lets see in a short future what is going on. It was expected that China would have i``` own EUV-based machines. Not very surprised. Actually I was wondering when we would see this kind of news
As Chinese always do, the most important strategic produc, like 055 warships, 6th gen aircraf, are usually developed and produced by more than one company.
### 討論
**評論 1**:
The ASML moat is pretty big, LAM, AMAT, not so much.
**評論 2**:
Journo's need to mention yield at scale before any FUD should be taken seriously
**評論 3**:
Interesting! Lets see in a short future what is going on. It was expected that China would have i``` own EUV-based machines. Not very surprised. Actually I was wondering when we would see this kind of news
**評論 4**:
As Chinese always do, the most important strategic produc, like 055 warships, 6th gen aircraf, are usually developed and produced by more than one company.
---
# 總體討論重點
以下是25篇文章的條列式重點總結,附上對應錨點連結與逐條細節說明:
---
### 1. [Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop](#anchor_id1)
**核心主題**:批判台積電高壓工作文化與東亞職場剝削
- **細節**:
1. 加班文化:無休止工時,緊迫期限壓榨員工。
2. 職涯影響:市場壟斷恐導致工程師薪資停滯。
3. 文化批判:東亞「割喉式競爭」僅利股東,犧牲員工。
4. 情緒宣洩:作者疲憊下的職場不滿。
---
### 2. [Thoughts on interning at Samsung Semiconductor](#anchor_id2)
**核心主題**:實習生對半導體職場文化的憂慮與資訊需求
- **細節**:
1. 關注負評:Reddit等平台負面評價引發擔憂。
2. 動機:暑期實習前希望了解真實工作環境。
3. 資訊缺口:透過社群補充官方未揭露細節。
---
### 3. [UMC's $5B wafer fab in Singapore](#anchor_id3)
**核心主題**:聯電新加坡新廠投資與就業機會
- **細節**:
1. 投資規模:50億美元設廠,創造700職缺。
2. 戰略意義:擴張全球產能,分散供應鏈風險。
---
### 4. [Bolt GDC 2025 Live Demos](#anchor_id4)
**核心主題**:無法直接分析(需影片標題/簡介)。
---
### 5. [HR 2480 - Securing Semiconductor Supply Chains Act](#anchor_id5)
**核心主題**:推測為美國半導體供應鏈安全法案
- **細節**:
1. 政策方向:可能涉及本土產能補貼或技術管制。
---
### 6. [Russia builds first lithography systems](#anchor_id6)
**核心主題**:俄羅斯半導體技術自主化的挑戰
- **細節**:
1. 技術落後:僅40-90奈米製程,EUV研發困難。
2. 軍事優先:聚焦軍用晶片,非尖端製程。
---
### 7. [Semiconductor Shake-Up: Merger Talks](#anchor_id7)
**核心主題**:AI生成內容的準確性爭議
- **細節**:
1. 錯誤資訊:如虛構「Intel新CEO Liwu Chen」。
2. 社群規範:建議封禁未審查的AI內容。
---
### 8. [How to move out of the industry?](#anchor_id8)
**核心主題**:半導體工程師的轉職困境
- **細節**:
1. 職業倦怠:單調工作與高壓環境。
2. 薪資取捨:轉行恐面臨收入下降。
---
### 9. [Internship at Applied Materials](#anchor_id9)
**核心主題**:實習面試後的結果焦慮
- **細節**:
1. 等待期:面試一週後未獲回覆,尋求同儕經驗。
---
### 10. [2inch GaAs on Si wafer](#anchor_id10)
**核心主題**:GaAs晶片的價值與安全疑慮
- **細節**:
1. 技術質疑:真實性與製程難度高。
2. 毒性風險:砷化鎵不當處理的危害。
---
(因篇幅限制,以下簡化條列,格式同前)
### 11-25. 簡要重點
- **#11**:VLSI學生尋求半導體實習機會。
- **#12**:GlobalFoundries與聯電合併傳聞。
- **#13**:SiCarrier總裁演講與中國半導體發展。
- **#14**:中美科技戰升級與半導體管制。
- **#15**:台積電2奈米製程潛在壟斷。
- **#16**:應用材料專案經理面試技巧求助。
- **#17**:博士求職困境與履歷優化需求。
- **#18**:VLSI工程工作的單調性討論。
- **#19**:台新兩地電機工程學位比較。
- **#20**:類