跳至主要内容

2025-04-01-rising

抓取設定​

  • 排序方式: RISING
  • 文章數量: 30

討論重點​

以下是25篇文章的討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的文章錨點連結與逐條細節：

1. Trump to announce new 20% tariffs​

重點：

  • 經濟影響：全面關稅對產業（如汽車、葡萄酒）與投資環境的衝擊。
  • 消費與企業矛盾：需求疲軟下關稅可能壓縮企業利潤（海外生產成本上升）。
  • 投資策略：市場不確定性中如何調整SP500投資（DCA或退出）。
  • 政治風險：政策與2025年提案的潛在關聯。

2. Accenture (ACN) contracts removed​

重點：

  • 上市公司表現：ACN股價下跌12%，對比非上市公司（如德勤）。
  • 數據比較：合約數量與節省金額表格（德勤3.7億美元 vs. ACN 2.4億美元）。
  • 業務背景：可能涉及政府專案（CGI Federal等公司列名）。

3. Investment strategies amid uncertainty​

重點：

  • 風險調整：從高風險（10/10）降至低風險（2.5/10），質疑自動化工具有效性。
  • 資產配置矛盾：增持美債加劇本土風險集中。
  • 流動性管理：平衡私募股權等高風險非流動資產。

4. U.S. Bear vs Bull Markets history​

重點：

  • 週期比較：牛市持續時間通常長於熊市。
  • 投資啟示：長期持有的潛在優勢。

5. Investing in Germany (DAX)​

重點：

  • ETF績效落差：Global X DAX ETF落後指數30%，匯率影響不明顯。
  • 替代方案：尋求歐元計價ETF或匯率避險工具。

6. Safety of Vanguard’s VMFXX​

重點：

  • 集中風險：70%流動資產投入單一基金。
  • 政治不確定性：川普政策對基金穩定性的潛在影響。

7. 401k without company matching​

重點：

  • 退休儲蓄順序：優先Roth IRA或HSA，再考慮未匹配的401k。
  • 稅務優化：三重免稅HSA的潛在優勢。

8. Yield differences in bond funds​

重點：

  • 稅務影響：市政債券（VCTXX）免稅導致收益率低於國債（VUSXX）。
  • 市場定價：短期vs.長期債券的收益率差異比例不一致。

9. ESOP transfer advice​

重點：

  • 處置選擇：直接兌現vs.轉換Class A股票（程序繁瑣）。
  • 稅務與效率：9年持股增值$35/股，需權衡變現利益。

10. $2,000/month REIT portfolio​

重點：

  • 配置疑慮：數據中心REITs（DLR、EQIX）占比20%是否過高。
  • 目標：平衡股息與增長，美元現金流為核心。

（因篇幅限制，以下為部分條目精簡呈現，完整版可依需求擴充）

11-25. 快速摘要​

  • 11. 優先股股息規則：醫用大麻公司轉型加密貨幣後，優先股分配細節混淆。
  • **12. [購屋儲蓄策略](#12-how-can-i-optimize-my-situation

文章核心重點​

以下是各篇文章的一句話摘要（條列式輸出）：

  1. Trump to announce new 20% tariffs...
    美國擬對所有貿易夥伴全面課徵20%關稅，引發對產業衝擊、消費抑制及投資策略調整的擔憂。

  2. Accenture (ACN) one of the hardest hit...
    Accenture因2.4億美元合約取消導致股價下跌12%，與非上市公司德勤等企業的政府合約表現成對比。

  3. What is everyone doing investment wise...
    投資者在經濟不確定性中降低風險偏好，質疑自動化工具能否應對美國孤立主義與市場波動。

  4. History of U.S. Bear vs Bull Markets
    歷史數據顯示美股牛市週期通常長於熊市，對長期投資策略具參考價值。

  5. Investing in Germany (DAX) as an American
    美國投資者困惑於DAX ETF績效落後指數30%，探討匯率與投資德國市場的更佳途徑。

  6. Will money market accounts...remain safe?
    投資者憂心政治風險恐影響VMFXX貨幣市場基金穩定性，評估70%流動資產集中配置的合理性。

  7. 401k - company does not offer matching...
    無公司匹配的401k是否仍應優先於Roth IRA與HSA，成為退休儲蓄優化策略的討論焦點。

  8. Yield difference between Money market funds...
    比較貨幣市場基金與長期債券的收益率差異，分析稅務與市場機制對市政債券定價的影響。

  9. Seeking advice on ESOP transfers
    UPS員工持股計劃參與者糾結於直接變現或繁瑣轉移至Fidelity帳戶的稅務與效率取捨。

  10. Building a $2,000/month REIT portfolio...
    以每月2,000美元建構退休導向的REIT組合，尋求數據中心等產業配置過度集中的風險評估。

  11. A company I bought stock in is awarding...
    轉型加密貨幣的醫用大麻公司發放優先股股息，投資者困惑於分配規則與權益變化。

  12. How can I optimize my situation?
    購屋頭期款儲蓄與退休規劃的資源分配衝突，尋求5年內達成財務目標的優化建議。

  13. Largest premium paid on public company acquisition?
    探討上市公司收購案例中極端溢價（如1900%）的歷史紀錄與背後戰略邏輯。

  14. Treasury Direct Still Down...
    美國財政部直屬網站異常延長維護時間，引發用戶對系統安全與故障的猜測。

  15. US tariffs: Time to move away from S&P500...
    美國保護主義興起促使被動投資者反思S&P500的全球代表性，考慮轉向FTSE等全球指數。

  16. Thoughts on my portfolio?
    以SCHD、FXAIX為核心的Roth IRA退休組合，強調REITs稅務優勢與國際市場分散配置。

  17. Where should I move my profit sharing to?
    前公司利潤分享帳戶的2萬美元轉移選項與稅務疑慮，尋求27年退休目標的整合建議。

  18. DBS vs OCBC - Which Singapore Bank...
    比較星展與華僑銀行的ROE、股息率與估值，探討新加坡銀行業長期投資首選。

  19. Commodities and Precious Metals up but...
    大宗商品期貨與相關公司股價背離現象，評估生產企業股票在當前市場的投資機會。

  20. Daily General Discussion and Advice Thread...
    開放式投資討論串，提供新手資源並強調提問時需揭露個人財務背景以獲實用建議。

  21. Stock Portfolio Analyzer?
    尋求具AI分析功能的投資組合工具，需支援52週高點提示等進階數據與操作建議。

  22. Should I put 10k emergency fund in HYSA...
    比較高收益儲蓄帳戶與貨幣市場基金的流動性與報酬，評估1萬美元緊急資金最佳存放方式。

  23. Future of VTI(long terms aspects)
    對VTI長期投資價值的疑慮，關注美國關稅政策與國際地位變化對40年投資週期的潛在影響。

  24. Need Help with My Investment Strategy
    醫學生規劃300k長期高風險投資，探討QQQM等高成長ETF配置與一次性投入的市場時機風險。

25

目錄​

1. Trump to announce new 20% tariffs this week on every single US trading partner, not just the initial group of 10-15 countries prev. stated​

這篇文章的核心討論主題圍繞以下幾個面向：

  1. 廣泛關稅的經濟影響：
    探討若美國對「幾乎所有貿易夥伴」實施全面20%關稅，將對哪些產業衝擊最大（相較於過去針對性關稅如汽車、葡萄酒等），以及對投資環境的潛在影響。

  2. 消費者需求與企業利潤的矛盾：

    • 在美國消費者需求已疲軟的背景下，關稅是否會進一步抑制消費？
    • 美國企業的盈利可能受何影響？由於許多企業依賴海外生產，關稅可能提高其成本（如COGS），反而侵蝕利潤，而非保護本土產業。

  3. 投資者的策略困惑：
    市場不確定性下，投資者對標普500指數ETF（SP500）的進退兩難——應繼續定期定額（DCA）買入、賣出，或完全退出市場？文章尋求其他投資者在關稅政策波動中的應對經驗。

  4. 政治與政策的不確定性：
    相關連結提及此關稅計畫與美國政治議程（如2025年政策提案）的關聯，暗示投資風險可能來自政策變動，而非單純市場因素。

總結：文章核心在分析「全面性關稅」對產業、消費端、企業盈利的多層次衝擊，並聚焦投資者在此政策不確定性下的決策困境。

內容​

What industries will this impact the most? Previous tariffs announcements have been easy to understand what industries it will impact (for example auto tariffs, wine tariffs, etc.). What would a sweeping 20% tariff on virtually every single US trading partner mean for investing?

Will it lead to lower consumer demand in an already weak US consumer?

Will it lead to higher profits for US based companies? Don't most US companies manufacturer outside of the US, so their operating costs/COGS will increase?

Is anyone still buying SP500 ETFs, or have people begun to sell? Not sure what to do with my portfolio, or if I should dollar cost average buy vs. sell. If anyone can share how they are navigating this uncertainty - leaving the market completely or riding it out.

---

Sources

https://www.reuters.com/markets/us/trump-says-reciprocal-tariffs-will-target-all-countries-2025-

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-third-term-tariffs-live-updates-b2724698.html

https://apnews.com/article/trump-reciprocal-tariffs-liberation-day-april-2-86639b7b6358af65e2cbad31f8c8ae2b

討論​

評論 1:

At this point I have no idea why I invest with any confidence

評論 2:

Will impact everything. Every raw material, from iron ore to rubber, silica, coffee, rare earths, wood, cocoa just went up in price by 20%. Put on top of 20% of parts, components and chemical and you have a recipe for a major stagflation.

評論 3:

Mad king. No rationale on decisions. Just pure ego. Every country is forming a front. The market is doing tango on a cliff. He has to stop

評論 4:

Liberation Day = Liberating us from our 401Ks and our jobs.

評論 5:

He sings a different tune every day. Wake me up when he shuts up and is on his way back to Florida.

2. Accenture (ACN) one of the hardest hit public consulting companies 240.3 million USD in contracts removed, stock down 12%​

文章的核心討論主題是比較幾家企業（包括德勤、Booz Allen Hamilton、Accenture等）在「節省金額」（Claimed savings）和「合約數量」（Number of contracts）方面的表現，並簡要提及其中一家上市公司（Accenture）近期的股價下跌情況。

具體重點包括：

  1. 非上市公司與上市公司的對比：德勤是非上市公司，而其他如Accenture是上市公司，且後者股價在過去一個月下跌12%。
  2. 數據比較：表格列出各公司在「節省金額」和「合約數量」的具體數字，例如德勤以129份合約和3.718億美元的節省金額位居前列。
  3. 潛在商業或政府合作背景：表格中的「合約」可能涉及政府或大型機構項目（如CGI Federal、SAIC等公司名稱暗示公共部門合作），但文章未明確說明具體領域。

總結：文章主要通過數據對比，分析這些企業在特定業務（可能是公共或大型項目）中的表現差異，並側面提及市場對上市公司的反應。

內容​

Deloitte is not publicly traded, but other firms on the list such as Accenture are, which is current down 12% over the last month.

||Claimed savings ($mn)|Number of contracts|

|:-|:-|:-|

||

||||

||||

|Deloitte|371.8|129|

|Booz Allen Hamilton|207.1|60|

|Guidehouse|376.1|54|

|Accenture|240.3|30|

|General Dynamics|202.8|16|

|IBM|34.3|10|

|Leidos|78.5|7|

|CGI Federal|0.5|7|

|SAIC|7.6|5|

|HII Mission Technologies|0|0|

討論​

評論 1:

what is IBM doing different? more complicated tech integrations? interesting chart to say the least. Plus things are just getting started.

評論 2:

Source: https://www.ft.com/content/f546506d-7f2d-4f64-976d-3f73e48333d7

評論 3:

removed by whom?

評論 4:

This will be intersting

評論 5:

they will revamp the greater than > sign on their logo..now..

3. What is everyone doing investment wise about economic uncertainty?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：在當前美國經濟不確定性增加的環境下，如何調整投資組合的風險配置以平衡風險與回報，具體圍繞以下幾個關鍵點：

  1. 風險偏好的動態調整：
    作者原本採取高風險策略（Wealthfront風險設定10/10），但隨著經濟不確定性上升，逐步降低風險至2.5/10，並質疑自動化工具（如Wealthfront）的傳統模型是否能有效應對當前美國特殊的經濟情境（如孤立主義、市場波動）。

  2. 資產配置的矛盾與集中風險：

    • 降低風險時，系統自動增加美國國內債券、減少外國股票，但作者認為這反而加劇了對美國經濟的風險集中（尤其身為房產持有者已高度暴露於美國市場）。
    • 質疑這種「去風險」策略是否真能分散風險，或僅是形式上的風險調整。

  3. 整體投資組合的複雜性：

    • 除了流動性資產（如Wealthfront），作者還持有高風險非流動性投資（私募股權、天使投資、房地產貸款等），因此將流動部分視為「緩衝」，需更謹慎管理以平衡整體風險。
    • 強調對特定高波動資產（如個股、加密貨幣）的刻意避險（快速脫手）。

  4. 主動與被動投資的取捨：
    作者放棄主動選股、衍生品操作等「玩具」，轉向以被動投資為主，但仍需在自動化工具框架下主動調整策略，反映對市場判斷與工具局限性的矛盾。

總結：
文章核心在探討「經濟不確定性下，如何透過風險再分配避免過度集中本土風險，同時平衡流動性與非流動性資產的整體曝險」，並凸顯自動化投資工具在特殊環境中的潛在盲點。

內容​

Context: mid 40’s, self-employed, homeowner.

I’m very financially literate, but took my (investing) toys away years ago when I proved to myself I wasn’t beating the market.

I now invest primary through Wealthfront, and at the start of the year my risk was set at 10/10. I’ve been steadily ratcheting it down as things get more and more uncertain, and I’m now at 2.5/10 risk.

My concern is that the standard financial return modeling used by tools such as Wealthfront may not cover the situation we are facing here in the US. For example, as I take “risk” down, domestic bonds goes up, and foreign equity allocation is going down. I’m not sure I agree with that as an effective strategy to deal with an isolated US. As a homeowner, I’m already very exposed to the US economy, so this feels like it’s concentrating risk rather than moving to a lower risk profile.

Thoughts?

[Edit based on some comment threads]

The above understates my overall risk profile after these changes. I’m an accredited investor. I’ve got a ton of other risks in the portfolio (late stage private equity, angel investments, MFR) that are much harder to migrate to lower risk levels quickly. So this liquid part is acting as a “shock absorber”.

[More edits]

“Take away my toys” means I don’t short the market or use options. I do have some individual stocks, but don’t make a habit of it. I sometimes hold vested public stock.

I also make a habit to liquidate whatever crypto I receive as soon as possible. I’m not in the business of holding those risks.

討論​

評論 1:

No change. Keep at the same risk level as I don’t want to miss when there is a recovery.

I was in your choose, playing with Fidelity Go risk portfolio and lowering it during crisis. It’s not helping as you lose the performance every time the market is recovering.

Now I have an advisor to avoid putting news or emotions into my investments. For now, we keep the financial plan on track but might delay investing my future bonus and keep cash powder due to recession and crash risk.

評論 2:

100% cash. The administration has promised to destroy my 401k for “reasons.” I’m 2 years from retirement, can’t ride this into a deep recession. All new money being deposited is going into stocks though.

評論 3:

early 60s here, the dotcom was was my baptism in the market. I've seen many cycles and downturns and good times.

I have moved 85% of my portfolio into cash to protect it. When I see rational economic policies from any administrations I'll get back in.

This is not trying to "time the market" for me, it's about capital preservation.

評論 4:

If doing DCA doesn’t ruin your day to day I don’t see the harm in it at least until things get really dire. The markets are down but still historically high compared to the last 20 years.

I’ll continue to DCA unless Trump actually crashes the economy for real. I’ve budgeted for it and even though things are bad it’s not too late for the morons in charge of all this instability to change their minds when they see all the backlash.

評論 5:

dca, dividend drip. also wealthfront but we don't use their service, only HYSA. business cash flow goes to stock brokerage account, buy more dividend stocks. $3k-4k a week.

4. History of U.S. Bear vs Bull Markets​

根據提供的文章連結（內容未直接檢視，但基於標題與網址推斷），其核心討論主題應為：

「歷史數據中牛市（bull markets）與熊市（bear markets）的持續時間比較，重點在於牛市通常比熊市維持更長的週期。」

可能延伸的相關內容包括：

  1. 定義牛市與熊市的標準（如漲跌幅門檻）。
  2. 歷史上具體的市場週期案例與持續時間統計。
  3. 此現象對投資策略的潛在啟示（如長期持有的優勢）。

若需更精確的總結，建議直接參考該文中的數據與結論。

內容​

The data shows that bull markets last longer than bear markets. https://www.uidaho.edu/-/media/UIdaho-Responsive/Files/Extension/county/Latah/finance/history-of-bull-and-bear-markets.pdf?la=en&hash=3FE66B60665F69ABF4A8CAEF3383C805F868ED0F

討論​

評論 1:

Note that history does not show what happens when the President of the US causes a recession, on purpose. One who starts fights will allies, that puts tariffs on allies, that threatens to take Greenland by force has not been ruled out, that threatens to invade and take the Panama canal, nor one who ridicules Canada and says they should be the 51st state, and has threatened to redraw the borders.

One who threatens US car makers in a private call if they raise prices on their cars, and then publicly says he could care less if they raise prices.

All these comparisons are off the table when you have a President purposefully tanking the economy.

In other words these historical charts do not include an imbecile dictating economic policy.

評論 2:

The Dow Jones Industrial Average did not return to its 1929 pre-crash high of 381.17 until November 23, 1954. Do you remember the last time the U.S. implemented sweeping tariffs? No? It was the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act of 1930.

評論 3:

Here’s to hoping that we get there soon!

Trump’s actions are unprecedented. I am not convinced we are adequately afraid of the worst case scenario.

評論 4:

The Great depression took over 15 years to get back to break even

評論 5:

We should take into account how drastically the investing landscape has changed over the last decade. Retail investors are entering the market at record rates thanks to how accessible it's become. Apps like Robinhood, fractional shares, faster settlement times, and instant deposits have made the market a completely different beast compared to the past.

There are Gen Z investors now. When I was a kid, I had no concept or interest in the stock market. My parents had to physically go into a TD Ameritrade branch to open an account. Today, you can sign up, get approved, and start trading all on the same day—sometimes within minutes.

These tools have not only lowered the barrier to entry, but they’ve also changed investor behavior—encouraging more frequent trading, risk-taking, and even turning investing into a form of entertainment.

All of these advances have changed how we invest, and we should be cautious when comparing today’s market to previous eras like the Great Depression or the Dot-Com Bubble. The context is just different.

So, stay the course.

5. Investing in Germany (DAX) as an American​

这篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. 投資德國市場的途徑探討：
    作者考慮投資德國市場，並探討了不同的投資方式，尤其關注追蹤德國DAX指數的選項。

  2. 美國投資者投資DAX的挑戰：
    作者作為美國投資者，研究如何透過美國市場的工具（如ETF）投資DAX，並發現**Global X DAX Germany ETF（DAX:NASDAQ）**的表現與DAX指數（以歐元計價）存在顯著差異。

  3. 匯率影響與績效差異的疑問：

    • 該ETF在5年期間相較於DAX指數（歐元計價）落後超過30個百分點，儘管美元兌歐元匯率在5年後基本持平（USD/EUR ≈ 0%變化）。
    • 作者觀察到ETF的表現與歐元匯率波動（2021年走強、2022年走弱）相關，但困惑為何在2023年歐元回升後，ETF未能「追回」績效差距。

  4. 尋求更好的DAX投資方式：
    作者開放其他投資德國市場的建議，可能包括：

    • 其他追蹤DAX的ETF或金融產品（如歐元計價的ETF）。
    • 直接投資德國股市或考慮匯率避險工具。

關鍵問題：​

  • 為何美元計價的DAX ETF未能反映歐元回升後的指數表現？（可能原因：匯率避險成本、ETF管理費、追蹤誤差等。）
  • 是否有更有效的方式獲得DAX/Germany的投資曝險？（例如：歐元計價ETF、ADR、或跨市場股票投資。）

總結：文章聚焦於匯率對國際投資的影響，以及美國投資者如何優化對德國股市的投資策略。

內容​

I am looking at possibly investing some in Germany. I looked through a couple different ways to get exposure and looked through the DAX composition and performance. This seemed satisfactory to me, but I have some questions about what is the best way to invest in DAX as an American. I was looking at the Global X DAX Germany ETF (DAX:NASDAQ) and noticed that when compared to the index price in EUR, the US ETF has underperformed by over 30pp. Looking at the chart, it makes sense that the US ETF outperformed until mid-2021, and then underperformed until mid-2022 because it matches periods when the EUR strengthened and then weakened against the USD, but at the end of 5Y USDEUR is basically at ~0% but the overall return is vastly different. Why did the US ETF not "catch up" after the EUR strengthened into 2023? What am I missing here? Also, is there any better way to get this exposure to DAX/Germany in general? Open to any ideas.

討論​

評論 1:

maybe r/Finanzen gives you a helping hand…

6. Will money market accounts, such as Vanguard's VMFXX, remain safe and stable?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：
「是否應繼續將大部分流動資產投資於Vanguard的VMFXX基金，並探討當前政治環境（如川普政府的政策行動）可能對該投資決策的潛在影響及需關注的風險。」

具體要點包括：

  1. 投資集中風險：作者目前將70%的流動資產（近六位數）投入VMFXX基金，妻子對此提出質疑，需評估是否過度集中。
  2. 政治不確定性：川普政府的政策行動（如經濟或金融監管措施）可能影響市場或基金穩定性，導致信心動搖。
  3. 主動監控需求：討論投資者應關注哪些潛在風險指標（如政策變化、基金表現、市場波動等），以做出調整決策。

整體而言，文章聚焦於「在政治經濟不確定性下，如何權衡流動資產的安全配置」。

內容​

Given everything that's going on, my wife has been pressing me to decide whether we should continue holding all of our liquid savings in Vanguard's VMFXX fund. It's a fair question.

Currently, nearly six figures—about 70% of our liquid assets—are invested in VMFXX. While I'm not overly concerned at the moment, the recent string of the Trump's administration questionable actions has left me feeling less than 100% confident.

Should I, and others, be concerned? What should we be keeping an eye on?

討論​

評論 1:

Youre in short dated funds with an avg maturity of 24 days. Theres nothing to worry about unless you think the Treasury is going to default which has never happened.

評論 2:

Are you retired or retiring soon? That's a massive amount of money tied up in a very conservative way.

評論 3:

Most people are asking: "With all that's going on, my wife is asking if we should move everything to VMFXX". I've got many times that amount sitting in preferable VUSXX. If the gov't can no longer print money to pay me back, my account balances will be the least of my worries (not that I'll be able to check them).

評論 4:

I’m 80% in VMFXX. Things are going to get worse.

評論 5:

After 2008, the government took steps to make money market funds a lot safer. The vast majority of my emergency fund is in money market funds and I'm not worried.

7. 401k - company does not offer matching until after 1 year probation​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：在不獲得公司匹配的情況下，如何優先分配個人退休儲蓄（如401k、Roth IRA、HSA）以達到最佳財務效益。具體要點包括：

  1. 401k的優先性：提問者詢問即使沒有公司匹配，是否仍應優先最大化401k供款。
  2. 投資順序的考量：討論在滿足緊急預備金和Roth IRA供款後，是否應將多餘資金投入401k或優先最大化HSA（健康儲蓄帳戶）。
  3. 稅務優化策略：隱含對不同退休帳戶（稅前401k、稅後Roth IRA、三重免稅HSA）的稅務優勢比較，以決定資金分配順序。

整體而言，問題圍繞「如何根據個人財務狀況，遵循推薦的投資順序來優化退休儲蓄」。

內容​

Hello,

If my company doesn't match, is it still recommended for me to try and max out my 401k? I know I have to max out Roth IRA and make sure I have emergency funds. But would putting more into 401k after that be beneficial? Or should I max my HSA first?

I know there's a recommended order of investing.

Thank you!

討論​

評論 1:

All the more you can save the better.

評論 2:

HSA has better tax advantages than a non-matched 401k. If you have leftover funds after the HSA, the non-matched 401k is still better than say a brokerage account (assuming it’s funds earmarked for retirement).

8. Yield difference between Money market funds vs regular government funds​

核心討論主題總結：​

這篇文章的核心問題在於探討 「為何不同類型的債券基金之間，股息收益率（dividend yield）的差異比例會顯著不同」，並通過兩組基金的比較來分析可能的原因：

  1. 第一組（貨幣市場基金）：

    • 美國國債基金（VUSXX，收益率4.24%） vs. 市政債券基金（VCTXX，收益率2.49%）
    • 差異：VCTXX的收益率比VUSXX低約40%。
    • 疑問：為何市政債券基金的收益率比國債基金低這麼多？

  2. 第二組（非貨幣市場的長期債券基金）：

    • 美國長期國債ETF（VGLT，收益率4.72%） vs. 加州市政債券基金（VCAIX，收益率3.34%）
    • 差異：VCAIX的收益率比VGLT低約29%。
    • 疑問：為何這組的收益率差異比例比第一組小？

關鍵討論點：​

  • 稅務影響：市政債券（如VCTXX和VCAIX）通常免徵聯邦稅（或州稅），因此其稅前收益率會低於應稅債券（如國債），但稅後收益可能更具吸引力。然而，兩組的差異比例不同，可能反映市場對稅收優惠的定價差異。
  • 基金類型差異：第一組是貨幣市場基金（短期債券），第二組是長期債券基金，兩者的利率風險和市場定價機制不同。
  • 流動性與風險：貨幣市場基金中的市政債券（VCTXX）可能流動性更低或信用風險略高，導致收益率折價更大；而長期債券的收益率差異可能反映期限風險和稅收效應的綜合作用。
  • 市場供需因素：投資者對短期市政債券（如VCTXX）的需求可能更高（因避稅需求），壓低其收益率，而長期市政債券（如VCAIX）的供需關係可能不同。

本質問題：​

作者試圖理解 「為何同樣是國債 vs. 市政債券的比較，短期基金與長期基金的收益率差異比例會不一致」，並探討背後可能的市場機制或稅務邏輯。

內容​

I wonder what can explain the difference of dividend yield in the first pair vs. the second pair?

Why is VCTXX significantly lower than VUSXX (40% difference) , whereas VCAIX is only 30% lower than VGLT

The first pair:

vs. the second pair which are not money market funds

討論​

評論 1:

To compare the yield - you need to look at what's called the TEY or tax equivalent yield. Munis are tax exempt and may be state tax exempt depending on the investor's state of residency.

Muni's are generally better for people who are in high tax brackets.

Sample tey calculator at Fidelity site here - https://digital.fidelity.com/prgw/digital/taxyieldcalc/

評論 2:

Money market funds are extreme short term duration, the ETFs you are comparing to are intermediate and long duration. You are looking at different spots on the yield curve.

評論 3:

Vanguard California Municipal Money Market Fund’s investment objective is to seek to provide current income that is exempt from both federal and California personal income taxes while maintaining a stable net asset value of $1 per share.

評論 4:

Your title should be about Muni not MMF.

9. Seeking advice on ESOP transfers​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

「是否應將UPS員工持股計劃（ESOP）中的股票直接兌現，還是經歷繁瑣程序轉移至個人經紀帳戶（如Fidelity），並考量稅務影響的決策分析。」

具體要點包括：

  1. ESOP股票的處置選擇：

    • 直接賣出變現後轉移資金至經紀帳戶。
    • 透過複雜程序轉換為Class A股票再轉移（需填寫文件、耗時）。

  2. 關鍵考量因素：

    • 程序便利性（直接兌現 vs. 轉換流程的繁瑣程度）。
    • 稅務影響（賣出或轉移可能產生的稅負差異，但作者未明確細節）。
    • 股票增值收益（9年來每股上漲$35，需評估持有或變現的潛在利益）。

  3. 求助建議：

    • 作者希望獲得關於「哪種方式更合理」的實用建議，尤其是稅務和效率層面。

總結：這是一個關於「優化員工持股變現或轉移策略」的實務問題，涉及成本效益與稅務權衡。

內容​

Here’s a quick background…I work for UPS and have 9 years worth of esop stock at what I believe is a 5% discount. I’ve stopped purchasing this via payroll deduction roughly a year ago and have 2/3 of the shares (423b shares) available to be sold/withdrawn/ transferred etc. After 9 years current price of this stock is up $35 vs. when I started buying them in 2015. After speaking with the customer service reps transferring these shares to my brokerage account (Fidelity) is going to be a pain in the ass. (Must be converted to class A shares then paperwork filed etc). Does it makes sense to just cash them out and then transfer funds into my brokerage accounts or go through the long process and hurdles of conversion and then transfer? I’m also not sure how the tax implications would impact me. Any advice would be appreciated

討論​

無討論內容

10. Building a $2,000/month REIT portfolio for retirement — Feedback welcome!​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
「如何優化以每月2,000美元投資REITs的組合，平衡股息收入與長期增長，並聚焦美元收益」

具體要點包括：

  1. 投資策略目標：

    • 每月定期投入2,000美元（透過IBKR平台），以REITs為核心資產。
    • 追求股息收入與長期資本增值的平衡，尤其重視美元現金流。
    • 計劃長期持有並再投資股息，退休後依賴收益生活。

  2. 現有組合分析：

    • 分散投資於不同REITs類型（如綜合ETF、商業地產、數據中心、賭場等）。
    • 潛在疑慮：數據中心（DLR、EQIX）占比是否過高（共400美元/月，占20%）。

  3. 徵求建議方向：

    • 組合的風險評估（如行業集中度、個股選擇）。
    • 是否有其他推薦的REITs或需替換的標的。

總結：作者希望社群反饋此REIT組合的合理性，並探討如何進一步優化配置以達成財務目標。

內容​

I’m planning to invest $2,000/month into REITs using IBKR. I want a mix of dividend income and long-term growth, with a focus on USD income. Here’s the portfolio I’m considering: • VNQ – $500/month (broad REIT ETF) • O – $400/month (monthly dividend king) • WPC – $300/month (global commercial) • VICI – $200/month (casinos/resorts) • DLR – $200/month (data centers) • EQIX – $200/month (premium data centers) • SCHH – $200/month (low-cost ETF)

I plan to reinvest all dividends until retirement, then live off the income.

Any red flags in this portfolio? Too heavy on data centers? Any other REITs you think I should include or replace?

Appreciate any thoughts or suggestions from the community!

討論​

無討論內容

11. A company I bought stock in is awarding preferred shares to common stock holders​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：一位投資者對某醫用大麻公司（現已更名並轉型涉及加密貨幣）發放的「特別優先股股息」相關規則感到困惑，尋求關於優先股性質、分配方式以及對現有普通股影響的解釋。

具體要點包括：

  1. 公司轉型與股息公告：公司從醫用大麻業務轉向加密貨幣投資，並更名後宣布發放特別股息（每持有1,000股普通股可獲1股優先股）。
  2. 投資者的疑問：
    • 優先股的定義與權利（相對於普通股有何不同？）。
    • 分配方式（自動到賬、需主動聯繫公司，或替換現有普通股）。
    • 持有20,000股普通股的影響（是否能獲得20股優先股，且保留原有普通股？）。

總結：文章聚焦於投資者對企業行動（corporate action）中優先股股息發放規則的不理解，並希望釐清操作細節與潛在利益。

內容​

I’m totally in the weeds with this.

Basically this medicinal marijuana company I bought stocks in started buying up a bunch of crypto and renamed itself in the process. As a way to celebrate their rebranding and acquisition of assets, they announced a special dividend of one preferred share for every 1000 common shares held before November 25, 2024. I have like 20000 shares.

I have no idea what this means. What’s a preferred share? How do I collect on this? Are they just going to hand it over? Do I contact them? Will it just appear in my portfolio one day? Am I trading my common shares for preferred shares? Or do they give me preferred shares in addition to my common stock.

Anything you can tell me would be helpful. Thanks.

討論​

評論 1:

Also if the company gets liquidated at any point in time, preferred shares get paid out first. Well, debt holders first, followed by preferred and then common shares. You can also have different voting rights based on the class of share you hold.

評論 2:

Preferred shares are owed a dividend every year (or quarter, or every two quarters, or whatever.) If the company doesn’t pay that dividend, it gets rolled over and accumulates.

The company is not allowed to pay dividends to the common shareholders until they’ve paid the balance owed to the preferred shareholders. They have to get their dividends first, which is why they’re “preferred”.

If they don’t intend to pay dividends, they will just let the preferred dividend accumulate and it’s not great for the shareholder.

評論 3:

A special dividend would be on top of your existing shares. Sometimes companies will spin off a separate ticker and award to shareholders. It happened to me with Brookfield a couple times.

I assume this is a private company? Do you have a special stock account from them like Shareworks? I would assume it just shows up eventually.

評論 4:

I have nothing useful to add, but I did want to thank you for the chuckle. "In the weeds" and "medical marijuana stock" was a good one. 😆

評論 5:

Preferred shares usually mean a certain dividend payout that has to happen before common shareholders get a dividend.  if the company doesn't pay dividends today, then likely it means nothing other more pieces of paper you own.

12. How can I optimize my situation?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是個人財務規劃與未來購屋儲蓄策略，具體聚焦於以下重點：

  1. 當前財務狀況盤點

    • 收入、資產（緊急預備金、退休帳戶、HSA等）與負債（無債務）的明細。
    • 現金流分配比例（必要支出、非必要消費、儲蓄投資）。

  2. 購屋目標的可行性分析

    • 提出將已達標的緊急預備金（EF）轉為房屋頭期款儲蓄（每月$964.78），並計算5年內達成20%頭期款（約$55,645）的可能性。
    • 以3倍年收入估算可負擔房價（約$278,226），並考量收入成長的潛在影響。

  3. 財務配置的優化思考

    • 檢視現有儲蓄/投資比例（如退休帳戶最大化利用）是否合理。
    • 探討其他可能被忽略的選項（如投資組合調整、額外收入來源），以加速購屋目標或提升財務靈活性。

  4. 長期與短期的取捨

    • 在「維持財務安全墊」（如保留EF）與「提前實現購屋」之間權衡，凸顯風險管理與目標優先級的決策過程。

總結：作者透過詳盡的財務數據，尋求如何在現有架構下調整資源分配，以平衡退休儲蓄與中期購屋目標，同時評估潛在盲點與替代方案。

內容​

[ ] 26, income of ~$93k

[ ] Debt free; own my used car (~7k-8k in value)

[ ] ~6 month EF ($13500) in HYSA

[ ] HYSA (8,291.43) for car maintenance + future car SF

[ ] 401k - $32779.72 currently vested, 2065 Vanguard target date fund

[ ] Roth IRA - maxing out for 2025 ($6385.35 total in account currently), 80% total US index fund 20% intl index fund

[ ] Maxing out HSA ($3379.19 currently in account)

Current spending/saving/investing:

[ ] 50.05% take home (2307.18) on needs/bills

[ ] 19.31% take home (890.18) on wants (eating out, future

[ ] 20.13% take home for saving/investing (500/mnth to HYSA for EF, 427.78/mnth for maxing Roth IRA)

[ ] 15% pretax to 401k, maxing out HSA and investing (4.1% pretax) = 19.1% pretax invested

[ ] Take home (4609.92) - all previously mentioned deductions/expenses/investments (4145.15) = 464.78/mnth left over doing nothing

Ideas/notes:

[ ] Free up 500/mnth from EF since it's almost 6 months funded to go toward future house (500 + 464.78 = 964.78/mnth to house)

[ ] Not an immediate concern (at least 3-5 yrs unless my income increases substantially)

[ ] 3x income 20% DP = 55,645.27 for 278,226.36 house); if I do redirect EF to house DP, this will be possible in 5 yrs (60 mo)

[ ] Maybe I'm not thinking of all my options, but that's why I ask. Thanks in advance for any advice!

討論​

無討論內容

13. Largest premium paid on public company acquisition?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：上市公司收購案例中，收購價遠高於當時股價的巨額溢價（premium）交易。具體聚焦以下幾點：

  1. 高溢價收購的極端案例
    提問者想知道是否存在「股價1美元卻以20美元收購」這類溢價幅度極高的案例（即溢價達1900%），並探討此類交易的背景與動機。

  2. 行業特殊性
    是否某些行業（如科技、生物醫藥）更可能出現高溢價收購，或因特定因素（如專利、市場壟斷）驅動溢價。

  3. 歷史案例與背景分析
    尋求實際案例中「最大溢價收購」的具體情況，例如：

    • 收購方願意支付高溢價的原因（如戰略價值、消除競爭）。
    • 被收購公司的特殊資產（技術、用戶數據、稀缺牌照）。
    • 市場環境（如股價暫時低估但資產潛力巨大）。

  4. 交易背後的邏輯
    探討溢價背後的財務或非財務考量，例如：

    • 控制權爭奪（敵意收購下的溢價抬升）。
    • 私有化退市（如大股東高價回購流通股）。
    • 監管或政策變化帶來的突發機會。

關鍵詞：收購溢價（acquisition premium）、股權收購（takeover bid）、行業差異（industry-specific factors）、控制權溢價（control premium）。

內容​

I am curious if anyone has examples on public companies that were bought out for a large % over the share price at the time of the offer.

For example, if a company’s stock is trading at $1, is there any event a company pays $20 per share to acquire all outstanding common shares? Is this industry specific? Curious on examples with the largest premiums paid and what the circumstances were around it.

討論​

評論 1:

I just cheated and used chatgpt:

  1. Medivation acquired by Pfizer (2016) • Purchase Price: $81.50 per share • Pre-rumor trading price: ~$26 • Premium: Over 200% • Context: Medivation had a blockbuster prostate cancer drug (Xtandi). Several bidders were interested (Sanofi, Pfizer, others). The high premium reflected the strategic value and competitive bidding.

⸻

  1. Zappos acquired by Amazon (2009) • Acquisition Value: ~$1.2 billion • Premium: Estimated at ~600% based on internal valuation • Context: Zappos was private but included here because it’s often cited due to Amazon’s massive valuation multiple and the high premium paid to secure the culture and customer service DNA.

⸻

  1. LinkedIn acquired by Microsoft (2016) • Purchase Price: $196 per share • Pre-announcement price: ~$131 • Premium: ~50% • Context: Strategic asset for Microsoft to build out its enterprise/social presence. Competitive dynamics also influenced the valuation.

⸻

  1. EMC acquired by Dell (2016) • Deal size: $67 billion (largest tech deal at the time) • Premium: ~28% • Context: EMC held a large stake in VMware, which added to the strategic complexity and premium.

評論 2:

Pharma company with a revolutionary drug maybe? In all likelihood you wouldn’t see a 2000% buyer’s premium ever. Information is simply too widely available.

評論 3:

Mars acquisition of kellanova?

評論 4:

Prosus is in the process of acquiring Just Eat Takeaway for something like a 50% premium.

14. Treasury Direct Still Down- Maintenance Extended By 6 Hours So Far​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：對美國財政部直屬網站Treasury Direct異常長時間系統維護的擔憂與疑問。

具體要點包括：

  1. 維護時間異常延長：原定從週五晚7點至週日中午12點，後延長至週日晚6點，引發用戶不安。
  2. 對原因的猜測：發文者詢問是否有人了解具體維護內容或相關消息，顯示對潛在問題（如技術故障、安全更新等）的隱憂。
  3. 社群尋求資訊：在缺乏官方說明的情況下，試圖透過社群討論釐清狀況。

整體聚焦於「維護延遲的異常性」及「背後原因的不確定性」所引發的緊張情緒。

內容​

This is the longest maintenance I have known Treasury Direct to do. It was scheduled to be from 7pm Friday to 12pm Sunday, now it says 6pm Sunday.

This makes me nervous. Does anyone here know what they are up to, specifically? Any news I'm unaware of?

討論​

評論 1:

Check Signal you should be in the groupchat.

評論 2:

Probably some poor bastards in their IT department, those who haven’t been DOGEd out yet, are trying to cobble together whatever series of rubber bands and hamster wheels that keep that website together.

評論 3:

News from the Most Tumparent Administration Anybody Has Ever Seen, Everybody's Talking About It It Is So Transparent Wow? 😯

There's a not-trivial chance Elon is having his 19 year olds migrate it to the latest version of React Native or whatever as we speak, with 80% of the functionality marked # TODO

評論 4:

I was just on it about 45 minutes ago

評論 5:

Yes. The United States federal government has collapsed.

Stay tuned for further upda

15. US tariffs: Time to move away from S&P500, to a proper world index ETF?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：在美國經濟與全球連結度可能下降的背景下，被動投資者是否應重新評估以S&P500作為「市場指數」替代品的合理性，並探討轉向真正全球性指數（如FTSE）的必要性。具體可分為以下重點：

  1. S&P500傳統定位的挑戰：
    過去被動投資者將S&P500視為全球市場的近似指標，因美國企業供應鏈遍佈全球，但此前提可能因美國政策（如川普時期的貿易保護主義）改變而動搖，導致美國與世界的經濟連結度降低。

  2. 美元與美國信任危機的潛在影響：
    美國國際地位下滑、美元作為主要儲備貨幣的穩定性受質疑，進一步削弱S&P500代表「全球市場」的邏輯基礎。

  3. 被動投資策略的重新思考：
    若S&P500僅反映「美國市場」而非「全球市場」，繼續單純投資該指數可能無法達成分散風險或捕捉全球成長的目標，需檢視其「地理溢價」（geographical premium）是否仍合理。

  4. 替代方案的提出：
    作者建議討論是否應轉向真正的全球性指數（如FTSE），以更準確反映市場整體表現，並應對美國經濟相對權重下降的趨勢。

關鍵問題：在全球化格局變動下，被動投資者是否需調整「市場」定義，從單一國家指數轉向更廣泛的全球指數？這涉及對美國未來經濟影響力的評估，以及投資組合地理分散化的策略修正。

內容​

For many years, passive investors have used the S&P500 as an approximation for a market index, because US companies’ supply chain span across the globe.

But with Trump’s policies, the world would no longer engage with the US like it did. Manufacturing may increase in the US, but the US’ connectedness to the world would decrease. Not to mention, there may even be a small potential that the US dollar no longer becomes the world’s principal reserve currency, with how countries’ respect for the US has decreased and the perceived trust and stability the US had offered has been broken.

This means passive investors who advise to “invest in the market” are no longer investing in the market if they continue only investing in the S&P500. The distinction that the S&P500 is an index of the US market, not the global market, is clearer now.

With this, any opinions on whether investing purely in the S&P500 is still worth the geographical premium? Or would it be better to invest in a true market index now, like the FTSE?

討論​

評論 1:

100% either pair it with an international index fund or start buying a global fund

評論 2:

Selling low and/or buying high is the exact opposite of what you want.

評論 3:

Bogleheads have been investing in the global market this whole time

評論 4:

My personal take has been to own both my entire adult life. It’s hard to predict when ex US will out perform or when small caps will out perform. The S&P does seem to be the most consistent group over multi decades, but owning it all helps me sleep at night.

Compare the 1990s versus the 2000s versus the past 15 years? All quite different. I just ignore the noise and keep buying VTI+VXUS. Something like just VT might be even better than what I do, but I like being a little overweight US. With current megacap valuations, you could make a strong argument to rotate toward more ex US or mid and small caps, but the tariffs are quite likely to hit everything - maybe small caps moreso than large cap. It’s just really hard to predict, so I always own it all.

評論 5:

I'm staying the course, 100% VOO.

16. Thoughts on my portfolio?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：如何構建一個多元化、被動管理的退休投資組合（以 Roth IRA 為帳戶類型），重點包括：

  1. 投資目標

    • 長期「設定後忽略」（set and forget）的被動投資策略，專注於退休儲蓄。
    • 透過多元化分散風險，並維持固定的資產配置比例。

  2. 資產配置與工具選擇

    • 股利成長型股票：SCHD（33.2%）作為核心收益來源。
    • 大盤指數追蹤：FXAIX（35.0%）提供美國大型股市場曝險。
    • 不動產投資信託（REITs）：PLD、INVH、MAA（合計25%）利用 Roth IRA 的稅務優勢。
    • 國際市場與小型股：VEU（12.5%）和 IWM（12.5%）增強多元性，分別涵蓋國際股市與美國小型股。

  3. 策略執行

    • 定期再平衡以維持目標比例。
    • 使用股息再投資（DRIP）最大化複利效果。

  4. 稅務考量

    • 選擇 Roth IRA 帳戶，使 REITs 的高股息與未來收益免稅，並搭配其他稅效優化工具（如 SCHD）。

總結：作者旨在透過「核心衛星策略」（核心資產+輔助性配置），結合股利增長、市場寬基指數、不動產及國際曝險，打造一個低維護、稅務高效且風險分散的退休組合。

內容​

Context - I am 21, this is a Roth Ira (REIT because tax advantage W) VEU for international exposure, and IWM is for small cap. Goal is to have a set and forget retirement portfolio, that is nice and diversified. Goal is to stay around these percents and to drip whenever possible.

SCHD -33.2% (Dividend Fund)

FXAIX -35.0% (SMP Tracker)

PLD -10.0% INVH -7.5% MAA -7.5% (REIT)

VEU -12.5% (IE)

IWM -12.5% (SC)

討論​

評論 1:

Nice and solid. My portfolio is very similar to yours

17. Where should I move my profit sharing to?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：如何最有效地管理現有的退休資金（包括利潤分享帳戶和補充退休帳戶），以達成27年後的退休目標。具體問題包括：

  1. 資金配置的選擇：

    • 作者擁有前公司的利潤分享帳戶（約2萬美元）和每月存入250美元的補充退休帳戶，但無法將利潤分享帳戶的資金轉入補充帳戶。
    • 尋求建議，將這些資金轉移到何處以優化退休規劃。

  2. 潛在的稅務或罰款問題：

    • 擔心移動利潤分享帳戶的資金是否會產生罰款（例如提前提取或轉移的稅務懲罰）。

  3. 是否需要專業協助：

    • 考慮是否應諮詢財務顧問（financial advisor）來制定策略，以實現長期退休目標（75%最終薪資的退休金）。

  4. 長期目標明確性：

    • 退休時間為27年後，但對具體投資工具（如IRA、401(k)、指數基金等）或稅務效率策略缺乏了解，因此尋求方向性建議。

總結來說，這是一個關於退休資金整合、稅務優化與投資策略選擇的求助，並強調對專業建議的需求。

內容​

I have a profit sharing account from a company I previously worked for. I now am able to contribute to a pension fund that will hopefully pay 75% of my final salary. I have roughly $20,000 in the profit sharing account. I have an additional supplemental retirement account that I contribute $250 a month into.

Where is the best place to move this money? Will I get penalized for moving it?

I cannot move it into the additional /

supplemental retirement account. Should I go through a financial advisor ? I suppose the goal would be to retire 27 years from now.

Any advice or direction would be appreciated. I apologize for not knowing more on the issue.

討論​

評論 1:

Are you allowed to do whatever/invest the funds?

18. DBS vs OCBC - Which Singapore Bank is the better investment?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：比較新加坡兩大銀行（DBS與OCBC）的長期投資價值，並透過財務指標（如ROE、P/E、股息率等）和業務特點，探討哪一家更適合作為長期投資標的。具體分析重點如下：

  1. 財務指標對比：

    • DBS的ROE（13.8%）、股息率（5.2%）和預期盈利增長（7%）均高於OCBC，但P/E（13.2）也較高，反映其估值相對較貴。
    • OCBC的P/E（11.9）較低，風險偏好保守，但股息率（4.5%）和盈利增長（6%）略低，可能被視為「價值型」選擇。

  2. 業務差異：

    • DBS是新加坡最大銀行，區域擴張能力強，成長性較高。
    • OCBC專注財富管理和保險業務，風險較低但增長潛力相對平穩。

  3. 關鍵爭論點：

    • DBS的高估值是否合理？其溢價能否被更高的成長性與股息率支撐？
    • OCBC的低P/E是「價值機會」還是反映其增長局限性？
    • 以股息為目標的投資者應如何選擇？

總結來說，文章聚焦於兩家銀行的成長性、估值合理性、股息回報之間的權衡，並邀請讀者分享實際投資經驗或觀點。

內容​

Hey all, looking at Singapore’s banking sector and curious to hear your thoughts on DBS (D05) vs. OCBC (O39). Both are major players in the region, but which one looks like the better long-term bet?

DBS Group Holdings (D05)

• ROE: 13.8%

• P/E: 13.2

• 5Y Earnings Growth Forecast: 7%

• Dividend Yield: 5.2%

DBS is the largest bank in Singapore, with a strong regional presence. Higher ROE and a solid dividend yield, but the valuation is also a bit richer.

OCBC Bank (O39)

• ROE: 12.5%

• P/E: 11.9

• 5Y Earnings Growth Forecast: 6%

• Dividend Yield: 4.5%

OCBC is more focused on wealth management and insurance. Slightly lower valuation and more conservative risk profile.

Key Questions:

• Does DBS’s premium valuation make sense given its higher growth?

• OCBC has a lower P/E – value opportunity or justified discount?

• Which is the better dividend play?

Would love to hear your take - anyone holding either of these?

討論​

無討論內容

19. Commodities and Precious Metals up but Companies Stocks Down​

該文章的核心討論主題是：

在不穩定的市場環境下，當大宗商品與貴金屬（如農產品、能源、林產品、金屬、黃金/白銀等）的期貨價格持續上漲，但相關公司的股價卻隨大盤下跌時（例如近期金銀市場的情況），是否適合投資這類生產與開採企業的股票？

具體討論的重點包括：

  1. 市場異常現象分析：探討為何商品期貨價格上漲，但相關公司股價反而下跌的背離現象。
  2. 投資策略評估：在這種情況下，投資此類公司是否具備潛在機會或風險（如避險屬性、估值吸引力或市場情緒影響）。
  3. 歷史案例參考：以近期金銀市場的表現為例，驗證此策略的可行性。

本質上，這是一個關於「市場分歧時期如何配置商品相關資產」的投資決策問題。

內容​

During high market instability do you think it is good to purchase companies that produce and mine Commodities & Precious Metals (Agricultural, Energy, Forest products, Metals, Gold/Silver), others) if the futures prices are still rising but the companies stocks are falling with the general market like what has happened recently with gold and silver?

討論​

評論 1:

this is a common misconception, "well if the price of <underlying commodity> is going up, than the producers of that commodity should also be going up". and it may be true, or it may not be true. generally the profit spread of producers of any given commodity is influenced by:

  • degree of contango of the curve, and the rate of change of it
  • fuel costs
  • financing costs

both oil, and its refined heating oil/diseal have been rising, and 10y financing rates are also increasing. also ex-gold, commody prices in the near term have given back some of last falls gains. so its not a suprise that producers are being sold (not to mention their overall beta to the market)

評論 2:

Some yes, not all: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/06/gold-copper-oil-price-outlook-2025.html?&qsearchterm=commodities

If the world economy slows prices can drop. If the dollar gains strength, prices can drop (commodities are priced in dollars).

I think precious metals are going to rise further. Not sure about oil, agriculture, common metals.

評論 3:

A good rule of thumb is, never buy high. Also, I would recommend safer options such as index’s and ETF’s.

20. Daily General Discussion and Advice Thread - March 31, 2025​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：提供一個開放討論區，鼓勵用戶提出與投資相關的一般問題、市場評論或分享小知識，同時引導新手投資者參考相關資源，並提醒尋求個人財務建議時應提供的關鍵資訊。

重點包括：

  1. 開放討論：允許用戶自由提問、評論市場或分享投資相關內容。
  2. 資源導向：提供常見問答（FAQ）、入門指南、書單、媒體推薦等連結，協助新手學習。
  3. 個人財務建議的注意事項：
    • 強調提問時需提供具體背景（如年齡、收入、風險承受度等），以便獲得更有價值的回饋。
    • 提醒用戶網路意見僅供參考，建議尋求專業顧問協助。

整體而言，文章旨在促進投資知識交流，同時強調資訊透明與自主研究的重要性。

內容​

Have a general question? Want to offer some commentary on markets? Maybe you would just like to throw out a neat fact that doesn't warrant a self post? Feel free to post here!

Please consider consulting our FAQ first - https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/wiki/faq

And our side bar also has useful resources.

If you are new to investing - please refer to Wiki - Getting Started

The reading list in the wiki has a list of books ranging from light reading to advanced topics depending on your knowledge level. Link here - Reading List

The media list in the wiki has a list of reputable podcasts and videos - Podcasts and Videos

If your question is "I have $XXXXXXX, what do I do?" or other "advice for my personal situation" questions, you should include relevant information, such as the following:

  • How old are you? What country do you live in?

  • Are you employed/making income? How much?

  • What are your objectives with this money? (Buy a house? Retirement savings?)

  • What is your time horizon? Do you need this money next month? Next 20yrs?

  • What is your risk tolerance? (Do you mind risking it at blackjack or do you need to know its 100% safe?)

  • What are you current holdings? (Do you already have exposure to specific funds and sectors? Any other assets?)

  • Any big debts (include interest rate) or expenses?

  • And any other relevant financial information will be useful to give you a proper answer.

Check the resources in the sidebar.

Be aware that these answers are just opinions of Redditors and should be used as a starting point for your research. You should strongly consider seeing a registered investment adviser if you need professional support before making any financial decisions!

討論​

評論 1:

How you guys feeling about Trump mentioning he is considering getting a third term in relation to investing in the US

評論 2:

Stock market makes no sense. So much bad news over the weekend and yet the S&P500 will close today in the green. I wanted to pull my S&P500 investment from my 401k but couldn't do it in time for today because it takes a day to process. Glad it didn't go through.

評論 3:

It should be a wild week!

Looking forward to see how this unfolds. If the market responds positively to whatever the tariff news is then I’ll happily make some money back. If it goes down I’ll have the opportunity to buy lower. But likely I won’t make any moves.

Comfort in knowing I’ve seen this all before and in a few years (or even months) it will only be a blip.

評論 4:

Sell sell sell

評論 5:

Hi all, I have a question in regards to options and wash sales.

I have 10,000 shares of a company (CCL). I'm currently down a good chunk and have decided to sell call options on my shares to generate at least something for now.

I have about 4000 shares listed as wash sale. If I put up 60 contracts instead of 100 will it sell those shares? Does it sell based on most recently acquired? Oldest acquired? Is there a way to specify that I don't want those specific shares sold?

I use Fidelity as my broker.

Id hate to have those shares called away and not be able to at least deduct them on my taxes.

21. Stock Portfolio Analyzer?​

这篇文章的核心讨论主題是：
「尋找具備AI分析功能的投資組合分析工具，並討論相關需求與現有資源」

具體重點包括：

  1. 核心需求：

    • AI驅動的投資組合分析工具，提供深度數據分析（如標的股價觸及52週高點、特定時間段內的漲跌幅變化等）。
    • AI建議功能（例如賣出時機提示）。

  2. 現有資源：

    • 已使用平台：Schwab、Fidelity、E-Trade、Personal Capital、Empower。
    • 嘗試過的工具：Quinn（可能未完全滿足需求）。

  3. 目標：

    • 透過社群（Reddit）尋求符合上述需求的推薦或解決方案。

內容​

Howdy Reddit Folks,

I am looking for a portfolio analyzer that would be AI powered it have rich analytics.

Requirement: Ability to scan the portfolio and highlight stocks that hit 52 week high, changed XY% in the past 30, 60/90 days or another time period. Perhaps use AI to suggest a sale etc.

What I have:

Schwab/Fidelity/Etrade/Personal Capital/Empower.

What I tried:

quinn

討論​

無討論內容

22. Should I put 10k emergency fund in HYSA or brokerage MM like VMFXX?​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：如何權衡資金的流動性與收益，以決定是否將約1萬美元的資金從當前的高收益儲蓄帳戶（HYSA，收益率約3.75%）轉移到其他投資選項（如貨幣市場基金、國債或超短期債券）。

具體討論重點包括：

  1. 投資選項比較：比較HYSA、貨幣市場基金、國債和超短期債券的收益率差異。
  2. 流動性與收益的取捨：探討資金保持高度流動性（如HYSA）與追求稍高收益（如債券）之間的利弊。
  3. 是否值得轉換：評估轉換投資工具的必要性，例如潛在收益提升是否足以彌補流動性或風險的增加。

整體而言，這是一個關於短期現金管理策略的決策分析，關注點在風險、回報與靈活性的平衡。

內容​

Thoughts on places to park around 10k? For reference, my current HYSA earns about 3.75%. For those of you using HYSAs, money market, treasury, or ultra-short bonds, what are thoughts about having the cash super liquid vs. earning slightly more return? Is it worth a switch?

討論​

評論 1:

Right now I have basically all of my cash in VMFXX. It’s got a 4.3%ish yield which is better than my HYSAs and it’s SIPC insured.

評論 2:

I personally keep mine in a MM fund. Earns 4.2% (higher than a HYSA), SIPC insured, and easy enough to access if I need it (only takes a business day to sell and transfer the money).

評論 3:

I keep everything in one place. Schwab. Emergency funds in SGOV.

評論 4:

HYSA since it will be fast to get the money out and it is insured by the FDIC. It will also help create different baskets between your brokerage and bank should there ever be a problem with customer service. Marcus will transfer same day before 12pm EDT.

評論 5:

Vanguard money market account like VMFXX!

23. Future of VTI(long terms aspects)​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：

  1. 長期投資策略的選擇：作者詢問在40年的投資期限下，是否應繼續定期定額（DCA）投資VTI（美國整體股市ETF）和VXUS（國際股市ETF），或考慮其他因素調整配置。
  2. 對美國市場未來表現的擔憂：作者質疑美國是否可能失去全球主導地位，並提到特朗普關稅政策可能損害國際關係，進而影響美國經濟與股市的長期前景。
  3. 資產配置的合理性：討論現有的VTI/VXUS組合是否足夠分散風險，或需因應地緣政治與經濟變化調整策略。

總結：文章聚焦於長期投資者對美國市場信心的動搖，以及如何在潛在的全球格局變化中優化投資策略。

內容​

What is the future outlook of VTI, y’all think? I currently have a 40 year time period, just started investing at 24. I hold a mix of VTI/VXUS currently. I’m wondering whether or not i should continue DCA, or if there’s other factors in play. Could the US be looking to lose its status as a world power? The Trump tariffs are turning allies against the US.

討論​

評論 1:

Stop trying to time the market. Block out the noise and keep investing regularly.

評論 2:

Yes, continue to DCA. If stocks tank, even better for you because you’re young. Better to get em on sale!

評論 3:

Vti with a 40 year time horizon? Hahahah this sub man. Holy shit

評論 4:

[deleted]

24. Need Help with My Investment Strategy​

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. 長期投資策略的選擇：
    作者（22歲，即將進入醫學院）與母親擁有高風險承受能力，並希望為長期（可能數十年）進行投資。目前持有ETF（如VOO、VTI、VXUS等）和個股（如BRK/B、Microsoft），並計劃新增300k資金，探討如何配置以最大化長期回報。

  2. 投資組合配置的考量：
    作者提出多種策略選項，包括：

    • 100%投入寬基指數（如VOO或VTI）
    • 成長型與寬基指數混合（如QQQM/VTI 50/50）
    • 成長型與股息型ETF組合（如QQQM/SCHD）
    • 增加國際市場曝險（如VXUS）
      其中傾向選擇高風險高報酬的QQQM相關組合，符合其長期目標與風險偏好。

  3. 市場環境與投入方式的抉擇：
    當前政治與經濟不確定性下，討論應一次性投入（lump sum）或分批定投（dollar cost averaging）。作者理解「時間勝於擇時」的原則，但仍猶豫是否分散投入以降低短期波動風險，最終傾向長期持有可能淡化短期影響。

  4. 個人背景強化投資邏輯：
    作者未來高收入預期（如外科醫生年薪50萬美元）及無資金需求，進一步支持其承擔高風險、追求成長的投資取向，並希望設定後長期不需頻繁調整（set and forget）。

總結：核心問題是如何在長期、高風險容忍的框架下，選擇最適合的資產配置策略（尤其是美股ETF組合），並決定資金投入方式以應對當前市場不確定性。

內容​

Hello Everyone,

This is my first post here and I'm looking for some help. I am in a very lucky position to be where my mother has a high income and wants to start investing. She has never invested until she gave me 100k two years ago to start investing. Her goal was to have the investments be set up for me in the future. So very long term. She wants to give me another 300k to invest.

I am 22 years old and will be starting medical school soon. Me or my mother will not need use of this investment so my risk tolerance is high. I will be fairly busy in medical school so I want to set and forget. I am also thinking of going into surgery which will defacto place me at most likely 500k salary.

The first 100 thousand was invested 2 years ago and, as of this moment, is 133,000. My ETF holding are [VOO - 49k], [VTI - 46k], [VXUS - 12k], [JEPQ - 13k]. My individual stock holdings are [BRK/B - 6k], [Microsoft - 5.5k].

With the 300k I have been thinking of various strategies. 1. 100% VOO or VTI 2. A 50/50 Mix of QQQM/VTI. 3. A mix of QQQM/SCHD 4. One of these mixes but also increasing my VXUS. I wanted to see what y'all think about all these options and where I should go. I was leaning towards QQQM mixes because of the high risk tolerance and lack of need for the money.

Also with the extreme variability of the political and financial climate right now what is the best way to invest right now. Should I lump sum or dollar cost average. I know time in market usually wins but maybe spreading it out over the year can reduce my overall risk. But then again if I'm going to be holding this for a long time it probably wouldn't effect my very long term that much.

Thanks for the help!

討論​

評論 1:

I have no long positions on the American markets at this moment in time, do with this information what you will.

On an unrelated note, you're destined to be a surgeon because only people who become surgeons would start counting money they'll make as surgeons before even starting school, lol.

評論 2:

Speaking from experience, my recommendation is for you to hire a personal investment advisor. Someone much older than you, who has been through market volatility. Interview various investment advisors and ask for proof of success during the 2008 to 2010 period. During economic periods like now and the 2008 to 2010 time frame, an advisor who can minimize loss is your best bet. Remember that a 50% drop in value takes a 100% rise just to break even. That break even period can take as much as 5 to 10 years, and can cost you a sizable loss in purchasing power. Best of success.

評論 3:

Wait for the bigger dip next month. Go VOO and QQQM. You have lots of time to build wealth.

25. Ex-US investing ahead pf dollar depreciation?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. 對美元貶值的預期與投資策略調整：
    作者認為美國前總統特朗普的政策可能導致美元貶值（例如通過協商手段），因此探討在美元仍強勢時，如何調整投資組合以應對潛在的貨幣風險。

  2. 尋求替代市場與資產類別的建議：
    作者質疑在美元貶值預期下，美國股市是否仍為理想選擇，並傾向於將資金配置到其他市場或資產類別（如房地產），以分散風險或保值。

  3. 法律與稅務層面的考量：
    作為美國投資者，作者特別關注跨境投資（如海外房地產或其他資產）時可能面臨的法律、稅務問題，並徵求相關建議以確保投資的合規性與效率。

總結：
文章主要圍繞「在美元可能貶值的背景下，如何選擇安全且具潛力的投資標的（尤其非美元資產）」，並結合美國投資者的稅務與法律限制，尋求具體的資產配置策略。

內容​

I am not convinced that the US is a bad place to invest, but I am convinced that Trump will devalue the dollar - probably through negotiations - which means it may be sound to invest in other markets. What are the best/safest asset classes and investments that can be made while the USD is strong? Not sure if there are stocks that make sense, so was more thinking real estate. Additionally as an American I welcome views from a legal/taxation standpoint of where/how it makes sense to do so.

討論​

評論 1:

You are confusing the value of the currency with the value of equities, which is ownership of companies. When currency devalues it "inflates" the value of tangible assets, including said companies and their shares. I say "inflates" because that's just what it looks like when it takes more dollars to buy a share, which is just a reflection of the dollar purchasing power going down.

評論 2:

I advise against playing the forex game if you're not actively trading forex

評論 3:

European stock markets are the easiest

評論 4:

Gold is always an option. Other minerals I’m sure.

Myself, I’m investing in water, but I’m a little nuts

評論 5:

When the dollar goes down, Americans travel less.  And right now, other countries are boycotting travel to the US, so I would stay away from any companies that rely on this, just as a thought.

Otherwise, it means America can compete better with other countries for business.  Companies want to have factories, etc., where it’s cheaper. If it becomes as cheap to have a factory in the US, for example, as China or Mexico or Canada, then that should be beneficial for the US.  Or that’s the idea, anyway.

Of course, building factories and fitting them out, is not something that can be done overnight.

The answer, really, is to be diversified.  I am adding foreign ETFs, SCHF and SCHE, but I’m also buying stable dividend US stocks and ETFs and bonds.

總體討論重點

以下是25篇文章的討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的文章錨點連結與逐條細節：

1. Trump to announce new 20% tariffs​

重點：

  • 經濟影響：全面關稅對產業（如汽車、葡萄酒）與投資環境的衝擊。
  • 消費與企業矛盾：需求疲軟下關稅可能壓縮企業利潤（海外生產成本上升）。
  • 投資策略：市場不確定性中如何調整SP500投資（DCA或退出）。
  • 政治風險：政策與2025年提案的潛在關聯。

2. Accenture (ACN) contracts removed​

重點：

  • 上市公司表現：ACN股價下跌12%，對比非上市公司（如德勤）。
  • 數據比較：合約數量與節省金額表格（德勤3.7億美元 vs. ACN 2.4億美元）。
  • 業務背景：可能涉及政府專案（CGI Federal等公司列名）。

3. Investment strategies amid uncertainty​

重點：

  • 風險調整：從高風險（10/10）降至低風險（2.5/10），質疑自動化工具有效性。
  • 資產配置矛盾：增持美債加劇本土風險集中。
  • 流動性管理：平衡私募股權等高風險非流動資產。

4. U.S. Bear vs Bull Markets history​

重點：

  • 週期比較：牛市持續時間通常長於熊市。
  • 投資啟示：長期持有的潛在優勢。

5. Investing in Germany (DAX)​

重點：

  • ETF績效落差：Global X DAX ETF落後指數30%，匯率影響不明顯。
  • 替代方案：尋求歐元計價ETF或匯率避險工具。

6. Safety of Vanguard’s VMFXX​

重點：

  • 集中風險：70%流動資產投入單一基金。
  • 政治不確定性：川普政策對基金穩定性的潛在影響。

7. 401k without company matching​

重點：

  • 退休儲蓄順序：優先Roth IRA或HSA，再考慮未匹配的401k。
  • 稅務優化：三重免稅HSA的潛在優勢。

8. Yield differences in bond funds​

重點：

  • 稅務影響：市政債券（VCTXX）免稅導致收益率低於國債（VUSXX）。
  • 市場定價：短期vs.長期債券的收益率差異比例不一致。

9. ESOP transfer advice​

重點：

  • 處置選擇：直接兌現vs.轉換Class A股票（程序繁瑣）。
  • 稅務與效率：9年持股增值$35/股，需權衡變現利益。

10. $2,000/month REIT portfolio​

重點：

  • 配置疑慮：數據中心REITs（DLR、EQIX）占比20%是否過高。
  • 目標：平衡股息與增長，美元現金流為核心。

（因篇幅限制，以下為部分條目精簡呈現，完整版可依需求擴充）

11-25. 快速摘要​

  • 11. 優先股股息規則：醫用大麻公司轉型加密貨幣後，優先股分配細節混淆。
  • **12. [購屋儲蓄策略](#12-how-can-i-optimize-my-situation