2025-04-03-top

精選方式: TOP
時間範圍: DAY

討論重點

以下是30篇文章的核心討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的錨點連結與逐條細節：

AI 專案管理與框架

CSO 框架避免 AI 幻覺
- Context：建立專案記憶檔（如 project_milestones.md）減少錯誤輸出。
- Structure：拆解任務為小步驟（20-30行代碼內）。
- Organization：依任務類型選模型（推理型 vs. 標準模型），並建立可追蹤流程（如 Git 提交）。
Cursor 工具與開發者經驗
- 推薦 Cursor 搭配 Gemini 2.5 Pro/Sonnet 3.5。
- 開發者共享 .cursorrules 轉向「專案規則系統」，提議社群共享庫。
- 對比 Cursor 版本差異（如批評第三版功能削弱）。
AI 模型成本比較
- Gemini 2.5 Pro：輸出 $5/M，輸入 $1.3/M。
- Claude 3.5 Haiku：輸出 $4/M，輸入 $0.8/M。
- Claude 3.7 Sonnet：輸出 $15/M，輸入 $3/M。
Cursor 開發 Chrome 擴展
- 快速開發實用工具（如「強制連結新分頁開啟」）。
- 推崇 Cursor 的「生成即用」體驗，免費版 Claude-3.7 效果佳。
Cursor 爭議與定價
- 開源替代方案（如 Roo Code）成本高（單次請求 $0.5）。
- Cursor 定價 $20/月可能虧損運營，需提升智能編碼代理功能。
為 Cursor 辯護
- 反駁成本質疑，數據顯示 Cursor 承擔部分 API 開銷。
- 強調其速度、功能豐富性與開發效率提升。

模型效能與工具體驗

Gemini 2.5 vs. Sonnet 3.7
- Gemini 2.5 跨程式碼庫理解能力強，Sonnet 易陷入循環討論。
- 實測案例：Gemini 2.5 快速解決問題，Sonnet 耗時 2 小時。
請求模式彈性需求
- 用戶希望切換「快速/慢速請求」模式以適應多工或即時需求。
Cursor 效能衰退解決
- 啟用 Large Context 功能可改善大型檔案處理效能。
遊戲開發技術探討
- 詢問遊戲資產生成工具與技術架構（如是否使用 LLM 輔助）。
Gemini 2.5 缺陷批評
- 代理模式下無視現有程式碼、虛構變數名稱。
- 對比 Sonnet 3.7 能一次性正確完成任務。
Vibe Styler 工具
- 需補充內容以總結（原連結為圖片）。

工具問題與解決方案

Cursor 評價混亂
- 社群評價兩極，學習者困惑於最佳實踐（如模型選擇、分步 Markdown 清單）。
MCP 安裝指南
- 尋求 Mod Coder Pack 正確版本與設定步驟。
Cursor 開源替代方案
- 探討 Qwen 測試部署需分叉版本或獨立應用程式以獲完整權限。
Manual 模式不滿
- 批評 Claude 新版本強制使用高階模型（如 Sonnet），無法選輕量級模型（GPT-4o-mini）。
Cursor API 成本疑問
- 質疑 Cursor 如何提供「無限 API 調用」與大規模上下文長度。
網站設計提示詞優化
- 尋求讓 Cursor 生成「現代化」網站的具體提示詞技巧。

文章核心重點

以下是各篇文章的一句話摘要（條列式輸出）：

Stop your AI from hallucinating...
- 提出CSO框架（Context-Structure-Organization）系統化避免AI幻覺，節省除錯時間。
Sharing my .cursorrules...
- 分享成功專案經驗，推薦Cursor搭配Gemini/Sonnet提升開發效率。
Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive...
- 比較AI模型價格，指出Gemini 2.5 Pro比Claude 3.7成本更低。
Cursor for Chrome Extensions...
- 讚揚Cursor工具快速開發Chrome擴展的高效體驗。
Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate...
- 辯護Cursor的價值，反駁批評並分析其定價合理性。
Cursor slams are so exhausting...
- 反駁對Cursor的負評，強調其性價比與效率提升。
Experience today with Gemini 2.5...
- Gemini 2.5在跨程式碼庫理解上優於Sonnet 3.7。
Suggestion: allow users to toggle...
- 建議增加快/慢請求模式切換功能以適應不同需求。
Cursor Degration REVERSED...
- 啟用「Large Context」功能可解決Cursor效能衰退問題。
Created an office simulator...
- 分享開發會議模擬遊戲的技術細節與工具使用。
Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor...
- 批評Gemini 2.5在Cursor中無視現有程式碼且虛構內容。
Vibe Styler...
- （無具體內容，無法摘要）
cursor is not having a great day...
- （圖片內容，無法摘要）
What am I supposed to do?...
- 反映對Cursor評價混亂的困惑，尋求使用指南。
Which MCP should I install...
- 詢問IDE上安裝MCP版本與設定的建議。
Cursor open source alternative?...
- 探討Qwen的測試部署方案與權限配置需求。
Would be good to have a 'yes'...
- （無具體內容，無法摘要）
Not sure about Manual mode...
- 批評Claude新版的Manual模式限制輕量模型使用。
How does Cursor get unlimited...
- 質疑Cursor提供無限API調用的技術可行性。
How to make my site look modern...
- 尋求優化Cursor提示詞以生成現代化網頁設計。
Observations after cursor update...
- 回饋v0.48.6版本穩定性改善但仍有午夜連線問題。
I built a Cursor extension...
- 開發擴展為AI建立專案知識庫，提升代碼理解10倍效率。
Best way to reference other projects...
- 討論多專案目錄結構下的開發環境優化策略。
gpt-4o-mini does not apply code...
- 反映Premium用量耗盡後模型切換與代碼應用的問題。
M1 MacBook Air quakes...
- 抱怨Cursor進程占用M1過高CPU資源。
My cursor deleted itself...
- 回報Cursor軟體異常導致檔案消失的故障。
Easy way to dictate in Linux?...
- 尋求Linux系統的語音輸入解決方案。
Which model do you use the most?...
- 討論Sonnet與Gemini等AI模型的效能偏好。
Has devcontainers stopped working?...
- 反映v0.48.6版本更新後開發容器無法啟動的問題。
"Oops, I accidentally removed too much code"...
- 批評AI代理過度修改程式碼，缺乏精準性。

[1. Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework that saved hundreds of debugging hours](#1-``` stop-your-ai-from-hallucinating-the-cso-fram)
[2. Sharing my .cursorrules after several successful projec with thousands of users ](#2- sharing-my-cursorrules-after-several-success)
[3. It seems Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7](#3-``` it-seems-gemini-2-5-pro-isn-t-as-expensive-a)
[4. Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it.](#4-``` cursor-for-chrome-extensions-i-am-loving-it-)
[5. Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified](#5-``` unpopular-opinion-the-cursor-hate-is-mostly-)
[6. Cursor slams are so exhausting](#6-``` cursor-slams-are-so-exhausting

- [7. ```
Experience today with Gemini 2.5 over Sonnet 3.7
```](#7-```
experience-today-with-gemini-2-5-over-sonnet)
- [8. Suggestion: allow users to toggle between slow/ fast reques```](#8-suggestion-allow-users-to-toggle-between-slow-fa)
- [9. ```
Cursor Degration COMPLETELY REVERSED by using Large Context
```](#9-```
cursor-degration-completely-reversed-by-usin)
- [10. ```
Created an office simulator for VibeJam - Meeting Dash - try to get work done between endless meetings
```](#10-```
created-an-office-simulator-for-vibejam-mee)
- [11. ```
Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor
```](#11-```
gemini-2-5-sucks-in-cursor
```)
- [12. ```
Vibe Styler  Transform Any Website's Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro
```](#12-```
vibe-styler-transform-any-website-s-style-w)
- [13. ```
cursor is not having a great day
```](#13-```
cursor-is-not-having-a-great-day
```)
- [14. ```
What am I supposed to do?
```](#14-```
what-am-i-supposed-to-do-
```)
- [15. ```
Which MCP should I install on my IDE?
```](#15-```
which-mcp-should-i-install-on-my-ide-
```)
- [16. ```
Cursor open source alternative?
```](#16-```
cursor-open-source-alternative-
```)
- [17. ```
Would be good to have a 'yes' and 'halt' button
```](#17-```
would-be-good-to-have-a-yes-and-halt-button)
- [18. ```
Not sure, how I feel about the Manual mode in the latest update!
```](#18-```
not-sure-how-i-feel-about-the-manual-mode-i)
- [19. ```
How does Cursor get essentially unlimited Claude API Calls
```](#19-```
how-does-cursor-get-essentially-unlimited-c)
- [20. ```
How to make my site look modern and user friendly
```](#20-```
how-to-make-my-site-look-modern-and-user-fr)
- [21. ```
Interesting observations after the latest cursor update 0.48.6
```](#21-```
interesting-observations-after-the-latest-c)
- [22. ```
I built a Cursor extension that gives AI perfect memory of your codebase (and it's made my workflow 10x better)
```](#22-```
i-built-a-cursor-extension-that-gives-ai-pe)
- [23. ```
Best way to reference other projec``` in Cursor?
```](#23-```
best-way-to-reference-other-projec```-in-cu)
- [24. ```
gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small does not apply code?
```](#24-```
gpt-4o-mini-or-cursor-small-does-not-apply-)
- [25. ```
M1 MacBook Air quakes as Cursor Renderer ea``` 79.9% CPU. Send help!
```](#25-```
m1-macbook-air-quakes-as-cursor-renderer-ea)
- [26. ```
My cursor deleted i```elf
```](#26-```
my-cursor-deleted-i```elf
```)
- [27. ```
Easy way to dictate to chat in Linux?
```](#27-```
easy-way-to-dictate-to-chat-in-linux-
```)
- [28. ```
Which model do you use the most these days?
```](#28-```
which-model-do-you-use-the-most-these-days-)
- [29. ```
Has devcontainers stopped working?
```](#29-```
has-devcontainers-stopped-working-
```)
- [30. ```
"Oops, I accidentally removed too much code. Let's put back everything except the setTimeout delays:" - WELP, at least it ge``` it.
```](#30-```
-oops-i-accidentally-removed-too-much-code-)

---

## 1. ```
Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework that saved hundreds of debugging hours
``` {#1-```
stop-your-ai-from-hallucinating-the-cso-fram}

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：**如何有效且系統化地實施AI專案，避免常見的混亂與失敗**。作者透過自身經驗總結出三個關鍵原則：  

1. **Context（上下文）**：  
   - 強調AI的效能取決於提供的上下文資訊，建議建立專案記憶檔（如 `project_milestones.md` 和 `documentation.md`），以減少AI的「幻覺」（錯誤輸出）。  

2. **Structure（結構化）**：  
   - 將複雜任務拆解成小步驟（如限制每項任務在20-30行代碼內），避免「複合式錯誤」和無止境的除錯循環。  

3. **Organization（組織化）**：  
   - 根據任務類型選擇合適的AI模型（如規劃用推理型模型，實作用標準模型），並建立可測試、可追蹤的工作流程（如頻繁提交Git紀錄）。  

作者指出，這些方法雖不華麗，但能顯著提升效率，尤其適用於規模較大的專案。文末也分享相關工具和延伸閱讀，呼籲讀者交流實戰經驗。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 08:49:42

### 內容

I spent the last year cleaning up messy AI implementations for founders who rushed in without a system. The pattern is always the same: initial excitement as things move 10x faster, then disappointment when everything breaks.

After fixing these systems over and over, I've boiled it down to three principles that actually work: Context, Structure, and Organization.

Context: Give Your AI A Memory

AI is literally only as good as the context you give it. My simplest fix was creating two markdown files that serve as your AI's memory. You can create these files yourself, or use ChatGPT or Claude to help you out:

project_milestones.md: Contains project overview, goals, and phase breakdowns
documentation.md: Houses API endpoin```, DB schemas, specs, and architecture decisions

This simple structure drastically reduces hallucinations because the AI actually understands your project's context.

Structure: Break Complex Tasks Down

Always work in small par```, don't make big tasks.

Also, stop those endless debugging spirals. When something breaks, revert to a working state and break the task into smaller chunks. I typically cap my AI implementation tasks at 20-30 lines max. This preven``` the compound error problem where fixing one issue creates three more.

Organization: Use The Right Models

Finally, use the right models for the right jobs:

Planning & Architecture: Use reasoning-focused models like 3.7 in max mode
Implementation: Standard models like Sonnet 3.5 work better with well-defined, small tasks
Workflow Pattern: Start each session by referencing your project context Work in small, testable incremen``` Update documentation Git commit early and often

Honestly, these simple guidelines have saved hundreds of hours of debugging time. It's not sexy, but it works consistently, especially when codebases grow beyond what one person can hold in their head. Would love to hear if others have found patterns that work / share horror stories of what definitely doesn't.

Edit: This is blowing up!

My cursor extension to stop hallucinations https://gigamind.dev/
Wrote on these topics with a bit more detail on my blog: https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-dev-tips

### 討論

**評論 1**:

What's your refactoring / cleanup strategy? I find that the most error prone

**評論 2**:

This is almost exactly what I do word for word, and I always get confused when I see pos``` saying cursor is broken blah blah blah because as long as you follow these steps (which I figured out on my own after 1 trial and error project because it seems so logical and intuitive to do things this way) because no matter which model I use, I don't use max and cursor works great. So I can attest that this works.

**評論 3**:

I was able to use a similar method to get Cursor to effectively program a lang it barely knows.

I had to instill some rules, similar to 'call me big daddy' but also including 'always ref these files' and so forth.

'these files' contained..

A: The very technical and detailed writeup of the program currently being worked on (goals, design layout and data structures, current status, etc.)
B: A LLM friendly compressed reference manual for the language that contained all words/syntax and some environment knolwedge, etc. Something compressed enough to fit, but containing the bi``` it was always getting wrong.

Took some tweaking, but after a while, I had Cursor singing and dancing right along how I wanted in a lang it was barely able to hello-world in at the start.

lo``` of wasted cycles however, as it was often forgetting to follow the rules, and I'd have to roll back over and over and kick it in the head until it woke up and followed instructions again, but then this was months and months ago.

I can't stress hard enough how critically important these kinds of tricks are, for anybody whos having problems getting cursor not to be..well,stupid.

Here is the big tip: It IS stupid, because you are allowing it room to be stupid. It's an LLM, but you have to anal-retentive-prompt is like diffusion AI when trying to generate a very very specific image. You have to give it very direct and complete instructions about every aspect you are aiming for, otherwise it's just guessing in the wind, and it's gonna guess badly more often than not.

Do what OP says, and cursor becomes a whole new kind of super power.

**評論 4**:

Any suggestions how to get this done in the middle of the project if you haven't done this from the start or if you've changed the project a lot without keeping the docs updated?

I've noticed that just asking cursor to write it up easily leaves some essential missing and/or cursor adds some hallucinations there.

**評論 5**:

Why we use 2 context fail instead of 1 ? If we will use 2 context file that will make unfocus

---

## 2. ```
Sharing my .cursorrules after several successful projec``` with thousands of users
``` {#2-```
sharing-my-cursorrules-after-several-success}

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

1. **Cursor 編輯器與 AI 工具（Gemini/Sonnet）的應用**：  
   作者推薦使用 Cursor 搭配 Gemini 2.5 Pro 或 Sonnet 3.5 進行開發，並認為這些工具能顯著提升效率，尤其適合學習者從模板（如 Vercel）開始建構專案。

2. **開發者經驗與自我評價**：  
   作者分享個人背景（25 年專業編程經驗、應用數學背景），並謙虛地自評技術能力，強調算法並非其強項。

3. **Cursor 的功能更新與社群共享**：  
   討論 Cursor 的改進（如棄用 `.cursorrules` 轉向「專案規則系統」），並提議建立社群共享庫以提升協作效率。

4. **工具比較與使用者反饋**：  
   對比不同版本的 Cursor 功能（如批評「第三版被削弱」），並有使用者表達對新系統的肯定與測試意願。

整體聚焦於 **AI 輔助開發工具（Cursor/Gemini）的實用性、開發者經驗分享，以及工具演進與社群協作的可能性**。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplf6u/sharing_my_cursorrules_after_several_successful/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplf6u/sharing_my_cursorrules_after_several_successful/)
- **外部連結**: [https://pastebin.com/HDWPLk43](https://pastebin.com/HDWPLk43)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 18:35:43

### 內容

Caveat: This is for JS/TS/React/Next.JS projec```, but you can easily ask Gemini to adapt it to another language.

I have 25(?) years of professional programming experience although i still rate myself as a 6/10 coder as I lack talent in algorithmics. I studied applied math and it doesnt exactly translate to comp sci.

I think Cursor with Gemini 2.5 Pro is fantastic. Sonnet 3.5 is all you need with it.

When youre learning I suggest starting with some template from Vercel and building upon it.

As a powerful Cursor user myself, I am impressed by the clarity and quality of this file- no doubt it will serve the community well to share this.

Perhaps even within Cursor, there could be a shared community library...

So much better than the third cursor is nerfed post today

Just as a heads up, they're planning to deprecate .cursorrules entirely, in favour of the (much better) project rules system. You could theoretically just paste this all into a global project rule, but it's much more effective to work with the new system.

Thank you. I need to test it but it already looks great

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Caveat: This is for JS/TS/React/Next.JS projec```, but you can easily ask Gemini to adapt it to another language.

I think Cursor with Gemini 2.5 Pro is fantastic. Sonnet 3.5 is all you need with it.

When youre learning I suggest starting with some template from Vercel and building upon it.

**評論 2**:

As a powerful Cursor user myself, I am impressed by the clarity and quality of this file- no doubt it will serve the community well to share this.

Perhaps even within Cursor, there could be a shared community library...

**評論 3**:

So much better than the third cursor is nerfed post today

**評論 4**:

**評論 5**:

Thank you. I need to test it but it already looks great

---

## 3. ```
It seems Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7
``` {#3-```
it-seems-gemini-2-5-pro-isn-t-as-expensive-a}

該文章的核心討論主題是 **不同AI模型的價格比較**，具體聚焦於以下三款模型的輸入（input）與輸出（output）token 的計費標準：

1. **Gemini 2.5 Pro**  
   - 輸出 token：每百萬（M）5 美元  
   - 輸入 token：每百萬 1.3 美元  

2. **Claude 3.5 Haiku**  
   - 輸出 token：每百萬 4 美元  
   - 輸入 token：每百萬 0.8 美元  

3. **Claude 3.7 Sonnet**  
   - 輸出 token：每百萬 15 美元  
   - 輸入 token：每百萬 3 美元  

總結：文章透過並列價格數據，提供用戶在選擇模型時的成本參考，並隱含對不同模型性價比（如 Haiku 相對低價、Sonnet 較高價）的潛在分析。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 08:52:17

### 內容

https://glama.ai/models/gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $5/M outputtokens $1.3/M inputtokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku: $4/M outputtokens $0.8/M inputtokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: $15/M outputtokens $3/M inputtokens

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Cursor is just making more money while protecting claude?

**評論 2**:

Is this the official pricing? Because as far as I know, I have not seen Google post the official pricing anywhere else like on the Google AI studio or on Google vertex or something. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

**評論 3**:

I do not understand if the pricing is with thinking active or not. Someone on Google wrote 2.5 Pro will also be non-thinking. I suspect this price will be the general one or with thinking active, because we have not received public comment on the non-thinking modality. Any hypotheses?

**評論 4**:

Assuming thats accurate (it may not be as I dont think pricing is public yet), the no cache is going to hurt. Gemini also has a significantly larger context window, and cursor charges per request not per token, so the cost per request may actually be comparable.

**評論 5**:

Even if this was official pricing, don't you have to consider context length differences. As I understand it, even with this pricing, a max context request would cost $1.3 just on input tokens. Which would be much more than Claude 3.7.

---

## 4. ```
Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it.
``` {#4-```
cursor-for-chrome-extensions-i-am-loving-it-}

這段文章的核心討論主題是：**作者使用Cursor工具（基於Claude-3.7-Sonnet模型）快速開發了兩款實用的Chrome擴展和WordPress插件，以解決個人痛點並提升工作效率，並對該工具的高效性和易用性表達高度讚賞**。  

具體重點包括：  
1. **自製Chrome擴展**：  
   - 開發「點擊連結自動在新分頁開啟且不跳轉」的擴展（滿足長期需求）。  
   - 開發「隱藏YouTube Shorts干擾性元數據面板」的擴展（解決使用痛點）。  

2. **工具的高效性**：  
   - 強調「生成即用」（generate, plug, and play）的流暢體驗。  
   - 提及也快速開發了WordPress插件，優化工作流程。  

3. **對Cursor工具的推崇**：  
   - 稱其為目前用過的最佳工具，並特別提到免費版Claude-3.7模型的效果。  
   - 表達持續探索工具潛力的熱情。  

總結：文章主要分享透過AI工具實現快速、個人化的軟體開發，並強調工具如何簡化解決問題的過程。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 12:28:03

### 內容

In the last two days, I've used Cursor to write and create two Chrome extensions for myself! One that I've always wanted, one to fix something that annoys me.

1 - What I always wanted - an extension that will open any link you click on in a new browser tab, without taking focus away from the current tab, and can be toggled off and on at will by clicking the plugin icon.

2 - A YouTube Shor plugin that hides the metadata panel that si like halfway over EVERY YOUTUBE SHORT and annoys the shit out of me.

Both have basically been entirely - generate, plug, and play!

I've even put together a few WP plugins for myself/biz use! Little things that just make my work life easier. Best tool ever so far. I am seriously loving this thing, and I cannot wait to play with it more! (for anyone curious, I use the claude-3.7-sonnet model, free)

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Open any link in new tab...

It's control + click...

**評論 2**:

I made Context Weaver and Im really proud of it.

Basically, you can highlight text on any webpage, and then pull up the extension and interact with an LLM in one click. Itll send off the text you highlighted and give you a quick response.

It requires an API key (which is how its 100% free,) and suppor OpenAI, DeepSeek, and xAI. You can also create custom archetypes, or system promp, to define how the AI behaves in the extension, and have LLMs help you design the archetypes.

I use it frequently day for day, though it still has some kinks. Very useful stuff. Thanks cursor devs for making it possible.

**評論 3**:

I agree. Its incredibly empowering.

---

## 5. ```
Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified
``` {#5-```
unpopular-opinion-the-cursor-hate-is-mostly-}

該文章的核心討論主題是：  

**「比較Cursor與開源替代方案（如Roo Code）的優缺點，並探討Cursor的定價合理性與未來發展方向」**  

具體要點包括：  
1. **開源工具的優劣**：雖程式碼生成能力較強，但運行成本高昂（如單次請求可能耗費0.5美元）。  
2. **Cursor的市場定位**：  
   - 價格（20美元/月）相對競爭對手（如Windsurf）更具競爭力，但可能長期虧損運營。  
   - 需平衡成本效益與功能優化（如提升「智能編碼代理」能力）。  
3. **用戶批評與期待**：  
   - 缺乏透明度與溝通，但產品仍屬業界頂尖。  
   - 呼籲團隊優先開發「對開發者真正有益」的功能。  

總結：作者在肯定Cursor價值的同時，指出其改進空間，並對開源方案的高成本提出質疑。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 18:00:07

### 內容

Hey everyone,

In the past weeks I have read quite a lot of commen``` about Cursor getting worse and people switching to Roo Code or similar Open Source solutions. I have now tried several open source solutions myself and while they offer better code generation in total, they also cost much much more to run.

For example: I used Roo Code to fix an error in a C# repo. It fixed like 80% of the bug, while also creating a new bug with memory allocation. In total, this one request with all i``` tool uses etc. has a total cost of almost 0.50$. A single request!

You could argue that Cursor has made some wrong decisions, yet they likely run at a large deficit per user and still have to find optimal solutions for better cost efficiency while maximizing agentic coding capabilities. 20$ a month is still very cheap for what the product offers, especially compared to competitors like Windsurf which offer much less reques and no slow reques after all fast reques``` are used.

I agree on some of the criticism like Cursor not being transparent enough and not communicating enough with their users, yet I believe that the product is still one of the best in class and I hope that the team will take the right actions and put a higher focus on real developer-benefitting features and optimizations.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I think it just boils down to 'you pay peanu```, you get monkeys'.

For $20 per month I can't expect the same quality as for instance Claude Code which sometimes burns $20 per hour.

Yes, Cursor is cheap.

By positioning it at this pricepoint and handicapping models to keep that low price point Cursor is positioning i```elf not a professional tool but as a tool for people who want to write some code in their spare time.

Which is totally fine.

However, I write code for a living. Time equals money, and quality and consistency matter there. I would gladly pay (a lot) more for Cursor just to have consistent, good quality code and a maximized context.

I've spend $850 on Claude Code in the past month and I've had the most productive month of my life. It paid i```elf back easily.

Cursor is best in i``` class, and that class appears to be "AI assisted IDE for the casual software developer". That's ofcourse not a bad place to be, but also not the kind of tool a lot of professional developers need or want.

As as with all tools, there are cheap hobbyist options and more expensive and professional options. Comparing the two should always take the price into consideration too.

The lack of communication, not offering a pro version, clipping Gemini 2.5, offering Claude 3.7 'MAX' (which doesnt even exist) are examples of the kind of corporate sales tricks that a lot of people don't like.

**評論 2**:

Same feeling.

We must not forget that this field is changing almost every day, so they also need to keep up the pace with this difficult environment.

Cursor in the right hands is still very powerful. But as users we also need to adapt to all the changes happening and adapt our workflows to fit new models and paradigms.

**評論 3**:

Same feeling

**評論 4**:

\> Cursor getting worse

People get disillusioned from their initial over-hype about ai models and tools.

My theory is that at the start they couldn't see i``` issues.

**評論 5**:

I think many of the criticism is down to the fact that Cursor documentation is crap. The app changes often and functionality changes are not communicated properly.

For me, lately it also started to work weirdly, even to the extreme that it flat out lied that it's not allowed to change my files, and can only suggest changes in the chat. But in each of these cases, I made something in the way as I did before the latest upgrade, which should have been changed after the upgrade. When I investigated, and read suggestions here on Reddit, I was able to use Cursor properly, but theose changes weren't documented.

---

## 6. ```
Cursor slams are so exhausting
``` {#6-```
cursor-slams-are-so-exhausting
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**作者強力推薦 AI 編程工具 Cursor，反駁對其的批評（如成本、功能問題），並強調其性價比和對開發者效率的提升，同時呼籲理性看待工具的價值。**  

具體要點包括：  
1. **Cursor 的優勢**：速度快、價格合理、功能豐富，顯著提升開發效率。  
2. **反駁成本質疑**：通過數據對比（如 Claude API 的直接使用成本），說明 Cursor 實際承擔了部分開銷，價格合理。  
3. **回應替代方案爭議**：承認其他工具存在，但批評者對 Cursor 的負面評價（如「過度昂貴」）不符合現實。  
4. **呼籲理性評價**：主張在批評前應肯定工具對技術生態的積極貢獻。  

整體語氣偏向「為 Cursor 辯護」，並試圖糾正外界對其的誤解。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 22:41:34

### 內容

Its honestly exhausting. Ive used a bunch of AI coding tools, and Cursor is hands-down the best. It's fast, affordable, and packed with features. Yet people still find ways to complain. Yes, regressions happen, progress isnt linear. But overall? This tool has made devs significantly more productive.

Worried about cost? Lets do some math. Using Claudes API directly can easily run over $0.05 per tool call, depending on context size. Its $3 per million input tokens for Sonnet 3.7. A 250-line file might cost about $0.007 to read. But that's just the inputtheres also conversation history, context, and more. Tool calls arent free, and Cursor is eating a lot of that cost.

And the we need alternatives crowd? There are alternatives. Tons of them. If Cursors not for you, try something else. But pretending its some sort of overpriced grift just isnt grounded in reality.

So yeah, maybe take a breath before slamming a tool thats genuinely pushing the ecosystem forward.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Finally some fairness.

They complain because they know Cursor is one of the best tool around and that give the best offer money wise.

**評論 2**:

Its because most people on this sub have never written a line of code in their life before

**評論 3**:

why are you exhausted by something tha``` a business and has nothing to do with you personally?

**評論 4**:

I think most people are probably just venting after a rough night wrestling with it. I think the power of the tool is pretty undeniable.

**評論 5**:

So i have tried a competitor, Roo.

Tbh i like them both, and when Roo adds internet capability out of the box I think I will prefer Roo 100%.

However, i``` mostly out of preference, as cursor is pretty great and most issues users have are actual skill issues.

What drove me to Roo was the whole gemini and context. I want my context and I like controlling my own keys and usage anyway, on top of now I wont be limited on usage at all. The only downside is maybe I'll spend over 20 a month.

---

## 7. ```
Experience today with Gemini 2.5 over Sonnet 3.7
``` {#7-```
experience-today-with-gemini-2-5-over-sonnet}

這段文字的核心討論主題是：  

**「Gemini 2.5 在處理複雜程式碼問題時的表現優於 Sonnet 3.7，尤其在跨程式碼庫的上下文理解與快速解決問題方面。」**  

具體要點包括：  
1. **效能對比**：作者比較了 Gemini 2.5 和 Sonnet 3.7 在解決複雜程式碼問題時的效率差異。  
2. **上下文理解能力**：Gemini 2.5 能有效調用程式碼庫中較遠的部分（跨模組或檔案），而 Sonnet 3.7 則陷入循環討論。  
3. **實證經驗**：作者透過實際案例（耗時 2 小時 vs. 快速解決）驗證了 Gemini 2.5 的優勢，並提到 LiveBench 評分與實際體驗一致。  

隱含議題可能包括：  
- 不同 AI 模型在實際開發場景中的適用性差異。  
- 上下文檢索能力對程式碼協助工具的關鍵影響。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbjnz/experience_today_with_gemini_25_over_sonnet_37/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbjnz/experience_today_with_gemini_25_over_sonnet_37/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbjnz/experience_today_with_gemini_25_over_sonnet_37/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbjnz/experience_today_with_gemini_25_over_sonnet_37/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 08:32:20

### 內容

I was going back and forth with Sonnet 3.7 on an issue in a large and complex codebase. Went around in circles for about 2 hours. I switched to Gemini 2.5 and it called up context from faraway par``` of the codebase and fixed the issue within a prompt or two. While Gemini 2.5 ranks higher than Sonnet 3.7 for coding on LiveBench, today was my first time seeing it live.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Which version of cursor are you using ? The new versions are so buggy

---

## 8. Suggestion: allow users to toggle between slow/ fast reques``` \{#8-suggestion-allow-users-to-toggle-between-slow-fa}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**用戶對於「快速請求」和「慢速請求」兩種模式的使用偏好與需求**。  

具體要點包括：  
1. **選擇彈性的需求**：用戶希望能夠自主決定何時使用「快速請求」或「慢速請求」，以適應不同情境（例如節省快速請求的額度）。  
2. **慢速請求的優點**：適合多工處理，提供用戶分心或切換任務的緩衝時間。  
3. **快速請求的用途**：當用戶需要專注或即時結果時更為實用。  
4. **對產品的正面反饋**：用戶表達對產品的喜愛與支持。  

總結：用戶期待更靈活的請求模式選擇，以平衡效率與多工需求。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcc1s/suggestion_allow_users_to_toggle_between_slow/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcc1s/suggestion_allow_users_to_toggle_between_slow/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcc1s/suggestion_allow_users_to_toggle_between_slow/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcc1s/suggestion_allow_users_to_toggle_between_slow/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 09:11:10

### 內容

Sometimes I have time for the slow reques and I do not want to use up the fast reques. It would be nice if we could decide which request to use.

The slow reques``` are great for multitasking, it gives time to look away... But other times you just want to focus on one thing

LOVE your product, thank you and thanks for having this sub too

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I like this idea.

**評論 2**:

That's like seeing a "buy one, get one free" deal at the store, and being like "can I just get the free one?".

---

## 9. ```
Cursor Degration COMPLETELY REVERSED by using Large Context
``` {#9-```
cursor-degration-completely-reversed-by-usin}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**「啟用 Cursor 編輯器的『Large Context』功能可顯著改善效能衰退問題」**  

具體重點包括：  
1. 作者原本感受到 Cursor 效能下降（但程度比其他用戶輕微）。  
2. 在設定中啟用 **Features → Large Context** 後，體驗大幅提升，能順暢處理大型檔案。  
3. 呼籲其他遇到效能問題的用戶嘗試開啟此功能。  

關鍵結論：該功能可能是解決當前效能問題的潛在方案。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 21:31:23

### 內容

Before, for a while, Cursor was slightly degraded for me. Not as crazy as the other users has specified, but it was a bit worse than I would say the old Cursor. After going through my Cursor Settings, I stumbled across Features -> Large Context, after enabling it, damn my Cursor experience changed. I started feeding it whole large files without a single issue.

Lo``` of people who are experiencing Cursor Degradation, please ENABLE this feature and it might completely change your experience.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Don't get too excited.

I've always had that enabled since they first brought that feature up (0.45 or 0.43) and Cursor it's still crap compared to back then. This is not a secret hack to save cursor and TBH I have no idea whether this really improves anything, makes me spend more money, or actually degrades the experience. This feature used to be Beta, now it's apparently not. But zero information on how that actually works under the hood. As usual.

**評論 2**:

Does enabling it uses more reques``` ?

---

## 10. ```
Created an office simulator for VibeJam - Meeting Dash - try to get work done between endless meetings
``` {#10-```
created-an-office-simulator-for-vibejam-mee}

這段對話的核心討論主題是圍繞一個免費遊戲的開發技術與工具，具體包括以下幾點：  

1. **遊戲推廣與體驗**：對話開頭提供免費試玩連結，暗示討論背景與該遊戲相關。  
2. **開發工具與素材生成**：提問者詢問遊戲中使用的「資產生成工具」（如美術、音效等資源的創作工具）。  
3. **技術架構與開發細節**：進一步探討背後的技術堆疊（如使用的程式語言、框架）及是否運用大型語言模型（LLM）等技術來輔助開發。  

總結：對話聚焦於「遊戲開發的技術實現」，包括工具選擇、資源生成方法及技術架構的說明需求。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpjw9e/created_an_office_simulator_for_vibejam_meeting/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpjw9e/created_an_office_simulator_for_vibejam_meeting/)
- **外部連結**: [https://v.redd.it/jh9tvmqiwdse1](https://v.redd.it/jh9tvmqiwdse1)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 16:43:28

### 內容

Try the game for free at: https://artifactvibe.com/games/ptR1Buxf4TmmmbY2qetv

what did you use for asset generation?

very nice. Can you provide some context on LLM/tech stack / how you made it?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Try the game for free at: https://artifactvibe.com/games/ptR1Buxf4TmmmbY2qetv

**評論 2**:

what did you use for asset generation?

**評論 3**:

very nice. Can you provide some context on LLM/tech stack / how you made it?

---

## 11. ```
Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor
``` {#11-```
gemini-2-5-sucks-in-cursor
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**用戶對Gemini 2.5模型在實際編程任務中的表現感到失望**，尤其是在「代理模式」（agent mode）下執行簡單的程式碼修改任務時，出現以下問題：  
1. **無視現有程式碼範例**，未正確搜尋或參考程式庫中的既有實現。  
2. **虛構內容（hallucination）**，例如捏造變數名稱或添加未要求的業務邏輯。  
3. **與其他模型（如Sonnet 3.7/3.5）的對比**，後者能一次性正確完成任務。  

用戶進一步質疑：  
- 問題是否源於Gemini 2.5的「Cursors」功能缺陷（推測可能指其交互或檢索機制）。  
- 為何Gemini 2.5被廣泛認為是「最佳模型」，卻在實際應用中表現不佳。  
- 商業環境中因程式庫龐大，難以透過其他途徑（如AI Studio）驗證問題。  

總結：**對Gemini 2.5在具體開發場景中的可靠性與實用性提出批判性討論**，並尋求其他用戶的經驗共鳴或解決方案。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 15:54:21

### 內容

Does anyone else have the same experience?

I asked Gemini 2.5 in agent mode to implement a simple feature (create a renderer to take a list of objec``` and draw it onto a datagrid, based on a previous implementation, just for another type of data column). There were tons of examples in the codebase, basically copy-paste and switch out a few variable names .

Gemini 2.5 fails this hilariously, making up names and adding extra business logic I didn't ask for. At first it didn't even try searching the codebase, but even when I explicitely told it to not make any assumptions and use the search tool, it did, however ended up still hallucinating property names.

Sonnet 3.7 non-thinking and even 3.5 (with a little help) did it just fine in a single go.

Is this Cursors fault or am I missing something?

(I hear everywhere that 2.5 is the best model available). I couldn't compare to using AI Studio from Google, because this is a commercial app with many hundreds of class files/views and constantly copy-pasting that would be a nightmare.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Gemini is not tuned for agent mode.

But it is awesome in chat mode

**評論 2**:

Yeah, same here: I was just trying to add dark mode to my iOS app a simple task. Claude handled it like a seasoned dev: updated the color asse, added the dark varian, touched only what needed touching. Gemini, on the other hand, went full chaos mode: It rewrote every view, sprinkled ternary operators on every color property like it was cheese (isLightMode ? colorLight : colorDark) and turned a 10-minute task into a codebase-wide chaos.

**評論 3**:

I added Roo as an extention to my Cursor. In Roo with Gemini 2.5 I handle entire architecture, file structure, mock classes etc to leverage i 1m context and better reasoning without "Cursor magic blackbox" that impac the model. Then Cursor implemen specific elemen (tbh 3.5 seems to be a better fit than 3.7 for this task) to leverage better edit/diff functionality. Maybe this workflow will work for you.

TBH your issue seems to be a rather an issue how Cursor handles context for Gemini than Gemini i```elf. When I tested G2.5 in 0.47 it worked good enough, in 0.48 after they removed "@codebase" I have similar problems as you.

**評論 4**:

i``` better than claude from my experience claude is shit i asked to implement firebase auth it cant do a damn thing right but gemini is fucking magic

**評論 5**:

Agree - Ive found it works well with Promptly though so I just use that

---

## 12. ```
Vibe Styler  Transform Any Website's Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro
``` {#12-```
vibe-styler-transform-any-website-s-style-w}

由於我無法直接訪問或查看連結內容（包括圖片或外部網站），因此無法總結該文章的核心討論主題。  

如果您能提供文章的具體文字內容或詳細描述圖片中的資訊（例如關鍵詞句、主要論點等），我可以幫助您分析並總結核心討論主題。  

例如，您可以：  
1. **描述圖片中的文字或數據**（如標題、段落要點）。  
2. **提供文章的主要觀點或爭議**（如科技發展、社會議題等）。  
3. **分享您的初步理解**，我會協助歸納重點。  

期待您的補充說明！

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpmgnz/vibe_styler_transform_any_websites_style_with/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpmgnz/vibe_styler_transform_any_websites_style_with/)
- **外部連結**: [https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg](https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 19:40:40

### 內容

連結： [https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg](https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg)

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 13. ```
cursor is not having a great day
``` {#13-```
cursor-is-not-having-a-great-day
```}

由於提供的連結是圖片格式（i.redd.it 的 PNG 檔），我無法直接查看或分析其內容。不過，可以根據常見情況推測可能的討論主題：

1. **Reddit 貼文常見主題**  
   若圖片來自 Reddit 討論區，可能涉及以下內容：
   - **網路迷因（Meme）或幽默內容**：圖片可能是迷因或搞笑圖，核心主題圍繞特定文化梗或社會現象。
   - **時事或社會議題**：例如科技、政治、娛樂等熱門話題的討論。
   - **個人經歷或問題求助**：如生活困惑、技術問題等。

2. **如何進一步獲取資訊**  
   - 建議直接查看圖片內容（需下載或訪問連結），或提供文字描述/關鍵細節。
   - 若圖片包含文字，可嘗試轉述內容以便總結主題。

3. **技術限制說明**  
   當前無法解析圖片內文，但若提供更多背景（如標題、子版塊名稱等），可協助推測方向。

如需更精確的總結，請補充圖片的具體資訊或文字內容。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpee19/cursor_is_not_having_a_great_day/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpee19/cursor_is_not_having_a_great_day/)
- **外部連結**: [https://i.redd.it/kqfvl3xp4cse1.png](https://i.redd.it/kqfvl3xp4cse1.png)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 10:45:09

### 內容

連結： [https://i.redd.it/kqfvl3xp4cse1.png](https://i.redd.it/kqfvl3xp4cse1.png)

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 14. ```
What am I supposed to do?
``` {#14-```
what-am-i-supposed-to-do-
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

1. **對Cursor工具評價的混亂與困惑**  
   作者觀察到社群對Cursor（AI輔助編程工具）的評價極度分裂，有人推崇其整合的Claude 3.5/Gemini 2.5等頂級模型，也有人批評其功能退化，這種矛盾資訊讓學習者感到困惑。

2. **尋求最佳實踐的具體指導**  
   作者作為有計算機科學和AI背景的學習者，希望釐清：
   - 使用Cursor時應避免的常見問題及解決方案
   - 經實證的有效操作策略（如分步Markdown清單、模型選擇等）
   - 是否值得堅持使用Cursor，或改用其他工具（如V0+Claude組合）

3. **AI輔助編程的效率優化訴求**  
   強調希望透過自動化和最佳實踐，最大化利用當前最強模型（SOTA）的能力，反映進階使用者對工具深度掌握的追求。

整體聚焦於「在評價分歧的環境中，如何系統性地掌握Cursor的實用技巧與避坑指南」，本質上是對AI編程工具「知識碎片化」現象的反思與整合需求。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jperh0/what_am_i_supposed_to_do/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jperh0/what_am_i_supposed_to_do/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jperh0/what_am_i_supposed_to_do/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jperh0/what_am_i_supposed_to_do/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 11:03:01

### 內容

So look Im learning to use Cursor the best way I know how, diverse research! YouTube vids like Mckays videos (https://youtu.be/W2QZZe3NzXM), cursor documentation and Reddit pos``` of course

But genuinely why is there so much fragmented though``` on Cursor?

All Im reading is yo Claude 3.7 sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro is elite and then THE VERY NEXT POST IS Cursor is even worse than before. I wish we had the old cursor blah blah.

This is just confusing the crap out of me.

Im not a no-code vibe coder, Ive studied computer science for so far for a year and AI for longer at the 2 year mark. BUT would I like to learn how to automate as much as possible and use the best cursor practices to take advantage of SOTA models? Yesof course.

I dont usually post but genuinely I got a few questions, sorry if this is a lot or a ramble Im just so lost rn:

What are all the problems Im now supposed to be avoiding with cursor and what are these apparent solutions?
What are the actual best practices for cursor then?
Why shouldnt I just use V0 for the front end and chuck it into cursor if cursors that bad or just use Claude code then??

Some are of best practices of course are:

Building a detailed markdown checklist so your selected model agent just focuses on one step at a time.
Connecting some MCPs.
Using the best models Claude 3.7 & Gem 2.5 Pro

Im sure others are feeling this too just needing to throw this out there and actually hear from some absolute pros

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I would ignore the noise and build stuff how you want to, experimenting with small features to understand the best workflow for you.

I find it absolutely fine as long as the prompt is clear enough.

**評論 2**:

The only way to know if i``` for you is to dive in and start building something. You'll pick up tips and tricks as you go that are right for you.

---

## 15. ```
Which MCP should I install on my IDE?
``` {#15-```
which-mcp-should-i-install-on-my-ide-
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  

**「尋求關於安裝MCP（Mod Coder Pack）的正確版本與設定步驟的建議」**  

具體內容包括：  
1. 確認適合的MCP版本。  
2. 詢問是否有特定的安裝或設定流程需要注意。  
3. 請求相關指導或建議。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp6y7u/which_mcp_should_i_install_on_my_ide/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp6y7u/which_mcp_should_i_install_on_my_ide/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp6y7u/which_mcp_should_i_install_on_my_ide/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp6y7u/which_mcp_should_i_install_on_my_ide/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 05:08:57

### 內容

Im trying to set up MCP on my IDE, but I want to make sure Im installing the right version. Can anyone clarify which MCP I should use and if there are any specific setup steps I should follow?

Would appreciate any guidance!

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I use brave search, postgres, github and sequential thinking

**評論 2**:

Go for brave search

**評論 3**:

This one: https://llmtxt.dev/mcp would help you a bit

**評論 4**:

If you want to try out mcp (model context protocol) with little to no setup:

I built https://skeet.build/mcp where anyone can try out mcp for cursor and dev tools.

We did this because of a painpoint I experienced as an engineer having to deal with crummy mcp setup, lack of support you have no idea how hard it is to set up SSE, deal with API keys and scope issues, and then to find things like the tool that you want isnt even coded yet.

And so one of the areas we found it to be useful was to do the soft communications with tools like Jira linear slack - updating stakeholders and all that friction that engineers hate doing. Some other areas people use a lot of tools with sequential thinking

Mostly for workflows that I like:

start a PR with a summary of what I just did
slack or comment to linear/Jira with a summary of what I pushed
pull this issue from sentry and fix it
Find a bug a create a linear issue to fix it
pull this linear issue and do a first pass
pull in this Notion doc with a PRD then create an API reference for it based on this code
Postgres or MySQL schemas for rapid model development

Everyone seems to go for the hype but ease of use, practical pragmatic developer workflows, and high quality polished mcp servers are what were focused on

Lmk what you think!

---

## 16. ```
Cursor open source alternative?
``` {#16-```
cursor-open-source-alternative-
```}

這段文字的核心討論主題是：**詢問如何將Qwen（可能指某種AI模型或工具）連接進行測試，並探討是否需要一個分叉版本（fork）或獨立應用程式（stand-alone app）以獲得完整的文件存取權限**。  

要點包括：  
1. **技術需求**：尋求將Qwen整合到測試環境的方法。  
2. **實現方式**：釐清應選擇分叉版本或獨立應用程式。  
3. **權限要求**：強調需要完整檔案存取功能以滿足測試需求。  

簡言之，重點在於「Qwen的測試部署方案與權限配置」。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj7x1/cursor_open_source_alternative/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj7x1/cursor_open_source_alternative/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj7x1/cursor_open_source_alternative/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj7x1/cursor_open_source_alternative/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 15:50:53

### 內容

Does anyone know?

I'd like to connect qwen to test but should be a fork or stand-alone app with full access to files.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Cline, Roocode

---

## 17. ```
Would be good to have a 'yes' and 'halt' button
``` {#17-```
would-be-good-to-have-a-yes-and-halt-button}

由於你提供的內容中沒有具體的文章標題或內文，我無法總結核心討論主題。請提供文章的標題或詳細內容，這樣我才能幫助你準確歸納核心主題。  

如果你能提供更多資訊，例如文章的主要論點、關鍵詞或相關段落，我可以更精確地分析並總結其核心討論主題。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 20:40:17

### 內容

Title

### 討論

**評論 1**:

There is a stop button, which hal``` the AI. You can resume by sending a new message

**評論 2**:

What's the difference to the "Submit" and "Cancel" buttons?

**評論 3**:

knowing when to hit that stop button is a crucial skill. sonnet 3.7 and gemini 2.5 are both extremely overeager to keep going once the problem is solved.

---

## 18. ```
Not sure, how I feel about the Manual mode in the latest update!
``` {#18-```
not-sure-how-i-feel-about-the-manual-mode-i}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**用戶對於Claude模型「Manual模式」的不滿，尤其是無法使用輕量級模型（如GPT-4o-mini）進行快速編輯的問題**。具體要點包括：

1. **對Manual模式的批評**  
   - 用戶認為舊的「Edit模式」更高效，能輕鬆完成簡單快速的編輯任務，而Manual模式破壞了原有工作流程。
   - 新模式下無法選擇輕量級模型（如4o-mini），被迫使用效能過剩的模型（如Sonnet或Gemini 2.5），導致效率下降。

2. **功能缺失的困擾**  
   - Agent模式無法自動更新文件，且強制使用高階模型，對簡單編輯需求不切實際。
   - 用戶拒絕使用「Auto模式」，因無法自主控制模型選擇。

3. **對輕量級模型的懷念**  
   - 強調4o-mini等輕量模型在快速小規模編輯上的優勢，並詢問其他用戶是否遇到相同問題。

總結：文章主要表達對Claude新操作模式（Manual/Agent）的負面體驗，核心訴求是恢復對輕量級模型的直接使用權限，以滿足高效、簡易的編輯需求。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jph2fq/not_sure_how_i_feel_about_the_manual_mode_in_the/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jph2fq/not_sure_how_i_feel_about_the_manual_mode_in_the/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jph2fq/not_sure_how_i_feel_about_the_manual_mode_in_the/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jph2fq/not_sure_how_i_feel_about_the_manual_mode_in_the/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 13:17:27

### 內容

https://preview.redd.it/tyqiprd3vcse1.png?width=500&format=png&auto=webp&s=bd1955aa6d2bee2141f246c3725fe37f57d92b88

Is anyone else also not liking the Manual mode? I mean the Edit mode was well enough. I use to use GPT-4o-mini for some obvious, quick edi``` and with Edit mode that use to happen quiet easily. Also there didn't use to be any issue.

Now I can't use 4o-mini or any of the lighter models with Agent mode, that also does not update the files automatically.

This has totally broken my workflow, and I am forced to use the Sonnet or Gemini 2.5

which honestly for few line of edi``` does not help and makes sense.

And no I don't want to use Auto mode because that will just randomly decide model.

Not sure if people are still using 4o-mini and face this as a problem. But I surely am, it was fast to make smaller edi```.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

yeah i feel annoyed as well, they should bring back edit mode because manual feels no different than ask mode

**評論 2**:

Edit mode was renamed to Manual, no other changes here. Is it not actually editing the file when you expect it to?

---

## 19. ```
How does Cursor get essentially unlimited Claude API Calls
``` {#19-```
how-does-cursor-get-essentially-unlimited-c}

該文章的核心討論主題是對「Cursor」工具如何能夠同時提供「無限API調用」和「大規模上下文長度」的技術可行性或商業模式提出疑問。作者表達了對這兩項高資源需求功能並存背後的運作機制（如成本控制、技術實現）或潛在限制（例如隱藏條件）的困惑與好奇。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcoc5/how_does_cursor_get_essentially_unlimited_claude/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcoc5/how_does_cursor_get_essentially_unlimited_claude/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcoc5/how_does_cursor_get_essentially_unlimited_claude/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpcoc5/how_does_cursor_get_essentially_unlimited_claude/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 09:27:59

### 內容

I don't understand. How can Cursor give unlimited API calls essentially while also allowing a massive context length?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

The answer is that they don't really allow the massive context length

**評論 2**:

investors burning money atm

**評論 3**:

Deal with Anthropic?

**評論 4**:

Me. I am the reason. I have 500 fast reques```/month, and I've barely used 150 of them. You may thank me now.

**評論 5**:

People who spend over $20/mo in llm credi``` pay $20. People who spend under $20/mo in llm also pay $20. This is certainly a net positive for them.

Also they can negotiate with the providers in bulk and get discoun beyond what us peasan can get.

---

## 20. ```
How to make my site look modern and user friendly
``` {#20-```
how-to-make-my-site-look-modern-and-user-fr}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**用戶在使用Cursor工具創建網站時，如何透過提示詞（prompt）讓設計成果更符合「現代感」**。具體要點包括：

1. **問題描述**：用戶指出，當要求Cursor「讓網站看起來現代化」時，實際生成的設計效果仍顯過時（dated），並尋求改善建議。  
2. **需求延伸**：用戶希望獲得具體的提示詞優化技巧，甚至附上預期效果的圖片範例，以更直觀地傳達設計目標。  

總結來說，這是一個關於**AI工具（Cursor）的設計提示詞優化問題**，聚焦於如何透過更精確的指令或方法提升生成結果的現代化視覺效果。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 02:03:47

### 內容

I find when I tell Cursor to make the site look modern when creating it, it doesnt do it very well, it always looks dated, any tips?

Thanks in advance

(Would love if you added a picture of what the prompt will achieve)

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Upload photos how to want it or use componen```

**評論 2**:

Take image screenshot of similar site you have in mind, ask any other AI to describe the website and then use that to prompt to the cursor and get it done step by step with the images and screensho```.

---

## 21. ```
Interesting observations after the latest cursor update 0.48.6
``` {#21-```
interesting-observations-after-the-latest-c}

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**使用者對軟體版本更新（0.48.6）的回饋**，主要包含以下重點：  

1. **正面改進**：  
   - 新版穩定性提升，解決了過去每12小時崩潰的問題。  

2. **待解決問題**：  
   - **午夜時段的連線失敗**：固定於PST午夜發生，與網路或VPN無關。  
   - **大檔案代碼遺漏**：使用高級模型（如GPT-4-Turbo）時，輸出可能不完整。  
   - **內部標記意外輸出**：如`<tool>`標籤泄漏，需切換模型才能清除。  

整體聚焦於版本更新的成效與持續存在的技術性問題，並提供具體案例供開發團隊參考。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 01:28:41

### 內容

Version Update & Feedback

Version: 0.48.6 (Universal)

VSCode Version: 1.96.2

Commit: 1649e229afdef8fd1d18ea173f063563f1e722e0

Date: 2025-03-31T05:01:56.506Z

OS: Darwin arm64 24.4.0

First off big thanks for the recent update.

The IDE is noticeably more stable, and I appreciate the improvemen```.

The previous issue of the IDE crashing every 12 hours appears to be resolved,

which has made a significant difference in daily workflow.

As I continue using this version, here are a few consistent behaviors

Ive noticed that may still need attention:

Ongoing/New Issues

Connection failure

(always at midnight PST)

Message: Connection failed.

If the problem persis```, please check your internet connection or VPN.

This happens consistently around midnight PST, even with a stable

internet connection and no VPN changes.

Dropped sections of code

in large files (with premium models)

When editing or generating completions in large files, Im seeing

increased occurrences of dropped or incomplete outpu```, even when using premium

models like GPT-4-Turbo.

Unexpected output:

<tool>Tool: run_terminal_cmd </tool>

This string occasionally appears in outpu```, possibly leaking

internal markup or system tags. It feels like a formatting/rendering artifact. I usually have to switch models back and forth to clear. IDE restar``` are not working.

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 22. ```
I built a Cursor extension that gives AI perfect memory of your codebase (and it's made my workflow 10x better)
``` {#22-```
i-built-a-cursor-extension-that-gives-ai-pe}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**如何解決AI在大型專案中因上下文限制而產生的理解問題，並介紹作者開發的解決方案——一個Cursor擴展工具，該工具能為AI建立並維護專案的「知識大腦」，從而提升AI對代碼庫的理解與協助效率**。

具體要點包括：
1. **問題背景**：  
   - AI在處理大型專案時因上下文長度限制，容易混淆架構、誤用文件，導致需要反覆解釋專案結構。  
   - 開發者花費過多時間在解釋而非編碼上。

2. **解決方案**：  
   - 開發一個Cursor擴展工具，建立「專案大腦」（project brain），透過以下功能讓AI持續理解代碼庫：  
     - 生成專案架構與設計模式的知識地圖。  
     - 追蹤組件間的依賴關係。  
     - 學習開發者的編碼風格與慣例。  
     - 隨專案迭代動態更新。

3. **成效**：  
   - 減少AI的錯誤（如幻覺或誤用文件）。  
   - 顯著提升AI生成代碼的準確性與實用性。  
   - 使AI成為真正理解專案脈絡的協作夥伴。

4. **動機**：  
   - 作者分享此工具以改善其他使用者的工作流程，同時謹慎避免過度自我推銷。  

總結：文章聚焦於「透過工具化手段克服AI在大型專案中的理解瓶頸」，並強調該方案對開發效率的實際提升。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpudmh/i_built_a_cursor_extension_that_gives_ai_perfect/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpudmh/i_built_a_cursor_extension_that_gives_ai_perfect/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpudmh/i_built_a_cursor_extension_that_gives_ai_perfect/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpudmh/i_built_a_cursor_extension_that_gives_ai_perfect/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 01:27:31

### 內容

As my project size grew, I needed to repeatedly explain my project structure to AI, because AI ge confused on larger projec because of the context size.

So, I built something to fix that... and I wanted to share it.

The challenges:

Re-explaining project architecture
AI ge``` lost or confused, uses wrong files and makes mistakes
Spending more time explaining than coding

What I built: A Cursor extension that creates and maintains a "project brain" - essentially giving the AI a consistent, persistent understanding of your codebase.

The extension works by:

Building a knowledge map of your project's architecture and design patterns
Maintaining awareness of dependencies and relationships between componen```
Learning your style and conventions
Evolving alongside your codebase as it grows

What users are experiencing:

No more hallucinations or mistakes by AI
Dramatic improvement in code generation quality
A genuinely helpful AI coding partner that understands YOUR specific project

I'm not sure about the rules of self-promotion, but I'm excited to share this with fellow Cursor users because it's made such a difference in my own workflow. (Also mods if you don't like this post lmk and I'll delete).

So I won't put a link here, but please drop a comment or DM if interested!

### 討論

**評論 1**:

One third of this sub is self promotion and another third is complaining. Mods need to do more but for now youre fine.

**評論 2**:

Downvoted because you're begging for commen```...either post a link or dont post at all

**評論 3**:

Send my way Ill take a look, ideally you would post the GitHub so we can all look at the source

**評論 4**:

Im not sure what confuses me more. AI or this sub.

Why cant OP just mention the project? Mods can delete it if they want. But Im not sure why they would do that.

Im going to bed

**評論 5**:

Interested, sounds intriguing

---

## 23. ```
Best way to reference other projec``` in Cursor?
``` {#23-```
best-way-to-reference-other-projec```-in-cu}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**如何在多專案目錄結構（如分開的後端/前端資料夾）中有效管理開發工具（如Cursor）的上下文環境，同時保持終端機操作的便利性**。

具體要點包括：
1. 開發者面臨在獨立專案資料夾（如backend/frontend）與根目錄之間選擇工作目錄的兩難
2. 擔憂在根目錄工作可能導致開發工具上下文混亂（認為是"sloppy approach"）
3. 偏好保持終端機在各自專案根目錄以維持操作效率
4. 尋求社群對多專案環境工作流程的最佳實踐建議

本質上是關於「多專案目錄結構下的開發環境優化」問題。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 00:42:30

### 內容

Hi guys, I have separate folders for backend/front end, etc and I sometimes want Cursor to have context into one or the other when implementing things.

I know I can be in the root folder where both folders exist, but I feel like that might be a sloppy approach (correct me if im wrong) because the terminal context is easier to navigate when it's in the root of each unique project.

How do you guys navigate this?

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 24. ```
gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small does not apply code?
``` {#24-```
gpt-4o-mini-or-cursor-small-does-not-apply-}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  

**用戶在使用Cursor AI編程工具時遇到的模型切換與代碼應用問題**，具體包括：  
1. **Fast Premium用量耗盡後，無法自動切換到其他可用模型**（如`gpt-4o-mini`或`cursor-small`）。  
2. **手動選擇替代模型時，生成的代碼無法直接應用**，僅提供不完整的操作指導。  
3. **詢問是否有設定能讓非Premium模型自動執行程式碼生成功能**。  

關鍵痛點在於工具的自動化流程中斷，且缺乏無縫降級到免費/低配模型的機制。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 21:51:11

### 內容

Good morning everyone, I was using Lovable to kickstart my project and switched over to Cursor - I have some basic knowledge of code so cursor has been a HUGE help building a dream website that I've been holding out on for years (I was on Wordpress and excited to leave it)

I am using the auto-select for the model, however it wont progress as I've run out of Fast Premium usage. I have no problem using the gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small models, however; It wont automatically switch to them. when I manually select gpt-4o-mini, it does not allow me to apply the code, it just tells me how to do some things manually (misses some steps)

Is there a setting or something I missed that allows the auto model to have gpt or cursor small apply the code it generates?

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 25. ```
M1 MacBook Air quakes as Cursor Renderer ea``` 79.9% CPU. Send help!
``` {#25-```
m1-macbook-air-quakes-as-cursor-renderer-ea}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**用戶抱怨「Cursor Helper (Renderer)」進程在 M1 MacBook Air 上佔用過高 CPU 資源（79.9%），導致效能負擔，並提及改用「agent」作為替代方案的可能性。**  

重點摘要：  
1. **效能問題**：M1 MacBook Air 的 CPU 被「Cursor Helper (Renderer)」大量佔用（79.9%），可能影響使用體驗。  
2. **軟體爭議**：該進程被形容為「CPU-chomping titan」（吞噬 CPU 的巨獸），暗示對其效率或設計的不滿。  
3. **解決方案**：作者提到改用「agent」，可能指切換到其他工具或優化方式以減輕負載。  

背景推測：  
- 「Cursor Helper」可能是某種游標輔助工具或 IDE（如 Cursor 編輯器）的渲染進程，因資源管理不佳導致問題。  
- 此討論反映用戶對輕量級設備（如 M1 MacBook Air）上高負載軟體的敏感度。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpja9f/m1_macbook_air_quakes_as_cursor_renderer_eats_799/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpja9f/m1_macbook_air_quakes_as_cursor_renderer_eats_799/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpja9f/m1_macbook_air_quakes_as_cursor_renderer_eats_799/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpja9f/m1_macbook_air_quakes_as_cursor_renderer_eats_799/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 15:55:56

### 內容

https://preview.redd.it/si3mdzt0odse1.png?width=1856&format=png&auto=webp&s=ca65d298cbd2263dca0ebd99214077176e2fc630

my poor little M1 MacBook Air versus the **Cursor Helper (Renderer)**a CPU-chomping titan! This beast is devouring 79.9% of my CPU

i just use agent

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I had the same problem

There is a popular extension in Cursor (millions of downloads), which ea``` up almost 100% of the CPU.

This extension is blocked in vscode, but is available in Cursor. Many people download it

https://github.com/shanalikhan/code-settings-sync/issues/1441

I don't understand why the Cursor developers don't prohibit downloading it.

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=Shan.code-settings-sync
I repeat - it is blocked in vscode, but the cursor sugges``` downloading it as one of the most popular. But it has not been updated for a long time and does not work for people!

---

## 26. ```
My cursor deleted i```elf
``` {#26-```
my-cursor-deleted-i```elf
```}

這段文字的核心討論主題是：**用戶在使用「Cursor」軟體時遇到的啟動問題與檔案缺失情況**。具體包括：
1. **軟體運行異常**（開啟速度極慢）；
2. **重啟後無法啟動**（提示「no cursor」）；
3. **檔案消失問題**（僅剩安裝程式，主程式遺失）；
4. **尋求類似經驗**（詢問其他用戶是否遇過相同情況）。

簡而言之，重點在於「Cursor軟體的技術故障與用戶求助」。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 02:31:04

### 內容

I just opened cursor and it opened but was impressively slow. I closed it, restarted my computer and then when I tried to open it, it said that there was no cursor. I check the files and theres no cursor.

I only had the installer. Has this happened to anyone?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

My next SaaS idea is an AI exorcist.

---

## 27. ```
Easy way to dictate to chat in Linux?
``` {#27-```
easy-way-to-dictate-to-chat-in-linux-
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**在Linux系統中尋找簡單的語音輸入（語音轉文字）解決方案**。  

具體要點包括：  
1. 用戶尋求在Linux上透過語音輸入（dictation）與聊天工具互動的方法。  
2. 提到Windows和Mac已有相關選項，但Linux缺乏可直接使用的方案。  
3. 提及嘗試過特定工具（如WhisperAssistant擴展）但未成功（在Ubuntu上無法運作）。  
4. 本質上是請求社群推薦可行的Linux語音輸入工具或替代方案。  

關鍵需求：**跨平台語音輸入工具的Linux兼容性**。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 01:30:45

### 內容

Hello,

Does anyone suggest a easy way to dictate to the chat, using voice, in Linux? I know that for Windows and Mac there are some options.

WhisperAssistant extension didnt work on my Ubuntu, unfortunately: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=MartinOpenSky.whisper-assistant

Thanks!

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 28. ```
Which model do you use the most these days?
``` {#28-```
which-model-do-you-use-the-most-these-days-}

這段討論的核心主題是：**用戶對不同AI模型（如Sonnet 3.5、3.7和Gemini 2.5）的體驗比較與偏好**。具體聚焦於以下幾點：

1. **模型性能的比較**：用戶提到從Sonnet切換到Gemini 2.5，認為後者速度更快、準確性更高，但也指出Gemini會產生更多無關內容的問題。  
2. **使用體驗的差異**：用戶分享對不同模型（如Sonnet的「思考模式」）的實際感受，並提出對當前主流偏好的疑問。  
3. **社群意見徵求**：用戶希望了解其他人目前認為最實用的模型，反映對技術迭代的持續關注與交流需求。  

簡言之，這是一個關於**AI模型選擇、優缺點分析及社群經驗分享**的討論。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 22:51:37

### 內容

I used to use sonnet 3.5, and sometimes 3.7 with thinking but found it not helpful and doing too much a lot of the times. Recently I find myself only using gemeni-2.5. It seems faster, and more accurate, though I find that it often edi``` completely unrelated code that isn't relevant, more so than sonnet. I'm curious to hear what folks are finding the most helpful these days?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I've totally switched to gemini 2.5 pro.

---

## 29. ```
Has devcontainers stopped working?
``` {#29-```
has-devcontainers-stopped-working-
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**用戶在更新 IDE（集成開發環境）至 v0.48.6 版本後，開發容器（devcontainer）無法啟動，且在嘗試重新安裝時發現該版本不再提供下載選項的問題**。  

具體要點包括：  
1. **版本相容性問題**：更新後 devcontainer 無法正常運作，可能涉及新版本的錯誤或與現有配置的衝突。  
2. **版本下載異常**：用戶嘗試重新安裝時，發現 v0.48.6 版本從官方下載選項中消失，可能因被撤下或臨時技術問題。  
3. **尋求解決方案**：用戶的疑問隱含對如何恢復開發環境正常運作的求助，例如降級版本或等待修復。  

整體圍繞「**IDE 更新導致的開發容器故障與版本管理問題**」展開。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplvkf/has_devcontainers_stopped_working/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplvkf/has_devcontainers_stopped_working/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplvkf/has_devcontainers_stopped_working/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplvkf/has_devcontainers_stopped_working/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 19:05:26

### 內容

https://preview.redd.it/txb622lrlese1.png?width=424&format=png&auto=webp&s=cd2149d98022057efdf6ac010fccc415b4a4b85f

I updated to v0.48.6 of the IDE and the devcontainer stopped booting, so I uninstalled to try re-installing and I can't see it as a downloadable option now?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

TIL about devcontainers. Thanks!

---

## 30. ```
"Oops, I accidentally removed too much code. Let's put back everything except the setTimeout delays:" - WELP, at least it ge``` it.
``` {#30-```
-oops-i-accidentally-removed-too-much-code-}

這段討論的核心主題是對某種「代理」（可能是程式碼編輯工具或AI助手，如Cursor）行為的批評，主要聚焦於以下兩點：

1. **過度激進的程式碼修改**  
   代理在執行任務時（例如修改3行程式碼），傾向於進行遠超必要範圍的改動（如刪除400行、新增50行），甚至「重新發明輪子」（reinvent），直到錯誤消失。這種行為缺乏精準性，可能引入不必要的風險或混亂。

2. **缺乏上下文理解的批量變更**  
   代理僅閱讀少量程式碼（如5行）後，便大幅新增/刪除大量不相關的程式碼（如新增500行、刪除100行），顯示其對程式碼庫的整體邏輯或架構理解不足，導致變更缺乏連貫性。

隱含議題：  
- 工具（如Cursor的某版本）在「自動化程式碼維護」上的可靠性問題  
- 開發者對這類代理行為的挫折感（用語如*aggravating*、諷刺語氣）  

總結：討論者質疑該代理在程式碼修改上的過度干預與低效策略，可能反映對AI輔助開發工具實際實用性的擔憂。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp43ed/oops_i_accidentally_removed_too_much_code_lets/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp43ed/oops_i_accidentally_removed_too_much_code_lets/)
- **外部連結**: [https://i.redd.it/2sn14yitv9se1.png](https://i.redd.it/2sn14yitv9se1.png)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 03:14:45

### 內容

More like "I was supposed to change 3 lines but decided to nuke 400 lines and add 50 lines so me just go and start reinventing until the errors stop"... Most aggravating thing this agent does beyond the "I read 5 lines now me add 500 new lines and remove 100 unrelated lines.

Version of Cursor?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

**評論 2**:

Version of Cursor?

---

# 總體討論重點

以下是30篇文章的核心討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的錨點連結與逐條細節：

---

### **AI 專案管理與框架**  
1. [CSO 框架避免 AI 幻覺](#anchor_1)  
   - **Context**：建立專案記憶檔（如 `project_milestones.md`）減少錯誤輸出。  
   - **Structure**：拆解任務為小步驟（20-30行代碼內）。  
   - **Organization**：依任務類型選模型（推理型 vs. 標準模型），並建立可追蹤流程（如 Git 提交）。  

2. [Cursor 工具與開發者經驗](#anchor_2)  
   - 推薦 Cursor 搭配 Gemini 2.5 Pro/Sonnet 3.5。  
   - 開發者共享 `.cursorrules` 轉向「專案規則系統」，提議社群共享庫。  
   - 對比 Cursor 版本差異（如批評第三版功能削弱）。  

3. [AI 模型成本比較](#anchor_3)  
   - **Gemini 2.5 Pro**：輸出 $5/M，輸入 $1.3/M。  
   - **Claude 3.5 Haiku**：輸出 $4/M，輸入 $0.8/M。  
   - **Claude 3.7 Sonnet**：輸出 $15/M，輸入 $3/M。  

4. [Cursor 開發 Chrome 擴展](#anchor_4)  
   - 快速開發實用工具（如「強制連結新分頁開啟」）。  
   - 推崇 Cursor 的「生成即用」體驗，免費版 Claude-3.7 效果佳。  

5. [Cursor 爭議與定價](#anchor_5)  
   - 開源替代方案（如 Roo Code）成本高（單次請求 $0.5）。  
   - Cursor 定價 $20/月可能虧損運營，需提升智能編碼代理功能。  

6. [為 Cursor 辯護](#anchor_6)  
   - 反駁成本質疑，數據顯示 Cursor 承擔部分 API 開銷。  
   - 強調其速度、功能豐富性與開發效率提升。  

---

### **模型效能與工具體驗**  
7. [Gemini 2.5 vs. Sonnet 3.7](#anchor_7)  
   - Gemini 2.5 跨程式碼庫理解能力強，Sonnet 易陷入循環討論。  
   - 實測案例：Gemini 2.5 快速解決問題，Sonnet 耗時 2 小時。  

8. [請求模式彈性需求](#anchor_8)  
   - 用戶希望切換「快速/慢速請求」模式以適應多工或即時需求。  

9. [Cursor 效能衰退解決](#anchor_9)  
   - 啟用 **Large Context** 功能可改善大型檔案處理效能。  

10. [遊戲開發技術探討](#anchor_10)  
    - 詢問遊戲資產生成工具與技術架構（如是否使用 LLM 輔助）。  

11. [Gemini 2.5 缺陷批評](#anchor_11)  
    - 代理模式下無視現有程式碼、虛構變數名稱。  
    - 對比 Sonnet 3.7 能一次性正確完成任務。  

12. [Vibe Styler 工具](#anchor_12)  
    - 需補充內容以總結（原連結為圖片）。  

---

### **工具問題與解決方案**  
13. [Cursor 評價混亂](#anchor_14)  
    - 社群評價兩極，學習者困惑於最佳實踐（如模型選擇、分步 Markdown 清單）。  

14. [MCP 安裝指南](#anchor_15)  
    - 尋求 Mod Coder Pack 正確版本與設定步驟。  

15. [Cursor 開源替代方案](#anchor_16)  
    - 探討 Qwen 測試部署需分叉版本或獨立應用程式以獲完整權限。  

16. [Manual 模式不滿](#anchor_18)  
    - 批評 Claude 新版本強制使用高階模型（如 Sonnet），無法選輕量級模型（GPT-4o-mini）。  

17. [Cursor API 成本疑問](#anchor_19)  
    - 質疑 Cursor 如何提供「無限 API 調用」與大規模上下文長度。  

18. [網站設計提示詞優化](#anchor_20)  
    - 尋求讓 Cursor 生成「現代化」網站的具體提示詞技巧。

討論重點​

AI 專案管理與框架​

模型效能與工具體驗​

工具問題與解決方案​

文章核心重點​

目錄​