跳至主要内容

2025-04-02-top

  • 精選方式: TOP
  • 時間範圍: DAY

討論重點

以下是9篇討論重點的條列式總結,並附上對應文章錨點連結:


1. Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.

  • 重點
    1. 高壓工作環境:批評台積電在美國廠的「血汗工廠」文化,包括無休假日、極端工時。
    2. 職涯隱憂:擔憂市場壟斷後工程師選擇權喪失,可能導致薪資壓榨。
    3. 文化批判:抨擊東亞企業「割喉競爭」文化,僅有利股東而非員工。
    4. 個人情緒:反映作者因工作疲憊引發的挫折感。

2. Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore

  • 重點
    1. 投資動態:聯電(UMC)在新加坡新建50億美元晶圓廠,創造700個職缺。
    2. 產業擴張:反映半導體供應鏈全球化布局趨勢。

3. How to move out of the industry?

  • 重點
    1. 職業倦怠:設備工程師形容工作如「fab monkey」,重複性高且壓力大。
    2. 轉職顧慮:想離開產業但擔心薪資大幅下降。
    3. 尋求建議:詢問轉向技術管理或跨領域的可能性。

4. Intel internships

  • 重點
    1. 實習生擔憂:因工廠延遲與CEO更換,擔心實習機會被撤銷。
    2. 成本考量:公司可能因營運壓力縮減非核心人力。

5. Thoughts on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor?

  • 重點
    1. 職場文化疑慮:關注三星半導體負面評價,尋求內部真實情況。
    2. 實習準備:希望了解產業趨勢以應對未來工作。

6. SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China

  • 重點
    1. 產業趨勢:推測內容涉及中國半導體自主化與技術突破。
    2. 供應鏈策略:可能回應地緣政治對產業的影響。

7. Internship at applied materials

  • 重點
    1. 求職焦慮:作者等待應用材料公司軟體實習面試結果。
    2. 情緒支持:尋求類似經驗分享。

8. Daily: US-China tech war spirals

  • 重點
    1. 科技戰升級:美中半導體出口管制與技術脫鉤加劇。
    2. 政治影響:特朗普重返可能強化對華科技限制。
    3. 供應鏈重組:分析全球產業鏈重塑與企業因應策略。

9. Internship offers??

  • 重點
    1. 實習機會詢問:VLSI培訓學生尋求半導體產業實習資訊。
    2. 領域聚焦:強調對超大型積體電路領域的興趣。

以上總結依序對應各篇錨點,條列細節涵蓋核心議題與具體討論內容。

文章核心重點

  1. Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.:作者強烈批評台積電的高壓工作環境與東亞競爭文化,認為其剝削員工且不利產業長期發展。

  2. Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore; 700 jobs to be created:聯電(UMC)宣布投資50億美元在新加坡建晶圓廠,預計創造700個職位。

  3. How to move out of the industry?:一位半導體設備工程師因職業倦怠尋求轉職建議,擔憂薪資落差但渴望脫離高壓環境。

  4. Intel internships:實習生擔憂Intel因營運問題可能撤銷錄用通知,反映企業策略調整對求職者的不確定性影響。

  5. Thoughts on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor?:實習生關注三星半導體的職場文化負評,希望獲取更多內部資訊以評估實習選擇。

  6. SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China:推測為SiCarrier總裁在SEMICON China的演講,可能聚焦中國半導體自主化與技術突破(需具體內容確認)。

  7. Internship at applied materials:求職者焦慮等待應用材料(Applied Materials)軟體工程實習的面試結果,尋求共鳴或建議。

  8. Daily: US-China tech war spirals; Trump cuts BIS funding; Interview w Gelsinger:分析美中科技戰升級、特朗普政策影響及供應鏈重組,凸顯地緣政治對半導體產業的衝擊。

  9. Internship offers??:VLSI培訓中的工程學生詢問半導體產業現有實習機會,尋求領域相關指引。

目錄


1. Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.

這篇文章的核心討論主題是作者對台積電(TSMC)工作文化的強烈不滿和批評,主要聚焦於以下幾點:

  1. 過度加班與高壓工作環境
    作者將台積電在美國的晶圓廠比作「中國血汗工廠」,批評其極端的工作節奏(如無休假日、日夜趕工),並以「現在或昨天」的急迫性要求員工。

  2. 對工程師職涯的負面影響
    作者擔憂,若台積電壟斷市場後,工程師將失去職場選擇權,導致公司可能壓低薪資,形成惡性循環。

  3. 對東亞競爭文化的批判
    文中指責這種「割喉式」的東亞企業文化(以犧牲員工權益追求極致效率)僅有利於股東,而非整體產業或員工。

  4. 個人情緒宣洩
    最後表明這是因疲憊工作日引發的抱怨,反映個人當下的挫折感。

總結:文章核心是抨擊台積電的高壓管理與短視競爭策略,並延伸至對東亞職場文化的反思,強調其對勞動者的剝削與產業長期發展的隱憂。

內容

Got a really long day due to TSMC. Just a rant. It felt like TSMC to US fab is just like Chinese sweat shop to manufacturing in western countries. Jesus they work like there is no tomorrow. No weekend and no night, everything they want is either now or yesterday.

Fucking Christ don't they know if they beat all competitions, the engineers will be the next on chopping block? Like there will be no other companies to jump to. So TSMC can and will suppress the salary cost to the ti```!

This type of throat cut east asian culture make no winner, except the shareholders of TSMC.

Sorry just a rough day. Vent out.

討論

評論 1:

Fab work in general is for the young. I'm glad I don't have to do it anymore.

Samsung was absolutely awful, I can't imagine TSMC being any better.

評論 2:

It's not just TSMC that's that demanding I work in an Intel (luckily not for them but for a vendor) fab and they are exactly the same.

評論 3:

Just curious , are you Taiwanese or American ? Cuz TSMC experience will mean a lot to them in coming years

評論 4:

Welcome to manufacturing!

評論 5:

Yeah man. It takes a certain kind of person to work in a fab for a long period. Im glad I did young when I entered the industry but super glad I dont work for the fab companies any more. I just go in there for time to time.


2. Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore; 700 jobs to be created

根據您的提問,核心討論主題為「GlobalFoundries(格羅方德)收購案的相關進展或最新消息」。可能的具體方向包括:

  1. 收購動態:是否有企業計劃收購GlobalFoundries,或該公司是否正在尋求併購其他企業。
  2. 市場傳聞:業界關於潛在交易的傳言或未經證實的消息。
  3. 官方回應:GlobalFoundries或其相關方(如投資者、客戶)對收購議題的公開聲明或澄清。
  4. 產業影響:若收購成真,對半導體行業(如競爭格局、供應鏈)的潛在影響。

由於問題簡短且缺乏上下文,若您能提供更多背景(如特定時間點的新聞或討論來源),可進一步精準總結。目前建議關注半導體產業媒體或財經報導以獲取最新動態。

內容

Any word on the GlobalFoundries acquisition?

討論

評論 1:

Any word on the GlobalFoundries acquisition?


3. How to move out of the industry?

这篇文章的核心讨论主題是:
一位半導體/製造業設備工程師對職業倦怠與轉職可能性的探討

具體重點如下:

  1. 職業現狀的矛盾:作者雖勝任當前工作(獲得同事好評),但感到工作內容單調重複(如「fab monkey」的比喻),且長期承受機台停機與安全問題的壓力,導致心理耗竭(「soul sucking」)。
  2. 轉職動機:希望脫離現有環境,尋求更具成長性或多元性的職涯方向,但對轉換領域可能伴隨的薪資大幅下降(「pay cut」)感到擔憂。
  3. 尋求建議:詢問同行或相關經驗者,是否有其他職業發展路徑可參考,例如轉向技術管理、跨領域技術角色(如製程開發、產品工程),或完全離開製造業。

整體而言,文章反映科技製造業中基層技術人員對職業瓶頸的焦慮,以及對轉型機會與取捨的現實考量。

內容

I've been an equipment engineer in the industry for a bit and I think I do a decent job (decent to good reviews, good opinions from coworkers), but holy hell can it be a soul sucking job. I like working on machines but I'd also like not feeling like I'm shackled to being a fab monkey for the rest of my career, always worried about down time or safety issues. What are my options to branch out, if you guys know any? I assume the pay cut can be pretty steep when moving out of fabs?

討論

評論 1:

Equipment vendor side - e.g. equipment start-up engineer?

評論 2:

what do you mean by out of industry? out of semicon? or out of manufacturing?

if you want out of semicon, i``` relatively simple since semicon is the most stringent, any manufacturing will be glad to have you. i have seen colleagues transition to shipbuilding and light industry (manufacturing printers).

if you want out of manufacturing, you can leverage your knowledge on maintenance/leadership instead of machine knowledge and transition to civil engineering. Take care of facilities management like bridge, road, train station, etc. Settle for govt job.

評論 3:

Been going through the same thing.

People who don't work in fab ops really have no idea how brutal and miserable it can be. Same goes for any manufacturing in the US.

My solution was to hop to a better company. The raise, change of scenery, superior culture, and new challenges (new department) have been enough to reinvigorate my engagement with the job.

Yeah, it's a certainty that I'll burn out again, but this has allowed me a few more years of high income until I inevitably can't take it anymore and pull the ripcord.

Other paths are management, sales, vendor roles.

評論 4:

Field service can be fantastic if you find the right company.

評論 5:

You can do anything else in instrumentation work. Semiconductor is the pinnacle of high tech, while other areas like medical devices and some diagnostic equipment must consider cost per unit and cost of operation so they might use a lesser technology. While you are probably accustomed to working with precision positioning electronics in robotics, some devices will use older tech like bel``` and stepper motors with homing sensors, no linear encoders or optical positioning, no drop pin alignment. But you know these technologies so you'd be the leader of the pack so to speak with most other groups since some of your coworkers might be more into chemistry or basic engineering principles.


4. Intel internships

這篇文章的核心討論主題是:「在Intel新任CEO上任且俄亥俄州工廠建設延遲的背景下,公司是否可能撤銷實習生錄用通知(internship offers)的擔憂與分析」

文中主要探討以下幾點:

  1. 成本考量:實習生若無法轉為正式員工,對公司而言是純粹的訓練成本,缺乏直接收益。
  2. 公司現狀影響:Intel當前營運狀況(如工廠延遲、市場地位動搖)可能降低招聘需求,進而影響實習生的留用機會。
  3. 新任CEO的潛在決策:作者推測新任CEO可能傾向撤銷實習機會,以節省開支。

整體而言,討論聚焦於「企業策略調整對實習計畫的衝擊」,並反映員工或求職者對不確定性的焦慮。

內容

Do y'all think internship offers will get revoked?

I feel like if I was the new CEO, revoking internship offers would be a no brainer. With delay of Ohio fab, I can't imagine they'll be hiring all that much... and interns at Intel are a profitless expense if you aren't hiring cause it's just pure training (and even then, your conversion rate pry won't be great with the company's standing).

討論

評論 1:

Unlikely. You need to keep building a talent pipeline and bringing entry level grads into your organisation, even when times are tough

評論 2:

If a company as large as Intel, with as many zeros as it does on i``` financial report, decides that cutting internships is the cost-saving move, that company is TRULY being run into the ground. For how little they cost, internship programs are high ROI (recruitment) and, as the other commenter said, builds a solid pipeline for more workers. Its honestly more human capital intensive than it is money intensive.

A summer program that cos``` six-/seven-figures is not a corner youre auditing when you are facing hundreds of million in loses and a collapse of your market valuation.

評論 3:

In the past, internships have been relatively safe. I'm not personally in a position to know anything definitive, but I would expect them to be safe based on past experience here.

評論 4:

At the keynote, he talked about retaining talent. I see that as a promising sign for most roles

評論 5:

Intel would do a mass layoff on Monday and hire new people on Tuesday. Companies as big as it is all ways needs new people coming in. If they are not hiring new people they are going out of business. They always need cheaper labor, which a new hire is .

Internships are about building talent pool. Also they want people who already know how they do things. If they are going to do anything they will increase internships in design areas as they bring in fresh ideas.


5. Though on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor? \{#5-though-on-interning-working-at-samsung-semico}

這段文字的核心討論主題是:

「實習生對半導體產業職場文化的擔憂與資訊需求」

具體要點包括:

  1. 負面評論的觀察:作者注意到關於該公司(或半導體產業)的負面職場評價,但缺乏具體細節。
  2. 尋求更多資訊:因即將開始實習,希望透過其他討論(如Reddit)進一步了解產業現狀或公司內部情況。
  3. 產業動向的關注:強調對半導體行業的長期興趣,並想掌握相關趨勢或內部資訊。

隱含需求:釐清負面評論的真實性,並為實習做準備。

內容

I saw a lot of negative commen about working here, but no specific details on other reddit pos. I will be interning here this summer, so I am curious and want to stay in the know with the semiconductor industry.

討論

評論 1:

Interns don't work hard. You're not going to get a call on the weekend or after hours about coming in to work.

評論 2:

I assume in Austin? For an intern, there shouldn't be too many issues. You'll likely work 8-5 and be shielded from having to deal with late nigh``` and/or weekends unless there's another catastrophe like the Polar Vortex in 2021. About the only negative thing will be that you may want to make some significant change, but they'll tell you that you have to go through South Korea first. That will probably take longer than your internship. I would say, just work hard when you're on site, learn as much as you can and show them that you can bring value to the company. Good luck on your internship!

評論 3:

Which facility lol. The American ones used to be able to actually do nothing and still get job offers.


6. SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China

根據提供的文章連結,目前無法直接訪問內容(可能因權限限制或連結不完整)。但根據標題和常見的半導體產業背景,可以推測核心討論主題可能圍繞以下方向:

  1. SiCarrier公司的戰略與發展

    • 公司業務模式、技術重點(如半導體設備、材料或服務)及市場定位分析。
  2. SEMICON China演講內容摘要

    • 總裁演講可能涉及中國半導體產業趨勢、SiCarrier的技術突破、合作計劃,或對供應鏈挑戰(如國產化、地緣政治)的回應。
  3. 行業洞察與政策影響

    • 中國半導體產業的自主化進程、技術瓶頸,以及全球競爭格局(如與美國的技術競爭)。

若需更準確的總結,建議提供演講原文或具體段落。SEMICON China作為重要行業展會,相關演講通常聚焦技術創新、市場策略及政策導向。

內容

連結: [https://www.nomadsemi.com/p/what-sicarriers-president-said-at

Full breakdown of SiCarrier and a translated copy of their President speech at SEMICON China](https://www.nomadsemi.com/p/what-sicarriers-president-said-at

Full breakdown of SiCarrier and a translated copy of their President speech at SEMICON China)

討論

無討論內容


7. Internship at applied materials

這篇文章的核心討論主題是:求職者對軟體工程實習面試結果的焦慮與等待

具體要點包括:

  1. 面試經驗:作者提到已完成一週前的軟體工程實習面試。
  2. 不確定性與期待:表達正在等待結果的狀態,並詢問是否有人處於類似情境。
  3. 尋求共鳴或建議:隱含希望獲得他人經驗分享或情緒支持。

整體而言,內容聚焦於求職過程中的心理狀態,而非技術或面試細節。

內容

I had interview last week for software engineer intern. Waiting for resul``` anyone ?

討論

評論 1:

What did they asked in your interview?


8. Daily: US-China tech war spirals; Trump cu BIS funding; Interview w Gelsinger \{#8-daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals;-trump-cu-bis}

根據《ChipBriefing》的文章〈Daily: US-China Tech War Spirals; Trump...〉,核心討論主題圍繞以下幾點:

  1. 美中科技戰升級
    文章聚焦美國與中國在尖端科技領域(尤其是半導體、AI等關鍵技術)的競爭加劇,分析雙方近期政策(如出口管制、投資限制)如何導致衝突螺旋式上升。

  2. 特朗普因素
    討論美國前總統特朗普可能重返政壇的潛在影響,包括其對華強硬政策的延續或升級,以及這對科技脫鉤趨勢的衝擊。

  3. 供應鏈與產業重組
    探討科技戰背景下全球供應鏈的重塑,包括中國自主研發的進展、美國盟友(如台韓荷)的動向,以及企業面臨的合規風險與戰略調整。

  4. 地緣政治與經濟後果
    分析科技競爭如何與國家安全、經濟利益掛鉤,並可能加劇兩國在軍事、外交等領域的對抗。

總結:文章從政策、產業、地緣三重角度,解析美中科技衝突的惡化趨勢及其對全球科技生態的深遠影響,尤其突出特朗普重返政治舞台可能帶來的變數。

內容

連結: https://chipbriefing.substack.com/p/daily-us-china-tech-war-spirals-trump

討論

無討論內容


9. Internship offers??

這篇文章的核心討論主題是:

「詢問目前半導體產業是否有實習機會,特別是針對正在接受VLSI培訓的四年制工程學士學生。」

文章重點包括:

  1. 學生背景:作者是一名四年制工程學士(BTech)學生,目前正在接受VLSI(超大型積體電路)相關培訓。
  2. 主要問題:詢問當前半導體產業是否有提供實習機會,希望獲得相關資訊或建議。

這篇文章主要聚焦於「半導體產業的實習機會可行性」,並尋求針對VLSI領域的具體回饋或指引。

內容

I'm a 4th year btech student ,undergoing vlsi training.At present do we have any internship opportunities in any semiconductor industry??

討論

無討論內容


總體討論重點

以下是9篇討論重點的條列式總結,並附上對應文章錨點連結:


1. Rant: TSMC is just sweat shop.

  • 重點
    1. 高壓工作環境:批評台積電在美國廠的「血汗工廠」文化,包括無休假日、極端工時。
    2. 職涯隱憂:擔憂市場壟斷後工程師選擇權喪失,可能導致薪資壓榨。
    3. 文化批判:抨擊東亞企業「割喉競爭」文化,僅有利股東而非員工。
    4. 個人情緒:反映作者因工作疲憊引發的挫折感。

2. Taiwan chipmaker UMC launches US$5 billion wafer fab facility in Singapore

  • 重點
    1. 投資動態:聯電(UMC)在新加坡新建50億美元晶圓廠,創造700個職缺。
    2. 產業擴張:反映半導體供應鏈全球化布局趨勢。

3. How to move out of the industry?

  • 重點
    1. 職業倦怠:設備工程師形容工作如「fab monkey」,重複性高且壓力大。
    2. 轉職顧慮:想離開產業但擔心薪資大幅下降。
    3. 尋求建議:詢問轉向技術管理或跨領域的可能性。

4. Intel internships

  • 重點
    1. 實習生擔憂:因工廠延遲與CEO更換,擔心實習機會被撤銷。
    2. 成本考量:公司可能因營運壓力縮減非核心人力。

5. Thoughts on interning/working at Samsung Semiconductor?

  • 重點
    1. 職場文化疑慮:關注三星半導體負面評價,尋求內部真實情況。
    2. 實習準備:希望了解產業趨勢以應對未來工作。

6. SiCarrier President full speech at SEMICON China

  • 重點
    1. 產業趨勢:推測內容涉及中國半導體自主化與技術突破。
    2. 供應鏈策略:可能回應地緣政治對產業的影響。

7. Internship at applied materials

  • 重點
    1. 求職焦慮:作者等待應用材料公司軟體實習面試結果。
    2. 情緒支持:尋求類似經驗分享。

8. Daily: US-China tech war spirals

  • 重點
    1. 科技戰升級:美中半導體出口管制與技術脫鉤加劇。
    2. 政治影響:特朗普重返可能強化對華科技限制。
    3. 供應鏈重組:分析全球產業鏈重塑與企業因應策略。

9. Internship offers??

  • 重點
    1. 實習機會詢問:VLSI培訓學生尋求半導體產業實習資訊。
    2. 領域聚焦:強調對超大型積體電路領域的興趣。

以上總結依序對應各篇錨點,條列細節涵蓋核心議題與具體討論內容。