2025-04-03-rising

精選方式: RISING

討論重點

以下是25篇文章的條列式重點總結，附上對應錨點連結與逐條細節說明：

Cursor編輯器與AI工具整合
- 推薦搭配Gemini 2.5 Pro或Sonnet 3.5提升開發效率
- 討論從.cursorrules過渡到新專案規則系統
開發學習建議
- 建議初學者從模板（如Vercel）擴展功能
- 強調實用導向而非過度專注理論
社群協作
- 提議建立共享函式庫促進協作

#2 Cursor slams are so exhausting

工具優勢辯護
- 強調Cursor速度快、價格合理、功能豐富
成本合理性
- 對比Claude API說明定價非過高
反駁負評
- 批評者忽略實際價值，市場已有替代品

#3 Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified

開源方案成本問題
- 單次請求可能耗費0.5美元
Cursor市場定位
- 20美元/月無降速限制，可能虧損運營
用戶期待改進
- 需加強透明度與核心功能優化

#4 Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework

上下文管理
- 建立project_milestones.md減少幻覺
任務拆解
- 限制每項任務20-30行程式碼
模型選擇策略
- 規劃用推理模型，實作用標準模型

#5 Cursor Degradation COMPLETELY REVERSED by Large Context

效能改善方案
- 啟用Large Context功能解決大型文件處理問題

#6 Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it

開發動機
- 解決個人痛點（如自動開新分頁）
工具效率
- 搭配Claude-3.7-Sonnet快速完成擴展開發

#7 Vibe Styler: Transform Website Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro

無法訪問內容
- 需提供圖片文字或描述以總結

#8 How to make my site look modern

AI設計限制
- Cursor生成風格過時，尋求改進技巧

#9 Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7

價格比較
- Gemini 2.5 Pro輸出token成本：$5/M，低於Claude 3.7的$15/M

#10 Observations after cursor update 0.48.6

穩定性改進
- 解決12小時崩潰問題
持續問題
- 午夜連線失敗、大檔案代碼遺漏

（因篇幅限制，以下為簡要條列，完整細節可依需求擴充）

#11-25 快速摘要

#11 否定pytest自動測試成功案例
#12 多專案目錄結構的上下文管理問題
#13 辦公室模擬器遊戲的開發技術討論
#14 Cursor異常刪除自身文件
#15 Gemini 2.5實測表現差於Sonnet
#16 Linux語音輸入工具需求
#17 未提供內容
#18 模型切換時代碼應用失效
#19 詢問@codebase的ask mode功能去向
#20 Python專案結構最佳實踐
#21 批評Cursor缺乏原生語音輸入
#22 質疑模型基準測試偏差
#23 開發者文化與非技術因素探討
#24 用戶偏好Gemini 2.5勝於Sonnet
#25 需提供Twitter內容以總結

完整錨點對應

實際錨點需替

文章核心重點

以下是根據每篇文章標題生成的一句話摘要（條列式輸出）：

Sharing my .cursorrules after several successful projec
- 作者分享成功專案中使用的.cursorrules設定檔，強調Cursor編輯器與AI工具提升開發效率的實用技巧。
Cursor slams are so exhausting
- 作者反駁對Cursor的批評，辯護其性價比與開發效率優勢，認為負面評價不合理。
Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified
- 文章比較Cursor與開源替代方案，認為其定價合理且功能優異，批評多屬不公。
Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework that saved hundreds of debugging hours
- 提出CSO框架（Context-Structure-Organization）系統化避免AI幻覺問題，大幅節省除錯時間。
Cursor Degration COMPLETELY REVERSED by using Large Context
- 開啟Cursor的「Large Context」功能後，處理大型文件效能退化問題完全解決。
Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it
- 作者使用Cursor快速開發自用Chrome擴展，盛讚其AI輔助開發的高效率與易用性。
Vibe Styler Transform Any Website's Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro
- （無法確認內容，可能為展示Gemini 2.5 Pro修改網站樣式的技術應用）
How to make my site look modern and user friendly
- 用戶求助如何改善Cursor生成的網站設計，使其更符合現代審美與用戶友好性。
It seems Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7
- 數據比較顯示Gemini 2.5 Pro的token成本低於Claude 3.7，更具價格競爭力。
Interesting observations after the latest cursor update 0.48.6
- 用戶回報Cursor 0.48.6版本穩定性提升，但仍有午夜連線失敗等技術問題待解決。
Has anyone successfully used cursor to write pytest autotes
- （標題不完整，推測為詢問是否有人成功用Cursor生成pytest自動測試）
Best way to reference other projec in Cursor?
- 探討如何在多專案目錄結構中管理Cursor上下文，兼顧終端操作與工具準確性。
Created an office simulator for VibeJam - Meeting Dash
- 開發者分享以「無盡會議」為主題的辦公室模擬遊戲，並討論開發技術細節。
My cursor deleted i
- 用戶遭遇Cursor軟體異常，主程序文件無故消失導致無法啟動。
Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor
- 用戶批評Gemini 2.5在實際編程任務中表現不佳，相較Sonnet模型更易生成無關代碼。
Easy way to dictate to chat in Linux?
- 尋求Linux系統下簡單可用的語音輸入工具，以替代鍵盤輸入提升效率。
Would be good to have a 'yes' and 'halt' button
- （標題不完整，可能建議新增功能按鈕以簡化操作流程）
gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small does not apply code?
- 用戶反映Cursor切換至非Premium模型後，生成代碼無法直接應用的功能限制。
How do I use @codebase for ask mode? Where is it gone?
- 詢問如何找回或使用Cursor中消失的「@codebase ask mode」功能。
What are the best rules for Python? How do I properly create project structure file?
- 討論Python專案的最佳實踐，包括程式碼風格、目錄結構設計與工具推薦。
Just trying it out for the first time. Is there no audio input?
- 新用戶批評Cursor缺乏原生語音輸入功能，需依賴外部文字轉語音工具。
Did anyone get better resul with Gemini 2.5 pro than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
- 質疑基準測試能否真實反映模型性能，探討Gemini 2.5與Claude 3.7的實際表現差異。
Interview with Vibe Coder in 2025
- 幽默對話探討開發者文化中的非技術因素，如情緒壓力與專業標

- [3. ```
Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified
```](#3-```
unpopular-opinion-the-cursor-hate-is-mostly-)
- [4. ```
Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework that saved hundreds of debugging hours
```](#4-```
stop-your-ai-from-hallucinating-the-cso-fram)
- [5. ```
Cursor Degration COMPLETELY REVERSED by using Large Context
```](#5-```
cursor-degration-completely-reversed-by-usin)
- [6. ```
Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it.
```](#6-```
cursor-for-chrome-extensions-i-am-loving-it-)
- [7. ```
Vibe Styler  Transform Any Website's Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro
```](#7-```
vibe-styler-transform-any-website-s-style-wi)
- [8. ```
How to make my site look modern and user friendly
```](#8-```
how-to-make-my-site-look-modern-and-user-fri)
- [9. ```
It seems Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7
```](#9-```
it-seems-gemini-2-5-pro-isn-t-as-expensive-a)
- [10. ```
Interesting observations after the latest cursor update 0.48.6
```](#10-```
interesting-observations-after-the-latest-c)
- [11. ```
Has anyone successfully used cursor to write pytest autotes```?
```](#11-```
has-anyone-successfully-used-cursor-to-writ)
- [12. ```
Best way to reference other projec``` in Cursor?
```](#12-```
best-way-to-reference-other-projec```-in-cu)
- [13. ```
Created an office simulator for VibeJam - Meeting Dash - try to get work done between endless meetings
```](#13-```
created-an-office-simulator-for-vibejam-mee)
- [14. ```
My cursor deleted i```elf
```](#14-```
my-cursor-deleted-i```elf
```)
- [15. ```
Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor
```](#15-```
gemini-2-5-sucks-in-cursor
```)
- [16. ```
Easy way to dictate to chat in Linux?
```](#16-```
easy-way-to-dictate-to-chat-in-linux-
```)
- [17. ```
Would be good to have a 'yes' and 'halt' button
```](#17-```
would-be-good-to-have-a-yes-and-halt-button)
- [18. ```
gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small does not apply code?
```](#18-```
gpt-4o-mini-or-cursor-small-does-not-apply-)
- [19. ```
How do I use @codebase for ask mode? Where is it gone?
```](#19-```
how-do-i-use-codebase-for-ask-mode-where-is)
- [20. ```
What are the best rules for Python? How do I properly create project structure file?
```](#20-```
what-are-the-best-rules-for-python-how-do-i)
- [21. ```
Just trying it out for the first time. Is there no audio input?
```](#21-```
just-trying-it-out-for-the-first-time-is-th)
- [22. ```
Did anyone get better resul``` with Gemini 2.5 pro than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
```](#22-```
did-anyone-get-better-resul```-with-gemini-)
- [23. ```
Interview with Vibe Coder in 2025
```](#23-```
interview-with-vibe-coder-in-2025
```)
- [24. ```
Which model do you use the most these days?
```](#24-```
which-model-do-you-use-the-most-these-days-)
- [25. ```
cursor rules tips
```](#25-```
cursor-rules-tips
```)

---

## 1. ```
Sharing my .cursorrules after several successful projec``` with thousands of users
``` {#1-```
sharing-my-cursorrules-after-several-success}

這篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

1. **Cursor 編輯器與 AI 工具的應用**：  
   - 作者推薦使用 Cursor 編輯器搭配 Gemini 2.5 Pro 或 Sonnet 3.5 進行開發，並認為這些工具能顯著提升效率。
   - 討論了 Cursor 的功能改進（如從 `.cursorrules` 過渡到新的「專案規則系統」）。

2. **學習與開發建議**：  
   - 建議初學者從現有模板（如 Vercel 的模板）開始，逐步擴展功能。
   - 強調實用性導向的開發方式，而非過度專注於算法理論。

3. **社群與資源共享**：  
   - 提議在 Cursor 中建立共享的社群函式庫，以促進協作。
   - 對其他使用者的貢獻表示肯定（如文件清晰度與實用性）。

4. **個人經驗與工具評價**：  
   - 作者分享自身背景（應用數學出身，多年編程經驗但自評算法能力普通），並認為工具能彌補技術短板。
   - 對比不同 AI 模型（如批評某篇關於 Cursor 功能受限的貼文）。

整體而言，主題圍繞「如何有效利用現代開發工具（Cursor + AI）提升生產力」，並結合實務經驗與社群協作的觀點。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplf6u/sharing_my_cursorrules_after_several_successful/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jplf6u/sharing_my_cursorrules_after_several_successful/)
- **外部連結**: [https://pastebin.com/HDWPLk43](https://pastebin.com/HDWPLk43)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 18:35:43

### 內容

Caveat: This is for JS/TS/React/Next.JS projec```, but you can easily ask Gemini to adapt it to another language.

I have 25(?) years of professional programming experience although i still rate myself as a 6/10 coder as I lack talent in algorithmics. I studied applied math and it doesnt exactly translate to comp sci.

I think Cursor with Gemini 2.5 Pro is fantastic. Sonnet 3.5 is all you need with it.

When youre learning I suggest starting with some template from Vercel and building upon it.

As a powerful Cursor user myself, I am impressed by the clarity and quality of this file- no doubt it will serve the community well to share this.

Perhaps even within Cursor, there could be a shared community library...

So much better than the third cursor is nerfed post today

Just as a heads up, they're planning to deprecate .cursorrules entirely, in favour of the (much better) project rules system. You could theoretically just paste this all into a global project rule, but it's much more effective to work with the new system.

Thank you. I need to test it but it already looks great

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Caveat: This is for JS/TS/React/Next.JS projec```, but you can easily ask Gemini to adapt it to another language.

I think Cursor with Gemini 2.5 Pro is fantastic. Sonnet 3.5 is all you need with it.

When youre learning I suggest starting with some template from Vercel and building upon it.

**評論 2**:

As a powerful Cursor user myself, I am impressed by the clarity and quality of this file- no doubt it will serve the community well to share this.

Perhaps even within Cursor, there could be a shared community library...

**評論 3**:

So much better than the third cursor is nerfed post today

**評論 4**:

**評論 5**:

Thank you. I need to test it but it already looks great

---

## 2. ```
Cursor slams are so exhausting
``` {#2-```
cursor-slams-are-so-exhausting
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**作者強力推薦「Cursor」這款AI編程工具，並反駁對其的批評**，主要圍繞以下幾點：  
1. **Cursor的優勢**：速度快、價格合理、功能豐富，能顯著提升開發者效率。  
2. **成本合理性**：對比其他AI工具（如Claude API）的實際使用成本，Cursor的定價並非過高，且承擔了部分隱形成本。  
3. **反駁負面評價**：批評者忽略工具實際價值，市場上已有其他替代品，不應無端指責Cursor是「過度收費的騙局」。  
4. **呼籲理性看待**：建議批評者先冷靜評估，承認Cursor對開發生態的貢獻。  

整體而言，文章旨在為Cursor辯護，強調其性價比與實用性，並反對不合理的負面評論。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpq9l0/cursor_slams_are_so_exhausting/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 22:41:34

### 內容

Its honestly exhausting. Ive used a bunch of AI coding tools, and Cursor is hands-down the best. It's fast, affordable, and packed with features. Yet people still find ways to complain. Yes, regressions happen, progress isnt linear. But overall? This tool has made devs significantly more productive.

Worried about cost? Lets do some math. Using Claudes API directly can easily run over $0.05 per tool call, depending on context size. Its $3 per million input tokens for Sonnet 3.7. A 250-line file might cost about $0.007 to read. But that's just the inputtheres also conversation history, context, and more. Tool calls arent free, and Cursor is eating a lot of that cost.

And the we need alternatives crowd? There are alternatives. Tons of them. If Cursors not for you, try something else. But pretending its some sort of overpriced grift just isnt grounded in reality.

So yeah, maybe take a breath before slamming a tool thats genuinely pushing the ecosystem forward.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Finally some fairness.

They complain because they know Cursor is one of the best tool around and that give the best offer money wise.

**評論 2**:

Its because most people on this sub have never written a line of code in their life before

**評論 3**:

why are you exhausted by something tha``` a business and has nothing to do with you personally?

**評論 4**:

I think most people are probably just venting after a rough night wrestling with it. I think the power of the tool is pretty undeniable.

**評論 5**:

So i have tried a competitor, Roo.

Tbh i like them both, and when Roo adds internet capability out of the box I think I will prefer Roo 100%.

However, i``` mostly out of preference, as cursor is pretty great and most issues users have are actual skill issues.

What drove me to Roo was the whole gemini and context. I want my context and I like controlling my own keys and usage anyway, on top of now I wont be limited on usage at all. The only downside is maybe I'll spend over 20 a month.

---

## 3. ```
Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified
``` {#3-```
unpopular-opinion-the-cursor-hate-is-mostly-}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**比較Cursor與開源替代方案（如Roo Code）的優缺點，並探討Cursor的定價策略、成本效益及未來發展方向**。  

具體要點包括：  
1. **開源方案的優劣**：雖然提供更好的程式碼生成能力，但運行成本高昂（如單次請求可能花費0.5美元）。  
2. **Cursor的市場定位**：  
   - 價格合理（20美元/月），相較競爭對手（如Windsurf）提供更多請求且無降速限制。  
   - 可能處於虧損狀態，需平衡成本與功能優化。  
3. **用戶批評與期待**：  
   - 缺乏透明度與溝通，但產品仍屬業界頂尖。  
   - 呼籲團隊聚焦開發者真正需要的功能改進。  

總結：作者肯定Cursor的性價比，但也指出開源替代方案的成本問題，並期望Cursor在用戶溝通與功能優化上改進。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpkwg7/unpopular_opinion_the_cursor_hate_is_mostly/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 18:00:07

### 內容

Hey everyone,

In the past weeks I have read quite a lot of commen``` about Cursor getting worse and people switching to Roo Code or similar Open Source solutions. I have now tried several open source solutions myself and while they offer better code generation in total, they also cost much much more to run.

For example: I used Roo Code to fix an error in a C# repo. It fixed like 80% of the bug, while also creating a new bug with memory allocation. In total, this one request with all i``` tool uses etc. has a total cost of almost 0.50$. A single request!

You could argue that Cursor has made some wrong decisions, yet they likely run at a large deficit per user and still have to find optimal solutions for better cost efficiency while maximizing agentic coding capabilities. 20$ a month is still very cheap for what the product offers, especially compared to competitors like Windsurf which offer much less reques and no slow reques after all fast reques``` are used.

I agree on some of the criticism like Cursor not being transparent enough and not communicating enough with their users, yet I believe that the product is still one of the best in class and I hope that the team will take the right actions and put a higher focus on real developer-benefitting features and optimizations.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I think it just boils down to 'you pay peanu```, you get monkeys'.

For $20 per month I can't expect the same quality as for instance Claude Code which sometimes burns $20 per hour.

Yes, Cursor is cheap.

By positioning it at this pricepoint and handicapping models to keep that low price point Cursor is positioning i```elf not a professional tool but as a tool for people who want to write some code in their spare time.

Which is totally fine.

However, I write code for a living. Time equals money, and quality and consistency matter there. I would gladly pay (a lot) more for Cursor just to have consistent, good quality code and a maximized context.

I've spend $850 on Claude Code in the past month and I've had the most productive month of my life. It paid i```elf back easily.

Cursor is best in i``` class, and that class appears to be "AI assisted IDE for the casual software developer". That's ofcourse not a bad place to be, but also not the kind of tool a lot of professional developers need or want.

As as with all tools, there are cheap hobbyist options and more expensive and professional options. Comparing the two should always take the price into consideration too.

The lack of communication, not offering a pro version, clipping Gemini 2.5, offering Claude 3.7 'MAX' (which doesnt even exist) are examples of the kind of corporate sales tricks that a lot of people don't like.

**評論 2**:

Same feeling.

We must not forget that this field is changing almost every day, so they also need to keep up the pace with this difficult environment.

Cursor in the right hands is still very powerful. But as users we also need to adapt to all the changes happening and adapt our workflows to fit new models and paradigms.

**評論 3**:

Same feeling

**評論 4**:

\> Cursor getting worse

People get disillusioned from their initial over-hype about ai models and tools.

My theory is that at the start they couldn't see i``` issues.

**評論 5**:

I think many of the criticism is down to the fact that Cursor documentation is crap. The app changes often and functionality changes are not communicated properly.

For me, lately it also started to work weirdly, even to the extreme that it flat out lied that it's not allowed to change my files, and can only suggest changes in the chat. But in each of these cases, I made something in the way as I did before the latest upgrade, which should have been changed after the upgrade. When I investigated, and read suggestions here on Reddit, I was able to use Cursor properly, but theose changes weren't documented.

---

## 4. ```
Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework that saved hundreds of debugging hours
``` {#4-```
stop-your-ai-from-hallucinating-the-cso-fram}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**如何有效且系統化地實施AI專案，避免常見的混亂與失敗**。作者透過自身經驗總結出三個關鍵原則，並提供具體方法：

1. **Context（上下文）**  
   - 強調AI的表現取決於提供的上下文，建議建立專案記憶檔（如 `project_milestones.md` 和 `documentation.md`）來減少AI的幻覺問題。

2. **Structure（結構化）**  
   - 將複雜任務拆解成小片段（如限制每項任務在20-30行代碼內），避免錯誤連鎖反應，並建議遇到問題時先回退到穩定狀態再逐步修正。

3. **Organization（組織化）**  
   - 根據任務類型選擇合適的AI模型（如規劃用推理型模型，實作用標準模型），並建立系統化的工作流程（如定期更新文檔、頻繁提交版本控制）。

文章最終呼籲讀者分享經驗，並附上相關工具與延伸閱讀資源，強調這些「不炫但實用」的方法能大幅提升開發效率與穩定性。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpbwa7/stop_your_ai_from_hallucinating_the_cso_framework/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 08:49:42

### 內容

I spent the last year cleaning up messy AI implementations for founders who rushed in without a system. The pattern is always the same: initial excitement as things move 10x faster, then disappointment when everything breaks.

After fixing these systems over and over, I've boiled it down to three principles that actually work: Context, Structure, and Organization.

Context: Give Your AI A Memory

AI is literally only as good as the context you give it. My simplest fix was creating two markdown files that serve as your AI's memory. You can create these files yourself, or use ChatGPT or Claude to help you out:

project_milestones.md: Contains project overview, goals, and phase breakdowns
documentation.md: Houses API endpoin```, DB schemas, specs, and architecture decisions

This simple structure drastically reduces hallucinations because the AI actually understands your project's context.

Structure: Break Complex Tasks Down

Always work in small par```, don't make big tasks.

Also, stop those endless debugging spirals. When something breaks, revert to a working state and break the task into smaller chunks. I typically cap my AI implementation tasks at 20-30 lines max. This preven``` the compound error problem where fixing one issue creates three more.

Organization: Use The Right Models

Finally, use the right models for the right jobs:

Planning & Architecture: Use reasoning-focused models like 3.7 in max mode
Implementation: Standard models like Sonnet 3.5 work better with well-defined, small tasks
Workflow Pattern: Start each session by referencing your project context Work in small, testable incremen``` Update documentation Git commit early and often

Honestly, these simple guidelines have saved hundreds of hours of debugging time. It's not sexy, but it works consistently, especially when codebases grow beyond what one person can hold in their head. Would love to hear if others have found patterns that work / share horror stories of what definitely doesn't.

Edit: This is blowing up!

My cursor extension to stop hallucinations https://gigamind.dev/
Wrote on these topics with a bit more detail on my blog: https://nmn.gl/blog/ai-dev-tips

### 討論

**評論 1**:

What's your refactoring / cleanup strategy? I find that the most error prone

**評論 2**:

This is almost exactly what I do word for word, and I always get confused when I see pos``` saying cursor is broken blah blah blah because as long as you follow these steps (which I figured out on my own after 1 trial and error project because it seems so logical and intuitive to do things this way) because no matter which model I use, I don't use max and cursor works great. So I can attest that this works.

**評論 3**:

I was able to use a similar method to get Cursor to effectively program a lang it barely knows.

I had to instill some rules, similar to 'call me big daddy' but also including 'always ref these files' and so forth.

'these files' contained..

A: The very technical and detailed writeup of the program currently being worked on (goals, design layout and data structures, current status, etc.)
B: A LLM friendly compressed reference manual for the language that contained all words/syntax and some environment knolwedge, etc. Something compressed enough to fit, but containing the bi``` it was always getting wrong.

Took some tweaking, but after a while, I had Cursor singing and dancing right along how I wanted in a lang it was barely able to hello-world in at the start.

lo``` of wasted cycles however, as it was often forgetting to follow the rules, and I'd have to roll back over and over and kick it in the head until it woke up and followed instructions again, but then this was months and months ago.

I can't stress hard enough how critically important these kinds of tricks are, for anybody whos having problems getting cursor not to be..well,stupid.

Here is the big tip: It IS stupid, because you are allowing it room to be stupid. It's an LLM, but you have to anal-retentive-prompt is like diffusion AI when trying to generate a very very specific image. You have to give it very direct and complete instructions about every aspect you are aiming for, otherwise it's just guessing in the wind, and it's gonna guess badly more often than not.

Do what OP says, and cursor becomes a whole new kind of super power.

**評論 4**:

Any suggestions how to get this done in the middle of the project if you haven't done this from the start or if you've changed the project a lot without keeping the docs updated?

I've noticed that just asking cursor to write it up easily leaves some essential missing and/or cursor adds some hallucinations there.

**評論 5**:

Why we use 2 context fail instead of 1 ? If we will use 2 context file that will make unfocus

---

## 5. ```
Cursor Degration COMPLETELY REVERSED by using Large Context
``` {#5-```
cursor-degration-completely-reversed-by-usin}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**「啟用 Cursor 編輯器的『Large Context』功能可顯著改善效能退化問題」**。  

作者分享個人經驗，指出開啟此功能後，處理大型文件時的性能明顯提升，並建議其他遇到類似問題的使用者嘗試啟用以改善體驗。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpom1i/cursor_degration_completely_reversed_by_using/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 21:31:23

### 內容

Before, for a while, Cursor was slightly degraded for me. Not as crazy as the other users has specified, but it was a bit worse than I would say the old Cursor. After going through my Cursor Settings, I stumbled across Features -> Large Context, after enabling it, damn my Cursor experience changed. I started feeding it whole large files without a single issue.

Lo``` of people who are experiencing Cursor Degradation, please ENABLE this feature and it might completely change your experience.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Don't get too excited.

I've always had that enabled since they first brought that feature up (0.45 or 0.43) and Cursor it's still crap compared to back then. This is not a secret hack to save cursor and TBH I have no idea whether this really improves anything, makes me spend more money, or actually degrades the experience. This feature used to be Beta, now it's apparently not. But zero information on how that actually works under the hood. As usual.

**評論 2**:

Does enabling it uses more reques``` ?

---

## 6. ```
Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it.
``` {#6-```
cursor-for-chrome-extensions-i-am-loving-it-}

這段文章的核心討論主題是：**作者使用Cursor工具（搭配Claude-3.7-Sonnet模型）快速開發自用的瀏覽器擴展與WordPress插件，以解決個人痛點並提升工作效率**。具體重點包括：

1. **開發動機**：  
   - 為滿足個人需求（如「點擊連結自動在新分頁開啟且不跳轉」）  
   - 解決日常困擾（如「遮蔽YouTube Shorts干擾性的元數據面板」）

2. **工具與技術**：  
   - 強調Cursor工具的易用性（「生成即用」的開發流程）  
   - 提及使用的AI模型（免費版Claude-3.7-Sonnet）  

3. **成果與體驗**：  
   - 快速完成兩款Chrome擴展及多個WP插件  
   - 高度評價工具效率（稱其為「目前最佳工具」）並表達持續探索的熱情  

整體聚焦於**「AI輔助開發如何簡化個人化工具的創建過程」**，展現從需求識別到實現的流暢體驗。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpgaur/cursor_for_chrome_extensions_i_am_loving_it/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 12:28:03

### 內容

In the last two days, I've used Cursor to write and create two Chrome extensions for myself! One that I've always wanted, one to fix something that annoys me.

1 - What I always wanted - an extension that will open any link you click on in a new browser tab, without taking focus away from the current tab, and can be toggled off and on at will by clicking the plugin icon.

2 - A YouTube Shor plugin that hides the metadata panel that si like halfway over EVERY YOUTUBE SHORT and annoys the shit out of me.

Both have basically been entirely - generate, plug, and play!

I've even put together a few WP plugins for myself/biz use! Little things that just make my work life easier. Best tool ever so far. I am seriously loving this thing, and I cannot wait to play with it more! (for anyone curious, I use the claude-3.7-sonnet model, free)

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Open any link in new tab...

It's control + click...

**評論 2**:

I made Context Weaver and Im really proud of it.

Basically, you can highlight text on any webpage, and then pull up the extension and interact with an LLM in one click. Itll send off the text you highlighted and give you a quick response.

It requires an API key (which is how its 100% free,) and suppor OpenAI, DeepSeek, and xAI. You can also create custom archetypes, or system promp, to define how the AI behaves in the extension, and have LLMs help you design the archetypes.

I use it frequently day for day, though it still has some kinks. Very useful stuff. Thanks cursor devs for making it possible.

**評論 3**:

I agree. Its incredibly empowering.

---

## 7. ```
Vibe Styler  Transform Any Website's Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro
``` {#7-```
vibe-styler-transform-any-website-s-style-wi}

由於我無法直接訪問或查看連結內容（https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg），因此無法總結該圖像或文章的核心主題。以下是可能的情況和建議：

1. **連結性質**：  
   - 該連結指向 Reddit 的圖片（.jpeg 格式），通常此類內容可能是迷因（meme）、資訊圖表、新聞截圖或用戶分享的視覺化資料。  
   - 若圖片包含文字或數據，主題可能涉及社會議題、科技討論、流行文化等，但需具體內容才能判斷。

2. **用戶可自行提供的線索**：  
   - 若您能描述圖片中的文字、標題或關鍵元素（例如「AI 發展」、「政治事件」等），我可協助分析核心主題。  
   - 或提供圖片中的摘要性文字，以便歸納重點。

3. **常見 Reddit 討論方向**：  
   - 如果是迷因或諷刺圖，主題可能圍繞網路文化或時事調侃。  
   - 若是新聞截圖，可能與近期熱門事件（如科技突破、政策變動）相關。

建議您提供更多細節，或直接上傳圖片中的文字內容，以便更精準總結。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpmgnz/vibe_styler_transform_any_websites_style_with/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpmgnz/vibe_styler_transform_any_websites_style_with/)
- **外部連結**: [https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg](https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 19:40:40

### 內容

連結： [https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg](https://i.redd.it/cx33wy27sese1.jpeg)

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 8. ```
How to make my site look modern and user friendly
``` {#8-```
how-to-make-my-site-look-modern-and-user-fri}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  

**用戶在使用AI工具（Cursor）生成現代風格網站時遇到的困難，並尋求改善設計效果的建議。**  

具體要點包括：  
1. **問題描述**：用戶指出Cursor在生成「現代風格」網站時效果不佳，設計顯得過時。  
2. **求助需求**：希望獲得提升設計質量的技巧或提示。  
3. **附加請求**：建議提供示例圖片，以更直觀展示理想設計效果。  

整體圍繞「如何優化AI工具生成的網站設計，使其更符合現代審美」展開討論。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpvbsv/how_to_make_my_site_look_modern_and_user_friendly/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 02:03:47

### 內容

I find when I tell Cursor to make the site look modern when creating it, it doesnt do it very well, it always looks dated, any tips?

Thanks in advance

(Would love if you added a picture of what the prompt will achieve)

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Upload photos how to want it or use componen```

**評論 2**:

Take image screenshot of similar site you have in mind, ask any other AI to describe the website and then use that to prompt to the cursor and get it done step by step with the images and screensho```.

---

## 9. ```
It seems Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7
``` {#9-```
it-seems-gemini-2-5-pro-isn-t-as-expensive-a}

該文章的核心討論主題是 **不同AI模型的價格比較**，具體聚焦於以下三款模型的輸入與輸出token成本：

1. **Gemini 2.5 Pro**  
   - 輸出token價格：每百萬（M）5美元  
   - 輸入token價格：每百萬1.3美元  

2. **Claude 3.5 Haiku**  
   - 輸出token價格：每百萬4美元  
   - 輸入token價格：每百萬0.8美元  

3. **Claude 3.7 Sonnet**  
   - 輸出token價格：每百萬15美元  
   - 輸入token價格：每百萬3美元  

總結：文章透過並列價格數據，直接比較這些模型的成本差異，可能旨在幫助用戶根據預算或需求選擇合適的模型。未提及性能或功能差異，純粹為**定價資訊的對照**。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpby5i/it_seems_gemini_25_pro_isnt_as_expensive_as/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 08:52:17

### 內容

https://glama.ai/models/gemini-2.5-pro-exp-03-25

Gemini 2.5 Pro: $5/M outputtokens $1.3/M inputtokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku: $4/M outputtokens $0.8/M inputtokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet: $15/M outputtokens $3/M inputtokens

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Cursor is just making more money while protecting claude?

**評論 2**:

Is this the official pricing? Because as far as I know, I have not seen Google post the official pricing anywhere else like on the Google AI studio or on Google vertex or something. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

**評論 3**:

I do not understand if the pricing is with thinking active or not. Someone on Google wrote 2.5 Pro will also be non-thinking. I suspect this price will be the general one or with thinking active, because we have not received public comment on the non-thinking modality. Any hypotheses?

**評論 4**:

Assuming thats accurate (it may not be as I dont think pricing is public yet), the no cache is going to hurt. Gemini also has a significantly larger context window, and cursor charges per request not per token, so the cost per request may actually be comparable.

**評論 5**:

Even if this was official pricing, don't you have to consider context length differences. As I understand it, even with this pricing, a max context request would cost $1.3 just on input tokens. Which would be much more than Claude 3.7.

---

## 10. ```
Interesting observations after the latest cursor update 0.48.6
``` {#10-```
interesting-observations-after-the-latest-c}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**針對軟體版本更新（0.48.6）的回饋與持續存在的問題**，具體分為以下重點：

1. **版本改進肯定**  
   - 使用者感謝更新後IDE穩定性提升（如解決了每12小時崩潰的問題）。

2. **回報的持續/新問題**  
   - **午夜連線失敗**：穩定網路下仍於特定時間（PST午夜）發生連線錯誤。  
   - **大檔案代碼遺漏**：使用高階模型（如GPT-4-Turbo）時，大型檔案編輯或生成代碼易出現輸出不全。  
   - **內部標記洩漏**：輸出中意外出現系統標籤（如`<tool>`），需切換模型才能解決。  

整體聚焦於版本穩定性進展與待解決的技術性缺陷，屬於典型的軟體使用者回饋報告。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpuept/interesting_observations_after_the_latest_cursor/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 01:28:41

### 內容

Version Update & Feedback

Version: 0.48.6 (Universal)

VSCode Version: 1.96.2

Commit: 1649e229afdef8fd1d18ea173f063563f1e722e0

Date: 2025-03-31T05:01:56.506Z

OS: Darwin arm64 24.4.0

First off big thanks for the recent update.

The IDE is noticeably more stable, and I appreciate the improvemen```.

The previous issue of the IDE crashing every 12 hours appears to be resolved,

which has made a significant difference in daily workflow.

As I continue using this version, here are a few consistent behaviors

Ive noticed that may still need attention:

Ongoing/New Issues

Connection failure

(always at midnight PST)

Message: Connection failed.

If the problem persis```, please check your internet connection or VPN.

This happens consistently around midnight PST, even with a stable

internet connection and no VPN changes.

Dropped sections of code

in large files (with premium models)

When editing or generating completions in large files, Im seeing

increased occurrences of dropped or incomplete outpu```, even when using premium

models like GPT-4-Turbo.

Unexpected output:

<tool>Tool: run_terminal_cmd </tool>

This string occasionally appears in outpu```, possibly leaking

internal markup or system tags. It feels like a formatting/rendering artifact. I usually have to switch models back and forth to clear. IDE restar``` are not working.

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 11. ```
Has anyone successfully used cursor to write pytest autotes```?
``` {#11-```
has-anyone-successfully-used-cursor-to-writ}

這句簡短的話語核心討論主題是「否定某件事曾被任何人做過」。它強調了某種行為或情況從未被任何人實現或經歷過，可能是在回應一個假設、問題或主張，表達強烈的否定態度。  

總結：**徹底否認某件事的發生或存在的可能性**。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwy44/has_anyone_successfully_used_cursor_to_write/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwy44/has_anyone_successfully_used_cursor_to_write/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwy44/has_anyone_successfully_used_cursor_to_write/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwy44/has_anyone_successfully_used_cursor_to_write/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 03:08:24

### 內容

Nope its never been doing by anyone ever

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Nope its never been doing by anyone ever

---

## 12. ```
Best way to reference other projec``` in Cursor?
``` {#12-```
best-way-to-reference-other-projec```-in-cu}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**如何在多專案目錄結構（如分開的後端/前端資料夾）中有效管理開發工具（如Cursor）的上下文環境**，同時兼顧終端機操作便利性與工具對專案結構的理解需求。  

具體要點包括：  
1. **開發工具上下文管理**：作者希望Cursor等工具能針對特定子專案（如後端或前端）提供準確的程式建議，而非僅從根目錄獲取混雜的上下文。  
2. **終端操作效率**：作者偏好直接在子專案根目錄操作終端機（而非總目錄），以簡化路徑導航，但擔心這可能影響開發工具的準確性。  
3. **尋求解決方案**：詢問其他開發者如何平衡這兩種需求，例如是否有工具設定技巧或目錄結構的最佳實踐。  

本質上是探討**開發環境工作流優化**的問題。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpt8jd/best_way_to_reference_other_projects_in_cursor/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 00:42:30

### 內容

Hi guys, I have separate folders for backend/front end, etc and I sometimes want Cursor to have context into one or the other when implementing things.

I know I can be in the root folder where both folders exist, but I feel like that might be a sloppy approach (correct me if im wrong) because the terminal context is easier to navigate when it's in the root of each unique project.

How do you guys navigate this?

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 13. ```
Created an office simulator for VibeJam - Meeting Dash - try to get work done between endless meetings
``` {#13-```
created-an-office-simulator-for-vibejam-mee}

這段對話的核心討論主題是：  

1. **遊戲推廣與試玩**：第一則訊息提供了一個免費試玩遊戲的連結，可能是為了推廣或展示該遊戲。  
2. **遊戲開發技術與工具**：後續的對話聚焦於遊戲的開發細節，包括：  
   - **資產生成工具**（如美術、音效等資源的製作方式）。  
   - **技術堆疊（Tech Stack）**：使用的程式語言、引擎或其他開發工具。  
   - **LLM（大型語言模型）的應用**：是否利用AI技術（如GPT等）輔助開發或整合到遊戲中。  

總結：對話主要圍繞「遊戲的免費試玩連結」以及「開發過程中的技術與工具選擇」展開。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpjw9e/created_an_office_simulator_for_vibejam_meeting/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpjw9e/created_an_office_simulator_for_vibejam_meeting/)
- **外部連結**: [https://v.redd.it/jh9tvmqiwdse1](https://v.redd.it/jh9tvmqiwdse1)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 16:43:28

### 內容

Try the game for free at: https://artifactvibe.com/games/ptR1Buxf4TmmmbY2qetv

what did you use for asset generation?

very nice. Can you provide some context on LLM/tech stack / how you made it?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Try the game for free at: https://artifactvibe.com/games/ptR1Buxf4TmmmbY2qetv

**評論 2**:

what did you use for asset generation?

**評論 3**:

very nice. Can you provide some context on LLM/tech stack / how you made it?

---

## 14. ```
My cursor deleted i```elf
``` {#14-```
my-cursor-deleted-i```elf
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**用戶在使用Cursor軟體時遇到的啟動問題和文件缺失問題**。具體包括：

1. **軟體運行緩慢**：用戶首次開啟Cursor時反應速度異常緩慢。  
2. **重啟後無法開啟**：重啟電腦後，軟體提示「沒有Cursor」（可能指程式文件消失）。  
3. **文件異常消失**：用戶檢查安裝目錄時發現Cursor的主程序文件缺失，僅剩安裝程式。  
4. **尋求類似經驗**：用戶詢問其他人是否遇過相同情況，試圖確認是否為普遍問題。  

總結：問題圍繞Cursor軟體的**異常行為**（性能與文件消失）及用戶對問題根源的困惑。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw0ud/my_cursor_deleted_itself/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 02:31:04

### 內容

I just opened cursor and it opened but was impressively slow. I closed it, restarted my computer and then when I tried to open it, it said that there was no cursor. I check the files and theres no cursor.

I only had the installer. Has this happened to anyone?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

My next SaaS idea is an AI exorcist.

---

## 15. ```
Gemini 2.5 sucks in Cursor
``` {#15-```
gemini-2-5-sucks-in-cursor
```}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  
**用戶對Gemini 2.5模型在實際編程任務中的表現感到失望**，並與其他模型（如Sonnet 3.7和3.5）進行對比。具體問題包括：  
1. **Gemini 2.5的執行問題**：在實現一個簡單功能時（基於現有代碼修改），模型未遵循指令，虛構變量名稱、添加多餘業務邏輯，且未能有效利用代碼庫搜索工具。  
2. **與其他模型的對比**：Sonnet系列模型能一次性正確完成任務，凸顯Gemini 2.5的不足。  
3. **用戶的困惑**：質疑問題根源是否來自Cursors工具，或自身使用方式有誤，同時對Gemini 2.5被廣泛推崇為「最佳模型」的說法提出疑問。  
4. **環境限制**：因涉及商業應用的複雜代碼庫，無法直接透過Google AI Studio測試，加劇驗證難度。  

整體聚焦於**AI模型在實際開發場景中的可靠性差異**，以及用戶對模型預期與實際表現的落差。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpj9ij/gemini_25_sucks_in_cursor/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 15:54:21

### 內容

Does anyone else have the same experience?

I asked Gemini 2.5 in agent mode to implement a simple feature (create a renderer to take a list of objec``` and draw it onto a datagrid, based on a previous implementation, just for another type of data column). There were tons of examples in the codebase, basically copy-paste and switch out a few variable names .

Gemini 2.5 fails this hilariously, making up names and adding extra business logic I didn't ask for. At first it didn't even try searching the codebase, but even when I explicitely told it to not make any assumptions and use the search tool, it did, however ended up still hallucinating property names.

Sonnet 3.7 non-thinking and even 3.5 (with a little help) did it just fine in a single go.

Is this Cursors fault or am I missing something?

(I hear everywhere that 2.5 is the best model available). I couldn't compare to using AI Studio from Google, because this is a commercial app with many hundreds of class files/views and constantly copy-pasting that would be a nightmare.

### 討論

**評論 1**:

Gemini is not tuned for agent mode.

But it is awesome in chat mode

**評論 2**:

Yeah, same here: I was just trying to add dark mode to my iOS app a simple task. Claude handled it like a seasoned dev: updated the color asse, added the dark varian, touched only what needed touching. Gemini, on the other hand, went full chaos mode: It rewrote every view, sprinkled ternary operators on every color property like it was cheese (isLightMode ? colorLight : colorDark) and turned a 10-minute task into a codebase-wide chaos.

**評論 3**:

I added Roo as an extention to my Cursor. In Roo with Gemini 2.5 I handle entire architecture, file structure, mock classes etc to leverage i 1m context and better reasoning without "Cursor magic blackbox" that impac the model. Then Cursor implemen specific elemen (tbh 3.5 seems to be a better fit than 3.7 for this task) to leverage better edit/diff functionality. Maybe this workflow will work for you.

TBH your issue seems to be a rather an issue how Cursor handles context for Gemini than Gemini i```elf. When I tested G2.5 in 0.47 it worked good enough, in 0.48 after they removed "@codebase" I have similar problems as you.

**評論 4**:

i``` better than claude from my experience claude is shit i asked to implement firebase auth it cant do a damn thing right but gemini is fucking magic

**評論 5**:

Agree - Ive found it works well with Promptly though so I just use that

---

## 16. ```
Easy way to dictate to chat in Linux?
``` {#16-```
easy-way-to-dictate-to-chat-in-linux-
```}

這段討論的核心主題是：  
**在Linux系統中，是否有簡單的語音輸入（語音轉文字）工具可用於聊天或對話場景？**  

具體要點包括：  
1. 用戶尋求Linux下的語音輸入解決方案（相較於Windows/Mac已有選項）。  
2. 提及嘗試過的工具（如WhisperAssistant擴展）在Ubuntu上無法運作。  
3. 本質是希望透過語音替代鍵盤輸入，提升溝通效率。  

延伸議題可能涉及：  
- Linux環境下語音識別工具的兼容性或替代方案。  
- 開源或跨平台語音輸入工具的推薦。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpugmt/easy_way_to_dictate_to_chat_in_linux/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 01:30:45

### 內容

Hello,

Does anyone suggest a easy way to dictate to the chat, using voice, in Linux? I know that for Windows and Mac there are some options.

WhisperAssistant extension didnt work on my Ubuntu, unfortunately: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=MartinOpenSky.whisper-assistant

Thanks!

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 17. ```
Would be good to have a 'yes' and 'halt' button
``` {#17-```
would-be-good-to-have-a-yes-and-halt-button}

由於你提供的文章標題（Title）內容為空，我無法根據具體內容進行總結。  

如果你能提供文章的標題或部分內容，我可以幫助你更準確地歸納核心討論主題。例如：  
- 若標題是 **「全球暖化對極地生態的影響」**，核心主題可能是「氣候變遷與極地生態系統的關聯」。  
- 若標題是 **「人工智慧在醫療診斷中的應用」**，核心主題可能是「AI技術如何革新醫療領域」。  

請補充具體資訊，我會為你進一步分析！

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpnkmz/would_be_good_to_have_a_yes_and_halt_button/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 20:40:17

### 內容

Title

### 討論

**評論 1**:

There is a stop button, which hal``` the AI. You can resume by sending a new message

**評論 2**:

What's the difference to the "Submit" and "Cancel" buttons?

**評論 3**:

knowing when to hit that stop button is a crucial skill. sonnet 3.7 and gemini 2.5 are both extremely overeager to keep going once the problem is solved.

---

## 18. ```
gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small does not apply code?
``` {#18-```
gpt-4o-mini-or-cursor-small-does-not-apply-}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：  

**用戶在使用 Cursor 開發工具時遇到的模型切換與代碼應用問題**，具體包括：  
1. **Fast Premium 用量耗盡後，自動切換模型功能失效**，無法順利切換至 `gpt-4o-mini` 或 `cursor-small` 等替代模型。  
2. **手動選擇模型後，生成代碼無法直接應用**，工具僅提供部分操作指引而非完整執行步驟。  
3. **詢問是否有設定選項** 能讓非 Premium 模型（如 `gpt-4o-mini`）在自動模式下正常生成並應用代碼。  

問題本質圍繞 **Cursor 的模型切換邏輯與功能限制**，並尋求解決方案以維持開發效率。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpp1r2/gpt4omini_or_cursorsmall_does_not_apply_code/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 21:51:11

### 內容

Good morning everyone, I was using Lovable to kickstart my project and switched over to Cursor - I have some basic knowledge of code so cursor has been a HUGE help building a dream website that I've been holding out on for years (I was on Wordpress and excited to leave it)

I am using the auto-select for the model, however it wont progress as I've run out of Fast Premium usage. I have no problem using the gpt-4o-mini or cursor-small models, however; It wont automatically switch to them. when I manually select gpt-4o-mini, it does not allow me to apply the code, it just tells me how to do some things manually (misses some steps)

Is there a setting or something I missed that allows the auto model to have gpt or cursor small apply the code it generates?

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 19. ```
How do I use @codebase for ask mode? Where is it gone?
``` {#19-```
how-do-i-use-codebase-for-ask-mode-where-is}

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：**用戶詢問如何使用或找到「u/codebase」的「ask mode」功能，並表達對該功能消失的困惑**。  

具體問題包括：  
1. **功能使用**：如何透過「u/codebase」啟用或操作「ask mode」。  
2. **功能位置**：該功能是否被移除或移動位置，導致用戶無法找到。  

整體聚焦於用戶對特定功能（ask mode）的存取與操作疑問。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwyu0/how_do_i_use_codebase_for_ask_mode_where_is_it/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwyu0/how_do_i_use_codebase_for_ask_mode_where_is_it/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwyu0/how_do_i_use_codebase_for_ask_mode_where_is_it/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwyu0/how_do_i_use_codebase_for_ask_mode_where_is_it/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 03:09:14

### 內容

How do I use u/codebase for ask mode? Where is it gone?

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 20. ```
What are the best rules for Python? How do I properly create project structure file?
``` {#20-```
what-are-the-best-rules-for-python-how-do-i}

該 Reddit 文章的核心討論主題圍繞在 **「Python 程式設計的最佳實踐與規範」**，具體可能包含以下方向：

1. **Python 的程式碼風格指南**  
   - 例如是否遵循 PEP 8 規範（如命名規則、縮排等）。
   - 工具推薦（如 `flake8`、`black`、`pylint`）來自動化檢查或格式化程式碼。

2. **提高程式碼可讀性與維護性的技巧**  
   - 如何撰寫清晰的註解、函數設計、模組化結構等。

3. **常見的 Python 陷阱與解決方法**  
   - 例如可變預設參數（mutable defaults）、變數作用域（scoping）等問題。

4. **個人或團隊的經驗分享**  
   - 網友分享自身採用的規則或工具，並討論其優缺點。

5. **初學者如何建立良好習慣**  
   - 針對新手的建議（如從哪些規範開始優先學習）。

由於無法直接查看原文內容，以上總結基於標題和 Reddit 常見的 Python 討論趨勢推測。若需更精確的分析，建議提供文章具體內容或關鍵段落。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwx7s/what_are_the_best_rules_for_python_how_do_i/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwx7s/what_are_the_best_rules_for_python_how_do_i/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwx7s/what_are_the_best_rules_for_python_how_do_i/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwx7s/what_are_the_best_rules_for_python_how_do_i/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 03:07:26

### 內容

連結： [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwx7s/what_are_the_best_rules_for_python_how_do_i/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwx7s/what_are_the_best_rules_for_python_how_do_i/)

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 21. ```
Just trying it out for the first time. Is there no audio input?
``` {#21-```
just-trying-it-out-for-the-first-time-is-th}

這段文字的核心討論主題是：**使用者如何透過文字轉語音（TTS）引擎實現語音輸入功能，以及當前系統或工具（如「cursor」）缺乏原生支援此功能的問題**。  

重點摘要：  
1. **文字轉語音（TTS）的應用**：使用者利用TTS技術將文字轉換為語音，以實現語音輸入的需求。  
2. **功能缺失的批評**：文中指出特定工具（如「cursor」）未內建原生語音輸入功能，導致使用者需依賴外部引擎。  

簡言之，討論聚焦於**語音輸入的技術實現與現有工具的支援不足**。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwvuj/just_trying_it_out_for_the_first_time_is_there_no/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwvuj/just_trying_it_out_for_the_first_time_is_there_no/)
- **外部連結**: [https://i.redd.it/eyrztl5kzgse1.png](https://i.redd.it/eyrztl5kzgse1.png)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 03:05:58

### 內容

people use text to speech engines to use voice input. no native functionality in cursor

### 討論

**評論 1**:

people use text to speech engines to use voice input. no native functionality in cursor

---

## 22. ```
Did anyone get better resul``` with Gemini 2.5 pro than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
``` {#22-```
did-anyone-get-better-resul```-with-gemini-}

根據提供的內容，文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下兩點：

1. **模型性能的差異疑慮**：  
   作者質疑當前基準測試（benchmarks）是否能真實反映不同模型（如Sonnet與其他版本）的實際表現，並推測測試中使用的提示詞（prompts）可能過度優化特定模型（如Sonnet），導致結果偏差。

2. **基準測試的可靠性問題**：  
   間接探討基準測試的設計是否存在局限性（例如過於依賴特定條件或優化），從而影響對模型能力的客觀評估。  

簡言之，主題圍繞「**模型基準測試的潛在偏差與現實應用之間的落差**」，並提出對測試方法或數據代表性的質疑。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwrs5/did_anyone_get_better_results_with_gemini_25_pro/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwrs5/did_anyone_get_better_results_with_gemini_25_pro/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwrs5/did_anyone_get_better_results_with_gemini_25_pro/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpwrs5/did_anyone_get_better_results_with_gemini_25_pro/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 03:01:24

### 內容

https://preview.redd.it/ri8fipkrygse1.png?width=2342&format=png&auto=webp&s=bdc115c48d743c401a3ce1ec3c85bf165fa976a3

I didn't... maybe the promp``` they use are too optimized for sonnet only? Or these benchmarks don't really reflect reality.

### 討論

無討論內容

---

## 23. ```
Interview with Vibe Coder in 2025
``` {#23-```
interview-with-vibe-coder-in-2025
```}

這組對話的核心討論主題可以總結為：**程式設計中的非技術性因素與開發者文化**，具體體現在以下幾個方面：

1. **開發者情緒與程式碼的關係**  
   首句以幽默方式將程式錯誤歸因於「情緒不協調」（mood misalignment），暗示開發者的心理狀態可能影響程式碼品質，而非單純技術問題。

2. **開發環境的壓力與荒謬性**  
   「fix it now or you go to jail」以誇張語氣諷刺高壓工作文化，凸顯非理性要求對開發者的影響。

3. **非傳統的技術驗證方式**  
   「We test it on TikTok」可能暗指現代開發流程中非正規的測試方法，或對社交媒體快速迭代文化的調侃。

4. **專業性與個人風格的衝突**  
   「Vibe coder vs. professional」直接點破開發者身份認同的矛盾——追求隨性創作（vibe）與維持專業形象的張力。

5. **社群互動的隨機性**  
   最後一句關於投票的隨意行為，反映技術討論中非理性或情緒化的參與模式。

整體而言，這些對話透過幽默和反諷，探討程式設計背後的人性化層面，包括情緒、工作文化、專業標籤的侷限性，以及社群互動的不可預測性，而非聚焦技術細節本身。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp1h6z/interview_with_vibe_coder_in_2025/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jp1h6z/interview_with_vibe_coder_in_2025/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeNS1ZNHQs8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeNS1ZNHQs8)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 01:31:12

### 內容

"It's not a syntax error, it's a mood misalignment"

"fix it now. or you go to jail. please" lmfao

We test it on TikTok

Vibe coder and professional dont go in the same title or phrase

i downvoted , then upvoted .

### 討論

**評論 1**:

"It's not a syntax error, it's a mood misalignment"

**評論 2**:

"fix it now. or you go to jail. please" lmfao

**評論 3**:

We test it on TikTok

**評論 4**:

Vibe coder and professional dont go in the same title or phrase

**評論 5**:

i downvoted , then upvoted .

---

## 24. ```
Which model do you use the most these days?
``` {#24-```
which-model-do-you-use-the-most-these-days-}

這段討論的核心主題是：**用戶對不同AI模型（Sonnet 3.5、Sonnet 3.7和Gemini 2.5）的體驗比較與偏好**，具體聚焦於以下幾點：

1. **模型效能比較**：  
   - 用戶認為Gemini 2.5在速度（faster）和準確性（more accurate）上表現較佳，但批評其更容易生成無關的程式碼（unrelated code）。  
   - 對Sonnet 3.7的「思考模式」（thinking）功能感到不滿，認為其過度冗長或效果不佳（doing too much）。  

2. **使用偏好轉變**：  
   - 用戶從過去使用Sonnet系列轉向現在主要使用Gemini 2.5，反映模型選擇的動態變化。  

3. **社群意見徵求**：  
   - 最後提問希望了解其他人當前認為最實用的模型，延伸至對不同模型優缺點的社群經驗分享。  

**總結**：討論圍繞「不同AI模型的實際應用體驗差異」及「用戶如何根據需求選擇最適合的模型」。

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpqid2/which_model_do_you_use_the_most_these_days/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-02 22:51:37

### 內容

I used to use sonnet 3.5, and sometimes 3.7 with thinking but found it not helpful and doing too much a lot of the times. Recently I find myself only using gemeni-2.5. It seems faster, and more accurate, though I find that it often edi``` completely unrelated code that isn't relevant, more so than sonnet. I'm curious to hear what folks are finding the most helpful these days?

### 討論

**評論 1**:

I've totally switched to gemini 2.5 pro.

---

## 25. ```
cursor rules tips
``` {#25-```
cursor-rules-tips
```}

由於我無法直接訪問外部連結（包括 Twitter/X 的內容），因此無法查看該文章的具體內容。不過，若您能提供文章中的關鍵文字或摘要，我可以協助分析並總結其核心討論主題。  

例如，您可以分享以下資訊：  
1. 文章的主要論點或問題  
2. 作者提出的關鍵觀點  
3. 討論的具體事件或議題  

請提供更多細節，我會盡力為您歸納重點！

- **Reddit 連結**: [https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw1h6/cursor_rules_tips/](https://reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw1h6/cursor_rules_tips/)
- **外部連結**: [https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw1h6/cursor_rules_tips/](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1jpw1h6/cursor_rules_tips/)
- **發布時間**: 2025-04-03 02:31:46

### 內容

https://x.com/elie2222/status/1907070722960187745

### 討論

無討論內容

---

# 總體討論重點

以下是25篇文章的條列式重點總結，附上對應錨點連結與逐條細節說明：

---

### #1 [Sharing my .cursorrules after several successful projects](#anchor_id_1)
1. **Cursor編輯器與AI工具整合**  
   - 推薦搭配Gemini 2.5 Pro或Sonnet 3.5提升開發效率  
   - 討論從`.cursorrules`過渡到新專案規則系統  
2. **開發學習建議**  
   - 建議初學者從模板（如Vercel）擴展功能  
   - 強調實用導向而非過度專注理論  
3. **社群協作**  
   - 提議建立共享函式庫促進協作  

---

### #2 [Cursor slams are so exhausting](#anchor_id_2)
1. **工具優勢辯護**  
   - 強調Cursor速度快、價格合理、功能豐富  
2. **成本合理性**  
   - 對比Claude API說明定價非過高  
3. **反駁負評**  
   - 批評者忽略實際價值，市場已有替代品  

---

### #3 [Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified](#anchor_id_3)
1. **開源方案成本問題**  
   - 單次請求可能耗費0.5美元  
2. **Cursor市場定位**  
   - 20美元/月無降速限制，可能虧損運營  
3. **用戶期待改進**  
   - 需加強透明度與核心功能優化  

---

### #4 [Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework](#anchor_id_4)
1. **上下文管理**  
   - 建立`project_milestones.md`減少幻覺  
2. **任務拆解**  
   - 限制每項任務20-30行程式碼  
3. **模型選擇策略**  
   - 規劃用推理模型，實作用標準模型  

---

### #5 [Cursor Degradation COMPLETELY REVERSED by Large Context](#anchor_id_5)
- **效能改善方案**  
  - 啟用Large Context功能解決大型文件處理問題  

---

### #6 [Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it](#anchor_id_6)
1. **開發動機**  
   - 解決個人痛點（如自動開新分頁）  
2. **工具效率**  
   - 搭配Claude-3.7-Sonnet快速完成擴展開發  

---

### #7 [Vibe Styler: Transform Website Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro](#anchor_id_7)
- **無法訪問內容**  
  - 需提供圖片文字或描述以總結  

---

### #8 [How to make my site look modern](#anchor_id_8)
- **AI設計限制**  
  - Cursor生成風格過時，尋求改進技巧  

---

### #9 [Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7](#anchor_id_9)
- **價格比較**  
  - Gemini 2.5 Pro輸出token成本：$5/M，低於Claude 3.7的$15/M  

---

### #10 [Observations after cursor update 0.48.6](#anchor_id_10)
1. **穩定性改進**  
   - 解決12小時崩潰問題  
2. **持續問題**  
   - 午夜連線失敗、大檔案代碼遺漏  

---

（因篇幅限制，以下為簡要條列，完整細節可依需求擴充）

### #11-25 快速摘要
- **#11** 否定pytest自動測試成功案例  
- **#12** 多專案目錄結構的上下文管理問題  
- **#13** 辦公室模擬器遊戲的開發技術討論  
- **#14** Cursor異常刪除自身文件  
- **#15** Gemini 2.5實測表現差於Sonnet  
- **#16** Linux語音輸入工具需求  
- **#17** 未提供內容  
- **#18** 模型切換時代碼應用失效  
- **#19** 詢問`@codebase`的ask mode功能去向  
- **#20** Python專案結構最佳實踐  
- **#21** 批評Cursor缺乏原生語音輸入  
- **#22** 質疑模型基準測試偏差  
- **#23** 開發者文化與非技術因素探討  
- **#24** 用戶偏好Gemini 2.5勝於Sonnet  
- **#25** 需提供Twitter內容以總結  

---

### 完整錨點對應
- 實際錨點需替

討論重點​

#1 Sharing my .cursorrules after several successful projects​

#2 Cursor slams are so exhausting​

#3 Unpopular Opinion: The Cursor hate is MOSTLY unjustified​

#4 Stop your AI from hallucinating: The CSO framework​

#5 Cursor Degradation COMPLETELY REVERSED by Large Context​

#6 Cursor for Chrome Extensions - I am LOVING it​

#7 Vibe Styler: Transform Website Style with Gemini 2.5 Pro​

#8 How to make my site look modern​

#9 Gemini 2.5 pro isn't as expensive as Claude 3.7​

#10 Observations after cursor update 0.48.6​

#11-25 快速摘要​

完整錨點對應​

文章核心重點​

目錄​