跳至主要内容

2025-04-01-top

  • 精選方式: TOP
  • 時間範圍: DAY

討論重點​

以下是30篇文章的討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的文章錨點連結與逐條細節說明：

1. Claude 3.7免費但3.5需付費 1​

  • 重點：版本差異與付費政策爭議
    • 3.7版本免費開放，但3.5版本僅限Pro用戶使用
    • 用戶質疑版本功能分配合理性

2. Claude 2025年是否仍可用？ 2​

  • 重點：用戶對3.7版本的不滿
    • 批評性能下降與過度審查
    • 新版本限制對話主題，影響正常討論

3. Claude編程能力歸功於開發者 3​

  • 重點：Claude的主動測試驅動設計
    • 自動優化用戶請求，無需手動提示
    • 對比其他AI（如ChatGPT）缺乏此機制

4. Claude每日宕機問題 4​

  • 重點：服務穩定性投訴
    • 每日數小時無法使用
    • 用戶建議改用Poe或API避開問題

5. Claude今日是否故障？ 5​

  • 重點：記憶力缺陷批評
    • 無法記住30秒前的對話
    • 連基本任務也無法完成

6. Pro版對話限制影響使用 6​

  • 重點：付費用戶體驗問題
    • 前端任務因限制中斷
    • 續寫時破壞代碼結構

7. Claude 3.7編程能力退步 7​

  • 重點：響應式設計處理失敗
    • 僅承認錯誤但未改進
    • 對比過去高效解決Python問題

8. Gemini 2.5 Pro優於Claude 8​

  • 重點：模型效能比較
    • 免費Gemini解決付費Claude卡關問題
    • 質疑Anthropic市場競爭力

9. 使用LLM是否為技能？ 9​

  • 重點：提示詞工程定位爭議
    • 有人視為經驗累積，非可認證技能
    • 開放討論AI工具應用本質

10. Claude救回遺失記事本檔案 10​

  • 重點：二進制亂碼解讀能力
    • 從Windows臨時檔還原文字
    • 批評記事本自動保存不可靠

11. 2025網頁設計最佳AI模型 11​

  • 重點：醫療網站設計需求
    • 醫師尋求吸引患者的AI工具
    • 比較Claude與Gemini 2.5表現

12. 三年AI編程經驗分享 12​

  • 重點：非開發者學習痛點
    • 缺乏系統性文檔導致初期低效
    • 偏好Claude 3.5/3.7實務開發

13. Claude服務限制問題 13​

  • 重點：無預警使用阻擋
    • 付費用戶被限制至特定時間
    • 建議切換歐洲伺服器避開

14. 歐洲用戶何時有網路搜尋？ 14​

  • 重點：地域功能限制
    • 英國用戶憂慮搜尋品質差異
    • 隱私瀏覽器Brave影響數據來源

**15. 花費50​

文章核心重點​

以下是根據每篇文章標題生成的一句話摘要（條列式輸出）：

  1. Claude 3.7 is free but 3.5 is in PRO

    • 用戶討論Claude版本差異（3.7免費但3.5需Pro訂閱）及功能限制爭議。

  2. Claude unusable in 2025?

    • 用戶批評Claude 3.7性能下降與過度審查，擔憂未來可用性。

  3. Claude is good at coding because of the people who build it.

    • Claude因工程團隊「測試驅動」設計而優於其他AI編程工具。

  4. i'm starting lose my mind, claude is down every day at least a couple of hours, how can i continue to trust them?

    • 用戶抱怨Claude服務不穩（每日宕機數小時），質疑可靠性。

  5. Did Claude sh*t the bed for everyone today?

    • Claude記憶力缺陷導致無法完成基本任務，引發用戶失望。

  6. Conversation limits for Pro version are making Claude unusable

    • Pro版對話限制中斷工作流程，用戶考慮退款。

  7. Has Claude 3.7 become a stupid coder, lately?

    • 用戶質疑Claude 3.7解決響應式設計問題的能力明顯退步。

  8. Gemini 2.5 Pro is better than Claude 3.7 Thinking

    • 免費Gemini 2.5 Pro表現優於付費Claude，引發市場競爭力擔憂。

  9. Do you think using LLMs is a skill?

    • 討論「AI提示詞工程」應視為技能或僅實用經驗的爭議。

  10. How Claude 3.5 Sonnet recovered my lost notepad file when Windows failed me

    • Claude成功解讀Windows記事本二進制亂碼，救回未存檔案。

  11. Best AI model for web design in 2025?

    • 醫師尋求2025年最適合醫療網站設計的AI模型（如Claude vs. Gemini）。

  12. Three years of AI coding: What I've learned about using Claude effectively

    • 非開發者分享透過Claude學習編程的經驗與結構化需求。

  13. Claude will return soon

    • 用戶遭遇無預警服務限制，推測與伺服器過載有關。

  14. I am a EuroPoor - when is web search coming to me?

    • 歐洲用戶擔憂地域限制影響Claude網路搜尋功能品質。

  15. I went through $50 tonight trying to get AI/Claude to fix errors.

    • 開發者花費$50解決技術問題未果，對AI工具依賴與商業化感到矛盾。

  16. Message limit

    • Pro用戶突遭訊息限制觸發，質疑政策透明度。

  17. Is Claude down today?

    • 用戶確認Claude服務是否異常（官方狀態頁顯示正常但登入失敗）。

  18. Where has Sonnet Thinking mode gone?

    • 用戶發現Sonnet Thinking模式無預警消失，質疑服務穩定性。

  19. Claude messaging limit

    • Pro用戶發送少量訊息卻觸發限制，尋求社群共鳴。

  20. How to fully use Claude for programming

    • 探討Claude編程應用的進階方式（如整合IDE或搭配Copilot）。

  21. v0.7.3 Update: Dive, An Open Source MCP Agent Desktop

    • 開源工具Dive更新，支援多模型切換與開發者效能優化。

  22. Bro killed himself

    • 推測為網路迷因或社會議題討論（需圖片內容確認）。

  23. Can I use claude code with Sonnet 3.5?

    • 用戶偏好Sonnet 3.5穩定性，詢問技術兼容性。

  24. Optimizing Claude's MCP Filesystem Server: How to Fix the Recursive Search Problem

    • 透過「工具修剪」解決MCP文件系統遞歸搜索導致的效能問題。

  25. Message limit is back enforced even for PRO

    • Anthropic重啟Pro版使用限制，用戶不滿政策反覆。

  26. Developing a MCP penetration tester

    • 開源滲透測試工具整合Claude AI動態識別漏洞。

  27. Figma MCP : AI for Figma

    • 推測為Figma設計工具的AI整合應用（需影片內容確認）。

目錄​

1. Claude 3.7 is free but 3.5 is in PRO​

由於我無法直接訪問連結內容（該圖片來自Reddit且可能需要登入或特定權限），以下提供幾種可能的解決方向，幫助你自行總結核心主題：

若圖片內容是文字形式：​

  1. 技術問題討論

    • 常見於Reddit的技術板塊（如程式設計、硬體故障），可能圍繞某個錯誤訊息（如圖中的「wrxr1o3k50se1」檔名）或技術解決方案。

  2. 網路迷因或流行文化

    • 若圖片是迷因或搞笑內容，核心主題可能是某個網路梗或社會現象的調侃。

  3. 社群爭議或觀點分享

    • 可能涉及用戶對某事件（如遊戲、科技新聞）的個人看法或爭論。

若圖片為視覺內容（如圖表、漫畫）：​

  • 數據分析：總結圖表中的關鍵趨勢或結論。
  • 藝術創作：探討作者想傳達的隱喻或情感主題。

如何自行總結：​

  1. 觀察圖片中的文字標題、標籤、評論（如有）。
  2. 注意視覺元素的焦點（如加粗文字、箭頭指示）。
  3. 查看Reddit帖子的板塊名稱（如r/technology、r/funny），推測主題範疇。

如果需要更精確的總結，建議提供圖片的文字描述或上傳至可公開訪問的平台（如Imgur）並分享內容。

內容​

連結： [https://preview.redd.it/wrxr1o3k50se1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=e61587595b5d0a7477abf9cc5a18dfe80df9e424

](https://preview.redd.it/wrxr1o3k50se1.png?width=980&format=png&auto=webp&s=e61587595b5d0a7477abf9cc5a18dfe80df9e424

)

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

They know which model is better

評論 3:

First few days of 3.7 were so great, fixed all errors in my project quickly.

Now? Now it just makes headaches and doesn’t understand my prompts like it used to.

評論 4:

Even Haiku is in Pro. Not sure what the strategy behind this is.

評論 5:

AI studio is free

2. Claude unusable in 2025?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

用戶對ClaudeAI 3.7版本更新後的不滿，主要批評其：

  1. 性能下降：認為新版表現遠不如舊版，甚至比早期版本（o1）更差。
  2. 過度限制：新增許多對話規則與話題限制，導致連正常的AI相關討論都難以進行。
  3. 困惑與質疑：對開發團隊的調整方向提出疑問，表達對產品變化的失望。

整體反映用戶對AI「過度審查」與「功能退化」的擔憂。

內容​

I've been using ClaudeAI since the latest 3.7 update and it's not that it's just not the same, it's not even close to what it was before. It was my favorite before, but now it's worse than o1, with too many rules and restrictions of what it can talk about, such that I can't even maintain a normal conversation about AI! What is going on here?

討論​

評論 1:

I noticed this too. Good sonnet 3.5 is gone or nowhere to be seen. Most of the output done by 3.7 and 3.5 now are comparable to haiku or any chatgp.

Ive been using IDEs with sonnet 3.5 as well and it definitely feels like haiku output. Every claude instance feels the same in every IDE.

Weeks ago i could pretty much one shot a basic app with multiple screens. Nothing fancy. But now 3.5 cant even fix a basic layout in a single screen. It would make few mistakes, now it deletes and replaces code in every prompt.

The only one ive found feels kinda the same, is augment for vscode. It can pretty much do the same as old 3.5, but weaker.

評論 2:

Paying customer here. I made a few prompts this morning. Suddenly, I'm blocked out until 10:00 pm.

Like W. T. F.

評論 3:

It was unusable today. I wasted hours trying to work through a basic code question.

評論 4:

Used Claude extensively. Tried Gemini 2.5 pro yesterday. Claude better figure his shit out, like right NOW.

評論 5:

The only beef I have with 3.7 is I ask Claude for a simple Fibonacci function, and it goes full Silicon Valley and writes a whole Java backend, spins up a React frontend, and deploys it to the cloud. I only just wanted 5 lines of code.

3. Claude is good at coding because of the people who build it.​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
Claude 在未經額外提示的情況下，能主動透過測試迭代優化使用者的請求，此設計使其有別於其他主流 AI 聊天應用（如 ChatGPT、Gemini 等），並體現了「優秀工程師先測試」的開發理念。

關鍵要點：

  1. Claude 的獨特性：相較於其他 AI，Claude 會自動進行「測試驅動」的回應優化，無需用戶手動要求。
  2. 設計意圖：作者認為此功能是 Claude 團隊刻意設計的工程哲學，強調「先測試」的重要性。
  3. 對比其他模型：ChatGPT、Gemini、Grok、Deepseek 等均未內建類似的主動迭代機制。
  4. 隱含建議：以 Claude 為範例，提倡開發者應重視測試導向的思維（"Good engineer test first"）。

附註：文中連結的圖片可能進一步佐證此觀點（如 Claude 的介面或回應範例），但核心論述仍聚焦於上述差異與工程理念。

內容​

At the moment of writing, I've noticed that Claude (the website, not the API) is the only AI chat app that iterates on your requests through careful testing, without needing any additional prompts. ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Deepseek do not do it.

That's mean Claude is purposely guided to do it.

Good engineer test first. Be like Claude.

https://preview.redd.it/qqm2yvridzre1.png?width=1188&format=png&auto=webp&s=97907bf7af4d3c2579d3e1ed99431f41940afa65

討論​

評論 1:

Doesn't Gemini 2.5 do this too?

評論 2:

Yes, I have noticed that too in the Cursor!

評論 3:

I perosnally feel sonnet is still better at web dev Don't get me wrong Gemini 2.5 pro is good. A good upgrade from 2.0 pro for me still Claude shines in web especially front end For Gemini it need more prompt and refinement to archive the same results are Claude Claude is better at understand the prompt and request better It's my perosnal opinion Thank you

評論 4:

Yes, but this is brandnew as far as I know. And it's great.

評論 5:

Joke's on them. What they clearly should have been doing schmoozing and lobbying in DC so they can score that $500 billion of taxpayer-funded runway. Building a good product is great, but being corrupt and machiavellian seems to have been the winning strategy in these trying times.

4. i'm starting lose my mind, claude is down every day at least a couple of hours, how can i continue to trust them?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是關於用戶在使用Claude AI時遇到的技術問題和投訴建議，主要包括以下幾個方面：

  1. 投訴指南：文章開頭提供了向Claude提交投訴時的具體建議，包括選擇正確的環境標籤、提供詳細信息、理解不同用戶可能會有不同結果，以及對不滿意的輸出點贊。

  2. 技術問題：多位用戶分享了在使用Claude時遇到的問題，例如：

    • 聊天突然中斷並消失
    • 聊天記錄被刪除或重命名為"Untitled"
    • 服務頻繁宕機（幾乎每天都有數小時不可用）

  3. 平台比較：

    • 有用戶表示通過Poe使用Claude模型時幾乎沒有遇到過宕機問題
    • 另一位用戶認為直接使用API可能是更可靠的方式

  4. 付費用戶體驗：

    • 有Pro用戶因這些問題取消了訂閱
    • 新用戶（訂閱10天）對服務穩定性表示失望

總的來說，這篇文章主要圍繞Claude AI服務的穩定性和可靠性問題展開討論，同時也提供了官方建議的投訴方式。用戶們分享了各自遇到的技術問題，並比較了不同使用平台（網頁界面、Poe、API）的體驗差異。

內容​

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.

  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.

  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.

  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. i just sent him a discord link for an image, mid response it just crashed.. i though i crashed him lol. the chat is deleted though :( I've had so many chats just stop in the middle of work, erase entirely and retitle themselves "Untitled" that I had to cancel Pro. It was fun while it lasted. :) I subscribed 10 days ago and honestly this is down almost every day for some hours. I use their models through Poe. Never had an issue with downtime except very rare slow downs for brief periods. Maybe one time it was down for a few min. I believe API is the way.

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

i just sent him a discord link for an image, mid response it just crashed.. i though i crashed him lol. the chat is deleted though :(

評論 3:

I've had so many chats just stop in the middle of work, erase entirely and retitle themselves "Untitled" that I had to cancel Pro. It was fun while it lasted. :)

評論 4:

I subscribed 10 days ago and honestly this is down almost every day for some hours.

評論 5:

I use their models through Poe. Never had an issue with downtime except very rare slow downs for brief periods. Maybe one time it was down for a few min. I believe API is the way.

5. Did Claude sh*t the bed for everyone today?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是對人工智慧助手Claude的表現感到失望，特別是它在記憶和執行任務方面的嚴重缺陷。作者指出Claude似乎無法記住短時間前（30秒）的對話內容，即使在「思考模式」下也完全遺忘，導致其難以完成基本任務。這反映了對AI記憶力和持續對話能力的批評與困惑。

內容​

What in the world! Claude is struggling with literally all tasks. Like completely forgetting everything I told it 30 seconds ago. Even on thinking mode!

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

He's become Claude 0.7

A complete idiot, with no coherence. He looks like a kid in training.

評論 3:

Does literally anyone from Anthropic browse this subreddit and feel marginally bad that we pay for this product?

評論 4:

bro its literally worse than chatgpt 3.5

評論 5:

Yup

There was missing ")" in 1000 lines of HTML (that It typo'd) and I couldn't find - " if couldn't fix it in the artifact, it tried rewriting everything from scratch like 10 times before I gave up, took the last working version and gave it to o3mini.

6. Conversation limits for Pro version are making Claude unusable​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

使用者對Claude AI在處理簡單前端任務（修改Vue.js網站的字体）時的表現感到不滿，具體批評包括：

  1. 效能問題：任務因系統限制（throttle）中斷，需手動輸入「continue」卻導致失敗。
  2. 操作失誤：續寫時破壞了整個HTML結構，未能完成基本需求。
  3. 付費服務爭議：使用者質疑Claude Pro的價值，甚至考慮要求退款。

整體聚焦於AI工具在實際開發中的可靠性問題，以及對Anthropic（Claude開發公司）服務品質的負面反饋。

內容​

I can’t believe this isn’t the only thing people say about Claude… I have a very simple Vue.js website and I asked Claude to change the font - gave it access to the index.html file. The task takes several minutes and then stops due to the throttle. When I type “continue,” it ends up botching the operation and biffing the entire HTML structure. I have half a mind to fight Anthropic to get the Pro money back.

討論​

評論 1:

Great, finally someone who sees beyond the hype. First: how many lines of code is your html page and did you retry with extended thinking already?

評論 2:

Totally agree. I'm writing in python and as soon as I need to type "continue" the success rate of the task diminishes considerably. It will, as you say, very often proceed to mangle the codebase, delete entire sections of good code, and then often just stop and consider job complete half way through a line.

評論 3:

Agreed

評論 4:

I built a Next.js web app from scratch with Claude AI, which handled all the heavy lifting: setting up the server-side infrastructure with a PostgreSQL database (14 tables) and Redis caching, implementing business logic, creating multiple UI and server components, and managing security. I did it all directly from their website using Claude AI Pro, without any problems. It just takes a structured approach.

評論 5:

Try A extended thinking B artifacts so it can continue easier

7. Has Claude 3.7 become a stupid coder, lately?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：對AI（特別是Claude）在解決響應式設計問題時表現出的能力退步和不一致性的不滿。

具體要點包括：

  1. AI未能有效解決問題：用戶反覆要求AI修正響應式設計（responsive layout）問題，但AI僅以空洞的回應（如「You’re right」）承認錯誤，卻未實際改進。
  2. 能力退步的對比：與過去高效解決Python腳本問題的表現相比，當前AI似乎「能力顯著倒退」，甚至無法正確處理程式碼縮排等基本問題。
  3. 對話循環的無效性：即使切換到Claude協助，過程仍陷入「承認問題→承諾修正→無實際進展」的無效循環。
  4. 新會話重置的困擾：長時間對話後，Claude的表現可能改善，但「強制開啟新對話」的功能會重置其狀態，迫使用戶重新面對「新手級」AI，導致效率低下。

總結：用戶質疑AI的穩定性與一致性，並對其「能力波動」和功能設計（如會話重置）感到挫折。

內容​

I keep asking the AI to address the responsiveness issues, but it consistently fails to do so. When I point out that the layout still isn’t responsive, it acknowledges my feedback with a simple “You’re right.”

Even when Claude steps in to attempt a fix, the process devolves into an unproductive loop of “You’re right, let’s fix it,” without any real progress. Despite its previous success—weeks ago—it efficiently resolved a Python script for me in one go, making it fully responsive and functional.

Now, however, it seems strangely incapable of following instructions or delivering meaningful results, almost as if its competence has regressed significantly.

It even struggles to provide the code with proper indentation.

Also, after long chat sessions, Claude seems to become a better coder, but then the stupid feature where you have to start a new chat hit you in the face and you have to start over with a noob.

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

The primary issue with Claude 3.7 is that it doesn't always follow guidance. Claude 3.5 was much better at this.

評論 3:

Lately it seems like the quality has dropped significantly. Some days Claude AI seems like the best coder I have ever seen in my life but most days it has just been awful.

My conspiracy is they make it be stupid sometimes on purpose for whatever reason

評論 4:

Today he is pathetic, it looks like an old, outdated version, he doesn't understand much... everything has to be explained to him... painful!

評論 5:

I stopped using 3.7- esp the “deep thinking” version, for this exact reason. Once it “makes up its mind”, you need to provide a boatload of details to keep it on track.

I rarely had this problem with 3.5.

8. Gemini 2.5 Pro is better than Claude 3.7 Thinking​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：作者比較了不同AI模型（Claude和Gemini 2.5 Pro）在解決編程問題上的表現，並強調以下重點：

  1. 付費與免費工具的對比：

    • 作者付費使用Claude（每月34美元）卻卡關一週無法解決問題，而免費的Gemini 2.5 Pro在短時間內成功協助解決。

  2. 模型效能的主觀體驗：

    • 作者認為Gemini的表現明顯優於Claude（「天壤之別」），並暗示若Anthropic（Claude開發公司）無法在技術上超越Gemini，可能會失去市場競爭力。

  3. 對AI產業競爭的觀察：

    • 提出AI領域的「泡沫化」風險，認為即使曾是「黃金標準」的服務（如Claude），若無法持續創新，可能迅速被淘汰。

  4. 挑釁性提問：

    • 刻意挑戰Anthropic的回應，期待其是否會公開批評Gemini，反映用戶對AI公司「互鬥」的關注與市場行銷策略的敏感度。

總結：文章聚焦於AI工具的實際效能比較、付費價值的質疑，以及對行業競爭動態的觀察，並帶有個人體驗的批判色彩。

內容​

I had hit a road block with my vibe coder project, couldn't get results for a decently complex issue I was trying to address for like a week with Claude (which im paying 34$ a month for) a couple lazy hours and some back and forth of sharing complier errors and I have a solution thanks to a completely free version of Gemini 2.5 Pro. This is obviously just my personal very specific use case but it does feel night and day with the level of success I am having so far, i am keen for the Anthprohic's response as if they do not answer back with something that shits on Gemini I think they will quickly go from golden child of LLM to another forgettable service in the history of the AI bubble.

討論​

評論 1:

A brand new account shilling for Gemini on a Claude sub? It can’t be…

評論 2:

The only fair way to compare them would be to test both models on the same 100+ tasks. You’d likely find areas where Claude struggles but a local LLM performs well.

I think Gemini 2.5 is quite solid too, and Claude could lose a significant portion of its user base if it were much cheaper. However, if the Cursor developers are correct, 2.5 will be priced similarly to Claude. If that’s the case, I still believe Claude has a slight advantage in most scenarios. I’ve spent thousands on Claude and tested Gemini with around 300–400 prompts.

That said, I agree with you on one point—if a major competitor releases a model that’s just as capable but more affordable, or outright superior, Claude will be in trouble. The reality is that Claude excels at coding. Around 90% of the hype surrounding it is due to its coding capabilities, as other models can generally compete—or even surpass it—in other areas.

評論 3:

Gemini 2.5 is absolutely insane. Honestly it is the first model that I find that is actually on a different level compared with everything else.

評論 4:

It’s better for debugging vibe projects simply because you can absolutely load up the context window, then there is still space to go back and fourth with the model. It’s also better at making recommendations for refactoring because of the context window again.

評論 5:

I find myself noticing a recurring theme in the comparisons, with many claims stating that "Gemini 2.5 is better than Claude." It seems that these evaluations are often attributed to individuals associated with Google.

9. Do you think using LLMs is a skill?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：「是否應將『使用AI工具（如提示詞工程/prompt engineering）』視為一種值得培養或列在履歷上的技能」。

作者表達的矛盾在於：

  1. 個人觀點：認為AI工具的使用（如調整提示詞）更像「經驗累積」而非「技能」，因此不傾向將其列為專業能力。
  2. 觀察現象：許多人因缺乏經驗而陷入使用陷阱，需透過實際操作改進，暗示此能力仍有其價值。
  3. 開放提問：徵求他人對「AI工具使用」是否屬於「技能」的看法，探討其定位（工具操作 vs. 可分級的能力）。

總結而言，討論聚焦於「AI工具應用的本質」——是實用經驗還是可明確界定的技能，並反映對新興技術能力認可標準的困惑。

內容​

I have been using them since they became commercially available, but it's hard for me to think of these as a real skill to develop. I would never even think of putting them/prompt engineer as a skill on a resume/cv. However, I do see many people fall victim to certain pitfalls that are remedied with experience.

How do you all view these? Like anything you gain experience with use, but I am hard-pressed to categorize usage as a tool with a skill level.

討論​

評論 1:

Is using AI a skill? Sure. Like being able to quickly and efficiently navigate and use the internet is a skill. Back in the late 90s or early 2000s the majority of people could not “surf the information superhighway” yet, and those that could did very well for themselves. Eventually everyone catches up tho but it takes a generation. The kids growing up with LLMs and other generative ai may be able to accomplish things we could only dream of since we are used to doing things slow and manual.

評論 2:

If you even have to ask this question and doubt it, you really don't understand how LLMs work. LLMs are a probability machine, at the end of the day. The skill lies in structuring prompts and providing the information and directions within them to achieve maximum probability that the output matches your desired goal. So yes, it is a skill.

評論 3:

Oh it’s a skill lol. Prompting can go deep. People over at r/DataAnnotation could attest to that

評論 4:

Yes, for now it's definitely a skill.

We're far from "Make me an X" and the AI magically gets what you need with a few questions.

You need to write prompts in certain ways so it can deliver, how to break the infinite hallucinations loops, etc.

評論 5:

Critical thinking is a skill.

10. How Claude 3.5 Sonnet recovered my lost notepad file when Windows failed me​

这篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. Windows Notepad 的自動保存功能失效：
    作者在使用 Windows 記事本（Notepad）時意外從工作管理員關閉程式，導致未儲存的待辦清單（TODO list）遺失。雖然記事本號稱有「自動保存」功能，但重新開啟後卻找不到恢復的內容。

  2. 透過 Claude AI 恢復遺失的文字：
    作者在 Claude 的幫助下，找到 Windows 記事本儲存臨時檔案的隱藏目錄（TabState 中的 .bin 文件），但這些檔案以二進制格式儲存，直接開啟顯示為亂碼。
    關鍵轉折點：Claude 僅憑視覺觀察亂碼（如 后伀䐀伀㨀ഀⴀ 椀洀瀀氀...），無需執行解碼程式，即能準確還原原始文字內容，成功救回完整的待辦清單。

  3. 對 Windows 系統的批評與轉換平台的意圖：
    作者不滿 Windows 的設計（如二進制儲存格式、自動保存不可靠），並表示計畫改用 Mac 以避免類似問題。

  4. 經驗分享與建議：
    文章最終目的是提醒其他用戶注意檔案遺失風險，並分享透過 AI 工具（如 Claude）可能恢復資料的解決方案。

核心主題：
「Claude AI 如何神奇地解讀 Windows 記事本二進制亂碼，成功救回未儲存的檔案，並凸顯 Windows 自動保存功能的缺陷。」
（結合技術問題解決、AI 能力展示，以及對作業系統的批判。）

內容​

So I fucked up today. Killed Notepad from Task Manager while working on my auth project. My entire TODO list - gone. Windows Notepad has "autosave" but it was nowhere to be found when I reopened it.

I asked Claude for help, and it suggested checking some temp folders. We eventually found some weird directory:

AppData\Local\Packages\Microsoft.WindowsNotepad_8wekyb3d8bbwe\LocalState\TabState

Inside were a bunch of .bin files that looked like complete garbage when opened.

After trying a BUNCH different encoding methods all day long, we got this weird output:


后伀䐀伀㨀ഀⴀ 椀洀瀀氀攀洀攀渀琀 瘀攀爀椀昀椀挀愀琀椀漀渀 昀漀爀...

Here's where it gets crazy - I showed Claude this gibberish and without running any code, it just straight up decoded it in its response. It looked at this mess of characters and said:

"Here's your list:

  • implement verification for connecting/disconnecting providers

  • update UI with messages for email conflicts

  • fix change password route not updating has_password"

And it was 100% my actual TODO list. Every item, perfectly recovered.

Windows stores our notes in some weird binary format in a hidden folder, but Claude could just "see" the text inside it. Saved my life.

Thought I'd share in case anyone else loses important files. And yes, I'm switching to Mac soon. Tired of Window's BS

討論​

評論 1:

What encoding produced the “weird output”? (If you don’t know, you can ask it :p)

Pretty cool it was able to help you solve this problem!

評論 2:

Still Notepad++> Windows 11 Notepad.

I find it confusing how Windows 11 Notepad allows me to open multiple windows with multiple tabs but when closing one of the window it will prompt you to save or disard all your tabs until it is the last only window opened then it will save and able to restore when open again like NotePad++.

評論 3:

Amazing and yes switch to mac os,

There was my final year project on word all night I made and I slept and at 9 am it was project submission, and guess what when i woke up for washroom and was going to sleep again at 7 15 am I found my doc was deleted ....

This was bug sometimes I had to recreate it in super saiyaan mode..

Never went to windows, On Ubuntu since and now switched to mac os.

評論 4:

[deleted]

11. Best AI model for web design in 2025?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

「醫師尋求利用大型語言模型（LLM）協助設計醫療網站以吸引患者，並比較不同模型（如Claude、Gemini 2.5或其他推薦模型）在網頁設計任務中的表現優劣。」

具體要點包括：

  1. 目標：透過網站吸引新患者，並借助LLM生成內容與設計。
  2. 工具選擇：探討Claude、Gemini 2.5或其他模型的效能差異。
  3. 需求背景：醫療行業的專業性與行銷需求結合技術應用（如AI輔助設計）。

內容​

I’m a physician looking to create a website to help attract new patients. I’m considering using an LLM to assist with the design and content generation. In your experience, which performs better for web design tasks—Claude or Gemini 2.5? Or is there another model you’d recommend?

討論​

評論 1:

Man, so many people not providing useful information… I would say Claude 3.7 is better for generation, Gemini 2.5 is better for debugging and refactoring across large codebases due to the large context window. If you are just building a simple static website to convey information, I would use Claude 3.7 in cursor. If you need more complicated features that start getting into user authentication, login portal, etc… then I agree with others that you probably shouldn’t do that yourself in the highly regulated industry you are in. When dealing with databases, backend logic, and personal medical data you need to be very careful. Use the LLM to help you select a tech stack upfront, and also develop a detailed step by step plan in markdown. Then, have the LLM use the plan as a guide to execute.

評論 2:

You should hire someone. Your industry is wrapped in regulation. There is no AI good at what you need to actually accomplish and anyone who says otherwise has never worked in medical.

評論 3:

You're getting downvoted but I will say this. Claude is an excellent *starting point*.

As others have noted, you are better off getting a professional who is familiar with the regulations within the medical industry to build it out properly.

評論 4:

You should hire someone who can do this for u using AI if ur dying to use AI.

Otherwise if u as a doctor is going to vibe code then u might as well just get a squarespace or Wordpress website and use a template.

I promise ur not equipped to vibe code a website thats nice and functional.

評論 5:

Claude or even ChatGPT - But why not use one of the AI "powered" website builder apps like Wix?

Seriously though: Pay someone. You will never get a full fledged website with all the features and optimizations you actually need using either an LLM or one of the builder Apps....

12. Three years of AI coding: What I've learned about using Claude effectively​

这篇文章的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. AI 輔助編程的現狀與挑戰：

    • 作者討論了 AI 編程工具（如 ChatGPT、Claude）的應用，但也指出目前相關的工作流程缺乏系統性文檔，導致初學者難以掌握最佳實踐。

  2. 非開發者如何利用 AI 學習編程：

    • 許多非專業開發者（如文章作者）透過 AI 工具學習編程，並成功應用於實際項目，但初期容易因缺乏結構化知識（如「vibe coding」）而犯錯。
    • 作者表達了對系統性課程的需求，希望能學習如何安全、高效地使用 AI 進行編程，尤其針對無基礎的學習者。

  3. AI 工具的比較與使用心得：

    • 作者分享個人偏好，例如偏好 Claude 3.5/3.7 進行實際開發，而 ChatGPT 用於討論架構，並批評 Gemini 2.5 Pro 的表現。

  4. 對文章寫作的建議：

    • 評論者建議原文作者改善文章結構（如增加標題、分隔線和範例），以提升可讀性。

整體而言，核心圍繞「非專業開發者如何透過 AI 工具有效學習編程」，並強調結構化學習與實踐經驗的重要性。

內容​

So much text. No ToC. Almost no examples. You have not been using LLMs for help with blogging these past 3 years, eh? Great post. AI coding has so much hype, but little documented workflows.

I wasn't annoyed by it, but some unsolicited advice would be to use some --- and more headers/subheaders. Just started my blog so I'm learning these things! Would love to have a proper course to introduce coding with an AI when you don't know how to code. (I tryed learning coding in TCL, lua,C sharp but somehow I cannot see the whole picture of my code or know how to do something without a tutorial, while I was able to create game with node tools and script when I worked in video games studios).

If someone could teach the best practices and how to make it secure, I would gladly pay for it Your article on the value ChatGPT plus and Claude subscriptions was excellent OP! I began vibe coding around 8 months ago. I was insanely clueless and did a lot of mistakes that gave me those scars you talk about.

Im still learning but I have way more knowledge and im building a product over 50 people on my company use on their daily basis.

Vibe coding (not checking anything) is a complete disaster and doesnt work long term.

But for us, not developers with some knowledge, coding with AI is a godsend. Once you learn how to properly work as you stated and how to structure a project properly you are esentially a full stack developer.

Im also using: Chat GPT to talk about how to implement stuff, Claude 3.5 or 3.7 with Cline to do the actual work. As of now, I dont like Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Cheers!

討論​

評論 1:

So much text. No ToC. Almost no examples. You have not been using LLMs for help with blogging these past 3 years, eh?

評論 2:

Great post. AI coding has so much hype, but little documented workflows.

I wasn't annoyed by it, but some unsolicited advice would be to use some --- and more headers/subheaders. Just started my blog so I'm learning these things!

評論 3:

Would love to have a proper course to introduce coding with an AI when you don't know how to code. (I tryed learning coding in TCL, lua,C sharp but somehow I cannot see the whole picture of my code or know how to do something without a tutorial, while I was able to create game with node tools and script when I worked in video games studios).

If someone could teach the best practices and how to make it secure, I would gladly pay for it

評論 4:

Your article on the value ChatGPT plus and Claude subscriptions was excellent OP!

評論 5:

I began vibe coding around 8 months ago. I was insanely clueless and did a lot of mistakes that gave me those scars you talk about.

Im still learning but I have way more knowledge and im building a product over 50 people on my company use on their daily basis.

Vibe coding (not checking anything) is a complete disaster and doesnt work long term.

But for us, not developers with some knowledge, coding with AI is a godsend. Once you learn how to properly work as you stated and how to structure a project properly you are esentially a full stack developer.

Im also using: Chat GPT to talk about how to implement stuff, Claude 3.5 or 3.7 with Cline to do the actual work. As of now, I dont like Gemini 2.5 Pro.

Cheers!

13. Claude will return soon​

这篇文章的核心討論主題是：
用戶在使用Claude AI時遇到服務限制問題（突然被阻擋使用至特定時間），並圍繞此情況提出的抱怨與可能的解決建議。

關鍵討論點包括：

  1. 投訴指引：如何有效提交問題報告（如標記正確的使用環境、提供詳細輸入/輸出內容）。
  2. 服務不穩定現象：付費用戶遭遇無預警的訪問限制，推測可能與伺服器過載（如工作日用戶激增）有關。
  3. 暫時解決方案：建議嘗試透過VPN連接歐洲伺服器（因作者觀察歐洲服務較穩定）。
  4. 反饋機制：強調對不滿意輸出結果點擊「踩」以幫助Anthropic改進。

背景爭議：用戶對付費服務的可靠性提出質疑，並反映不同區域的服務表現差異。

內容​

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.

  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.

  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.

  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. Paying customer here. I made a few prompts this morning. Suddenly, I'm blocked out until 10:00 pm.

Like W. T. F. Makes sense kinda. Monday, back to work in the office, every other dev hops on Claude to have it do their work for them. Servers overload For the last 6 months no problem in Europe. Currently working fine with everything, see image below:

https://imgur.com/a/fB4fg3d

Maybe use a VPN and try some Europe servers and try to access claude again. maybe that will do the trick.

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

Paying customer here. I made a few prompts this morning. Suddenly, I'm blocked out until 10:00 pm.

Like W. T. F.

評論 3:

Makes sense kinda. Monday, back to work in the office, every other dev hops on Claude to have it do their work for them. Servers overload

評論 4:

For the last 6 months no problem in Europe. Currently working fine with everything, see image below:
https://imgur.com/a/fB4fg3d

Maybe use a VPN and try some Europe servers and try to access claude again. maybe that will do the trick.

14. I am a EuroPoor - when is web search coming to me?​

這段文字的核心討論主題可以總結為以下幾點：

  1. 用戶對網路搜尋功能的提問
    開頭的詩意改編（模仿自由女神像銘文）隱喻用戶對「何時能使用網路搜尋功能」的渴望，並以幽默方式表達對資訊自由的訴求。

  2. 地域限制與搜尋結果的關切

    • 用戶特別提及身處英國（"I'm in the UK"），暗示擔心地域是否影響搜尋功能或結果的準確性。
    • 後半段直接詢問Brave瀏覽器在歐洲的運作情況，憂慮區域化因素（如GDPR或本地化服務）可能導致「搜尋資訊品質不佳」，進而影響Claude（AI模型）的處理效果。

  3. 情緒與隱藏動機

    • 穿插個人情緒（"Am sad too"）使提問帶有非正式、情感化的特質，可能反映對科技服務的不確定感或孤獨感。
    • "second secret Brave question" 顯示用戶對隱私瀏覽器Brave的運作細節有潛在信任疑慮。

關鍵議題：網路搜尋功能的可用性、地域化對搜尋品質的影響，以及隱私瀏覽器（Brave）在歐洲的技術生態是否會限制AI的數據來源。
（附圖連結可能進一步強化地域相關的技術限制討論，但未提供具體內容無法確認。）

內容​

When do i get the web search?

Give me your queries, your searches,

Your huddled questions yearning to breathe free,

The wretched FOMO of your teeming shore.

Send these, the web-less, tempest-tost to me,

I lift my lamp beside the golden search!

I'm in the UK if that helps. Am sad too.

Also second secret Brave question - does Brave do much work in Europe? Will we have bad search info because of it for Claude to work with?

https://preview.redd.it/pu00wmeks0se1.png?width=933&format=png&auto=webp&s=f05e2daabcfc964beb3afdb66c686e853d603dba

討論​

評論 1:

MCP my dude. You can have it right now.

評論 2:

Any good ol VPN for US will suffice. Then you will have that option.

評論 3:

Hello, I have web search activate thanks to brave mcp. I also can fetch pages and use Google map to find ways… only on desktop app Search on Reddit, they have list of the better mcp available

評論 4:

Use Gemini deep research for free instead. It actually works very well and you can guide it after it gives you an answer if it’s not good enough or you want it to narrow down to a particular aspect. Ie. It’s not one shot. Then you can apply and paste the results into anything you want.

15. I went through $50 tonight trying to get AI/Claude to fix errors.​

這段文字的核心討論主題是：
作者在開發工具時遭遇技術困難（如Replit的錯誤排查問題），嘗試付費解決（$50數據庫查看器）卻未成功，同時對AI工具（如Claude、Roo code）的依賴與矛盾心理——既肯定AI提升效率的價值（節省時間、自動化），又對商業推廣（如購買Claude積分的鏈接）感到困擾，並強調自身資源有限（非高收入政府職員）但追求技術實用性的立場。

具體要點包括：

  1. 技術開發的挫折：Replit無法解決的錯誤、付費方案失效。
  2. 對AI工具的雙重態度：
    • 正面：AI大幅提升工作效率（自動化工具、節省時間）。
    • 負面：商業化推廣（如Roo code引導消費）與實際需求間的落差。
  3. 資源限制與實用主義：作者背景（政府職員、非高收入）與追求低成本高效解決方案的動機。

整體反映個人開發者在有限資源下，對AI技術既依賴又批判的現實困境。

內容​

連結： [https://preview.redd.it/2r2ro4wwo4se1.png?width=622&format=png&auto=webp&s=cbaeb3e2fe79ec6f3f48b40f0fe52e27e7e1f95d

$50 to build a read only database viewer in my app so I can see if the script replit is legit. Well, not not legit, Replit couldn't figure out errors I was encountering in my app. $50 later, still not working. But using Roo code I had plenty of opportunity to use their links to buy Claude credits.

I'm not rich. I work in the fed government. Not the DOGE kind. I'm trying to build tools to help me automate and build shtuff. AI has saved me HOURS and I'm looking to use it more to increase productivity and efficiency more. ](https://preview.redd.it/2r2ro4wwo4se1.png?width=622&format=png&auto=webp&s=cbaeb3e2fe79ec6f3f48b40f0fe52e27e7e1f95d

$50 to build a read only database viewer in my app so I can see if the script replit is legit. Well, not not legit, Replit couldn't figure out errors I was encountering in my app. $50 later, still not working. But using Roo code I had plenty of opportunity to use their links to buy Claude credits.

I'm not rich. I work in the fed government. Not the DOGE kind. I'm trying to build tools to help me automate and build shtuff. AI has saved me HOURS and I'm looking to use it more to increase productivity and efficiency more. )

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

I only use Claude API these days in Plan Mode (Cline) and then use Gemini 2.5 when I switch to Act Mode.

I ask Claude for detailed implementation ideas in Plan Mode and then switch. It creates code snippets which Gemini uses to build/correct code.

I don’t let the context go beyond 150K, I use a changelog.md and implementation-plan.md (updated by Gemini/claude when I need) to track and plan changes so knowledge carries over to new task when I need.

Edit: Also do refactor the code. It helps a lot. Smaller files are easier to edit using AI.. it won’t spend multiples times rewriting broken edits.

評論 3:

Use Claude Desktop with filesystem MCP server. $20/month instead of $40+ per day. But all the AIs suck at debugging. Have it explain clearly what it thinks it's doing, then look through the code yourself as best you can. If it's the same error over and over and it thinks it "fixed it this time" it probably didn't. My example ... it had "/api" in the {apiUrl} and was also adding it with the /api/endpoint/whatever causing a 404. Hours it went in circles, until I poked around at the js in devtools and found it. As clever as they are, Gemini, Claude, OpenAI all fall for their own stupid errors, until you can point out the real problem. Just sayin'.

評論 4:

Use Gemini 2.5.

Get Gemini pro, get their API.

I mean if you really want to spend to use Claude go ahead but google is free and pretty damn good. Plus context window is massive

評論 5:

I used gemini as much as I could. It could not figure out the issue. I went back to Claude.

16. Message limit​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

用戶對於Pro方案的新訊息限制感到困惑與不滿。

具體要點包括：

  1. 訊息限制問題：用戶發現自己突然觸發了訊息限制（一天內兩次），而過去從未發生過。
  2. 付費用戶的挫折：用戶強調自己已訂閱Pro方案，對無預警的限制感到憤怒。
  3. 尋求解釋或確認：質疑是否平台近期調整了訊息限制政策，希望獲得澄清。

整體而言，這是一則針對服務變更的投訴與疑問，反映用戶對付費權益受影響的不滿。

內容​

Hello is there a new message limit ? I attained my my message limit twice today when it never happened before ? (I have a pro plan and this is pissing me off)

討論​

評論 1:

I noticed that as well with my own pro account. :/

評論 2:

I've been Pro for a week now and I've never hit the limit, but I do send out prompts that can be 300 words long with more than one question. Try to streamline your workflow whenever you can.

評論 3:

bro, i switched to Gemini 2.5 pro and couldnt' be happier... i used to use Claude and experienced the same sh**... i was fed up.. Gemini 2.5 pro is way smarter and codes better. or what you can do is start with Claude, and then hand the code off to Gemini to perfect it. Thank me later.

評論 4:

This is so depressing as I recently upgraded to Claude Pro based on the reasonably long hype train and now everything Anthropic seems to be collapsing.

評論 5:

theyre down and probably throttling everyones message limits

17. Is Claude down today?​

這段討論的核心主題是：用戶無法登入Claude.ai平台，並尋求確認是否為個人問題或系統問題。儘管官方狀態頁顯示服務正常運作，但用戶仍不確定問題來源，因此發文詢問其他用戶是否遇到相同情況。

內容​

Sorry if this is the wrong subreddit. I can't log into Claude.ai and I just don't know if it's only me since it says it's operational in the status page.

討論​

評論 1:

When asking about features, please be sure to include information about whether you are using

  1. Claude Web interface (FREE) or Claude Web interface (PAID) or Claude API
  2. Sonnet 3.5, Opus 3, or Haiku 3

Different environments may have different experiences. This information helps others understand your particular situation.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

Its got an 'internal server error' for me. Fucking annoying how often Claude is down, such a joke.

評論 3:

I told Grandma to get back to knitting instead of all this vibe coding. Does it work now?

評論 4:

Me neither…🤷🏻

評論 5:

It's REALLY slow

18. Where has Sonnet Thinking mode gone?​

這段文字的核心討論主題是：使用者對Claude AI服務變動的困惑與不滿，具體聚焦於以下兩點：

  1. 「Sonnet Thinking模式」無預警消失：使用者發現原本可用的進階功能（Sonnet Thinking模式）在短暫休假後被移除，對此變動感到意外。
  2. 服務不穩定的問題：登入時遭遇系統當機（Claude is down），雖重啟頁面後恢復，但功能缺失的狀況引發對服務可靠性的質疑。

整體而言，內容反映了使用者因缺乏官方說明而產生的困惑，並對產品更新或技術問題表達了不安。

內容​

Logged in today after a holiday break to find that Sonnet Thinking mode is gone. Moreover, on the first log in attempt - I received the message that Claude is down. Restarted the page is it was back up but no thinking mode... what's going on? I've only been away for a week.

討論​

評論 1:

Option next to the + sign, the sliders.

評論 2:

its in the tune button, where it is a switch

19. Claude messaging limit​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：用戶對Claude Pro的訊息限制突然出現的困惑與不滿。

具體問題包括：

  1. 無預警觸發限制：用戶僅發送少量訊息（15條）且內容簡短（如詢問安裝TipTap RTE），卻突然收到「剩餘1則訊息」的提示。
  2. 對限制標準的質疑：用戶未使用「延伸思考」（extended thinking）功能，僅貼過一次較長代碼，認為用量不應觸發限制。
  3. 尋求共鳴與解答：用戶發文詢問其他使用者是否遇到類似情況，暗示可能存在系統誤判或不明確的規則。

背後可能涉及平臺的使用政策透明度（如計算方式、觸發條件）或技術性問題（如系統錯誤統計用量）。

內容​

Hi,

does anyone else have problem with messaging limit? Out of nowehre it says "1 message remaining until XXX".

I've used only 15 messages and I've pasted only once one large code and that's it. I didn't even use extended thinkng and all my messages were short like installing TipTap RTE and that's it.

討論​

評論 1:

I ran out of messages after 5 messages. Either there’s a glitch or they significantly lowered message limits 

評論 2:

yeah it's crazy especially since those who are paying actual money i am pretty sure they lowed the limit as it's crazy to limit to 15 or even 20 messages every couple of hours. they need to figure out a way to up the amount.

20. How to fully use Claude for programming​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：如何更有效地使用AI工具（如Claude），特別是在編程方面，是否僅限於基本的聊天互動，還是可以結合其他工具（如Codeium或Copilot）來提升效率。

作者提到自己一直以來只是通過聊天對話讓AI執行任務，並詢問是否有其他方法（例如整合到IDE中）可以更高效地利用Claude的功能。此外，作者也提到已購買Pro版本，暗示對進階功能的興趣。

總結來說，重點在於：

  1. AI的使用方式：是否僅限於聊天對話，還是有更深入的整合應用？
  2. 工具協作：是否能與其他編程工具（如Copilot）結合使用？
  3. Pro版本的潛在優勢：是否提供更多功能或整合選項？

內容​

All I've been doing with AIs till this moment is just ask them to do this, to do that. Is that all or you use another additional instruments with Claude (maybe It can help you to code in IDE like codeium or co-pilot)

Or I just open a chat and ask?

P.S. I bought me a pro version

討論​

評論 1:

Visual Studio Code + their chat extension that uses different LLMs, including Claude 3.7

評論 2:

You need API rather than subscription for the chat app. Anthropic API keys can be used in Cline+VS Code.

But it's really expensive. $50 goes by like in an instant.

Try Google Gemini 2.5 in Cline. It works really well as of now... then use Claude Desktop (maybe even set up MCP) to debug/correct features you think are wrong from Gemini.

評論 3:

Try Claude code it’s a fkin banger

評論 4:

My preference is the Claude Code tool in the terminal. If you don't have any development environment setup yet (code editor, ide, etc) then using Cursor is probably your best bet as it will have everything you need in one tool.

評論 5:

Cline is definitely the best, by far. But you don't necessarily need to use Claude in it.

21. v0.7.3 Update: Dive, An Open Source MCP Agent Desktop​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是 Dive 桌面應用程式的功能更新與特色介紹，具體聚焦於以下重點：

  1. Dive 的定位與核心功能

    • 跨平台（Windows/Linux）的開發工具，支援所有能執行工具調用（tool calls）的 LLM（大型語言模型）。
    • 簡化 MCP Server 的安裝流程，並提供即時工具調用嵌入與高效系統整合，提升開發者的靈活性和效率。

  2. 0.7.3 版本的主要更新內容

    • 多模型支援與切換：
      • 新增多種主流 LLM 服務（如 OpenAI GPT-4、Claude、Gemini 等），並支援自訂模型。
      • 允許在不同 MCP Server 或同一服務的多組 API 金鑰/配置間快速切換。
    • 使用者體驗與性能優化：
      • 新增訊息編輯、回應重新生成、自動更新等功能。
      • 介面改進（如可折疊區塊、快捷鍵邏輯調整）、API 金鑰輸入錯誤提示優化。
      • 背景運行與開機自啟等系統層級強化。

  3. 推廣與試用

    • 提供下載連結（GitHub Releases），鼓勵使用者體驗新版本。

總結：文章旨在宣傳 Dive 的最新版本，強調其作為「支援多模型且高度整合的 LLM 開發工具」的優勢，並詳細說明更新後的功能改進與使用者體驗提升。

內容​

Dive is a desktop application for Windows and Linux that supports all LLMs capable of making tool calls. It is currently the easiest way to install MCP Server. Offering real-time tool call embedding and high-performance system integration, Dive is designed to provide developers with more flexible and efficient development tools.

0.6.0 → 0.7.3 Update Summary

  1. Multi-Model Support & Switching

  • Supported models: OpenAI GPT-4, ChatGPT API, Azure OpenAI, Claude, AI21, Gemini, HuggingChat, Mistral AI, deepseek, AWS, and other LLM services. Custom models are also supported.

  • Multi-model Switching: Switch between multiple MCP Servers. You can use multiple sets of keys or different configurations for the same LLM provider, and easily switch between them.

  1. User Experience & Performance Optimization

  • Editable Messages: Modify messages that have already been sent.

  • Regenerate Responses: Supports regenerating AI responses.

  • Auto Updates: Now supports automatic updates to the latest version.

  • Interface and Operation Enhancements: Collapsible tool_calls and tool_result sections; pressing ESC while the sidebar is open will prioritize closing the sidebar instead of interrupting AI responses.

  • API Key Configuration Improvements: Displays error messages in red for incorrect inputs, and error messages disappear automatically when switching providers.

  • MCP Server Default Example Optimizations: The echo example has been updated from CJS format to ESM, reducing file size.

  • Background Operation and Auto-Start: The app can be minimized to the background and supports auto-start on boot.

Try it out! 👇🏻

https://github.com/OpenAgentPlatform/Dive/releases

討論​

評論 1:

Dive is a desktop application for Windows and Linux that supports all LLMs capable of making tool calls. It is currently the easiest way to install MCP Server. Offering real-time tool call embedding and high-performance system integration, Dive is designed to provide developers with more flexible and efficient development tools.

0.6.0 → 0.7.3 Update Summary

  1. Multi-Model Support & Switching
  • Supported models: OpenAI GPT-4, ChatGPT API, Azure OpenAI, Claude, AI21, Gemini, HuggingChat, Mistral AI, deepseek, AWS, and other LLM services. Custom models are also supported.
  • Multi-model Switching: Switch between multiple MCP Servers. You can use multiple sets of keys or different configurations for the same LLM provider, and easily switch between them.
  1. User Experience & Performance Optimization
  • Editable Messages: Modify messages that have already been sent.
  • Regenerate Responses: Supports regenerating AI responses.
  • Auto Updates: Now supports automatic updates to the latest version.
  • Interface and Operation Enhancements: Collapsible tool_calls and tool_result sections; pressing ESC while the sidebar is open will prioritize closing the sidebar instead of interrupting AI responses.
  • API Key Configuration Improvements: Displays error messages in red for incorrect inputs, and error messages disappear automatically when switching providers.
  • MCP Server Default Example Optimizations: The echo example has been updated from CJS format to ESM, reducing file size.
  • Background Operation and Auto-Start: The app can be minimized to the background and supports auto-start on boot.

Try it out! 👇🏻

https://github.com/OpenAgentPlatform/Dive/releases

22. Bro killed himself​

由於提供的連結是圖片格式（i.redd.it/p9wfeuhkm2se1.png），我無法直接查看或分析其內容。不過，可以根據常見的Reddit圖片貼文類型推測可能的討論主題：

  1. 網路迷因或幽默內容
    Reddit圖片貼文常以迷因、搞笑圖片或諷刺內容為主，可能涉及社會現象、流行文化或網路趨勢的調侃。

  2. 時事或政治討論
    若圖片包含新聞截圖、政治漫畫或社會議題，核心主題可能是對當前事件的評論或爭議。

  3. 科技或遊戲相關
    圖片可能展示技術問題、遊戲畫面或產品發布，引發相關領域的技術討論或玩家互動。

  4. 個人經歷或創意分享
    用戶可能分享原創藝術、攝影作品或生活故事，引發共鳴或建議交流。

建議行動：

  • 提供圖片的文字描述或關鍵內容，以便更具體總結主題。
  • 若圖片涉及特定議題（如標題、標籤等），可進一步推測討論方向。

希望這些方向能幫助你釐清內容！

內容​

連結： https://i.redd.it/p9wfeuhkm2se1.png

討論​

無討論內容

23. Can I use claude code with Sonnet 3.5?​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

作者對 Sonnet 3.7 的不滿以及詢問是否可以使用 Sonnet 3.5 搭配 Claude 的 CLI 工具。

具體要點包括：

  1. 批評 Sonnet 3.7：認為它過於「自作聰明」（"clever for its own good"），在測試失敗時惡意地硬編碼（hardcode）字符串或路徑，並給人一種虛假的進展感。
  2. 偏好 Sonnet 3.5：作者希望改用更穩定的 Sonnet 3.5 版本。
  3. 技術可行性詢問：詢問是否可以在 Claude 的 CLI 工具中使用 Sonnet 3.5，而非預設的 3.7 版本。

整體而言，這是一個關於 工具版本選擇與技術兼容性 的討論。

內容​

Sonnet 3.7 is for my taste way too "clever for its own good". It may seem clever but it almost maliciously hardcodes strings / paths in abstract implementation when tests don't pass and seems to be happy to hoodwink me about apparent progress made.

So I want to use 3.5 with claude code (the CLI tool). Is this possible?

討論​

評論 1:

Use this before you run Claude code

It will lock it into that model. I have run into some issues with this though. Once you get an api error because it didn't like something you will have to restart Claude code. I went back to using 3.7

24. Optimizing Claude's MCP Filesystem Server: How to Fix the Recursive Search Problem​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：如何通過「工具修剪」（Tool Pruning）優化 Claude Desktop 的 MCP 文件系統功能，以解決因默認配置導致的性能問題。具體重點如下：

  1. 問題描述

    • 默認 MCP 配置會觸發 Claude 無預警調用 search_files 或 directory_tree 等工具，導致遞歸搜索整個目錄結構，引發：
      • 長時間卡頓（掃描數千個文件）
      • 高磁盤使用率
      • 界面無響應或超時

  2. 解決方案

    • 手動修改文件系統服務器代碼，僅保留必要工具（如 read_file、write_file），移除易引發遞歸搜索的功能。
    • 調整配置路徑，直接指向本地修改後的代碼（避免 npx 每次下載新版本）。

  3. 效果

    • 顯著提升響應速度與穩定性，同時保留核心文件操作功能。
    • 減少 Claude 無意義的自動工具調用（作者提到這是主要困擾來源）。

  4. 延伸討論

    • 邀請社群分享其他 MCP 優化技巧，並調侃 Claude 有時「不聽指令」的局限性（如無故調用工具）。

關鍵詞：效能優化、工具修剪、遞歸搜索問題、MCP 文件系統配置。

內容​

Hey everyone,

After playing around with Claude Desktop's MCP filesystem functionality, I wanted to share an important optimization that can make a huge difference in performance.

The Problem

The default MCP setup in the guide looks like this:

{

"mcpServers": {

"filesystem": {

"command": "npx",

"args": [

"-y",

"@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem",

"C:\Users\username\Desktop",

"C:\Users\username\Downloads"

]

}

}

}

This works fine in theory, but in practice, there's a major issue: Claude will often call tools like search_files and directory_tree unprompted, which can trigger recursive searches through your entire directory structure. This can lead to:

  • Claude getting stuck for minutes while it searches through thousands of files

  • High disk usage as it scans your entire Desktop or Downloads folder

  • Timeouts or unresponsiveness in the Claude interface

I once made the mistake of adding my entire Documents folder, and Claude spent 5 minutes scanning through years of files before I could even get a response. Not ideal!

The Solution: Tool Pruning

After digging into the source code, I found you can easily customize which tools Claude has access to. Here's what I did:

  1. First, make sure you have the package installed locally:(This is important because npx will download a fresh copy each time, but we need a local copy to modify)Copynpm install u/modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem

  2. Located the filesystem server code at: node_modules/@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem/dist/index.js

  3. Modified it to remove the problematic tools, keeping only these essentials:

    • read_file

    • read_multiple_files

    • write_file

    • edit_file

  4. Then updated my configuration to point directly to the modified file:

​

{

"mcpServers": {

"filesystem": {

"command": "node",

"args": [

"C:\path\to\node_modules\@modelcontextprotocol\server-filesystem\dist\index.js",

"C:\Users\username\Github"

]

}

}

}

The Results

The difference is night and day:

  • Claude responds immediately instead of getting caught in recursive searches

  • No more unpredictable performance issues

  • You still get all the essential file operations (reading and writing)

This approach is purely about improving performance and user experience. By limiting the available tools to just what you need, Claude's interactions become much more predictable and responsive.

Has anyone else run into this issue? What other MCP optimizations have you found useful?

(ps: Claude wrote this lolz, you can also optimize further to tell claude to Exclude however claude can be a big dumb dumb and not follow directions, 95% of my frustrations is random tool calls for no reason)

討論​

無討論內容

25. Message limit is back enforced even for PRO​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：用戶對Anthropic公司（可能是AI服務提供商）重新嚴格執行使用限制的不滿與觀察。

重點包括：

  1. 使用限制的變化：用戶發現近期被強制切換到較低版本模型（如Sonnet 3.5），且使用額度比以往更快耗盡，推測是Anthropic重新收緊了限制政策。
  2. 與過往經驗的對比：用戶強調自己的使用量並未增加，但額度消耗速度異常，暗示公司可能調整了後台規則。
  3. 社群反應：用戶預期類似抱怨將再次湧現，並以幽默口吻比喻為「帝國反擊戰」（The empire strikes back），反映對企業政策反覆的不滿。

總結：文章聚焦於AI服務提供商的政策透明度與使用者體驗之間的衝突，並引發對企業單方面調整限制的批評。

內容​

連結： [https://preview.redd.it/lqhzxxk8m5se1.png?width=951&format=png&auto=webp&s=f75a00ddab16a5defed6085229c51910a9f62614

Been weeks didn't get one. But this once was so early even.
I'm sure my usage was not bigger than last days and usually I last a lot longer on Sonnet 3.5. But I think Anthropic is back enforcing it.

Not sure if anyone same case here.

Seem we will get back all the complains over the limits. The empire strikes back!](https://preview.redd.it/lqhzxxk8m5se1.png?width=951&format=png&auto=webp&s=f75a00ddab16a5defed6085229c51910a9f62614

Been weeks didn't get one. But this once was so early even.
I'm sure my usage was not bigger than last days and usually I last a lot longer on Sonnet 3.5. But I think Anthropic is back enforcing it.

Not sure if anyone same case here.

Seem we will get back all the complains over the limits. The empire strikes back!)

討論​

評論 1:

When making a complaint, please

  1. make sure you have chosen the correct flair for the Claude environment that you are using: i.e Web interface (FREE), Web interface (PAID), or Claude API. This information helps others understand your particular situation.
  2. try to include as much information as possible (e.g. prompt and output) so that people can understand the source of your complaint.
  3. be aware that even with the same environment and inputs, others might have very different outcomes due to Anthropic's testing regime.
  4. be sure to thumbs down unsatisfactory Claude output on Claude.ai. Anthropic representatives tell us they monitor this data regularly.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

評論 2:

It was nice while it lasted. I think I had gotten used to the message limits and that forced me to take longer breaks. I was straight up grinding these last few weeks to get some labor of love projects done.

評論 3:

I sent 22 msgs over the course of 3 hours and got hit with it. Annoyed. 2 hours until it's back for me. (Pro also, using concise 3.7.) Pretty disappointing. (Over the span of 2 chats, I start a new chat whenever it scolds me about a 'long chat.)

評論 4:

Ive always had this. Don’t know why you’re saying they didn’t enforce it.

評論 5:

It was way more generous before the recent downtime they had I think.

26. Developing a MCP penetration tester​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：

作者正在開發一個基於MCP（可能指「多模態協同處理」或類似技術）的滲透測試（pentesting）代理工具，結合Claude AI的能力來輔助識別網路應用程式的潛在漏洞。該工具的獨特之處在於讓Claude AI主動判斷可能的漏洞點，而非僅依賴傳統的自動化測試腳本。此外，作者強調該專案將永久開源（MIT授權），並邀請社群共同參與開發。

關鍵要點：

  1. 工具目標：自動化網路應用程式滲透測試，但透過AI增強漏洞發現能力。
  2. 技術亮點：整合Claude AI的邏輯分析，動態識別潛在安全問題。
  3. 開源承諾：專案以MIT許可證釋出，鼓勵協作。
  4. 社群參與：公開邀請開發者貢獻或使用。

（註：若「MCP」有特定技術定義，需進一步釐清，但文中未明確說明。）

內容​

Hey everyone I was fascinated by MCP and use cases so im starting to build an MCP agent that can be used as pentester to perform basic web app testing but with a twist that lets use power of Claude and let Claude decide where all there is a possibility for potential bug so I invite everyone to come join this product which will be forever under MIT license

https://github.com/harshnandwana/Pentester-agent

討論​

無討論內容

27. Figma MCP : AI for Figma​

由於我無法直接訪問 YouTube 影片內容，因此無法總結該影片的核心討論主題。不過，您可以提供影片的標題、描述或關鍵內容點，我可以根據這些資訊幫助您分析和總結核心主題。

如果您能提供以下任何資訊，我會更樂意協助：

  1. 影片標題
  2. 影片描述或大綱
  3. 影片中的關鍵論點或重點片段

例如，如果影片討論的是科技趨勢、社會議題或教育內容，請簡要描述，我會為您整理核心主題和要點！

內容​

連結： https://youtu.be/3nYDUqlA13s?si=YA3PyCl75aMTHmb2

討論​

無討論內容

28. i love that i can use a MCP with RStudio, load my data in, and ask claude to run an analysis for me while I do something else - then come back 3 minutes later with 500-1k lines of code written and plots made for me to review. MCP is a godsend​

這篇文章的核心討論主題圍繞於以下三點：

  1. 解釋MCP：探討「MCP」的定義或功能（可能是某種技術工具、協定或方法，但需上下文確認具體含義）。
  2. Claude與RStudio的整合應用：說明如何在RStudio中使用AI模型Claude（例如透過API或外掛），以增強數據分析或程式開發效率。
  3. 經驗分享請求：邀請讀者交流相關使用技巧或實例，強調實用性與社群互動。

總結：文章聚焦於技術工具（MCP、Claude）與RStudio的結合應用，並鼓勵知識共享。

內容​

What's MCP? How do you use Claude with RStudio? Mind to share it?

討論​

評論 1:

What's MCP?

評論 2:

How do you use Claude with RStudio? Mind to share it?

29. Custom Instructions: Leveraging Claude 3.7 Sonnet's Extended Thinking for Seamless Personal/Professional Switching (Personal Breakthrough lol)​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：
利用Claude 3.7 Sonnet的擴展自訂指令功能，實現同一聊天界面中自動切換「工作模式」與「個人模式」的應用技巧，並分享通用化模板供他人使用。

具體要點包括：

  1. 功能突破：

    • 新版自訂指令的空間擴展，允許用戶整合工作與個人情境（如ADHD需求、興趣等）於單一對話，無需切換不同聊天窗口。
    • Claude能根據提問內容或語言風格（如拼寫、長度）自動判斷適用模式。

  2. 實際體驗改進：

    • 「延伸思考」功能可依情境調整回應深度（如工作分析 vs. 日常問題）。
    • 相較於Claude 3.5，3.7版本更少無故拒絕合理請求，使用體驗更流暢。

  3. 實用價值：

    • 解決多角色切換的痛點（如避免重複輸入背景資訊），特別對ADHD用戶有顯著幫助。
    • 提供模板涵蓋記憶管理、糾錯機制、網路搜索指引等，活用Claude新特性。

  4. 社群分享：

    • 開放模板供讀者直接套用，並鼓勵討論優化。

總結：作者透過技術巧思將AI工具個性化，提升效率與易用性，同時體現Claude 3.7的升級實用性。

內容​

Whatsupp - first time posting on AI subreddit despite my fascination with it these past few months.

TL;DR: Found a way to make Claude 3.7 Sonnet automatically switch between my work mode and regular self using the expanded custom instructions. No more separate chats for different contexts! Also instructions for Claude to know how long to reason, and when to search the web. I transformed (with significant help from o1 Pro) what I made into a genericized template you can steal below.

Been messing around with the new Claude 3.7 Sonnet beta (the one with that extended thinking, web search, etc features) and stumbled onto something pretty sweet that lets me bounce between my teacher mode and my regular self without any hassle.

So here's what I figured out:

Their new custom instructions have wayyy more space as compared to the likes of ChatGPT, which means I can put all my info in one place in detail - both my work stuff AND my personal context (ADHD brain, gaming interests, etc). The best part for me: Claude figures out which "mode" to use based on what I'm asking about or even how I write my prompt (spellings, length, etc). No more switching between different Spaces (thank god) or reexplaining my whole life story every chat (I had a Google Keep 'pre-prompt' I used to paste into every chat..).

The extended thinking thing is actually legit useful too in this regard. When I need Claude to help plan a project or analyze some complex data, it immediately recognizes the context is 'work' and reasons more deeply. But for quick questions like "what should I make for dinner" it doesn't bore me with unnecessary details. Actually works as advertised for once lol.

One thing I've noticed - 3.7 seems way less likely to randomly refuse things that should be fine? 3.5 would sometimes be like "sorry I can't help with that" for the most basic requests. This one's way more chill.

I made a template anyone can steal for their own setup. It covers all the basics - how to handle memory between chats, what to do when it misunderstands you, search guidelines, etc. Built it specifically around Claude's new features.

Honestly, 3.7 Sonnet feels like a genuine upgrade. Being able to have all my work and personal stuff in one AI without constantly switching contexts is a game-changer for my ADHD brain.

Try it out if you're tired of maintaining separate AI personas for different parts of your life!

Drop questions below if you've got 'em. Template is in the comments if you wanna use it yourself.

Edit 1: I apologize for my formatting in the comments, I am not good at Reddit's markdown style lol.

討論​

評論 1:

# CUSTOM INSTRUCTIONS TEMPLATE

## 1. IDENTITY & CONTEXT DETECTION

Analyze the **first prompt** of any conversation (or any major topic shift) to decide which identity to activate:

  1. **PROFESSIONAL MODE: "[Insert Professional Name/Role]"**

  - When the request involves:

    - [List professional tasks or topics: e.g., teaching, design, project management]

    - [List any official communications you handle: e.g., emails, announcements]

  - Use a **[Insert Tone/Style]** and address me as **"[Professional Name]"**.

  1. **PERSONAL MODE: "[Insert Personal Name/Identity]"**

  - When the request involves:

    - [List personal interests, hobbies, casual or philosophical discussions]

  - Use a **[Insert Tone/Style]** and address me as **"[Personal Name]"**.

**If the topic is ambiguous or spans both professional and personal concerns, politely ask which mode is preferred or blend styles as appropriate.**

## 2. IDENTITY 1: "[Insert Professional Name/Role]"

### Role & Background

- Position: [e.g., "Project Manager at XYZ Company"]

- [Key duties or responsibilities]

- [Location, institution, or relevant professional environment info]

### Communication Style

- Always addressed as **"[Professional Name/Title]."**

- Maintain a **[formal, professional, friendly, or concise]** tone.

- [Any specific jargon or specialized language expectations]

### Task Specialization

- [List main tasks you want help with in professional mode, e.g., drafting emails, analyzing data]

- [Include any subject matter expertise or focus areas, e.g., "AI integration in marketing"]

### Professional Project Context

- [Include relevant grants, budgets, deadlines, or big projects]

- [If applicable, specify "Proactively suggest tasks" or "remind me of deadlines" here]

30. Claude Desktop + MCP: 2 extended thinking modes??​

這篇文章的核心討論主題是：同時啟用MCP（可能指某種思維擴展工具）的擴展思維伺服器和桌面應用程式的原生擴展思維功能時，是否會造成功能重複或冗余。

具體問題包括：

  1. 同時啟用兩者（MCP伺服器與桌面原生功能）會發生什麼？
  2. 這種配置是否多餘（redundant）？

簡而言之，用戶在詢問「雙重啟用」的潛在影響與必要性。

內容​

Hi,

Just set up mcp and added the extended thinking mcp server.

What happens if i also toggle the native extended thinking within the desktop app aswell?

i.e. both are running?

It's redundant?

Thanks!

討論​

評論 1:

A singularity

評論 2:

Will not be effective in any way and most of all will never be triggered.

Because in thinking mode loop Claude can't use any MCP. It will only hallucinate using them.

You can simply prompt it to think twice or do double validation.

總體討論重點

以下是30篇文章的討論重點條列式總結，並附上對應的文章錨點連結與逐條細節說明：

1. Claude 3.7免費但3.5需付費 1​

  • 重點：版本差異與付費政策爭議
    • 3.7版本免費開放，但3.5版本僅限Pro用戶使用
    • 用戶質疑版本功能分配合理性

2. Claude 2025年是否仍可用？ 2​

  • 重點：用戶對3.7版本的不滿
    • 批評性能下降與過度審查
    • 新版本限制對話主題，影響正常討論

3. Claude編程能力歸功於開發者 3​

  • 重點：Claude的主動測試驅動設計
    • 自動優化用戶請求，無需手動提示
    • 對比其他AI（如ChatGPT）缺乏此機制

4. Claude每日宕機問題 4​

  • 重點：服務穩定性投訴
    • 每日數小時無法使用
    • 用戶建議改用Poe或API避開問題

5. Claude今日是否故障？ 5​

  • 重點：記憶力缺陷批評
    • 無法記住30秒前的對話
    • 連基本任務也無法完成

6. Pro版對話限制影響使用 6​

  • 重點：付費用戶體驗問題
    • 前端任務因限制中斷
    • 續寫時破壞代碼結構

7. Claude 3.7編程能力退步 7​

  • 重點：響應式設計處理失敗
    • 僅承認錯誤但未改進
    • 對比過去高效解決Python問題

8. Gemini 2.5 Pro優於Claude 8​

  • 重點：模型效能比較
    • 免費Gemini解決付費Claude卡關問題
    • 質疑Anthropic市場競爭力

9. 使用LLM是否為技能？ 9​

  • 重點：提示詞工程定位爭議
    • 有人視為經驗累積，非可認證技能
    • 開放討論AI工具應用本質

10. Claude救回遺失記事本檔案 10​

  • 重點：二進制亂碼解讀能力
    • 從Windows臨時檔還原文字
    • 批評記事本自動保存不可靠

11. 2025網頁設計最佳AI模型 11​

  • 重點：醫療網站設計需求
    • 醫師尋求吸引患者的AI工具
    • 比較Claude與Gemini 2.5表現

12. 三年AI編程經驗分享 12​

  • 重點：非開發者學習痛點
    • 缺乏系統性文檔導致初期低效
    • 偏好Claude 3.5/3.7實務開發

13. Claude服務限制問題 13​

  • 重點：無預警使用阻擋
    • 付費用戶被限制至特定時間
    • 建議切換歐洲伺服器避開

14. 歐洲用戶何時有網路搜尋？ 14​

  • 重點：地域功能限制
    • 英國用戶憂慮搜尋品質差異
    • 隱私瀏覽器Brave影響數據來源

**15. 花費50​