跳至主要内容

2025-04-02-top

  • 精選方式: TOP
  • 時間範圍: DAY

討論重點​

以下是30篇文章的討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的錨點連結與逐條細節：

1. [Will money market accoun, such as Vanguard's VMFXX, remain safe and stable?](#1-will-money-market-accoun-such-as-vanguard-s-v)​

  • 重點：政治經濟不確定性下，貨幣市場基金（如VMFXX）的安全性與配置調整建議。
  • 細節：
    1. 70%流動資產配置於VMFXX，擔憂政策波動影響穩定性。
    2. 需評估風險分散必要性（如轉移部分資金至國債或現金）。
    3. 關鍵指標：聯儲利率動向、基金淨值波動。

2. Riding out my first drop without jumping out the window​

  • 重點：年輕投資者面對市場下跌的心理調適與策略堅持。
  • 細節：
    1. 每月57%收入投入VOO，但憂慮高估值與潛在衰退。
    2. 緊急備用金充足，但需平衡家庭責任（婚育）與投資風險。
    3. 建議：長期持有、避免情緒化操作，參考歷史暴跌經驗。

3. Investing in Germany (DAX) as an American​

  • 重點：美國投資者如何有效投資德國DAX指數及ETF表現落差分析。
  • 細節：
    1. Global X DAX ETF長期落後指數30%，匯率因素僅部分解釋。
    2. 潛在原因：追蹤誤差、稅務或費用結構問題。
    3. 替代方案：歐元計價ETF或衍生性商品。

4. What's a good way to put away money for 10 years?​

  • 重點：長期資金鎖定與被動投資的執行方式。
  • 細節：
    1. 需求：自動再投資標普500指數，避免主動提領。
    2. 信託結構可行性，需第三方監管確保合規。
    3. 建議：目標日期基金或IRA帳戶。

5. ALLW - Bridgewater released an ETF version of All Weather last month with State Street​

  • 重點：橋水全天候策略ETF（ALLW）的配置與風險平衡機制。
  • 細節：
    1. 資產分配：債券（71%）、股票（42%）、商品（37%）。
    2. 目標波動率10%-12%，費用率0.85%。
    3. 槓桿透過期貨實現，非高倍風險。

6. Just started Investing as an 18 y/o. I was wondering if I should use Robinhood compared to other brokerages?​

  • 重點：新手券商選擇（Robinhood vs. 傳統券商）。
  • 細節：
    1. Robinhood便利性 vs. 過往爭議（如GameStop事件）。
    2. 傳統券商（Schwab/Fidelity）更穩定但介面較複雜。

7. Massive Spikes in Individual Stocks?​

  • 重點：個股異常波動（如±50%）的成因與套利可能性。
  • 細節：
    1. 可能原因：流動性不足、數據錯誤或算法交易異常。
    2. 實際成交與報價差異，不建議盲目跟進。

8. 2025 Q1 asset class returns & new valuations​

  • 重點：2025年Q1資產表現與美元貶值影響。
  • 細節：
    1. 非美股（VXUS）漲5.7%，美股（VTI）跌4.8%。
    2. 美元指數跌4%，推升外幣資產回報。

9. HDHP HSA Married decision to do separate or one insurance​

  • 重點：夫妻

文章核心重點​

以下是每篇文章的一句話摘要（條列式輸出）：

  1. Will money market accounts remain safe?
    討論Vanguard貨幣市場基金VMFXX在政治經濟不確定性下的安全性與資產配置策略。

  2. Riding out my first drop
    年輕投資者面對市場潛在下跌時的心理調適與長期投資策略的焦慮。

  3. Investing in Germany (DAX) as an American
    分析美國投資者透過ETF投資德國DAX指數的匯率影響與績效落差問題。

  4. What's a good way to put away money for 10 years?
    探討長期資金存放方案，結合被動投資與信託監管機制。

  5. Bridgewater's All Weather ETF (ALLW)
    介紹橋水基金「全天候策略」ETF的風險平價配置與槓桿設計。

  6. Robinhood vs. traditional brokerages
    年輕投資者評估Robinhood的可靠性與轉換傳統券商的必要性。

  7. Massive spikes in individual stocks
    探討個股異常波動現象的成因與潛在套利機會。

  8. 2025 Q1 asset class returns
    分析全球資產類別季度表現，聚焦美元貶值對非美資產的影響。

  9. HDHP HSA for married couples
    夫妻評估分開或共同投保高自付額健康保險計劃的財務利弊。

  10. ESOP transfer advice
    討論員工持股計劃(ESOP)股票轉移的稅務與程序複雜性。

  11. Vanguard vs. Fidelity accounts
    比較兩大券商退休帳戶的差異與轉換效益。

  12. SMH/SMHX semiconductor ETFs
    投資者評估半導體ETF長期持有或止損的決策矛盾。

  13. 28 y/o with $955 IRA
    低收入年輕投資者詢問Roth IRA配置與關稅政策影響。

  14. Exiting actively managed funds
    計劃從高費用主動管理基金轉至低成本指數基金的策略。

  15. Short interest data sources
    尋找可靠且即時的股票空頭比例數據來源。

  16. Mutual fund dividends
    （內容重複且無實質摘要）

  17. Brokerage transfers under dual citizenship
    雙重國籍者跨券商資產轉移的身份驗證挑戰。

  18. Daily investment discussion thread
    Reddit投資社群的一般討論與提問規範指南。

  19. Is it time to invest?
    19歲學生規劃25,000美元在指數基金與高風險資產的配置。

  20. Expertise on SDOW (inverse ETF)
    反思散戶嘗試市場擇時交易反向ETF的失敗經驗。

  21. Stocks vs. real estate investing
    比較股票被動投資與房地產主動管理的收益與成本取捨。

  22. Exercising call options strategies
    探討價內看漲期權行權與平倉的資金效率與稅務影響。

  23. Post-diversification investment options
    在傳統資產低迷時尋找多元化投資替代方案。

  24. BDTX biotech stock analysis
    分析Black Diamond Therapeutics藥物授權交易後的低估投資機會。

  25. $2,000/month REIT portfolio
    建構以REITs為核心的退休被動收入組合優化建議。

  26. Long-term VTI outlook
    質疑美國股市ETF(VTI)在地緣政治風險下的40年投資前景。

  27. Missed IPO opportunity regret
    投資者錯失Newsmax IPO獲利機會後的決策反思。

  28. Is diversification overrated?
    挑戰傳統分散投資與再平衡策略的絕對必要性。

  29. Ethics of investing in Anduril
    國防科技公司投資的財務回報與道德價值觀衝突。

  30. Stimulus checks vs. QE impact
    駁斥刺激支票推動經濟復甦的論點，強調量化寬鬆的真實作用。

目錄​

1. Will money market accoun, such as Vanguard's VMFXX, remain safe and stable? \{#1-will-money-market-accoun-such-as-vanguard-s-v}​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：在當前政治與經濟不確定性的背景下，是否應該繼續將大部分流動資產投資於Vanguard的VMFXX貨幣市場基金（或其他類似選項），以及相關的風險評估與應對策略。

具體要點包括：

  1. 資產配置的疑慮：作者目前將70%的流動資產投入VMFXX，但對政治環境（如川普政府的政策）可能帶來的市場波動感到不安。
  2. 風險評估：探討當前政治不確定性是否會影響貨幣市場基金的安全性，以及是否需要分散或調整投資策略。
  3. 行動建議：作者尋求建議，例如是否該保持現狀、轉移部分資金，或監測哪些關鍵指標以做出未來決策。

背後隱含的深層問題是：在動盪時期，如何平衡流動性、安全性和收益性，尤其涉及政治風險對低風險投資工具的潛在衝擊。

內容​

Given everything that's going on, my wife has been pressing me to decide whether we should continue holding all of our liquid savings in Vanguard's VMFXX fund. It's a fair question.

Currently, nearly six figuresabout 70% of our liquid asse```are invested in VMFXX. While I'm not overly concerned at the moment, the recent string of the Trump's administration questionable actions has left me feeling less than 100% confident.

Should I, and others, be concerned? What should we be keeping an eye on?

討論​

評論 1:

Youre in short dated funds with an avg maturity of 24 days. Theres nothing to worry about unless you think the Treasury is going to default which has never happened.

評論 2:

After 2008, the government took steps to make money market funds a lot safer. The vast majority of my emergency fund is in money market funds and I'm not worried.

評論 3:

Are you retired or retiring soon? That's a massive amount of money tied up in a very conservative way.

評論 4:

Most people are asking: "With all that's going on, my wife is asking if we should move everything to VMFXX". I've got many times that amount sitting in preferable VUSXX. If the gov't can no longer print money to pay me back, my account balances will be the least of my worries (not that I'll be able to check them).

評論 5:

Money market accoun will likely remain safe however the one thing to keep in mind about money market accoun is with the new regulations, during times of market stress if a lot of people are trying to redeem all at once you could be charged liquidity fees when trying to access your money, whos to say how long this could go on for in a highly stressed period so just keep that in mind, I hold a small position in VUSXX, about $15k but I prefer to keep most of my cash position directly in short-dated T-bills which can easily be sold on the secondary market with pretty tight spreads, is one safer than the other? Hard to say but I like having the direct control of holding my own T-bills personally for the majority of my position

2. Riding out my first drop without jumping out the window​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：一位年輕投資者（30多歲）在當前經濟不確定性和潛在的金融危機背景下，對自己的投資策略和風險承受能力產生焦慮，並尋求心理調適與財務規劃的建議。具體要點包括：

  1. 投資策略的擔憂：

    • 作者每月以「美元成本平均法」（DCA）投入4,000美元至標普500指數基金（VOO），但擔心當前市場高估值、潛在的經濟衰退，以及科技行業（軟體工程師）的裁員風險可能影響長期計畫。
    • 投資比例偏高（月收入7,000美元中佔57%），且從未經歷金融危機，不確定自己是否能承受市場大幅下跌。

  2. 風險管理與流動性：

    • 雖已備有1–2年的緊急備用金（現金），但仍猶豫是否應將部分資金轉向低風險工具（如貨幣市場基金或現金），以應對可能的收入中斷或家庭開支（即將結婚並生育）。

  3. 心理層面的挑戰：

    • 如何堅持長期投資策略，避免因市場波動而情緒化決策？
    • 請求有經驗的投資者（尤其是經歷過經濟低谷者）分享應對市場暴跌的心態調整方法。

  4. 人生階段與財務目標的權衡：

    • 即將進入家庭責任階段（婚姻、育兒），需平衡投資的進攻性與財務安全，避免過度暴露風險而影響短期生活需求。

總結：文章核心圍繞「在高風險環境下，如何調整投資策略、管理心理壓力，並在長期財務目標與短期不確定性之間取得平衡」。作者希望透過經驗分享，評估自身風險承受能力是否與當前策略匹配，並找到更穩健的應對方式。

內容​

Young investor here (30s) and cautiously watching all this play out.

Im currently DCAing $4,000 a month into VOO and have been since the greatest bull run in history post COVID. Sitting with about $95k total in my portfolio with an emergency fund that can last me a year or two unemployed in cash.

As someone who has never lived through a financial crisis Im getting concerned about such a heavy investment of my take home (4k out of $7k a month) with possibility of layoffs. Im a software engineer and the market is rough as hell from what Ive heard anecdotally.

My play currently is to keep the $4k a month DCA into the S&P and sing god bless America the whole way down hoping for an early retirement after the show is over and hold onto my butt that my company doesnt go out of business or do layoffs.

How do you mentally prepare for big drops and stay steady with your strategy?

Am I overestimating my risk tolerance and should shove some of the income into a money market or hard cash or hang on?

Advice from older people who have been through hard times appreciated, Im getting married in a few weeks and planning to start a family

討論​

評論 1:

Thats what an emergency fund of for, in case you lose your job

評論 2:

You will go through a lot of these even``` over the next 20 or 30 years. Just follow your path and turn off the tv.

Future you will thank you for not panicking and over reacting.

評論 3:

You think THIS is a drop?

Buckle up buttercup.....

評論 4:

Keep investing. Thats why you DCA, to buy more shares during downturns. This has barely been a correction. You cannot bail every time the market takes a 10% hit, especially at your age. Dont listen to the chicken-littles saying the sky is falling. The market has weathered bigger problems than some tariffs.

評論 5:

Ask yourself honestly if the market drops another 20% from here, can you stomach the drop and keep, or better yet, increase your exposure? Actually calculate what your portfolio would drop to in that scenario and mentally think about it. If the answer is yes, keep doing what you're doing. If you can't, you might need to allocate some to risk free asse```.

3. Investing in Germany (DAX) as an American​

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. 投資德國DAX指數的最佳方式：
    作者作為美國投資者，探討如何有效投資德國DAX指數，並比較不同途徑（如ETF）的優劣。

  2. Global X DAX Germany ETF（DAX:NASDAQ）的表現問題：

    • 該ETF以美元計價，但與歐元計價的DAX指數相比，長期（5年）表現落後超過30個百分點。
    • 作者觀察到匯率波動（如歐元兌美元在2021-2022年的強弱變化）部分解釋了短期表現差異，但無法解釋為何在2023年歐元回升後，ETF仍未「追回」長期落後幅度。

  3. 匯率影響與績效差異的疑問：
    作者困惑於匯率變動未能完全解釋ETF與指數的長期表現差距，懷疑是否有其他因素（如追蹤誤差、費用結構或稅務問題）導致差異。

  4. 替代投資方案的尋求：
    作者開放討論是否有更好的方式獲得DAX或德國市場的曝險（例如其他ETF、直接投資歐元計價產品，或透過衍生性金融工具等）。

總結：
文章主要聚焦於「美國投資者如何最有效投資德國DAX指數」，並深入分析特定ETF的異常表現，同時尋求更優的投資策略建議。關鍵問題包括匯率影響、ETF追蹤機制，以及替代方案的可行性。

內容​

I am looking at possibly investing some in Germany. I looked through a couple different ways to get exposure and looked through the DAX composition and performance. This seemed satisfactory to me, but I have some questions about what is the best way to invest in DAX as an American. I was looking at the Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX:NASDAQ) and noticed that when compared to the index price in EUR, the US ETF has underperformed by over 30pp. Looking at the chart, it makes sense that the US ETF outperformed until mid-2021, and then underperformed until mid-2022 because it matches periods when the EUR strengthened and then weakened against the USD, but at the end of 5Y USDEUR is basically at ~0% but the overall return is vastly different. Why did the US ETF not "catch up" after the EUR strengthened into 2023? What am I missing here? Also, is there any better way to get this exposure to DAX/Germany in general? Open to any ideas.

討論​

評論 1:

maybe r/Finanzen gives you a helping hand

評論 2:

The DAX is a total return index, it includes the dividends. The Global X DAX ETF is a distributing ETF. AFAIK Google finance does not plot total returns for distributing ETF.

Likely the differences that you see are due to the dividends.

評論 3:

when i compare the dax priced in USD, to DAX US Equity, over 5y, i see a total under performance of about 40bps / year, 20 of which is management fees/expense ratio.

the other 20bps / year is due to the nature of the index:

https://www.globalxetfs.com/prospectus-regulatory/?id=2955

it incurs transaction cos at the quarterly rebalance, which the dax index obvi does not since i a theoretical index (implementation fees)

>The Fund generally will use a replication strategy. A replication strategy is an indexing strategy that involves investing in the securities of the Underlying Index in approximately the same proportions as in the Underlying Index. However, the Fund may utilize a representative sampling strategy with respect to the Underlying Index when a replication strategy might be detrimental or disadvantageous to shareholders, such as when there are practical difficulties or substantial cos involved in compiling a portfolio of equity securities to replicate the Underlying Index, 2in instances in which a security in the Underlying Index becomes temporarily illiquid, unavailable or less liquid, or as a result of legal restrictions or limitations (such as tax diversification requiremen) that apply to the Fund but not the Underlying Index.The Adviser expec``` that, over time, the correlation between the Fund's performance and that of the Underlying Index, before fees and expenses, will exceed 95%

if their stated goal is around an r^2 of 95% and youre getting call it 15bps/year in tracking issues (or about 1.2bps/month, tha``` basically nothing.

if you want to own the dax, buy dax stock index futures on eurex.

評論 4:

I hold some DAX ETF, but I honestly bought it too early. I do believe that in the long term the relative attractiveness of US and EU marke``` will favour the latter, but there's more pain to come before the money settles in this new configuration.

4. What's a good way to put away money for 10 years?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：
如何在長期（例如10年）內安全存放資金並避免損失，同時實現被動投資（如追蹤標普500指數）的需求。具體包含以下幾點：

  1. 資金安全性與長期保值：

    • 詢問是否有銀行或投資顧問能提供「類鎖定」機制，確保資金在長期內不被輕易動用或損失。

  2. 被動投資的執行方式：

    • 希望以標普500指數為標的，自動再投資（如透過指數基金或ETF），無需主動管理。

  3. 信託結構的可能性：

    • 探討是否可透過信託（trust）等法律結構，由可信第三方監管資金，限制隨意提取。

  4. 監管與信譽需求：

    • 強調需由「可信機構」（如銀行、專業顧問）託管，確保資金安全與合規性。

總結來說，作者尋求一種結合「長期資金鎖定」、「被動市場投資」和「第三方監管」的財務解決方案。可能的實現途徑包括信託帳戶、目標日期基金或自動再投資的退休帳戶（如IRA），但需進一步評估流動性限制與風險偏好。

內容​

Are there banks or investment advisors that can hold on to your money (and not lose it) for 10 years? Like you can quasi lock it in. Like would this be considered a trust or something?

Let's say I just want someone to take the S&P 500 and keep reinvesting it until I need it. How can you do this so you can't get easy access to it and someone else, reputable, keeps an eye on it?

討論​

評論 1:

Are you trying to keep yourself from selling? You can open a brokerage account with anyone, buy the S&P, set it to auto drip, and never look at it again quite easily.

If youre trying to figure out WHERE to put your money, then you need to do some research or hire a financial advisor. Certainly dont listen to random people on Reddit. WaitIm a random person on Reddit. Shit

It sounds like you want the S&P tho. If thats all you want, you can buy VOO and never look back while you avoid paying someone 1% a year (for 10 years) to do something you can do in a hour or two. VOOs expense ratio is .03%/year.

評論 2:

>What's a good way to put away money for 10 years?

Stocks are appropriate for a 10 year horizon, generally speaking.

> Are there banks or investment advisors that can hold on to your money (and not lose it) for 10 years?

The closest thing you describe here is a CD

> Let's say I just want someone to take the S&P 500 and keep reinvesting it until I need it.

You can do that yourself. Obviously theres risk of loss with a stock fund.

> How can you do this so you can't get easy access to it

Contribute to your 401k. Otherwise, any brokerage account or IRA is fully accessible to you

> and someone else, reputable, keeps an eye on it?

To do what? They cant prevent losses if your money is invested in the stock market

Youve gotta decide what you want: no losses but virtually no gains , or risk of loss with potential for long term gains

評論 3:

Treasury Bills, 10 year, 4.625%.

評論 4:

CD ladder, i-Bonds.

評論 5:

Mattress

5. ALLW - Bridgewater released an ETF version of All Weather last month with State Street​

上述文章的核心討論主題是 Bridgewater（橋水基金）的「全天候」（All Weather）資產配置策略，以及其新推出的 SPDR Bridgewater All Weather ETF（ALLW） 的運作方式與投資組合結構。以下是重點總結：

1. 全天候策略的核心原則​

  • 目標是透過「環境平衡」（environmental balance）設計一個在不同經濟環境（如增長與通脹變化）下都能表現穩健的投資組合。
  • 策略基於資產類別對宏觀經濟驅動因素（增長與通脹）的結構性敏感度，透過以下方式實現平衡：
    • 增長平衡：配置在增長上升（如股票、商品）與下降（如固定利率債券、通脹掛鉤債券）時表現良好的資產。
    • 通脹平衡：配置在通脹上升（如商品、通脹掛鉤債券）與穩定（如股票、固定利率債券）時表現良好的資產。
  • 不依賴戰術性擇時，而是長期維持風險均衡（Risk Parity）的資產權重。

2. ETF的運作機制​

  • 由State Street Global Advisors（SSGA）管理，Bridgewater提供每日模型投資組合建議。
  • 目標年化波動率控制在 10%-12%，費用比率為 0.85%。
  • 投資工具以衍生品（如期貨）為主，以實現槓桿效果（但非高倍槓桿，屬風險平價型配置）。

3. 當前投資組合分配​

  • 全球名義債券（71.37%）：分散於多國長期與中期公債（如美債、德債、澳債等）。
  • 通脹掛鉤債券（32.42%）：全為美國TIPS。
  • 全球股票（41.70%）：覆蓋已開發市場（美、歐、日、澳）及新興市場（中國、其他新興市場）。
  • 商品（36.67%）：以貴金屬（48.2%）和能源（19.2%）為主。

4. 市場討論與關注點​

  • Reddit等論壇關注其作為「槓桿化全天候策略」的潛力（儘管實際槓桿比例未明確揭露）。
  • 投資者對其費用比率（0.85%）是否合理存在討論，尤其相較於其他被動型風險平價基金。

總結​

此ETF是Bridgewater將其經典的「全天候策略」以透明、流動性高的ETF形式推向市場的嘗試，核心在於透過宏觀經濟驅動的資產配置，實現長期風險調整後的穩定回報。

內容​

連結： [https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/spdr-bridgewater-all-weather-etf-allw
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1516212/000119312524261064/d824091d485apos.htm
https://www.reddit.com/r/LETFs/commen```/1j7zn82/allw_new_leveraged_all_weatherrisk_parity_etf/
0.85% expense ratio

>Bridgewater provides a daily model portfolio to SSGA FM based on Bridgewater's proprietary All Weather asset allocation approach. The model portfolio is specific to the Fund. Based on Bridgewater's investment recommendations, SSGA FM purchases and sells securities and/or instrumen for the Fund. \> \>Bridgewater's proprietary strategy is an approach to strategic asset allocation that is designed with the goal of generating consistent returns across different economic environmen. Bridgewater believes that asset classes have different structural sensitivities to economic conditions that can be logically understood because they are rooted in the characteristics of the asset's cash flows, and that this understanding can be used to structure a portfolio that is diversified to what Bridgewater believes are the most important fundamental macro drivers of asset returns: growth and inflation.
> >For example, allocating to asse that Bridgewater believes will likely outperform in rising growth (e.g., equities and commodities) alongside asse it believes will likely outperform in falling growth (e.g., fixed-rate and inflation-linked government debt) can create a portfolio that collec the market risk premium with no fundamental sensitivity to growth conditions. Similarly, allocating to asse that Bridgewater believes will likely outperform in rising inflation (e.g., commodities and inflation-linked debt) alongside asse it believes will likely outperform in low or stable inflation (e.g., fixed-rate government debt and equities) can create a portfolio that collec the market risk premium with no fundamental sensitivity to inflation. Bridgewater refers to this approach to portfolio diversification as environmental balance.
> >Bridgewater does not vary the weigh of investmen in the model portfolio based on any tactical view of how particular investmen will perform, but rather attemp to balance the risk of the model portfolio based on i understanding of the relationship between asset classes and economic environmen. Bridgewater may, however, vary the allocations across and within asset classes based on i assessment of market conditions and evolutions in i understanding of how to best achieve balance to growth and inflation. The model portfolio typically targe``` an annualized volatility level for the portfolio ranging between 10%-12%.

Current Allocation:

Global Nominal Bonds (all futures): 71.37%
  - 30.7% US 10yr
  - 20.0% Australia 10yr
  - 20.0% German Bund 10yr
  - 16.1% US Long
  - 9.8% UK Gilt 10yr
  - 3.3% Canada 10yr
Inflation Linked Bonds: 32.42%
  - 100% US TIPS
Global Equities: 41.70%
  - 35.5% US (SPLG)
  - 25.0% Europe (STOXX 50 futures)
  - 12.4% Japan (Topix futures)
  - 10.0% China (GXC, SPEM)
  - 9.7% Australia (SPI 200 futures)
  - 7.5% Emerging Marke ex China (SPEM) Commodities (all futures): 36.67%   - 48.2% Precious metals   - 19.2% Energy   - 9.6% Industrial metals   - 4.9% Sof
  - 3.4% Livestock](https://www.ssga.com/us/en/intermediary/etfs/spdr-bridgewater-all-weather-etf-allw
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1516212/000119312524261064/d824091d485apos.htm
https://www.reddit.com/r/LETFs/commen```/1j7zn82/allw_new_leveraged_all_weatherrisk_parity_etf/
0.85% expense ratio

>Bridgewater provides a daily model portfolio to SSGA FM based on Bridgewater's proprietary All Weather asset allocation approach. The model portfolio is specific to the Fund. Based on Bridgewater's investment recommendations, SSGA FM purchases and sells securities and/or instrumen for the Fund. \> \>Bridgewater's proprietary strategy is an approach to strategic asset allocation that is designed with the goal of generating consistent returns across different economic environmen. Bridgewater believes that asset classes have different structural sensitivities to economic conditions that can be logically understood because they are rooted in the characteristics of the asset's cash flows, and that this understanding can be used to structure a portfolio that is diversified to what Bridgewater believes are the most important fundamental macro drivers of asset returns: growth and inflation.
> >For example, allocating to asse that Bridgewater believes will likely outperform in rising growth (e.g., equities and commodities) alongside asse it believes will likely outperform in falling growth (e.g., fixed-rate and inflation-linked government debt) can create a portfolio that collec the market risk premium with no fundamental sensitivity to growth conditions. Similarly, allocating to asse that Bridgewater believes will likely outperform in rising inflation (e.g., commodities and inflation-linked debt) alongside asse it believes will likely outperform in low or stable inflation (e.g., fixed-rate government debt and equities) can create a portfolio that collec the market risk premium with no fundamental sensitivity to inflation. Bridgewater refers to this approach to portfolio diversification as environmental balance.
> >Bridgewater does not vary the weigh of investmen in the model portfolio based on any tactical view of how particular investmen will perform, but rather attemp to balance the risk of the model portfolio based on i understanding of the relationship between asset classes and economic environmen. Bridgewater may, however, vary the allocations across and within asset classes based on i assessment of market conditions and evolutions in i understanding of how to best achieve balance to growth and inflation. The model portfolio typically targe``` an annualized volatility level for the portfolio ranging between 10%-12%.

Current Allocation:

Global Nominal Bonds (all futures): 71.37%
  - 30.7% US 10yr
  - 20.0% Australia 10yr
  - 20.0% German Bund 10yr
  - 16.1% US Long
  - 9.8% UK Gilt 10yr
  - 3.3% Canada 10yr
Inflation Linked Bonds: 32.42%
  - 100% US TIPS
Global Equities: 41.70%
  - 35.5% US (SPLG)
  - 25.0% Europe (STOXX 50 futures)
  - 12.4% Japan (Topix futures)
  - 10.0% China (GXC, SPEM)
  - 9.7% Australia (SPI 200 futures)
  - 7.5% Emerging Marke ex China (SPEM) Commodities (all futures): 36.67%   - 48.2% Precious metals   - 19.2% Energy   - 9.6% Industrial metals   - 4.9% Sof
  - 3.4% Livestock)

討論​

評論 1:

Damn, that's almost as expensive as giving my money to Morgan Stanely, but in a single ETF.

And the expense ratio also doesn't include the interest risk, right?

6. Just started Investing as an 18 y/o. I was wondering if I should use Robinhood compared to other brokerages?​

這段討論的核心主題是：是否應該繼續使用 Robinhood 作為主要券商，或是轉移到更傳統的券商如 Charles Schwab 或 Fidelity。

具體要點包括：

  1. 對 Robinhood 的擔憂：用戶已投入資金，但擔心平台可能不可靠（例如過往爭議事件）。
  2. 替代選項的考量：比較其他券商（如 Charles Schwab 或 Fidelity）的穩定性與信任度。
  3. 尋求建議：詢問他人經驗或意見，以決定是否轉換平台。

總結：這是一個關於「選擇合適券商」的決策討論，重點在權衡 Robinhood 的便利性與潛在風險，並評估其他更傳統券商的優勢。

內容​

Hey guys, I was wondering if I should use Robinhood as my main brokerage? If I shouldn't should I just switch to Charles Schwab or Fidelity? I already put in $600 into my Robinhood account but I'm scared of Robinhood screwing me over if something comes up. Please me know if y'all have any tips.

討論​

評論 1:

Fidelity is good

評論 2:

I'd avoid Robinhood. Too much drama. Fidelity and Schwab are solid

評論 3:

Dont use Robinhood.

評論 4:

As an 18 year old, it may be easy for you to fall into gambling habi``` with Robinhood. There is a lot of gamification on the app and the culture around it on social media falls more into gambling than on other apps. Event trading has made it more dangerous in that regard.

That said, imo it has the best user inferface and graphing of any of the major apps. I manage six-figure accoun``` on each of RH, Schwab, and Fidelity. I've used Vanguard in the past and the app is terrible. I much prefer buying/selling and managing portfolios on RH as opposed to the other two for a large variety of user interface reasons. But it isn't great for research. I don't really use any of the brokerage apps for research though.

They are highly unlikely to screw you over. But should you use it as your brokerage as an 18 year old, you should hyperfocus on being diligent and avoiding gamification traps, options, and event gambling.

評論 5:

Use Fidelity. Robin Hood steals little tiny bi``` from you on every trade by giving you bad pricing. Fidelity also has their own ETFs and mutual funds with good rates, Tools for a retirement planning, etc.

Your next order of business should be to open up a Roth IRA.

7. Massive Spikes in Individual Stocks?​

这篇文章的核心讨论主题是：股票价格的异常波动（特别是短时间内出现的大幅涨跌，如±50%）以及这些波动是否可以被利用。

具体内容包括：

  1. 异常波动现象：作者观察到某些股票（如LAC）在图表上出现极端的价格波动（如±50%），但这些高价或低价似乎并未实际成交。
  2. 原因探讨：作者好奇这些价格波动的原因，可能涉及数据错误、市场操纵、流动性不足或技术性因素（如闪崩或算法交易异常）。
  3. 潜在机会：作者询问是否有可能利用这些异常波动获利，隐含对交易策略或套利可能性的兴趣。

简言之，文章聚焦于金融市场中的异常价格波动现象及其背后的原因与交易机会。

內容​

Every once and a while I will see super volatile char``` with +- 50% fluctuations like LAC today. https://www.google.com/finance/quote/LAC:NYSE?hl=en The high price never seems to actually exist but it shows up on the chart. I was wondering what causes these spikes and if there is some way to take advantage of them.

討論​

無討論內容

8. 2025 Q1 asset class returns & new valuations​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是 2025年第一季全球主要資產類別的表現與市場分析，具體涵蓋以下重點：

  1. 資產類別回報率比較

    • 美國股市（VTI）下跌4.8%，非美國股市（VXUS）上漲5.7%，美國債券市場（BND）上漲2.8%。
    • 平衡型基金表現：全球股票（VT）下跌1.0%，60/40股債組合（VSMGX）微漲0.2%。

  2. 美元貶值的影響

    • 美元指數（DXY）季度下跌約4%，間接推升非美國資產的美元計價回報（因外幣升值轉換效應）。

  3. 通脹數據與實際回報

    • 累計通脹率（CPI-U）為1.1%，暗示名義回報需扣除通脹後才能評估真實收益。

  4. 估值指標變化

    • 美國股票（VTI）本益比（P/E）從27.5x降至26.1x，收益率微升至3.8%。
    • 非美國股票（VXUS）本益比穩定（15.4x→15.6x），收益率維持6.4%附近。
    • 債券（BND）到期收益率保持4.6%不變。

總結：文章透過數據分析2025年Q1市場動態，探討美元走弱、通脹環境及資產估值變化如何影響各類投資表現，尤其凸顯非美國股市的相對強勢與美國股市的修正。

內容​

The total returns (including reinvested dividends) in nominal (before-inflation) USD terms of core asset classes during the first quarter of 2025 were:

|Asset Class|Nominal USD Return|

|:-|:-|

|US stocks [via VTI]|-4.8%|

|Ex-US stocks [via VXUS]|+5.7%|

|US total bond market [via BND]|+2.8%|

For some blended / balanced funds:

|Fund|Nominal USD Return|

|:-|:-|

|Global stocks [via VT]|-1.0%|

|60/40 global stocks / bonds [via VSMGX]|+0.2%|

A weaker USD was a contributor to the return of ex-US stocks in USD terms. The USD ended the quarter down about 4% relative to a basket of other currencies (source), increasing the USD value of ex-US stocks denominated in other currencies that strengthened against the USD.

Cumulative CPI-U inflation across the 3 months through February was 1.1% (source).

Valuation metrics as of 3/31/2025:

  1. VTI trailing P/E ratio: 26.1x (source) => trailing earnings yield: 3.8% [from 27.5x / 3.6% at the start of the quarter/year]

  2. VXUS trailing P/E ratio: 15.6x (source) => trailing earnings yield: 6.4% [from 15.4x / 6.5% at the start of the quarter/year]

  3. BND yield to maturity: 4.6% (source) [unchanged from the start of the quarter/year]

討論​

無討論內容

9. HDHP HSA Married decision to do separate or one insurance​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：一對沒有孩子的年輕健康夫妻，在雙方公司都提供符合HSA資格的高自付額健康保險計劃（HDHP）的情況下，是否應該選擇分別投保各自的保險計劃，還是共同加入其中一方的計劃。

具體討論的重點包括：

  1. 保費成本：共同投保是否會比分別投保更省錢？
  2. 自付額（Deductible）的影響：
    • 共同投保的自付額較高，而分開投保的自付額較低。
    • 若其中一方發生醫療需求，分開投保可能更容易達到自付額，從而更早獲得保險分攤。
  3. 健康狀況考量：兩人目前健康狀況良好，但需評估潛在風險。

最終問題在於如何權衡保費節省與自付額的差異，以做出最合適的保險選擇。

內容​

Married, no kids. Trying to see what are the pros/cons of HDHP HSA separate or to just go on one insurance. Both of our companies offer HSA-eligible HDHPs. Would the premiums typically be much cheaper in total if we are on just one insurance? The deductible will be higher if we are just on one I do know that... We are both young and healthy. So, my thinking is that if something does happen to happen to one of us, if we are on separate insurances we would hit the deductible earlier if we were on separate because the deductible is lower. Any input on this decision?

討論​

評論 1:

It should be pretty easy to math out.

I have me and my kids on a family HDHP and my wife is on her own employers HDHP. Why? Because her employer gives her $800 annual HSA contribution and pays 100% of HER premium, but pays almost little or even no subsidy for me/kids. My employers gives me a $2500 HSA contribution for the family plan and subsidizes the kids decently.

The only way we don't come out quite a bit ahead would be if BOTH of us needed deductible maximizing treatmen``` in a year, but that's never happened as we are both healthy (knock on wood)

10. Seeking advice on ESOP transfers​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：
「是否應直接賣出UPS員工持股計劃（ESOP）的股票並轉移現金，還是經歷繁瑣的轉換程序將股票轉移至個人經紀帳戶？」

具體要點包括：

  1. 選擇的兩難：

    • 直接賣出股票並轉移現金（簡便但可能有稅務影響）。
    • 透過複雜程序將股票轉換為Class A股後轉移至Fidelity經紀帳戶（保留資產但過程繁瑣）。

  2. 關鍵考量因素：

    • 稅務影響：未明確說明但被反覆提及，需評估賣出時的資本利得稅或折扣部分的稅負。
    • 流程便利性：股票轉換涉及文件作業，作者傾向避免麻煩。
    • 投資偏好：若對UPS股價長期看好，可能傾向保留股票；反之則變現再投資。

  3. 背景資訊：

    • 持股9年，當前股價較2015年高出35美元，享有5%購股折扣。
    • 423股（2/3持倉）已可自由處置，但轉移程序複雜。

總結：作者尋求在「稅務成本」、「程序效率」與「投資策略」之間權衡的建議。

內容​

Heres a quick backgroundI work for UPS and have 9 years worth of esop stock at what I believe is a 5% discount. Ive stopped purchasing this via payroll deduction roughly a year ago and have 2/3 of the shares (423b shares) available to be sold/withdrawn/ transferred etc. After 9 years current price of this stock is up $35 vs. when I started buying them in 2015. After speaking with the customer service reps transferring these shares to my brokerage account (Fidelity) is going to be a pain in the ass. (Must be converted to class A shares then paperwork filed etc). Does it makes sense to just cash them out and then transfer funds into my brokerage accoun``` or go through the long process and hurdles of conversion and then transfer? Im also not sure how the tax implications would impact me. Any advice would be appreciated

討論​

無討論內容

11. What makes Vanguard Accoun different \{#11-what-makes-vanguard-accoun-different}​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：比較Fidelity和Vanguard的退休投資選項（如指數基金和退休帳戶），並探討是否值得從Fidelity轉換到Vanguard。具體重點包括：

  1. 被動投資策略的偏好：作者傾向「設定後不管」的長期退休投資方式，目前持有Fidelity的指數基金。
  2. Vanguard產品的熱門討論：對Vanguard旗下如VT（全球股票）、VOO（標普500）等基金的優勢與特殊性提出疑問。
  3. 轉換的實際效益：評估從Fidelity轉到Vanguard是否有顯著差異，或僅是微小調整（「分裂頭髮」式的比較）。

整體而言，作者希望釐清兩家機構的退休投資工具是否存在實質區別，以決定是否調整現有配置。

內容​

I currently have a fidelity index fund for my Roth IRA as Im not a big investor. Very much a set it and forget it type that wan``` to set something up for retirement (hopefully one day).

I always see a lot of talk about Vanguard accoun (VT, VOO, etc) and wonder what makes these accoun so different or special?

Should I switch my Roth IRA from a fidelity index fund to a vanguard retirement account?

Is there an actual difference or would I just be splitting hairs?

討論​

評論 1:

  1. VT and VOO are funds, not accoun```. You do not need to use a Vanguard brokerage account to invest in Vanguard ETFs.
  2. Vanguard is known for pioneering low-expense index fund investing, and had the lowest fees for years, but they do not have lower fees than competitors nowadays in most categories. There is no need to use their funds over competitors.

評論 2:

It depends. Are you buying mutual funds or ETFs?

The main reason to hold your account at Vanguard is if you want direct access to Vanguard mutual funds (e.g. VTSAX, VFIAX etc) without the fees that other brokers like Fidelity would charge you to buy and sell Vanguard mutual funds. If you're only buying ETFs (e.g. SPY, VOO, VTI, etc) then it really doesn't matter if your account is at Fidelity or Vanguard.

評論 3:

Vanguard's main argument seems to be fees. Fidelity Freedom 2060, for example, charges 0.75%. Vanguard Target Retirement 2060 charges 0.08%. That adds up over time.

評論 4:

Not much reason to move it just because people hype Vanguard. The performance and fees are nearly the same. Id worry more about how much you're putting in rather than which brand it's with. If youve still got cash sitting on the side, maybe look into a HYSA to park that for now. No need to fix whats already working.

評論 5:

  1. Vanguard invented mutual funds.

  2. I saw a comparison of $2000/year for 20 years in an SP 500 account with both. Because of a tiny difference in the fees, after 20 years the Vanguard fund had $900 more.

  3. Fidelity says, "This fund is exactly like Vanguard's VGT," regarding their technology fund. Why have a copy? Why not go to the source? So I have a Vanguard account, and a lot of VGT.

Also, no fees for trading individual stocks, and their brokerage account pays interest.

12. I have money in both SMH and SMHX and down 17% and 22%. Is this something to buy and hold long term or do I really need to get out?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：投資組合的資產配置與風險管理，特別是針對半導體行業的集中投資是否應該繼續持有或轉向更分散的投資策略。具體要點包括：

  1. 投資組合結構分析

    • 當前組合集中在高風險資產（如半導體ETF SMH/SMHX、科技板塊XLK/QQQM、比特幣ETF FBTC），僅1/4配置於廣泛市場指數VTI。
    • 反映投資者偏好成長型行業，但意識到過度集中於單一領域（半導體）的潛在風險。

  2. 風險與分散化的考量

    • 投資者擔憂行業集中可能導致波動性過高，尤其面對市場下行時是否該「止損」或長期持有。
    • 提問是否應轉向更分散的配置（如增加VTI比例），以平衡風險與回報。

  3. 時間框架與投資目標

    • 15年的投資期限（至提前退休）允許承受中期波動，但需評估行業週期性（如半導體是否具長期成長潛力）。
    • 關鍵問題：當前持倉是否與長期財務目標匹配？是否需要主動調整以降低不確定性？

  4. 心理與策略矛盾

    • 對半導體行業的信心（「I like」）與分散化需求之間的衝突，凸顯主動投資與被動指數策略的取捨。

總結：討論本質是「集中投資 vs. 分散化」的抉擇，結合個人風險承受度、行業前景判斷及退休規劃，尋求最適化資產配置的建議。

內容​

This is in my Roth IRA where I put my riskier plays. It's compiled of 3/4 SMH, SMHX, XLK, QQQM, FBTC and 1/4 VTI.

I like the semiconductor industry but feel I'm too focused on one sector. Is it too late to get out of these and can I generally expect them to recover and ride it out, or should I cut my losses and diversify? Ideally I have 15 years until early retirement.

討論​

評論 1:

Change the ongoing mix first. Day trading as a personal investor will almost always end off worse

評論 2:

Two things can be true. It will likely be up in 15 years and youre too focused on one sector.

評論 3:

Hold or sell? Thats the million-dollar question. But with 15 yrs, ride the semiconductor rollercoaster. Dont puke! "

評論 4:

If these stocks turn the corner right now you're going to regret selling them all for a loss at their possible lowest point. I think SMH is poised for great gains in the next few years, certainly higher than where they are today

評論 5:

SMH is probably a fine investment long term - although I have no special insight into the semiconductor industry. People will post that it is the future and they are probably not wrong - but do they really know more than the market? The real question here is why you are questioning if you should get out on your riskier plays - your risk tolerance may not be what you thought it was in which case it could make sense to rebalance. Keep in mind you would be doing the exact thing which causes someone to underperform though - making a concentrated bet and then bailing on it after it drops significantly.

13. 28 y/o with $955 in Fidelity IRA​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

一位28歲、收入不高但支出較低的投資者，詢問關於在Fidelity開設的Roth IRA中配置60/40比例的FZROX（美國全市場指數基金）和FXILX（國際指數基金）的建議，並考慮是否應等待關稅政策明朗化後再投資，或暫時持有現金。

重點包括：

  1. 投資配置選擇：是否應按原計劃投入60/40比例的FZROX和FXILX。
  2. 市場時機考量：是否因關稅政策（tariffs）的不確定性而推遲投資，或直接執行長期策略。
  3. 財務目標：將資金投入退休帳戶（Roth IRA）以實現長期增值，避免短期動用。
  4. 風險偏好：強調長期投資，接受市場波動，並詢問短期政策風險的影響。

整體而言，提問者希望平衡「市場時機」與「長期投資紀律」，並尋求對低成本指數基金配置的建議。

內容​

Hello!

I have saved up some birthday and Christmas money and put it in my first Roth IRA on Fidelity.

I make a very modest income and I am 28. Low expenses.

I have been planning on putting 60/40 in FZROX and FXILX.

My question is, should I go ahead and make those investmen``` after we see how the tarrfis shake out or just hold the cash right now in the core position?

I have other liquid savings and my goal overall was to put money somewhere I couldn't immediately use in hopes it can gain some value or at least not loose any. (In the long run)

Thank you!

討論​

評論 1:

If this is for retirement many decades from now, short term price action is likely to be irrelevant and you should just buy ASAP

評論 2:

This sub has degraded terribly over the last three months.

At 28, none of the current economic circumstances should inform your retirement account.

評論 3:

One way to do this would be to invest the money over a period of time. For example, $100/month until it is all in.

You won't get the timing right, but you also won't get it wrong.

評論 4:

Honestly, dont know, trumps really unpredictable. Personally, Id just put it in and forget as i``` not going to matter 37 years down the line

評論 5:

Nice job getting started early, seriously. Dont overthink the timing with a long-term Roth$955 invested today bea``` $955 waiting on the sidelines. Stick to your plan and just keep adding!

14. Taking money out of actively managed fund - Brokerage to Roth​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：

如何降低投資管理費用並優化退休帳戶（Roth IRA）的配置。具體包括以下幾點：

  1. 轉移高費用管理帳戶：作者希望將目前由高費用顧問（2% AUM/年）主動管理的Roth IRA轉移到低成本平台（如Fidelity或Vanguard），並改為投資低成本指數基金，以節省長期費用。

  2. 最大化Roth IRA供款：作者計劃從應稅經紀帳戶中提取7,000美元（稅後資金），並將其存入Roth IRA，以補足2025年的供款額度（因無法在2024年截止日前完成）。此舉是基於當前稅率較低的考量，以減少稅務負擔。

  3. 逐步退出顧問管理：作者打算先從Roth IRA開始，未來再逐步將經紀帳戶也移出顧問管理，進一步降低費用並自主控制投資策略。

  4. 尋求潛在風險或問題：作者詢問此計劃是否有任何潛在缺點或需要注意的地方（例如稅務影響、轉移流程等），希望獲得他人建議。

總結來說，文章聚焦於如何透過轉移帳戶、降低成本、優化稅務策略來改善長期投資效益，並探討相關執行細節。

內容​

I have a brokerage account and Roth IRA that are currently actively managed by an advisor. This advisor has high fees (2% AUM/year) and I would like to transfer my Roth to something like Fidelity or Vanguard and start dollar cost averaging low cost funds. I was looking at taking out $7,000 (after tax) from the brokerage and putting that into my Roth to max out my 2025 contribution (wont be able to do it before the 2024 deadline). I figured that would be best since I am in a relatively low tax bracket at the moment.

Does anyone have any though``` on why this wouldnt be a good idea? I hope to get the rest of the brokerage out of the advisors management in the future as well but starting with the Roth. TIA!

討論​

評論 1:

Exiting a 2% AUM situation is urgent. That's an egregious fee.

You can open equivalent accoun at Fidelity, and, armed with your advisor account numbers and recent statemen (PDF or scan), you can pull them in from the Fidelity side via the ACATS process.

Then you can sell taxable shares and contribute to the Roth IRA, and you won't need to rush it for 2025. The only rush would be for 2024 (I'm not seeing why you wouldn't do that first).

15. Where to get accurate timely data on short shares as % of float?​

這段文字的核心討論主題是：尋找準確且即時的股票「空頭利息」（short interest）數據來源。

作者提到：

  1. 已知來源的限制：

    • FINRA 雖提供原始數據，但僅比較不同報告週期，可能不夠即時。
    • 其他平台（如 Yahoo Finance、Marke```hare）雖有相關數據，但資訊不一致，且更新頻率不明確。

  2. 核心需求：

    • 希望找到一個可靠、更新及時的來源，以獲取特定股票的空頭利息比例（short interest percentage）。

總結：作者在探討如何解決「空頭利息數據的準確性與即時性」問題，並比較現有管道的不足。

內容​

I know FINRA publishes raw data comparing reporting periods. But I'm looking for an accurate up-to-date source for how much of any particular stock is short interest. I also know there are sites like Yahoo Finance, Marke```hare, etc. that publish this, but their info varies and I'm not clear how often they update.

討論​

評論 1:

For short interest information on listed securities, you get that from the exchanges. ICE doesn't make that data available for free. But Nasdaq does and you can subscribe to access their data files via SFTP.

Relevant links for anyone that cares about this dataset:

https://www.finra.org/finra-data/browse-catalog/equity-short-interest

https://www.finra.org/finra-data/browse-catalog/short-sale-volume-data/daily-short-sale-volume-files

https://www.finra.org/finra-data/browse-catalog/equity-short-interest

https://www.nasdaqtrader.com/Trader.aspx?id=ShortInterest

Otherwise - you have to rely on third-party data aggregators who would normally make the data available.

Short interest data is released every 2 weeks. The calendar for 2025 can be found here - https://www.finra.org/filing-reporting/regulatory-filing-systems/short-interest

16. Question about Mutual Fund Dividends​

| 1.3 | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. | 1. |

內容​

If I own a mutual fund and decide to sell it on the ex-date, will I get the dividend or not?

I know with stocks and ETFs, you get the dividend if you own the holding on the ex date. But with mutual funds they do not price out until close.

So if 4/1/25 is the ex date on a MF, and I sell on 4/1/25 will I receive the dividend or must I wait to sell until 4/2/25?

討論​

評論 1:

Yes, you get the dividend if you were the owner of the shares at the time of ex-div announcement, even if you sell afterwards.

評論 2:

The ex dividend date is the day it trades with out the dividend.

So yes you will get the dividend if you sell on the ex dividend date. However there really is not benefit , if you sold on 03/31 besides the movement on 04/01 i``` not like you would be out any money .

17. Has anyone transferred brokerage asse between accoun under different citizenships?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

「擁有雙重國籍的投資者，在兩個不同券商帳戶（分別以不同國籍身份開立）之間轉移資產時，可能面臨的KYC（認識你的客戶）身份驗證衝突問題，以及相關經驗分享。」

具體要點包括：

  1. 雙重國籍導致的身份差異：作者以摩爾多瓦和羅馬尼亞兩種身份分別開立券商帳戶（TradeStation vs. Interactive Brokers），但系統中可能視為「不同法律身份」。
  2. 資產轉移的潛在障礙：擔憂券商因KYC資訊不一致（如ID文件、居住國等）拒絕跨帳戶的ETF轉移。
  3. 尋求同類經驗：詢問是否有類似雙重國籍者成功完成此類轉移的案例或建議。

關鍵問題在於「不同身份開立的帳戶，如何被券商系統識別為同一持有人」，並涉及合規性與操作實務的挑戰。

內容​

Im in a bit of a unique situation and would love to hear from others whove dealt with this.

I have dual citizenship and opened brokerage accoun``` in the U.S. with two different brokers under each of my nationalities:

  • My TradeStation account was opened using my Moldovan citizenship and ID.

  • My Interactive Brokers account was opened under my Romanian citizenship.

Now I want to transfer my asse``` (ETFs) from TradeStation to Interactive Brokers. But Im concerned that the brokers might reject the transfer due to KYC mismatches different IDs, possibly different countries of residence, and technically different legal identities in their systems (even though Im the same person).

Has anyone successfully done a broker-to-broker transfer in a similar situation?

討論​

無討論內容

18. Daily General Discussion and Advice Thread - April 01, 2025​

這段文字的核心討論主題是：「如何在 Reddit 的 r/investing 社群中提問或參與討論」，主要內容包括：

  1. 開放討論的範圍：鼓勵用戶提出一般性問題、分享市場評論或有趣但不需獨立發文的小知識。
  2. 資源導向：
    • 建議提問前先查閱 FAQ、側邊欄（含投資入門指南、閱讀書單、媒體推薦等）。
    • 提供具體的 Wiki 連結（如「Getting Started」「Reading List」「Podcasts and Videos」）。
  3. 個人財務諮詢的提問規範：
    • 若涉及個人財務建議（如「我有一筆錢該如何投資？」），需詳列背景資訊（年齡、收入、風險承受度等），以獲得針對性回答。
  4. 免責聲明：
    • 提醒用戶 Reddit 的意見僅供參考，建議尋求專業投資顧問協助。

總結來說，這段文字旨在引導用戶有效利用社群資源進行投資討論，並規範個人化提問的格式，同時強調資訊的參考性質。

內容​

Have a general question? Want to offer some commentary on marke```? Maybe you would just like to throw out a neat fact that doesn't warrant a self post? Feel free to post here!

Please consider consulting our FAQ first - https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/wiki/faq

And our side bar also has useful resources.

If you are new to investing - please refer to Wiki - Getting Started

The reading list in the wiki has a list of books ranging from light reading to advanced topics depending on your knowledge level. Link here - Reading List

The media list in the wiki has a list of reputable podcas and videos - [Podcas and Videos](https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/wiki/medialist)

If your question is "I have $XXXXXXX, what do I do?" or other "advice for my personal situation" questions, you should include relevant information, such as the following:

  • How old are you? What country do you live in?

  • Are you employed/making income? How much?

  • What are your objectives with this money? (Buy a house? Retirement savings?)

  • What is your time horizon? Do you need this money next month? Next 20yrs?

  • What is your risk tolerance? (Do you mind risking it at blackjack or do you need to know i``` 100% safe?)

  • What are you current holdings? (Do you already have exposure to specific funds and sectors? Any other asse```?)

  • Any big deb``` (include interest rate) or expenses?

  • And any other relevant financial information will be useful to give you a proper answer.

Check the resources in the sidebar.

Be aware that these answers are just opinions of Redditors and should be used as a starting point for your research. You should strongly consider seeing a registered investment adviser if you need professional support before making any financial decisions!

討論​

評論 1:

sold a bunch of SPY today in anticipation of it maybe going down tomorrow (like 20% of my holdings)

tell me why this is a bad idea

評論 2:

Can someone please explain to me why the s&p500 is actually on the raise today? 10-20+% tariffs on all trading partners seems like a coffin nail on growth.

評論 3:

Is now a good time to invest in VOO?

Or is there another total market fund?

評論 4:

Any real reason someone would invest in QQQ and SCHG?

I mean, having VOO also, there's already overlap because of SP500...

評論 5:

Holy crap, I just read that the Trump administration will be announcing REVERSE tariffs today, actually subsidizing imported goods!

19. Is it the time to invest?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：
一位19歲機械工程學生如何優化現有資金（25,000美元）的投資配置，重點包括：

  1. 投資組合分配：

    • 計劃將15,000美元以80/20比例配置於：
      • 80%被動指數基金（如IVV等），追求長期穩定增長。
      • 20%高風險個股，作為學習投資的實驗性資金。

  2. 剩餘資金的運用選項：

    • 高利率儲蓄帳戶（年利率約4.65%）。
    • 定期存款（固定收益但流動性較低）。

  3. 核心目標：

    • 避免資金閒置於低利率帳戶，最大化每一元的使用效率。
    • 在低負債（由父母支援學費）且居住成本低的優勢下，平衡穩健與高風險投資，同時累積個人投資經驗。

其他可考慮的面向：風險承受能力、緊急預備金保留、稅務影響，以及長期財務目標（如購房、創業）的規劃。

內容​

I am 19 and studying a mechanical engineering degree. I am**debt free,**living at home and my uni debt is thankfully going to be taken care of by my paren. I work part time at an engineering firm and have**$25k**total at the moment.**I am looking to invest $15k at a 80/20**split between 80% index funds (mostly IVV and maybe 1 other) and some individual high risk stock (wanting to learn about investing into individual stocks this way). I will then allocate most of the remaining into either**1.**A high interest savings account (say 4.65% p.a) or**2.**allocate this money into a fixed term deposit. Could I please get some though or things I could further consider? I am just wanting to ensure that each dollar I earn is working, rather than sitting in a low interest savings account... Cheers!

討論​

評論 1:

Honestly it depends on your beliefs right now. If you are optimistic that the current u.s. administration has your best interest at heart then yeah this is a good time to invest. The marke``` will likely continue to fall in the short term but once the new normal is established things will start to rise again.

If you believe the current administration is in the process of dismantling the current world economic apparatus which may trigger a recession at best, a depression at medium, and another world War at worst... well then it had never been a riskier time to buy stocks and you may not recover your losses for a decade or more

The only thing people can probably mostly agree on right now is that the short term does not look favorable for growth for the average investor. If you are an options trader... well it looks great!

評論 2:

Now is a fantastic time to begin investing. When people are panicking (which a lot are right now) then they are offloading shares cheaply. As long as you dollar cost average your way in then you don't really have much to worry about. Broadly speaking the stock marke``` and economy always recover.

I'm actually excited about the prospec``` of a recession beginning soon.

評論 3:

Our government is "risking systematic instability." Is now a good time to invest in stocks? Probably not.

評論 4:

Hi u/Independent-Theory10,

Your plan to diversify with 80% in index funds (like IVV) and 20% in high-risk stocks is a smart way to balance stability and learning. For the remaining cash, a high-interest savings account (4.65% p.a.) gives flexibility, while a fixed-term deposit locks in returns but reduces liquidity. If you might need quick access, go with savings or else, term deposi``` can offer better rates.

Also, consider dollar-cost averaging instead of a lump sum to reduce timing risk. Hope this helps :)

評論 5:

Youre in a great spot to start investing early. Alongside index funds and high-yield savings, some people explore alternative asse like private credit or RWAs for diversification. Kasu, Ondo or even tokenized credit platforms could be worth looking into over timeespecially if you want exposure beyond traditional marke.

20. Who is an expert on SDOW?​

這段文字的核心討論主題是：市場時機的不可預測性以及散戶投資者在嘗試掌握市場時機時面臨的挑戰。

具體要點包括：

  1. 個人經驗教訓：作者與親友曾因過度持有反向ETF（如SDOW）而蒙受損失，反映市場時機判斷的困難。
  2. 業餘投資者的限制：雖具備基礎經濟與公司分析知識，但缺乏專業能力精準預測市場轉折點。
  3. 市場時機的本質：質疑是否有人能真正「掌握」市場時機，並隱含對「市場不可預測」的結論（如「答案可能是否定的」）。
  4. 工具與策略的反思：將SDOW視為投資工具之一，需搭配更全面的策略，而非單靠時機判斷。

整體而言，核心在於對「擇時交易」可行性的質疑，並強調散戶需正視市場的不確定性。

內容​

Couple years ago. Me and my uncle Did really well with SDOW, had a good sense on things. ended up losing most of it hanging on too long. Swore off it.

Were amateurs, economic/society nerds. We know basic metrics for companies.

I think Im asking the question wrong, SDOW is a tool in a suite of investment options

I guess the answer is, has any ever mastered timing the market - which must mean no?

討論​

評論 1:

> I guess the answer is, has any ever mastered timing the market

If someone mastered timing the market they wouldn't be farting around on a Reddit investing sub, they'd be enjoying champagne on their private jet the the Maldives.

評論 2:

you should never hold something like SDOW for more than a month at a time. If you want something leveraged to make lo``` of money on long term you should go with UDOW instead

評論 3:

I made a good deal on TSLQ this year so far which is an inverse leveraged ETF like SDOW.

You never want to hold a short position for too long. You will blow yourself up. Just take the money and get out.

It also sounds like you guys dont have any sort of trading plan and dont know how to stick to it? You need to set take profit poin``` and stop losses ahead of time. Stick to your plan. If youre wrong, youre wrong. Sell it. If youre right, sell it. Dont get greedy.

評論 4:

lol

21. Stock market or property investmen, and why? \{#21-stock-market-or-property-investmen-and-why}​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是「投資股票市場與投資房地產（以買入後出租或轉售為目的）的比較與選擇」。作者比較了兩種投資方式的潛在收益和工作量：

  1. 房地產的優勢：長期持有（5-10年）可能帶來更高的收益（如資產增值和租金收入）。
  2. 股票市場的優勢：被動投資（如指數基金）所需的管理工作較少，流動性更高。

最終，作者糾結於「更高潛在收益但需投入更多精力」的房地產，與「輕鬆但收益可能較低」的股票投資之間的權衡。討論焦點在於投資回報與付出成本的取捨。

內容​

Would you rather invest in the stock market or in property (buy to ) and why?

I'm comparing numbers and realising property can make more money if someone buys and then sells in 5-10 years, with the equity built.

On the other hand, it's way much more work than putting money in an index fund.

Though```?

討論​

評論 1:

I would rather work 50 hours a week and get 200k ish a year in wages, benefi```, 401k match, etc than spending my time renting properties and maintaining them. I will just take my extra wages and put them in the stock market

評論 2:

I own a restaurant and 2 Airbnbs.

The income from the real property and business gives you a huge sense of security and allows you to take more risks in the stock market without excessive worry or crying when blowing your account up on r/wallstreetbe```.

Yes its much more work, but the tax advantages of being able to depreciate property over 27.5 or 39 years does make up for some the extra income you bring in, as a bonus to the security and stability it provides versus stock asse```.

I would advocate to own 1-2 investment rental properties and also own stocks. Its the best of both worlds. If stocks underperform, no worries. Your rental income has your back. If your stocks outperform, great!

評論 3:

[removed]

評論 4:

I was fine with the much less work of owning strictly equities and equity funds while having two steady jobs for 30 years. Just FIREd at 58 with more than enough and never fixed a toilet or changed a lightbulb that wasn't in my own house.

評論 5:

Please tell me you're talking about REITs v. SP500. Otherwise, stock market.

22. Should I actually buy stocks when exercising right of options?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：在美股期权交易中，当持有的看涨期权（long call option）即将到期且处于价内（in-the-money）时，如何最有效地实现收益。具体围绕以下问题展开：

  1. 是否必须行权（exercise）？

    • 当标的股票（如AAPL）市价（$260）高于行权价（$240）时，期权持有人理论上可通过行权以低价买入股票获利。但行权需支付全额行权成本（如$24,000），可能面临资金不足的问题。

  2. 替代方案探讨：

    • 平仓（Sell to Close）：更常见的做法是直接卖出期权合约，赚取期权溢价（内含时间价值+内在价值），无需动用大额现金。
    • 行权与即时卖出股票：若行权后立即卖出股票，可锁定利润（$260 - $240 = $20/股），但需考虑交易成本和税务影响。
    • 资金不足的解决方案：如缺乏行权资金，平仓是更实际的选择。

  3. 关键考量因素：

    • 流动性（期权市场深度）、交易成本、资金可用性，以及行权后的股票处理策略。

总结：文章主要指导期权交易者如何在资金受限或避免复杂操作的情况下，通过平仓等灵活方式实现收益，而非被动依赖行权。

內容​

For example, if I buy long call option (strike price $240) on AAPL (now $230). When the date is close to the expiration day, the AAPL price is $260. Should I actually spend $24000 ($240 100) to exercise the call right? Is there any way to walk around to get my earnings? Because I'm not sure I could take $24000 cash from my bank.

Thanks in advance!

討論​

評論 1:

You could just sell the call option back at any time and get th profit you made on them. You don't have to exercise (unless you want to own the shares).

評論 2:

You can just sell the option contract back (sell to close). Sometimes it might be more favourable to exercise due to tax implications depending on country.

評論 3:

It is rarely beneficial to exercise long call contrac. One reason to exercise contrac early, is because the dividends received is more than the extrinsic value remaining on the contrac```.

In general, it normally makes more sense to sell the contrac because there may be extrinsic value on those contrac.

評論 4:

[removed]

23. Even After Diversifying, Where Else to Invest?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：在不確定的經濟環境下（如房地產、股票、ETF和比特幣等主流資產表現低迷或停滯），投資者應如何分散配置10,000美元資金，並探討不同資產類別的未來潛在走勢與相互影響。具體聚焦以下幾點：

  1. 當前市場困境的評估

    • 房地產、股票、ETF和比特幣普遍下跌或停滯，投資者對傳統分散策略的失效感到困惑。
    • 提出「若現狀持續」的假設情境，探討各資產可能的分化表現（如比特幣逆勢上漲、房地產因供需矛盾反彈或進一步下跌）。

  2. 資產間的關聯性與替代效應

    • 討論不同資產的連動性（如股票長期停滯是否推動資金流向比特幣）。
    • 宏觀經濟因素（如建築成本、購房需求、關稅政策）對各類資產的潛在衝擊。

  3. 不確定性下的投資策略

    • 尋求主流資產外的多元化選項（未明確提及但隱含問題）。
    • 試圖預測「趨勢延續」下的結果，以調整配置方向。

  4. 關鍵矛盾點的權衡

    • 房地產：高成本與需求vs.購買力不足的拉鋸。
    • 比特幣：作為避險或投機工具的可能性。
    • 股票/ETF：長期經濟疲軟與政策風險的影響。

整體而言，文章反映投資者在低增長、高波動環境中對「資金該流向何處」的焦慮，核心在於如何透過分析現有趨勢的延展性（或反轉可能）來優化資產配置。

內容​

Lets say someone had $10,000 to invest. If someone has property, stocks, ETFs, and bitcoin, where else to diversify? Im just looking at whats going on right now.

Houses slowly going down, stocks and etfs down and maybe stagnate for a long long time. Bitcoin is down as well but if stocks stagnate, maybe btc goes up? What are ramifications if things stay like this? Bitcoin might be on the up and up? Properties maybe goes up because expensive to build and demand is high? Or maybe nobody can afford so they die down? Stocks go down cause of tariffs for long time and tank economy? Like where do we invest and what do you guys think will happen if things trend the way they are.

討論​

評論 1:

Seems everyone is a long-term stock investor until stocks drop.

評論 2:

Two things I know that are unaffected: Gold & Pokemon

評論 3:

gold etf

評論 4:

Fixed income, treasuries, bonds, CDs

評論 5:

If stocks stagnate, that means there isnt cheap or excess money flowing into the system. Bitcoin does not go up in this scenario.

The other real return asset classes that have low correlations to stocks that youre missing are bonds (especially long duration) and managed futures, such as CTA or KMLM.

24. BDTX - diamond in the rough​

这篇文章的核心讨论主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. Black Diamond Therapeutics (BDTX) 的業務與發展

    • 該公司是一家臨床階段的生物技術公司，專注於開發針對腦部和肺部腫瘤的「MasterKey」療法（能靶向多種變異的藥物）。
    • 目前有兩種藥物候選：
      • 一種處於 Phase 2 階段，預計明年上半年進入 Phase 3 或申請 FDA 批准。
      • 另一種剛進入 Phase 1 階段的藥物，已以 7,000 萬美元預付款 + 7.1 億美元里程碑付款 的協議出售給 Servier，後者將承擔後續開發成本。

  2. 公司財務與市場表現

    • 交易前：市值 9,000 萬美元，現金儲備 1 億美元。
    • 交易後：現金增至 1.7 億美元，市值一度飆升至 2 億美元，但因大股東套現回落至 7,500-8,000 萬美元。
    • 股價歷史：IPO 時為 30 美元，後暴跌至 5 美元（次級市場），現價 1.5 美元，作者認為估值被低估。

  3. 投資觀點與風險提示

    • 作者認為公司前景改善（管線獲大藥廠背書、現金充足），已購入 2.5% 流通股，但提醒讀者自行評估風險。

核心主題：​

Black Diamond Therapeutics 的藥物開發進展、與 Servier 的交易對公司財務與市值的影響，以及當前股價被低估的投資機會。

內容​

Black Diamond Therapeutics (BDTX) is a clinical stage company developing MasterKey therapies (targeting a wide array of variations) against tumours and cancers in brain and lungs.

The company has 1 drug under development, for different types of patien```, currently under Phase 2 development, likely to move into Phase 3/FDA approval request by H1 of next year.

It had another drug candidate it had just begun developing, which was on Phase 1 trials. 10 days ago it signed a deal to sell that drug to Servier for $70mln upfront + $710mln in milestone paymen and licensing fees at later stages, with Servier taking on the cos of future development.

Prior to the announcement, the company was trading at a $90mln market cap, with $100mln in cash on i``` balance sheet.

Now, with its pipeline validated by a pharma giant, least advanced drug sold in a $750m deal and cash at $170m, it is trading at. $80mln in market cap.

After the deal, it shot up to $200mln in market cap, before falling back down to $75-80mln. Reason being, sales of a large shareholders that needed liquidity.

This stock used to be at $30 on IPO and its value was worse than it is now.

Secondary was at $5, where it was basically dead.

With its prospec``` better than ever, you can buy at $1.5 per share.

I bought up 2.5% of the float, follow at your own risk.

討論​

評論 1:

Youre in the wrong sub for hyping crap lol

評論 2:

-97% over the past 5 years... do we have the same definition of diamond

25. Building a $2,000/month REIT portfolio for retirement Feedback welcome!​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：
「如何優化每月2,000美元的REITs投資組合，以平衡股息收入與長期增長，並側重美元收益」。

具體要點包括：

  1. 投資策略：

    • 每月定期投資（2,000美元），透過Interactive Brokers（IBKR）執行。
    • 目標為「股息再投資直至退休，退休後依賴被動收入」。

  2. 當前配置分析：

    • 組合涵蓋不同REITs類型（如廣泛型ETF、商業地產、數據中心、賭場等），但可能過度集中於數據中心（DLR+EQIX佔20%）。
    • 提問是否需調整權重或納入其他類別（如醫療、基礎設施REITs）。

  3. 風險評估：

    • 請求社群檢視潛在「紅旗」（如行業集中度、單一標的風險）。
    • 是否需分散至其他領域（如工業倉儲、住宅REITs）以降低波動性。

  4. 社群建議需求：

    • 尋求替代標的或配置優化建議，以達成收益與成長的平衡。

總結：作者希望透過專業意見，完善其REITs組合的長期收益結構與風險管理。

內容​

Im planning to invest $2,000/month into REITs using IBKR. I want a mix of dividend income and long-term growth, with a focus on USD income. Heres the portfolio Im considering: VNQ $500/month (broad REIT ETF) O $400/month (monthly dividend king) WPC $300/month (global commercial) VICI $200/month (casinos/resor```) DLR $200/month (data centers) EQIX $200/month (premium data centers) SCHH $200/month (low-cost ETF)

I plan to reinvest all dividends until retirement, then live off the income.

Any red flags in this portfolio? Too heavy on data centers? Any other REITs you think I should include or replace?

Appreciate any though``` or suggestions from the community!

討論​

評論 1:

Why REITs? And your age?

Dividends should not be a focus since they are tax inefficient compared to stocks that do not pay out a dividend. Theyre basically tiny forced sales. If you plan to reinvest all dividends, its far more efficient to not receive them at all.

評論 2:

overall I think it's a bad plan, it will be a better plan if ur 62, per se

評論 3:

Why would you do this as opposed to owning stocks? TSM funds contain REITs.

評論 4:

Depending on your time horizon, you could also buy a broader index that doesnt pay much dividend but with a total return higher than REITs, then pivot towards REITs when you retire.

評論 5:

Data centers overload! Planning to retire in a server room? Diversify or youll be debugging your portfolio!

26. Future of VTI(long terms aspec) \{#26-future-of-vti-long-terms-aspec}​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
「長期投資者（40年時間跨度）對VTI（美國整體股市ETF）未來前景的擔憂與策略考量」，具體圍繞以下幾點展開：

  1. 投資策略的選擇

    • 作者目前持有VTI（美國股市）與VXUS（國際股市）的組合，並考慮是否應繼續「定期定額投資（DCA）」或調整策略。

  2. 對美國經濟與地緣政治的憂慮

    • 質疑美國是否可能失去全球主導地位（如「國際儲備貨幣地位」或經濟霸權），尤其提到川普關稅政策導致盟友關係惡化，可能影響長期經濟表現。

  3. 長期投資的不確定性

    • 以24歲年輕投資者的角度，探討在長達40年的持有期間，宏觀政治經濟變化（如美國衰退風險）對被動投資策略（如指數化投資）的潛在衝擊。

隱含問題：在美國潛在衰退或國際地位動搖的背景下，是否應堅持現有投資組合，或需納入其他避險或多元化因素（如增加國際配置、另類資產等）。

內容​

What is the future outlook of VTI, yall think? I currently have a 40 year time period, just started investing at 24. I hold a mix of VTI/VXUS currently. Im wondering whether or not i should continue DCA, or if theres other factors in play. Could the US be looking to lose i``` status as a world power? The Trump tariffs are turning allies against the US.

討論​

評論 1:

Vti with a 40 year time horizon? Hahahah this sub man. Holy shit

評論 2:

Stop trying to time the market. Block out the noise and keep investing regularly.

評論 3:

Yes, continue to DCA. If stocks tank, even better for you because youre young. Better to get em on sale!

評論 4:

[deleted]

評論 5:

For a 40 year time frame, investing in a mix of VTI/VXUS is a great investment strategy.

And yes, you want to keep buying when (not if) stocks go into the toilet.

27. Just missed out on an actual good IPO​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：

作者對於是否參與IPO（首次公開募股）投資的猶豫與後悔，並尋求他人對IPO投資的建議。

具體要點包括：

  1. 後悔錯過投資機會：作者原本考慮投資Newsmax的IPO，但最終放棄，事後發現若參與可獲利$8,000，因而感到懊悔。
  2. 對IPO投資的陌生與疑慮：作者從未參與過IPO，不清楚如何購買上市前的股票（pre-IPO），也不確定是否值得投資。
  3. 尋求建議：作者詢問其他人是否推薦投資IPO，希望獲得相關經驗或策略。

整體而言，文章圍繞著「是否該參與IPO投資」的猶豫、錯失機會的負面情緒，以及對IPO市場的陌生與探索。

內容​

Never used IPOs before. I was looking at getting Involved with Newsmax but decided against it after seeing their value over the past few years...

Woke up this morning and saw I would have made $8,000 with them. Now I'm ready to throw myself off my balcony.

Does anyone suggest actually buying IPOs? Cause I've never bought them before they go public and have no idea how to even buy them pre-IPO

討論​

評論 1:

If you feel like throwing yourself off a balcony on a $8k opportunity cost I think its best you dont touch ANY IPOs alone trading or investing.

And definitely don’t check out r/wallstreetbe```

評論 2:

IPOs dont usually go straight up like that, so dont get your expectations up

評論 3:

IPOs rarely take off out of the gate.

Newsmax is nothing but a pump and dump. Look at their financials. They arent worth these amoun```.

Look at the subject matter they report on. Look at those that they cater to. Look at those that they report on. This is a grift.

The rug is going to be pulled and this will be back in the teens/single digi``` the second before option chain become available. It will be a penny stock in a matter of months

評論 4:

Nope, not unless you are locked into IPO price. Fortunately for me, Reddit (RDDT) gave long time contributors access to the IPO. I was allowed to buy at $34 and sold at ~$150. Not waiting for it to return to below IPO price.

評論 5:

I very nearly (two clicks away) from putting the limit ($10k?) into Reddit via the pre-IPO sale for Reddit members.

I think I walked away from $60k in pre-tax profit if I sold at the peak. $20k at current prices.

Would have been less anyway. No way Id have received a full allocation. Or managed to sell at the peak. Or not sell when it initially doubled. Or not paid short term holding cap gains.

28. Is the advice of "Stay Diversified" over-rated?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：「分散投資（Stay Diversified）這一廣被推崇的投資建議是否被過度高估？」

作者透過Stuart Kirk在《金融時報》的文章（以及其父親的投資策略）提出質疑，認為長期嚴格執行「再平衡」（rebalancing）可能反而損害報酬，因此「分散投資」不應被視為絕對優先的投資法則。這引發了對傳統分散投資策略的實用性和價值的反思。

內容​

Stuart Kirk, writing recently for the FT (Eight Investment Rules to Live and Die by), discusses his late father's investment strategy. (A lifetime of investing is a pretty good timeframe!)

On diversification, he writes:

"Constant rebalancing would have hurt his returns...it is why 'stay diversified' it not investment rule number seven"

Is the oft-cited investment advice of "Stay Diversified" over-rated?

討論​

評論 1:

No

評論 2:

Concentrate if you can see the future, diversify if you can't.

評論 3:

My main answer? No. I wouldnt say its overrated.

It just boils down to risk tolerance. You can just go straight up all in one company. Maybe it goes up like 300%+ within 5 years or so. Or it can get blasted and go down 50%+ after 5 years. The more concentrated the higher the risk. The more diverse the more protection. (Although you wont be immune.) But the more diverse the more average youll be. (Maybe a bit less than that.)

評論 4:

No next question

評論 5:

Imagine putting all your funds in BTC. You will visualize better. And - yes - diversify.

29. Moral pros and cons of investing in Anduril?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
投資者在面對財務利益與道德價值觀衝突時的抉擇，具體聚焦於是否投資國防科技公司 Anduril 的兩難。主要分為兩個層面：

  1. 財務與道德的權衡

    • 作者認同 Anduril 是「穩健的財務投資」（solid financial investment），但對其涉及武器製造（可能加劇暴力或戰爭）以及公司高層的政治立場（支持川普的「科技兄弟」文化）感到道德不安。
    • 儘管創辦人屬民主黨，但作者質疑其「非政治性」主張在當前政治環境下的真實性。

  2. 原則型投資者的觀點探討

    • 作者尋求其他重視道德原則的投資者意見，希望了解：
      • 是否應將個人政治與道德價值納入投資決策？
      • 這類衝突如何被權衡（例如：完全避開、部分妥協，或區分財務與道德）？

關鍵矛盾：高回報投資機會與個人對「科技軍事化」及政治立場的反感之間的拉扯，反映了現代投資中日益受關注的「ESG（環境、社會、治理）」議題。

內容​

I have an option to invest in Anduril and am convinced it is a solid financial investment.

However, there are moral argumen``` that it is a) a defense company that makes weapons (which I'm not super comfortable with) and b) run by the most pro Trump tech bros (who I really do not like the agenda of). I know the CEO and co-founder is a lifelong democrat, so maybe they are genuinely nonpartisan, but since Trump's election I find that hard to stick by.

Even though as a pure investment, it seems to be a no-brainer, I'm curious to hear from principle-minded investors how they would approach this and whether they would share the concerns or consider it completely fine.

討論​

評論 1:

>am convinced it is a solid financial investment.

End of analysis right there.

You not investing will literally make zero difference in global politics or war.

You investing in a good company can potentially give you the resources to donate to charity or political candidates of your choice that can help to make a difference.

評論 2:

Do something just with the returns to clear your mind. I wouldn't pass up and opportunity to invest in them.

評論 3:

Not sure i amoral to defend yourself. I was in that camp before (weapons are bad). But just ask Ukrainians. Or listen to first hand accoun. For example this one by a Brit fighting there.

評論 4:

The highest returning stock in U. S history is a company called Altria, which was formally Philip Morris of America. And it spun off i``` international segment. But Altria since inception has returned 165,000,000 per cent. Far eclipsing poor performers like Microsoft, Nvidia and Apple. But if you don't like cigarettes, then you would have missed out on that return.

If you don't like oil and gas and energy and alcohol and industrials that contribute to climate change, You can eliminate all these companies but you will be left with only a few to invest in and likely with poor economics.

評論 5:

Can you even directly invest in anduril, as its a private company?

30. How did the stimulus checks boost economy so much?​

这篇文章的核心讨论主题是 「2020年经济复苏现象的真实驱动因素」，具体围绕以下争议点展开：

  1. 对主流观点的质疑
    作者反驳了YouTube上流行的说法（如「经济复苏源于刺激支票」），指出小额一次性补贴（如1200美元）根本不足以解释房价飙升、汽车市场暴涨等现象，因多数人将钱用于短期消费（食品、酒类），而非大额投资。

  2. 量化宽松（QE）的潜在影响
    作者认为，真正的驱动因素是美联储的「数万亿美元量化宽松政策」，而非刺激支票。QE通过注入大量流动性，推高了资产价格（如房地产、股市），但这一关键因素被舆论简化或误读。

  3. 经济现象与政策归因的错位
    讨论揭示了公众叙事（归因于刺激支票）与经济现实（QE的长期结构性影响）之间的脱节，批评了片面归因的误导性。

总结：文章核心在于 「拆解经济复苏表象背后的政策真相，并批判舆论对量化宽松作用的忽视」。

內容​

I'm hearing from all the YouTube gurus that the economy rallied in 2020 from the stimulus checks, billion sf of commercial real estate to be built to accommodate all of the spending. Car market exploding with 100% mark ups on new cars. Housing prices skyrocketing. etc

Like the checks were $1200.. and they weren't even given to everyone. Most people spent it on food and booze in like a week. They didn't go out and finance a new monster truck or put a down payment on a $500k house with them.

I'm 99% sure they're actually referring to trillions of dollars of quantative easement that caused all of this, instead of blaming the stimulus checks lol

討論​

評論 1:

It was the PPP paymen```. Many of them were lottery sized. Business owners paid off mortgages, bought luxurious cars, took extravagant vacations and much more. A massive welfare giveaway, mostly to people who already had money.

評論 2:

>YouTube gurus

That should answer your question.

評論 3:

>YouTube gurus

Is that the new term for grifters and con artis```?

評論 4:

They didn't. They increased the money supply and caused inflation, which exacerbated the mess we're on today.

評論 5:

Don't forget that was $1200 per person and 3 or 4 separate stimulus checks. We got almost $20k that year for our family. We didn't miss any work so our wages were the same and we had some decreased cos``` without having to drive into work each day. It certainly was a windfall for my family.

總體討論重點

以下是30篇文章的討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的錨點連結與逐條細節：

1. [Will money market accoun, such as Vanguard's VMFXX, remain safe and stable?](#1-will-money-market-accoun-such-as-vanguard-s-v)​

  • 重點：政治經濟不確定性下，貨幣市場基金（如VMFXX）的安全性與配置調整建議。
  • 細節：
    1. 70%流動資產配置於VMFXX，擔憂政策波動影響穩定性。
    2. 需評估風險分散必要性（如轉移部分資金至國債或現金）。
    3. 關鍵指標：聯儲利率動向、基金淨值波動。

2. Riding out my first drop without jumping out the window​

  • 重點：年輕投資者面對市場下跌的心理調適與策略堅持。
  • 細節：
    1. 每月57%收入投入VOO，但憂慮高估值與潛在衰退。
    2. 緊急備用金充足，但需平衡家庭責任（婚育）與投資風險。
    3. 建議：長期持有、避免情緒化操作，參考歷史暴跌經驗。

3. Investing in Germany (DAX) as an American​

  • 重點：美國投資者如何有效投資德國DAX指數及ETF表現落差分析。
  • 細節：
    1. Global X DAX ETF長期落後指數30%，匯率因素僅部分解釋。
    2. 潛在原因：追蹤誤差、稅務或費用結構問題。
    3. 替代方案：歐元計價ETF或衍生性商品。

4. What's a good way to put away money for 10 years?​

  • 重點：長期資金鎖定與被動投資的執行方式。
  • 細節：
    1. 需求：自動再投資標普500指數，避免主動提領。
    2. 信託結構可行性，需第三方監管確保合規。
    3. 建議：目標日期基金或IRA帳戶。

5. ALLW - Bridgewater released an ETF version of All Weather last month with State Street​

  • 重點：橋水全天候策略ETF（ALLW）的配置與風險平衡機制。
  • 細節：
    1. 資產分配：債券（71%）、股票（42%）、商品（37%）。
    2. 目標波動率10%-12%，費用率0.85%。
    3. 槓桿透過期貨實現，非高倍風險。

6. Just started Investing as an 18 y/o. I was wondering if I should use Robinhood compared to other brokerages?​

  • 重點：新手券商選擇（Robinhood vs. 傳統券商）。
  • 細節：
    1. Robinhood便利性 vs. 過往爭議（如GameStop事件）。
    2. 傳統券商（Schwab/Fidelity）更穩定但介面較複雜。

7. Massive Spikes in Individual Stocks?​

  • 重點：個股異常波動（如±50%）的成因與套利可能性。
  • 細節：
    1. 可能原因：流動性不足、數據錯誤或算法交易異常。
    2. 實際成交與報價差異，不建議盲目跟進。

8. 2025 Q1 asset class returns & new valuations​

  • 重點：2025年Q1資產表現與美元貶值影響。
  • 細節：
    1. 非美股（VXUS）漲5.7%，美股（VTI）跌4.8%。
    2. 美元指數跌4%，推升外幣資產回報。

9. HDHP HSA Married decision to do separate or one insurance​

  • 重點：夫妻